| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler sez:
"As for their zip files of their dinky little 1067 pixel photos, I could suggest some rather creative backup storage options."
I didn't know you were into anal, Drooler! ;-)
|
04-24-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
777
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I admit I'm a sucker for a deal. When there's a site that I'm jazzed about based on PU reviews and I see a special discount, I sign up. The best part is that the discount usually holds past the first month making the savings really significant.
|
04-23-08 08:25am
|
Reply
778
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Sorry, but I'm confused.
I thought Ginger was played by Tina Louise and was the glamour girl; and Mary Anne was played by Dawn Wells, the cute girl next door type. I got my rox off with Tina Louise back in the day.
|
04-21-08 10:09am
|
Reply
779
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Ambiguous question. I RESIDE in California but I LIVE in Paris.
|
04-17-08 08:18am
|
Reply
780
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Andy, I understand yoiur point but I must disagree. Churches aren't into being anti-porn activists unless it directly impacts their operation...such as a porn shop with a hawker peddling to church goers on Sunday morning.
The people we need to be watching out for are those who are into governmental involvement in everything. Here in LA, for example, the government dictates just about everything we say and do, from the bags we use in the grocery to what can be carried on cable to how porn shops can sell and how their fronts can be displayed (nothing can be seen from the street except a small sign that just names the shop, not what they sell).
And this is LA, the home of the Porn industry and the moral relativist Liberals who condone murder convicts to go free to save money but condemn porn shops.
And yes. Even here in LA there is a substantial risk that our all Liberal city and county gummints will tax internet porn. It will start with their Sales Tax proposal (8.25% on all website subscriptions) but once the revenue starts, watch out.
The church folks in LA have no interest in this subject.
|
04-13-08 05:35pm
|
Reply
781
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used to do it (a few times) for sites that I had joined before joining PU and really remembered little except my overall impression.
I don't think just a rating without a review tells anyone a lot. A low rating deserves a stated reason (even a comment would do). Otherwise how is a member supposed to use a low rating in his consideration of a site?
|
04-11-08 07:53am
|
Reply
782
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
Whatever she wants. The act of fisting does nothing for me (I prefer the basic fingering where I get some tactile pleasure as well) but if it floats her boat, that's fine with me.
I do enjoy watching fisting on videos when the babe clearly enjoys it and would probably enjoy giving my babe that enjoyment as well.
|
04-07-08 08:43am
|
Reply
783
|
N/A
|
Reply of
heff's Poll
I had a 250 Gb external hard drive that was about 80% full. I packed it for a trip across country last Sept. and it worked fine at my destination. But when I got home the hard drive would not operate properly. A computer tech told me that I shouldn't rough handle an external hard drive because, unlike those external hard drives identified as "portable," it is easy to damage the drive.
I think I can get the stuff off the hard drive but I surprised myself. I really don't miss it, mainly because I can count on a ton of new stuff to replace it.
Interesting thing about porn, it's fun when it's around but when it goes away, no big deal.
|
04-05-08 07:26am
|
Reply
784
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm glad I came in late so I know the point of the Poll.
I use "My Favorites" on the PU site to store sites where a review or a comment by someone I trust makes me want to consider signing up.
My budget maxes out at $50 per month with exceptions for sites that I want to sign up for longer stints. I've gone as high as $75 but find that that's a waste of money because I don't have time to visit all those sites frequently during a normal month.
So when I see a site written up on PU that looks very promising, I use the favorites feature because my mammary...oops I meant memory....isn't quite what it once was.
If your question is raised because you're thinking about removing it, please don't. But if you do, please give us some notice so I can copy the list.
Thanks.
|
04-03-08 11:27am
|
Reply
785
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That's about how I feel as well. I'm not out to get a Pulitzer Prize, I just want to help other P. U. members get the most for their money, just as I do.
Frankly, this site has saved me a bunch of money and frustration because the reviews, both by TBP staff and P. U. members, really tell the story without any "hype." Better yet, I've found some terrific sites that I would never have found without TBP/PU.
|
03-26-08 06:35pm
|
Reply
786
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I guess I really never understood T-shirts that have messages of any kind. Or, for that matter, bumper stickers. What's the objective? To "make a statement" to strangers that you will never see again? To change the way someone thinks?
Yesterday I saw a T-shirt that said, simply, "Kerry-Edwards, A Fresh Start for America." How, exactly, should I react to that?
I don't even like "logo shirts" with a Nike "swoosh" or a LaCoste alligator. They don't pay me to advertise their merchandise.
|
03-22-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
787
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
BINGO. and that's why I switched to Brazzers, which I find much better in that regard.
|
03-02-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
788
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I can relate completely. Most of the good sites with high resolution videos offer 200-400Mb downloads. Those don't take long to fill up even a 500Gb hard drive.
I've tried using Windows Movie Maker to trim out the garbage from big ones and save just the portions I want but the process downgrades the resolution.
My next purchase will probably be a good video editing software disc that I can use for editing my porn collection.
|
02-21-08 04:50pm
|
Reply
789
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Also a tittie lover, any activities that show REAL fun bags in all their glory, including nipple tugging/twisting is fine. Self sucking of nipples by big titted honeys also results in my Willy coming to full attention.
|
02-19-08 11:17am
|
Reply
790
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Actually this question has been on my mind all day (shows you how little I have on my mind since the football season is over) I do have a method to my timing. If I'm signing up normally for a month with a 25/75 chance (25% chance I'll let it auto-renew - 75% chance I'll cancel a week or so in) I'll time it so that the end date of the subscription is a Monday so I can get 5 weekends of membership. And I'll never sign up in February because a month membership will be date to date so it's only 28 or 29 days instead of 31 in the membership.
Aren't you sorry they asked? ;o)
|
02-17-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
791
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I agree completely, but that was the only reason I could see other than they just ran out of poll questions.
|
02-17-08 01:34pm
|
Reply
792
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I suspect the webmasters might be interested. There was a recent case where one of our fellow members reported a pricing glitch ($5 too low) that the webmaster instantly fixed. If the error is made during a slow enrollment period (such as weekend days) their loss is insignificant.
|
02-17-08 08:42am
|
Reply
793
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Danni's Hot Box had very well produced FREE live shows with chat room interaction using multiple high res cameras. Because they had to deal with the traditionally unpunctual porn whores, they frequently had late starts and unhappy participation by paying menbers. (I quit the site for other reasons, so I don't know if those sessions are still there.)
|
02-15-08 07:08am
|
Reply
794
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Model Name>Website>Variable title/name
I also have specialized filing for sites (like FTV, Amateur, etc.) that just use phony first names.
I also keep an Excel spreadsheet with thumbnail photos and comments* and with links to the files to make it easy to find the babe/content that will do it for me.
*Big naturals, great face, large labia, etc.
|
02-07-08 10:56pm
|
Reply
795
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I understand the urge to purge is a major problem when a babe takes it up the shitter.
Nothing can shut down a magic moment any faster than a turd showing up at a very inopportune moment.
The sensation to some women may be positive, but I think it's really a creation of something to add a little variety to a normal vaginal fuck.
As a porn lover, the best part of an anal fuck is that the RCG position shows off the porn whore's cunt in all its glory with no schlong in the way.
|
02-01-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
796
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Agree. The face is a part of the package. Gotta see the eyes, the lips, the hair, the expressions, etc.
The good news is that the hidden face is a rapidly disappearing phenomenon that started with some low end porn videos in the 1980's.
I suspect the market place has spoken because I don't recall seeing any hidden face stuff in a long time.
|
01-31-08 07:28am
|
Reply
797
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Frankly I skip past all that "what's your name?" "When did you first have sex?" and "How long have you been in the business" nonsense unless the babe is bare-assed naked and is showing off her assets while she's talking.
Foul language makes no sense to me because it expresses nothing of any value other than to show that the porn whore knows the terminology.
Repeating stuff too frequently, what ever the word (or noise) makes me turn off the speakers and go for just the babe and the sex.
|
01-27-08 02:32pm
|
Reply
798
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I agree with the general trend of replies; that I go to paysites almost exclusively. The free sites are not that good and there are plenty of paysites that have good pricing (there's a recent trend nowdays where the successful sites have discovered that there is a lot more money to be made at a slightly lower price than by keeping the price high.)
|
01-27-08 02:24pm
|
Reply
799
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Not enough options. I like 'em starting with sexy clothing and stripping down to the level where PTA* are fully exposed so we can see the action without any camouflage. I get really pissed when a babe with great tits leaves her bra on throughout or when the panties are pulled aside but not removed. Stockings or no stockings, who cares?
By the way, when a chunky lass like Brandy Talore (aka Brandy Taylor) wears something around her waist/belly, that's fine. I like watching her bouncing titties, not her bouncing belly.
* PTA - Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
01-06-08 06:42pm
|
Reply
800
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I think Jay G has nailed it. Three ratings makes the most sense.
Quantity:
I have gone to a great looking site at a good price to find that I can download everything on it in a week or so. Relatedly, I've gone to high rated sites that have infrequent updating, or none at all. A quantity rating makes great sense.
Quality:
A rating of quality that is not influenced at all by price or quantity adds considerably to the value of the rating.
Price:
Stating the price is good, but the TBP folks have seen everything so they can add a price/value subjective rating to the mix. If it's independent from the content rating, than it's a big addition to the review.
|
12-30-07 08:38am
|
