| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
876
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Frankly, the multiple names issue becomes a marketing loser both for the babe and for the sites on which she appears. If I want to see more of Angelica Costello, for example, I will have difficulty locating much content through a web search so any sites that have her fratured by her better known alias, Venus Knight (or just Venus) will get no hits from me.
I really see no benefit at all to the babe, However the sites can create the illusion of exclusivity by creating a unique name for a babe so I would like to see the babes insist on a site using a known identifier when signing a web deal.
|
06-20-07 09:38am
|
Reply
877
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
I agree. If I gotta do one-by-one downloads, I get very selective. Otherwise I can slide-show a zip d/l and pick out the ones I want to delete very easily.
|
06-17-07 09:20am
|
Reply
878
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
It's been my experience over the past few years that, if a site isn't reviewed on TBP, it's probably a garbage site. In Nov., I broke my rule about not signing up for a site that was not reviewed on TBP (Angelica Costello's site - she's also known as Venus Knight) and wasted $19.95 on a totally worthless site. Never again.
TBP is the Consumers Reports of On Line porn.
|
06-17-07 09:16am
|
Reply
879
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Poll
Actually nI never gave the distinction much thought. If I see a site referred to as a "soft core" site, I don't expect vaginal sex at all. However, beyond that, it's a nebulous term. I've seen hot and heavy lesbian sex with strap-ons and other toys on supposedly "soft core" sites.
In the late 90's, when most general circulation magazines stopped short of any penetration by anything, the introduction of non-intercourse penetration by Hustler and Penthouse blurred the line significantly.
|
06-17-07 09:08am
|
Reply
880
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
The quality of the videography can make or break a shower scene. If the babe has a nice set of natural boobs and gives them a good workout as she washes...and the cameraman is as much a tit-man as I am, it can be great.
|
06-17-07 09:00am
|
Reply
881
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I've gravitated to video from pix so Video Box is my choice. But having been a member to all but Abby Winters, I will say they are all great sites.
I'm surprised that Met-Art was omitted as a choice because it ranks high by most review sites and really has superb content.
|
06-01-07 09:15am
|
Reply
882
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I have found TBP to be very accurate and refuse to sign up for any site with a lousy review (or no review) on TBP.
I would check off all of the choices in the poll if I could but I can't so I picked "honest."
This site is, by far, the best for us Porn fans.
|
05-15-07 07:55pm
|
Reply
883
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Roger that, Pat362!! The worst thing a site owner can do is piss off a newbie with this deception. I stick around on any new site I subscribe to for a few months...and some for a year or more...but if I get schnookered with an upsell I'm gone.
The good news is that about 50% of the time I can talk my way out of the upsell by calling CCBill's (or whomever) 800 number.
|
05-15-07 07:51pm
|
Reply
884
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I used to be like both PinkPanther and Maloicchio, but with the volume of material available now in very high resolution, I tend to not watch vids that don't show well full screen.
The sites that stay with the lower resolution stuff will lose a lot of business soon if they don't improve their offerings.
|
05-09-07 12:56pm
|
Reply
885
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'm into the girl and her showing off all of her assets. That's why RCG is my favorite.
But with nice large natural hooters, a well shot doggie style does the trick.
|
05-08-07 10:52pm
|
Reply
886
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Poll
My experience has been that a site not covered by TBP generally sucks. Worst example is Angelica Costello's site (Venus Knight) that was essentially DOA.
If I can't find a review here, the closest I'll come to joining is to buy a trial if offered.
|
04-03-07 10:44pm
|
Reply
887
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The best site for dating is Danni's Hot Box, but they have become the worst for customer service.
|
03-16-07 08:23am
|
Reply
888
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I sign up only for sites that MBP has rated high and the MBP summary shows no DRM. I seldom sign up for more than 1 month for sites except sites like VideoBox that have a large number of updates (5 per day, 155 new CD's per month) and the price is reasonable (like VB). With sites that I like a lot, like Busty Adventures, I'll sign up for a month, then again six months later because they update only once weekly and catching up every six months is a piece of cake.
|
03-16-07 08:19am
|
Reply
889
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Haven't encountered very many recently. It was an issue a few years back and it really pissed me off back then. I swore that I would never sign up with any site with DRM or with download limits ever again.
|
02-26-07 10:06am
|
Reply
890
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
I agree. A reasonably priced site like Twistys and VideoBox with very frequent and excellent updates have kept me as a member over the long haul.
Other sites that cost more and update once a week get me for a month only, then I'll leave and wait for several months for them to do their updates, then return.
Financially, by and large all sites are fixed cost operations. Whether they have 1 or 500 members, their costs are generally the same (except when the need to add servers because of popularity arises). Thus the sites with a reasonable price will make a lot more money than those with $29.99 and up price tags.
|
02-25-07 08:11am
|
Reply
891
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I always check TBP's reviews. I've been burned when I haven't and I find that, if TBP hasn't reviewed a site, or at least listed it for a future review, it is likely a loser. Also, TBP has great deals on some sites where one can save some good money. So far I've had excellent success with TBP.
|
02-25-07 08:01am
|
Reply
892
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
With all I have to do, there's no time to kick back and watch any porn. I don't even know if the company has filters to block that sort of thing in any case.
|
02-25-07 07:58am
|
Reply
893
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Shap's Poll
I really don't know how/why one would make up an email address, especially when a site has all the charge data and has whacked one's credit card, but there would be no place to acquire the membership number for cancellation or to obtain the id/password on many sites. I use a secondary email so that all paysite transactions are easy to find in my message logs.
|
02-22-07 05:37pm
|
Reply
894
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Shap,
Glad to see that you are monitoring this site. That alone shows that Twistys wants to stay on top of its genre.
I'll let you know if I have any suggestions.
Jack
|
01-26-07 11:50am
|
Reply
895
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Shap's News
Thanks, Shap, for a great site. I've been a member for a while now and love your stuff. Please see my review.
The one area that you could improve on is to fix or replace some of the very old videos that compare poorly with your current material.
|
01-25-07 04:12pm
|
Reply
896
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
Got it. 90 to me is spot on. At least at this point in my membership. Clearly theirs is a different niche than, say, Bang Bros or Brazzers, but they are, IMO quite superior to, say, Danni.com.
|
09-26-09 02:47pm
|
Reply
897
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Not only a 1TB, but maybe 2 or 3. Or more.
I signed up using the three month network option that was offered in August and I just can't find the time to D/L all of the superb content I've found on this and the other sites.
A HUGE uptick for the quality of the babes and the videos they've made.
It's too early for me to write a review but I'm a notch higher than an 85...but not a lot of notches.
|
09-26-09 11:55am
|
Reply
898
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The first time I went to the tour site using the PU link the price was $29.95. I logged out and did something else. I went back a few minutes later, spent more time checking out the talent, then decided to move on. As I was exiting the tour site a pop up offered me was $23.95, 20% off the $23.95. I visited the tour site twice...so maybe they felt I was close to signing up and needed an extra nudge.
Whatever, I decided not to join the site.
|
04-06-14 11:59am
|
Reply
899
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
This review should be read by every webmaster in the porn site industry. Based solely on this review, the price/quality ratio makes 18X Girls a winner for me. I'm signing up without reservation.
If only other sites with great material would understand that pricing their product too high costs them a lot of revenue in exchange for their slightly lower bandwidth cost.
|
02-26-12 08:01pm
|
Reply
900
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Been a member of 21 Century for a while. What this means is, if you are a member of, say, 21 Century and a video from, say, 21 Naturals looks good to you, you can either sign up for 21 Naturals to get access, or you can purchase just the one video for $2.95.
If you choose to sign up for a membership in 21 Naturals you can get the video and any other videos in the 21 Naturals content.
|
02-09-18 10:18pm
|
