| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I have to agree that download limits are a terrible thing! I am extremely critical of sites that use them. I can understand sites using them to certain extents, but there is a limit to which they should be used. I have downloaded videos at more than 1 GB per part, just as Exotics said. Having low download limits is just a sneaky method of getting people to have to pay for multiple months and possibly forget about their membership and end up charged hundreds of dollars before realizing. Either that or they are trying to avoid buying more bandwidth, or both for that matter.
I will mention though that I did not have any issue with download limits a few months ago though, but that does not mean they are not there. Anything Eroitics says about a site should be taken seriously, after all he is the highest user here!
|
03-18-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
902
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I usually get an error message stating that the server does not allow resume downloads. I did send a ticket to the support team. I will update this if they reply with anything new. I agree this is irritating, sometimes the downloads take too long and end up stopped by the server if I am downloading 5 or 6 large videos at a time.
|
03-18-08 05:19pm
|
Reply
903
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
Some site you just have to change the server address, Videobox, and Brazzers this works for. But, that does not seem to be the case here. I am still trying to find a way to resume the downloads, but no luck yet.
|
03-18-08 11:06am
|
Reply
904
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
I can confirm this. I downloaded their entire site in one day, so download limits are no issue here! This is not to say the site is small though, i was using a LAN connection! :)
|
03-18-08 12:02am
|
Reply
905
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Review
Curious, have you downloaded this whole site? If so, how large is it? Thanks!
|
03-17-08 11:57pm
|
Reply
906
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Review
Just a warning! Be prepared to be hazed and have very detailed answers for questions based on the rating you gave this site. 100 ratings are not viewed lightly on this forum for damn good reason. I should know this because I have been defending a 100 score on videobox or a few weeks now!
Can you give a detailed reason as to why you give this site a 100? What is not good about this site? Every site has something that could be better (that does not make it unperfect). You are going to have to give a real good reason as to why you feel Brazzers is perfect. No one will trust this review if you do not justify it.
Keep in mind that I have reviewed their site and I am a current member and have been so for nearly a year. I would not call them perfect! They are great though, but could use work on quality. The photos in the sets are rather small and the videos are not HD, when that should be standard for new sites and old ones alike.
Please check out my review of the site, and perhaps my review of videobox (the replies!) just to see what happens when people notice a 100 rating here! It is rather entertaining. :)
|
03-17-08 11:52pm
|
Reply
907
|
Big Tits Round Asses
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Comment
Thanks for this post. It answered a few of the exact questions I was wondering!
|
03-17-08 11:39pm
|
Reply
908
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
hla8002's Review
This is true! Right after joining I got a notice of a charge using the same username and password for a trial of another site with would rebill at $40 per month! The site was localnakedbabes.com. This site was a pain to cancel a well!
Thank you for that warning, I will be keeping a close eye on my credit card for a while. I was suspicious after the automatic trial that was unsolicited and actually billed by a different company. LNB-Services.
|
03-17-08 09:38pm
|
Reply
909
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
The idea is not bad, and it certainly will not hurt me any to have the money. However, I dont think hat a few hundred bucks will go that far, particularly if you consider the current value of the dollar. Seriously, that is only a few months worth of gas for most people. And a few hundred dollars will not pay all the bills that people owe! But I feel kinda strange for saying this, but it should not be used on porn or other non essentials. But I can see many people pissing it away at the bar or the track. Sad.
|
03-17-08 09:21pm
|
Reply
910
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
Online Skeptic 's Comment
I will agree with the 3 month option, the site can be downloaded much faster. I was kicking myself for the extra money gone. The site definitely could be restructured, but I would not give it s 20 as you say! Always remember a lot of the reviews are based on personal preference. Plus, live and learn, you know to never go back! I most likely will never return either, but I would not call it a waste.
It sounds like you are pretty specific what you are looking for, perhaps you should tell us what you want to see and someone might be able to point you to a site that would not be a waste of your time and money.
Also, who voted to trust this guy!?!?! He only has one comment and no reviews? Hum?
|
03-12-08 09:36pm
|
Reply
911
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
In KB/sec I am assuming then you are talking about Bytes rather than Bits correct. Assuming you are talking about Bytes, that is not too shabby! Your 15 Mbit/s connection would kick the crap out of my 3 MBit here at home, but not the 100 Mbit LAN I use :) Anyway Then you would be getting about 200 or so KByyes/s, that is not terrible, but it should be much faster. Perhaps they throttle out of USA connection? I really dont know, but that is too bad it is not fast for you. I have heard of others getting much lower speeds though, down as low as 2 KBit/s! I could understand this affecting their reviews, I dont care how great a site is if you cant get anything from it! I was on the LAN a week ago and got 30 MBit/s for 6 hours from them, but i was downloading from Nubiles too at the same time at another 20 or so MBit/s.
|
03-12-08 09:11pm
|
Reply
912
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes! There is a certain allure to nicely taken photos. And the screaming in any video can get old after a while. I typically watch my DVDs on mute. A soft moan can be extremely erotic, but the screaming bloody murder seen (heard) in so many videos can eventually be a turn off...so I turn it off! :)
Try getting a hold of their customer service, perhaps they have a bad connection across the boarder for some reason and other have had the same issue from Canada. Their site is fast for me, but I will ask how many were you trying to download at a time and what is your actual internet connection speed?
I can tell you that I have never seen more than 12 Mbit/s per connection come from any website period! When I am downloading from the LAN connection I sometime use I am downloading at least 10 videos at a time using 1 connection per video. I can nearly always get at least 40 Mbit/s from them alone.
Or maybe you are just unlucky. I have been unlucky with Brazzers lately and cannot download them from the LAN, but can at home? Go figure!
|
03-12-08 07:34pm
|
Reply
913
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hum? I have no speed issues with Videobox. They have been a great backdrop for me when another site is giving me fits. There have been many times that I sustained 40 Mbit/s for several hours at a time.
That is the great thing about forums, people do not have to agree and you can rate the site based on your experiences. Mine have been absolutely wonderful with Videobox. The cons I listed are not terrible things and nothing I personally hold against the site, but I thought it fair to mention something at least. I did so because I though they might be viewed as negative to some people. I gladly pay more for better quality, and I would not want to pay for quality I could not use if I were on dial up or something.
They could use some expansion to sub-niches, but they are definitely a straight up hardcore video site, the few videos they do have of other niches could be viewed as treats in addition to the normal stuff.
I do not truly view the cons I listed as major cons, but rather as the slight changes that could be made, but are by no means necessary!
Oh and yes, I love pictures too! Millions of pictures!
|
03-12-08 01:00pm
|
Reply
914
|
Asses In Public
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Actually. I could agree with that for the entire network! Granted the updates they do put up are pretty good sized, they still could use more.
The site alone is still pretty small. The sites are designed to work together more than be 19 separate sites or so. Updates to each site takes a little longer because the update in a rotation, at least the sites at are updated.
|
03-11-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
915
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Then lets have the webmaster delete the option to leave a 100. But then I would give them a 99 because that would then be the perfect score! This is an endless cycle.
Worth noting, any time someone says "Valid but ignored." it throws up an immediate flag saying that "what I am about it say is in ignorance because I am ignoring statements that I myself classify as valid." Please do not take that as a personal attack, I do enjoy this debate.
|
03-11-08 10:14am
|
Reply
916
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Good point. I will put it in there.
|
03-11-08 09:47am
|
Reply
917
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Very nice point! It does make thing more interesting, and I like to play devil's advocate. But I do honestly believe they are the best. Every other site is lacking something as well. Videobox lacks the least at this point. I do promise however that if someone comes along and beats Videobox in my eyes than I WILL adjust my score. If a perfect site does exist, there can not be two, unless they are identical in which case that would be pointless. There is always a best out there. And the best is always the most close to perfection, and therefore would be our closest approximation to perfection. As this site words it...they are looking for approximate perfection.
Also, no one has defeated the logic behind my statements!! :)
So yes, I do enjoy this.
|
03-10-08 10:50pm
|
Reply
918
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Assuming you are referring to my old laptop. Yes it actually does do well considering. Granted it cant keep up with a new SATA drive or especial fiber channel, but I have never been somewhere that it would not keep up just downloading. Of course it cant do much else!
|
03-10-08 10:29pm
|
Reply
919
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
simple. raid, or span volumes
|
03-10-08 10:26pm
|
Reply
920
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Comment
I am truly curious to know if they enforce the download limits!?!?!
I download this entire is about 6-8 months ago and I was blowing well over 15 GB per day. I was actually very close to 20 GB per hour honestly! Perhaps I got lucky?
Those bit rates are not unheard of. I actually have some videos at that rate. But none the less that is exciting because I have been considering rejoining. i might have to bump them up on my schedule!
Thank you for a great update!
|
03-10-08 09:28pm
|
Reply
921
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Honestly I believe that nubiles and teendreams were a bit better. Siminscans is good though. The girls on nubiles are much better looking though, and the videos are a higher quality. A good handful of Fugly chicks on simonscans. Teendreams from a years ago still beats simonscans on quality.
Simonscans does have quantity of photos though. About 70 GB worth. But only about 330 videos as of early march.
|
03-10-08 09:06pm
|
Reply
922
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
hafty's Reply
5 or 6 GB per day will not cut it! Are you trying to host this site from home or something?
I will not join a site with bandwidth restrictions this tight. The only thing this tells me is that the site can not afford bandwidth. If you can not afford bandwidth how can you afford to keep the site updated with good material? The only explanation is that you have a good deal on hosting that has restrictions about traffic and you dont want to lose the host, or you have a terrible deal and can not afford to pay for bandwidth when you exceed your limits!
I can understand having a limit though, to protect yourself from having your servers falling off the racks when an account get hacked and 300 people are all downloading full speed. But anymore it is reasonable for a person to be able to download 30 GB in a day. I can on my # Mbit/s DSL for $30 a month. 20 GB per day would be tolerable, but make sure the user can unlock his account if he assures you that he is in fact the one downloading, IP addresses?
Unless of course this li8mit is simply to force people to have to buy several months worth of membership in order to be able to download the entire network! Webmasters like this piss me off. If I could I would download the site as fast as possible just to make things break. It is really just the principle that people should be able to have access to what they are paying for. Your download limits are turning a lot of people away.
Invest more into bandwidth ot simply face having less members and less income. And eventually I will find a way around the download limit and download the whole thing of an OC3...that should make things go smoothly!
Wonder why I am a several year member of video box? I can downlaod all day every day if I want..which I dont actually. Plus I can download for 6 hours or so at 45 Mbit/s from them alone and they dont cry about it.
|
03-10-08 08:51pm
|
Reply
923
|
Asses In Public
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Just though it would be worth mentioning that this site is based of a network of sites, as this review mentions. But do not be scared of the size limitation. Asses in Public is a very new addition to the network. Across the network there is around 600 GB. I can account for 550 GB that I have downloaded, and there is some new stuff I have not got around to yet. I agree that AIP is small, but the whole is huge!
I definately agree about the pictures...they need to grow. there is now excuse for small pictures when a nice Digital SLR is less than $1000. They also should be shooting the videos in HD, those cameras not that expensive. If they would do that they would have a network that would be hard to top for the boob lovers like me!
Nice review!
|
03-10-08 05:53pm
|
Reply
924
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I could agree with that. This was my first time downloading from them, but I would be willing to go back in the future. Some of the videos are pretty hot, but they need to show in HD as I believe everyone should. It is easy to downgrade quality, but it is hard to upgrade poor quality!
|
03-10-08 05:39pm
|
Reply
925
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Sure! As of about a week ago there was 330 videos. That is what I have downloaded at least. I believe I got them all. It is a hard question to answer because the bit rate is different for some of the videos. The resolutions seem to be around 480 x 360. The largest video is 168 MB and 22 minutes long. There seem to be a good number of them with bit rates at about 1200 Mbit/s. The average video looks to be around 10 minutes long. They really do vary a bit from 7 to 12 minutes. They do not look bad, but I certainly have seen much better. This really is a picture site more than anything.
|
03-10-08 05:38pm
|
