| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Yeah, it's probably time for a review but I'm thinking it's just marketing. They recently reduced the number of updates to the Brazzer's site in order to start beefing the rolls on Mofos. You're going to see the same girls and pretty much get the same thing as Brazzers just in a new package.
|
02-19-09 11:34am
|
Reply
552
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
I'm currently a Brazzer's member and have seen all the hype they've been pushing on Mofos. From looking at the tour it basically just looks like a Brazzer's clone in terms of quality (aka - average at best). Apparently they're just trying to up their revenue streams by pushing another network you have to pay for. Frankly, they should just raise their price on the Brazzer's site and add more content but maybe their bean counters figured that this route would create more money overall. I think I'm sort of done with Brazzer's so the new offerings don't tempt me too much.
|
12-23-08 03:36pm
|
Reply
553
|
Mommy Loves Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I've done a few ultra cheapie trials in the last year without problems but all of those have been done with reputable sites and/or billing processors. I mostly posted this as a warning for newbies or casual porn users since the potential problems are less obvious than with some other sites.
|
07-24-09 12:01pm
|
Reply
554
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review, thanks Denner. I had my eye on this site for a while but I think I'll put it on hold at least for now.
|
04-30-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
555
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
I like that word "shonk". Cant' say I've heard of it before. Sounds like a name that should have it's place in the PU vocabularly as an unscrupulous vendor.
|
02-10-09 04:49pm
|
Reply
556
|
Nasty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Thanks for the review on this one. Just a general comment in that I looked at the tour page and found stuff that's been on my computer for a long time; stuff from Clubseventeen if that site is still around and a few others. Not sure how much of this new or just recycled old content.
|
02-19-13 12:13pm
|
Reply
557
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestJoe's Reply
Way to go Joe! I've had to defend some of my reviews from webmasters before; it is a bit tedious and annoying in my book. Good for you to stick by your guns.
|
08-21-09 01:11pm
|
Reply
558
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MountainMan's Review
Good first review there MountainMan. Glad you've come down from your peak of to share your porn wisdom with the masses. A few more technical specs (vid sizes, etc.) would be useful but darn good for a first review. Hope to see more.
|
04-21-11 05:03pm
|
Reply
559
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
I do admit you did a good job of justifying your "100" score. My only beef with NA is that their pics lack size, especially the older stuff which hurts them in my book a pic guy. When looking at your score it's more based upon your preference which is perfectly acceptable. Overall, when looking at everything the site has to offer in terms of specs I couldn't pull the trigger on such a score. Guess I try to be too objective.
|
02-20-09 11:56am
|
Reply
560
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Review
I've been thinking about going to this site in the near future. I'm more of picture fan and I was wondering what size the pics come in now? I believe the older material is/was 800x600 but was wondering if the newer stuff has gotten larger?
|
07-17-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
561
|
Naughty Julie
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestJoe's Review
Welcome to PU HonestJoe. Good review there and I hope to see more coming in the future.
|
08-18-09 03:55pm
|
Reply
562
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the positive feedback. I wish more webmasters would take our reviews to heart (at least the non newbie reviews anyway) but I doubt that will happen here. My instincts tell me that this is now just a place holder site and that most of the marketing and money at NS is going into their parody productions. While it's disappointing from a consumer's perspective it perversely makes good business sense ... if you can't or don't want to compete with what's out there today just keep doing what you're doing until it doesn't pay any more.
|
07-17-13 11:39am
|
Reply
563
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I hear ya. My only reason for bringing up the issue of posting a review or comment was the fact that TBP has no review of this site and Denner's comment (the only one posted) doesn't mention the price gouging. I thought others might want to be forewarned more clearly is all.
|
08-14-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
564
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey Drooler, I'd say go ahead and post a review on this one even though it's been a while since you were a member. I found this site looking at an outside review site and was tempted until I checked here. Several sites have given this one a high rating. For me, it means more when I see a review as opposed to just a comment. After relying on good ol' PU I think I'll pass on this one for now.
|
08-14-08 11:58am
|
Reply
565
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Denner has talked about is issue a few times in the forum (there's a new thread by him today on the topic). Basically, contact NS and see if they'll change their pricing or give you a partial refund or something.
|
03-14-09 01:53pm
|
Reply
566
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
aesop7's Review
I've been thinking about joining this site and was wondering how much hardcore content there is? Appreciated if you could let me know. Thanks for the review.
|
06-03-08 04:00pm
|
Reply
567
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Sounds like these people stole an idea from the amusement park people on the whole fast tracking thing. Haven't heard of this on a porn site before. On one hand, it seems like an interesting little perk. On the other, you know the update is coming anyway so why pay for "earlier" access other than the free fast tracks you get. I guess it sounds more like an innocent gimmick to me than a porn paradigm shifter.
|
08-03-09 10:42am
|
Reply
568
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
Hey Xbigvmanx. Just wanted to say welcome to PU. As a heads up, people (including myself, not trying to hide behind this one) are going to want to see more content in your reviews. What you have now is pretty thin. Once you qualify for the weekly drawing you'll also find out that more in depth reviews will earn you more raffle tickets. Hope to see more from ya.
|
10-30-08 08:29pm
|
Reply
569
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveF's Review
Good review on this site (a welcomed and significant improvement over the first few reviews you did). The only thing I would add is to include maximum picture sizes and vid sizes since these facts aren't always clear from the site info posted on TBP. Otherwise, keep the reviews coming. It's good to see someone new get involved here.
|
07-08-09 11:43am
|
Reply
570
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Thanks for the additional info. This site posts frequently on a tgp site I visit a lot so just looking to clarify a few things I didn't find in the reviews. Thanks.
|
05-02-08 11:53am
|
Reply
571
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Thanks for the good review here. I've thought about joining and was wondering about 2 things: 1. Is there any hardcore at all; and 2. Is their any toy play. Neither one is a deal killer for me but I'm just wondering.
|
05-02-08 12:07am
|
Reply
572
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Thanks for the review on this one. I was a member a few years ago and, being a picture person, was somewhat disappointed in the smallish picture sizes. From some of the free thumbnails I've seen it looks like the pics have gotten bigger so I was wondering what pixel size their stuff is coming in at now a days.
|
01-22-09 01:51pm
|
Reply
573
|
Oye Loca
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this one. I hate the misleading tours and previews on sites and encourage everyone to post them in their reviews or comments.
|
05-29-08 12:17pm
|
Reply
574
|
Pantyhose Addict
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Thanks for the update on this site. I've noticed it before but the reviews on it weren't very well done and they are over a year old now.
|
09-24-08 06:15pm
|
Reply
575
|
Pantyhose Line
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornviewer's Comment
In response to your question about how to join scenes together, that came up in the forum some time ago. I don't know if it will help you but here's the link: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=194.
While they have some decent content my main beef with the site was that the content only had limited angles. By that I mean, for example, in the hardcore stuff you might only get a couple of positions in a scene. That sort of left me wanting.
It is a good site for those who like women and hosery but it needs help in my opinion before I'd rejoin.
|
02-24-09 10:05pm
|
