| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1251
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
RA, if you're into a solo ass crack focus, you won't be disappointed at all with ITC. BTW, a network site that has a lot of ass focus but mainly hard core material is Perfect Gonzo.
|
09-05-15 01:17pm
|
Reply
1252
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Just posted my review (score = 90).
I will be signing up once or twice a year going forward unless they bring the price down or offer a 3 or 6 month membership.
Great site that delivers what it promises.
|
09-04-15 09:58pm
|
Reply
1253
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
OK, I signed up. First impressions after about 2 hours:
- Outstanding video clarity, even with some of the older 640 stuff
- Initially awkward navigation
- Good naming conventions but tagging needs some work
- Generally gorgeous babes
- No hetero/lesbo content as far as I can tell (not a problem for me)
- Content reminds me of a superior Met Art for video.
- As expected looks like a gynecologists training site, but I am also impressed by the great videography that maximizes the babe's "talents"
I'm looking forward to the next 29 days.
|
07-04-15 10:59am
|
Reply
1254
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
williamj and TBP (their review) both convinced me to break my all time standard of never spending more than $29.99 per month on a site.
I will be signing up tomorrow when I know I'll have a few hours to start draining the good stuff from the site.
The amount of content showing on the preview site means that, if it's as good as indicated, I may be blowing a few more bucks in the future as well.
|
07-03-15 04:20pm
|
Reply
1255
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
I agree. RagingBuddhist writes terrific reviews in a very easy to read manner. I've been hanging on this site (on my futures list) because of price and will now hang patiently a little longer. Hopefully someone (Webmaster?) who can do something about the search and D/L issues in the near future.
|
10-04-09 09:08am
|
Reply
1256
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I've got In the Crack on my long list (it's over my max of $30) of sites to check out once I win the lottery and don't care about price any longer and it's in there with the Dev8 sites (they are all $30) in the high interest group. But I'm still checking the sites that are under $25 which are, by and large, quite good.
Because I've only checked out the preview site (gotta love Andie Valentino's super hi-def sample-1920x1080 (1080p) full HD) I really don't know much about the In The Crack site except what I see there. Dev8 provides a lot more opportunity to sample their stuff and I agree with you about the feel being European. (I believe, based on the TBP review, but do not know, that Dev8 Entertainment, Ltd. is a British Virgin Islands company.)
|
03-15-09 01:37pm
|
Reply
1257
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
OOPS. The similarity of this site to Ass Traffic and similar sites screwed me up.
Indexxxed.com is not related at all to In The Crack or to Charisma.
Sorry about that.
|
03-15-09 11:12am
|
Reply
1258
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
All sites operated by Dev8, including this one, are summarized at indexxxed.com so if you want to search all scenes for a specific model on a specific site (or all sites) you can go to indexxxed.com. It's a free site, BTW, and a place to go to find trailers for every scene on every site operated by Dev8.
|
03-14-09 09:13pm
|
Reply
1259
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Forgive my ignorance, but what's a "pornpass" discount site? Sounds like something my wallet needs to learn more about.
|
11-26-08 04:49pm
|
Reply
1260
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
I agree with everyone. Great review! This site has been high in my Favorites list but the price has always stopped me from giving it a go. If I can see a period where I can drain out everything I would want in 30 days (no distractions like work and such ;o)) I probably would spring for one month at the current price.
But if the site decides that they would grab a large number of new subscribers by dropping the price by just $5, I'll be right there in line.
One more thing. This site has some of my favorite babes such as Andrea (Andie) Valentino, she with the perfect body and attitude, and a pair of labia lips to die for...and in HD as well. YIKES. Dammit! There goes my libido again working overtime trying to convince me to drop $35 on a porn site.
|
11-25-08 03:51pm
|
Reply
1261
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
The PPV reference is now gone. But the review still mentions a download limit, which the Webmaster also says is gone. Perhaps that comment can be corrected as well.
The very good news is that "In The Crack's" Webmaster understands and gets it. Unfortunately he started the site off with some user-unfriendly attributes that, although they are now corrected, will linger on in the review sites because they once existed.
Now, that said, it's time to check my "playtime" budget to see if I can handle a $35 whack...then on to a signup.
(By the way, Khan, this is why PU is such a terrific site for us porn users. The communications capability through this site results in the consumer knows what he/she is getting and, more importantly, provides a site's webnaster an opportunity to address questions and misunderstandings about a site and, thus, increase traffic.)
|
07-03-08 10:39am
|
Reply
1262
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Interesting. TBP, today (7/3/08) still says the video is PPV.
I've never signed up for a site that wants more than $29.99 but this one really looks like it might be the first. But a PPV program sucks.
I'm counting on TBP being wrong on this because I'm about to spring for a one month membership.
|
07-03-08 08:09am
|
Reply
1263
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Northern Pike's Review
Once again I call for PU to start listing all sites with known cases of scam billing like this. At least a caution list of some kind is called for. It would be a tremendous positive feature in PU.
|
06-01-08 11:33am
|
Reply
1264
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nickdv's Review
I really would like TBP to create a warning list of some kind based on this sort of problem.
|
05-07-08 07:30am
|
Reply
1265
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
1618to1's Reply
I agree with you about shady practices, but I've always had honest dealings with Paycom/Epoch and no problems. And based on the positive new review by exotics4me, I'm ready to pop with this site.
|
05-23-10 01:20pm
|
Reply
1266
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I totally agree. Another excellent review by Trash Man. The network looked very promising when going onto the preview site, but thanks to Trash Man;s review it's clear that the majority of the "bonus sites" are just archived old stuff.
I'm seeing how this is becoming a more prevalant practice...advertising a big network that turns out to be a collection of dormant sites, usually with crappy quality.
|
06-15-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
1267
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Kami's Review
Talk about false advertising! It's Real and much of the content is fake. Sites like this are what give internet Porn a bad name.
|
10-15-10 07:52am
|
Reply
1268
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Good news. Looks like that $5 drop will get them another $20 from me.
|
09-08-08 08:51am
|
Reply
1269
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I was correcting williamj's review that mentioned a $19.95 price by pointing out that PU is showing a $24.95 price.
|
08-22-08 10:35pm
|
Reply
1270
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Looks like the price went up. The PU advertised price is $24.95.
Apart from that your review tells me that this is a great individual model site. There are so many sites out there that are totally dormant and are there only to suck some cash from unwitting horndogs who happen by.
I really like Jaime Hammer for her obvious major assets but also from a personality standpoint.
Your review was very informative and tells me that this site could be a one month deal where I can go in and drain the site in a month's time then sit it out for a year or so before I go back in to update my collection.
Great review. Thanks.
|
08-22-08 11:46am
|
Reply
1271
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
After further review, the original call stands. Libido wins. Looking forward to checking out much, much more this babe.
She's one of those rare little sweeties with a fabulous face, nice body and ohhhhh those puffy nipples that just drive me totally wild. And she's one of the very few who I would not like to see doing hardcore with some hairy balled retard with tattoos and stringy hair.
I suspect I could handle a b/g scene with a Tom Byron type (early on when he looked like a clean cut teen aged kid; not after he did drugs and got gnarly looking.
But so long as she sticks with solo and g/g, I'll remain a devoted fan.
Thanks, Pink Panther. Your comments really helped.
|
11-22-08 11:34am
|
Reply
1272
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Sorry. I worded it badly. The update schedule listed only past dates and did not state if they were photos or videos...or how many. Having been burned many times where an "update" consisted of a single photo I was hoping you, or someone else, may have direct knowledge of how the site operates.
I guess I'll have to take one for the team and sink $25 into the site and check it out.
As you suggest, there's a Hellofalot more potential for this site than that POS JennaRocks.com site.
My wallet says, "hang on, big fella, you already dropped $15 on a piece of crap."
But my libido says, "Go for it. You know you really want so see much more Jana Jordan. And what's $25? That's just one lap dance with that skank at the titty bar, including tip"
Sigh. The libido always seems to win these arguments.
|
11-22-08 08:54am
|
Reply
1273
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I checked out the Club Jana Jordan site but I see mo evidence at all that it's an active site with reasonably frequent updates apart from a sole announcement that she was appearing on November 20 at the Hustler in DC., and an "update" calendar that says nothing at all about what they updates are...photos, videos or whatever.
There's also a list of Cam shows that looks good, if it's accurate and if it's complied with.
Are you a current member? If so, can you provide an estimate of the number of video updates per month?
Thanks.
|
11-21-08 11:45pm
|
Reply
1274
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks.
I have to admit something. I am fascinated by Jana Jordan's chicks cute body and even cuter face, especially with her blonde bangs in the early days. So I actually spent more time last night checking out some of the individual photos on the site which are, despite her body parts being fully covered, rather sexy anyway. And they are, indeed, early in her career because she has some rather distinctive tattoos today that were not in the photos I checked out.
So, although not worth the $15 by any means, it wasn't a total loss. (When it comes to porn, I'm a "glass is half full" kinda guy.)
[Just occurred to me. Perhaps I should do an academic study on Ms. Jordan tracing her body art and public displays of her body parts as they have occurred over her career and submit it to some elite University for publication! ;o)]
|
11-19-08 09:18am
|
Reply
1275
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
In the interest of full and fair disclosure I must note that I misstated a few details.
- The total combined run time of the site's 9 videos is closer to 10 minutes, not the 25 minutes I said in the review.
- In one video (the Valentine's Day 30 second one) if one watches very carefully one can detect an accidental flash (about 1/2 second) of a small portion of Jana's right nipple. But ya gotta be very quick.
- In one video (the black dress one) she actually lifts up the back of her dress and pulls down her panties so that we get a long shot of her ass crack (nothing else, but she does have a nice ass) for about 2 or 3 seconds.
So I suspect that, if this site were to be shown on Mr. Roger's Neighborhood, they might need to block out about 3 seconds of material.
|
11-18-08 07:01pm
|
