Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (0)  

Feedback:   All (3599)  |   Reviews (184)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (3379)

Other:   Replies Received (1510)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 701-725 of 3379 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
701
Visit Aussie Ass

Aussie Ass
(0)
Reply of jook's Reply

Of course if you had than you wouldn't have taken one for the team and maybe other people would have joined what looks to be a rather very disappointing site.

I've done it more than once and I always take comfort in the fact that my loss is also the site's loss because my review turns people away.


10-12-14  05:28pm

Reply
702
Visit Aussie Ass

Aussie Ass
(0)
Reply of jook's Review

Thanks for the review because you took a bullet for the some other people that might have wanted to join but will hold off now that they know what they are getting for their money. It took me less than 10 seconds to know that the site wasn't worth it because the second scene is one starring Lexi belle who has been retired for about a year now. Then I looked at their blog and the last post is about 4 months old.

10-12-14  10:34am

Reply
703
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I grant you that face fucking is probably in a class all of it's own and should not be used when describing other sites but some of the stuff assylum does sort of reminds me of the stuff I saw on FF. It doesn't look like they are out to degrade the talent like FF but it is very hard to walk the line when you are shooting some very extreme stuff.

Both sites are located in the North East so far away from California and therefore that may appeal to performers that live in that part of the US and commute to CA when they want to do porn. I think that is one of the reasons why FF is still able to get performers because if they were in the valley than most girls would avoid them like the plague.

As to why some girls shoot more than one scene. I personally think that they accept to shoot for FF more than once because they are in desperate need of cash and foolishly choose to shoot for them a second time. Normal porn is already hard on the performers so I don't want to imagine what an FF shoot must be like.


10-12-14  10:27am

Reply
704
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think starting a new one may be more interesting because it would allow everyone to start fresh and more importantly won't require people to read back multiple pages to see where the thread was going.

Mind you the forum is almost a non-entity these days. There are so few people posting stuff that it's coming to the point where it won't be worth it to bother looking at it. I'm just as guilty as everybody else because I rarely bother writing stuff.


10-11-14  10:59am

Reply
705
Visit Out Of The Family

Out Of The Family
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I actually bought the Lone Ranger so you can imagine how stupid I feel. It's bad but not in a way that you can laugh at it's awfulness.
I actually enjoyed the first two movies but the third one was where they lost me as a possible customer. I will never watch another Bay Transformer movie in a theater or buy it on dvd.

I know that sooner or later I will join fame digital again if only because it's only 5$ but it's likely more for some of their older stuff that I haven't downloaded than anything new.


10-08-14  05:55pm

Reply
706
Visit Out Of The Family

Out Of The Family
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

I get at least 3 offers a week from various sources but never for this site. It's usually Rocco's or Devil Films. It's a 5$ offer so I should be thrilled and yet I still don't join because the main site whose movies I used to like is Devil Films and sadly they almost never update. I consider them to be so close to deaths door that it's almost the same.

10-08-14  01:55pm

Reply
707
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Although I agree with Drooler that it would be okay if he had something worthwhile to say but they never do and that is why I really dislike it.

10-07-14  03:14pm

Reply
708
Visit Porn Megaload

Porn Megaload
(0)
Reply of SCORE's Reply

Thanks You very Much for replying to my review. I was getting very nervous. I used your suggestion of the live chat on eboobstore and May in your service department was able to help me. Hopefully whatever is wrong with Megaload will be fixed. Sadly this episode probably means that I will never join another score site because I'm not going through this again.

10-06-14  01:49pm

Reply
709
Visit Porn Megaload

Porn Megaload
(0)
Reply of SCORE's Reply

1-I'm in Canada so the 800 number your are mentioning is not going to help me and there is no way that I'm paying for a phone call to cancel a membership. Especially not a 50$ membership.

2-I don't use Skype so that's a no go

3-I'm not using a fax because I would again have to pay for the call and frankly that is just a bigger pain than anything else.

4-I don't know if anybody in your tech department is paying attention but the members service is not working very well as that is the first place I went when I wanted to cancel. The site couldn't find my info so I emailed the support desk twice over a 48 hrs period without a reply. It is now about 96 hrs later and still no reply.

5-I would finally like to point out that the following message is on the members service page: Need live help? We're available Monday-Friday 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM EST at 1-800-967-2673. Immediate help with password problems can be found 24/7 by using the links listed below. Now being your average guy IO would assume that since it does not mention that this 800 is only valid in the US that it would also be valid in Canada but it is not or worse it's no longer in service. I know because I tried it twice.


10-06-14  01:46pm

Reply
710
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It is very important for me because I find that all videos are improved by the addition of multiples camera angles. By default that means that a video that has only one or few angles is likely to be a bit of a disappointment to me. That's not always the case but you need someone with a lot of talent behind the camera to make sure the scene is good.

10-05-14  09:34am

Reply
711
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

Like I said. You can be forgiven for not looking too deeply seeing as this is a well established site. At least now you may rad the error reports prior to joining other established sites. I tend to always be very cautious when the words :free trial: are used.

10-04-14  06:25pm

Reply
712
Visit Porn Megaload

Porn Megaload
(0)
Reply of kyote1's Comment

I'm having the same issue and that is bound to affect the score I give the site and it will show up in my review. I've issued an error report on TBP.

10-04-14  10:16am

Reply
713
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Yes but wouldn't those women be more inclined to get the real thing as opposed to using a hand or a toy?

10-04-14  09:22am

Reply
714
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

Now you can be forgiven for not doing it but I assume you didn't check out TBP's review prior to joining because there is more than one error report this year and it's all about the trial not being a full one. In fact 3 out of the 4 reports this year were about the trial not being a full one. Not sure if you paid more than 1$ but hopefully you didn't.

10-04-14  09:21am

Reply
715
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Younger women may do it as much as men but I suspect that older ones do not as much as their male counterpart.

10-03-14  02:44pm

Reply
716
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I would rather no one does it because I finds it offensive and strangely those terms are often only on the preview section and not really inside the site.

10-01-14  02:41pm

Reply
717
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I had to pick other because there wasn't an actual choice for what I wanted to say. Although I agree that anal is now so common that it may even surpass that of vaginal porn but I think the number is on the decline. I like anal porn or should I say I enjoy good anal porn. There is very little of the good kind when compared to the crappy one so I keep track of anal in all it's form and that's why I say that the number is on the decline. I don't think it has anything to do with peoples desire for anal as much as studios just don't want to pay the extra amount knowing that they won't make enough profit to warrant paying more money.

09-29-14  04:14pm

Reply
718
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(0)
Reply of jook's Reply

I just read on another forum comments made by the owner of the site and in case anyone had a doubt that the caning is real than I can confirm that it is because he said that a performers who agree to it will show marks of it on their body. It's not my cup of tea but it's still basically what the stuff Kink was shooting a little less than a decade ago so nothing new. They shoot out of NY so I don't hold a lot of hope that they can survive long term. Flying a California based performer to NY can't be cheap and this kind of porn must also be a little more expensive to shoot because you have to pay the performers more money.

09-27-14  05:46pm

Reply
719
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

I didn't even consider that when I posted my comment but I guess it does fall under feedback. Mind you I'm also not sure if I'm talking to a webmaster or a support person.

09-27-14  05:37pm

Reply
720
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The only feedback I have given is when one of them comments on a review of their site.

09-27-14  10:39am

Reply
721
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I don't know about the rest of you but these days almost every site offers some kind of discount. The only thing that differentiates one from the next is the level of the discount.

09-25-14  03:50pm

Reply
722
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

graymane has already said what I was thinking.

09-24-14  03:13pm

Reply
723
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Let me first say thanks for the review. I'm glad you found a site that you enjoy. This is the kind of site that could get a high score from multiple people and it would still get a low score from me because I simply can't enjoy their brand of porn. Here is a partial list of why it would get a low score.

1-There are way too many visible pain marks on the body of the women for me to overlook them or get sexually stimulated.

2-The main character always wears a mask and I can't tell you how much that that annoys me.

3-Too much of their porn is circus acts that I thought was on the way out. I guess there must still be a market for someone to attempt bringing it back.

4-Too much of the porn is designed to demean the women and by default it makes it impossible for me to believe that they enjoy what's being done to them.

This site reminds me of the misogynistic stuff Facial Abuse is known for but here it's may alienate many performer who might otherwise have worked for them thinking it's like Kink. It's not by a long shot.


09-21-14  06:22pm

Reply
724
Visit Club Savanna Samson

Club Savanna Samson
(0)
Reply of starduster's Reply

Don't mention it. I also would want to get as much of Savanna's stuff as I could. After all Savanna was a really hot looking women who did some amazing movies.

09-21-14  01:11pm

Reply
725
Visit Prostitute Movies

Prostitute Movies
(0)
Reply of Herman's Review

I am glad that you enjoyed it but the TBP review makes it clear that this is not a very good site. In fact it's borderline awful and it is a complete sham. You can believe that these are real prostitutes having sex with their customers but 2257 regulations means that you cannot release a video if you do not have the proper identification of each performers in those videos. The nature of prostitution is such that real names are usually to be avoided for fear of legal and marital repercussions.

09-21-14  05:13am


Shown : 701-725 of 3379 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.47 seconds.