| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1476
|
Stunners
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Is the trial a full access trial or is it limited?
|
02-19-09 11:54am
|
Reply
1477
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
SimonSubAms's Reply
I like the site but a few samples would be nice to help evaluate the style and quality of reproduction.
|
01-16-11 10:14am
|
Reply
1478
|
Sun Devil Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
carydjh's Review
After reading this review, I checked out the preview site. The price of $9.99 is advertised as being a starting price and it will go up to $29.99 in July 2009.
There are only ten models on the preview site and no preview videos so if a few of them aren't available at all, this is really not much of a site, considering other sites that are offering a whole lot more content.
|
04-28-09 03:16pm
|
Reply
1479
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Also ditto. The best way to attract members from PU is to participate in the discussion.
Just the fact that the webmaster responded quickly and the high score review just posted have made me very interested in dropping a few bucks on this site.
|
08-20-11 10:49am
|
Reply
1480
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfart's Review
Excellent review.
An earlier review listed three sites in the network:
TeenSexMania.com
TeenSexMovs.com
PrivateTeenVideo.com
Are the three sites you listed the only ones in the network as of today or have they expanded?
Are the girls indexed to all three sites or is each site independent of the others?
|
12-13-09 09:36pm
|
Reply
1481
|
Teens In Nature
(0)
|
Reply of
My 2 cents's Comment
Thanks for your comment. This site has been on my "let's give it a try" list for a while, but no longer.
I really don't like the "what you see is not really what you will get" preview sites.
|
09-07-12 09:14am
|
Reply
1482
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Review
Frankly if you are a member of the network, this addition is really superfluous because they (Brazzers) do a great job of combining all their sites in their index...and there's no benefit to joining just this one site (not sure if you even can). That makes this site more of a reason to load yet more content, A GOOD THING!
That said, The volume of updates on Brazzers is mind boggling. These guys must have a huge member base to be able to afford the volume and frequency of the high quality exclusive content they offer.
|
04-08-08 11:22am
|
Reply
1483
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Nice review, Pat.
I never really thought about this site until your review popped up. I took a look at the preview site and found a number of ladies that I used to be in love with back in the day.
I'm signing up for a month so I can reacquaint myself and reminisce about the past.
Thanks for the encouragement.
|
03-30-17 03:53pm
|
Reply
1484
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Good review, but some comments:
The iced tea at Micky D's is (slightly) flavored water and is just awful. Their coffee isn't a whole lot better.
As you noted TLE s slightly more erotic than Met Art (the gals will touch some parts of their bodies on TLE (squeezed boobs, touching labia lips, etc.) but that's a bout it.
The movies on Met Art are a bit improved from past years but aren't worth joining for.
The two sites; TLE and Met Art, do use a lot of the same models and usually use the same names.
They should have stayed with the same navigation system that they use for Met Art.
|
04-20-16 03:01pm
|
Reply
1485
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Been a member for 3 months and let it expire two days ago. I had my notes ready to write my review but yours covered all of my points plus a lot more. We agree on virtually everything except the score, which I would say is an 85.* The reason being that the number of models is far smaller than Met Art and the navigation isn't as easy as Met Art.
Also, as you said, the tag feature really sucks. It isn't great on Met Art either, but it's a whole lot better there thsn on TLE.
I would have dropped the site after 2 months but I missed the deadline.
It's on my annual consideration list. Next year I'll sign up for a month to drain off any new stuff that's worth keeping.
* I just posted my 85 score for the site.
|
03-05-16 06:35pm
|
Reply
1486
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Excellent review. I've been thinking about signing up for a while but I just got an email offering $9.95 recurring. So I decided to skip the supersized Big Mac and spend the money on this site to check it out.
Besides it's healthier. A porn site has fewer calories and saturated fat than a Big Mac with Fries.
|
12-05-15 12:05pm
|
Reply
1487
|
The Real Me
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Decided to sign up for the trial. Shay Laren is model # 14, added yesterday (7/1/08) so there's a faint hope that the webmaster will eventually populate the site.
See my review.
|
07-02-08 09:11pm
|
Reply
1488
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Clownpuncher's Review
As a member back when this review was written, I agree with the review and with the "good ole standby" bottom line; accurate at that time.
But the drastic changes made and currently being made to the site is quickly turning Twistys from a refreshingly different site to just another hardcore slam bam thank you ma'm site where the format and new content is virtually indistinguishable from many (most?) other straight hardcore sites.
Right now the only reason to sign up on Twistys is for its huge archive of excellent content and drain off the good stuff before the new owners decide to delete it forever.
|
08-03-14 10:38am
|
Reply
1489
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
brotherlove's Comment
Interestingly, I've been a member for more than 5 years. My annual membership expired in mid-June (no auto renew) so when I lost access I contacted Twisty support. They offered me what they called a great deal not available to the general public. Their "great deal" prices were slightly better than the current PU/TGP prices (less than 1 cent per day cheaper. Plus they offered a lifetime membership for $64.94 in any other site so long as I maintained my membership in Twistys. The sites included in this offer are:
Brazzers
Mofos
Babes
3DXStar
Digital Playground
Wicked
Reality Kings
Reality gang
I didn't bite.
It will be interesting to see if Twistys continues its tailspin. If it recovers, I'm all in. But with the new ownership, I'm not holding out very much hope.
Sad.
|
08-03-14 12:41am
|
Reply
1490
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Reply
Thanks Hooliganzo, for a great reply. It works as a "bottom line" commentary to your review.
I have relatively minor issues with the site's search function by criteria; for example, the cup sizes are not accurate, there is no search by natural/enhanced but there is a search by state (who really cares about state?), no search by soft core/hard core, no search by solo vs. G/G or B/G, etc.
I also give it an uptick for dating everything no matter how old, a clear indication of original content and a halfway decent discussion forum and a responsive webmaster who tries to be responsive to most comments.
|
10-15-12 10:25pm
|
Reply
1491
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Ditto.
I have been a member for quite a while and would be most interested in the reasons for a 93 score.
Thanks.
|
10-12-12 10:25am
|
Reply
1492
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Another excellent review.
e4m pretty much echos my feelings about the site. It's been around a long time and is not as edgy as many other sites but, if you can tolerate their non-responsive support function, it's a great site for volume, quality and variety of content.
The current PU discount price (annual membership is about $8 a month) makes it a very good deal, IMO.
|
05-16-12 11:38pm
|
Reply
1493
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I had similar experiences. My account finally was cancelled when my credit card expired and the renewal charge was rejected.
I was OK with the site, so the involuntary renewals were not a serious problem for me.
If the good folks at Twistys keep going downhill with their support function, they will wind up as just a memory. A shame because they are still a good site for those of us who like less "edgy" sites that concentrate on lovely ladies and their body parts.
|
05-16-12 11:14pm
|
Reply
1494
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
CT - I really like your new review format. Gets right to the point without a lot of unnecessary verbiage.
As for Twistys I would like them to add two things to their search engine - 1) hard core/soft core/midcore and 2) natural vs enhanced (bogus) boobies.
|
09-18-11 11:49pm
|
Reply
1495
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
nymano's Review
What does "no action" in your con list mean? The emphasis is on "softcore" but Twistys has a lot of hardcore "action" available in both its photo and video offerings.
|
07-31-10 11:29am
|
Reply
1496
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
The characterization of toys and finger play as "midcore" is associated with the pornography standards of magazines over the latter part of the 20th Century.
Playboy was the first mainstream porn mag to show muff back in the late 1960's, creating a mild firestorm. Penthouse grabbed the momentum by showing modest amounts of genitalia, usually somewhat hidden by bush and, by today's standards, very mild.
Content in mainstream porn mags with any form of insertion arrived in the late 1990's in Hustler who toyed with the process earlier with solo labia lip activity.
We old farts look at insertions as going more hardcore than the PG (pretty girl) genre we grew up with where all there was was babes showing their bodies with no overt sexuality.
That's a long way of saying I understand where Capn is coming from and agree completely.
|
07-31-10 11:26am
|
Reply
1497
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
The zip file associated with the sample I mentioned above is janaredlng.zip. I agree with you completely that an effort to use more descriptive zip file names would be a major improvement. These days, with substantially improved file naming protocols, there's no technical reason why severely truncated file names must be used by Twistys.
|
07-25-08 11:20pm
|
Reply
1498
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Twistys has a third bonus site, Anette Dawn.com, which is not a clone.
Blue Fantasies is a very well populated site with tons of good stuff. Naughty Staff is a brand new site with excellent stuff, but not much of it yet.
Thus there are 3 clones and 3 separate content sites in addition to the mother lode called Twistys.
|
07-25-08 07:08pm
|
Reply
1499
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I just checked one photo set and one photo in it...here's the label...janaredlng_003.jpg.
It's a Jana Cova photo set posted today that they call "Dip and Lick" and the red, I suppose, refers to her bright red panties. There are clues, obviously, and I suppose their naming is better than others that use just numbers, or the same names for everything.
|
07-25-08 07:05pm
|
Reply
1500
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
To amplify a bit on Drooler's reply, the Twistys network has 7 separate sites:
These five are individual with unique content. Some models appear on more than one site but there is no duplication of content among these five sites:
Twistys - the "parent site" Multiple updates daily
When Girls Play - Lesbian - Several updates monthly. They keep it fresh. (This does not appear to be a separate site that has a preview/join us capability.)
Anette Dawn - Single model site with 4 or 5 updates each month.
Naughty Staff - Brand new site - No established update schedule as far as I can tell.
Blue Fantasies - Glamour site - 2 or 3 updates each week
These two have content duplicated from Twistys that fits their genre. There's no unique content:
Eurofoxes
BustyOnes
As Drooler said, the quantity is superb for the price.
|
07-20-08 01:39pm
|
