| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I took a quick peek and yup, they advertise 1080 p HD vids. You have to be admit that they don't promise downloads in HD but it's still deceptive marketing. I also see that they are advertising "100% satisfaction guaranteed or money back" on their sign up page. I wonder if that's a scam too or if they're going to dooling out some refunds soon.
|
06-26-09 06:49pm
|
Reply
452
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Comment
Just to let you know they are the same thing. They just use the two names as part of a marketing operation. As for pricing, welcome to the newest porn trend of regional pricing. Being from the states I can't say if you're stuck shelling out 20 pounds or not. I recently got a deal for $10 a month by linking through another site. Good luck hunting down a deal. You might also consider looking for a deal on Mofos.com. That is the newest brazzer's network. It's small at this time but you might find some deals on it. Good luck.
|
12-29-08 11:54am
|
Reply
453
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Thanks for kudos on the review. I just looked and it appears that there's about 320 anal scenes throughout the network. They do a pretty good job of tagging as I don't recall seeing any anal scenes that didn't have the tag but, then again, I don't look at every scene. Either way, if you like it backdoor they do have a good amount of material for you.
|
12-11-08 11:54am
|
Reply
454
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Mmmmm, I just snagged this deal about 30 minutes ago. I'll see what I conjur up (play "Jeopardy" theme music while I open a new page).
You are right, it now looks like the $7.50 is now only for the multi-month membership. However, they still have the $10 per month offer going. Here's the url: http://tour.brazzersnetwork.com/tour/?action=home
Hope that isn't a big disappointment. I'll re-edit the comment to reflect this.
|
12-02-08 07:45pm
|
Reply
455
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
There's a PU forum discussion thread on this subject if you want to contribute.
|
06-02-08 04:49pm
|
Reply
456
|
Brooke Lee Playmates
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I would suggest posting this topic about winrar's as a forum thread so more people have the chance to figure this out when they come across them. I haven't heard of them before this so its good info to know.
|
05-06-09 02:41pm
|
Reply
457
|
Busty Ones
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
My trial membership is just expiring here. To let you know, I did the $2.26 two day trial through Bluefantasies.com. When I went to cancel they gave me a special offer to stay of $9.99 per month. That saves you a few bucks if you're still interested in checking it out again.
|
07-15-08 11:03pm
|
Reply
458
|
Buy My Socks
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
This does sound like a slightly different kind of place on the net. You used to see more sites (or at least I did) a few years ago where you could buy lingerie a girl had worn for a scene. Never seen a site developed around buying a specific article of clothing. Frankly, my socks get pretty damn tepid after a day or two, I can't imagine that some girl's feet stink any better after a week. Definitely a fetish niche site / catalog if there ever was one.
|
10-27-08 02:15pm
|
Reply
459
|
Cara's Nylon World
(0)
|
Reply of
marinette's Review
I'll echo what G Code said. Sorry about getting ripped off. However, we usually rely on reviews to see what the general content of a site is and what you get for your membership. Thus, adding some of that info to your review would be welcomed, along side your problem with the custom shoot.
|
03-19-09 02:40pm
|
Reply
460
|
Club Kayden
(0)
|
Reply of
juanchopancho's Review
Thanks for doing a review on this one. I'd been thinking about it but wasn't ready to take the leap without some substantive review coming out. Just curious as to what pixel sizes the photos come in and if the photo sets have zips. Thanks.
|
01-04-09 05:28pm
|
Reply
461
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I see from the reviews that there's a silent drm on this site. As I'm more of a picture guy I'm wondering how big the pics are and about how many photo sets there are across the site. Thanks.
|
05-14-09 11:46am
|
Reply
462
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
Just curious, about what size are the pictures now and are the new sizes only for the current material or did they also boost the resolution on their older material too?
|
04-19-08 03:43pm
|
Reply
463
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Thanks for the review on this site; good review and funny by the way. I had joined years ago and was recently thinking about checking it out again. Sounds like the site has kept on going strong. I'll probably pass at the moment given the smallish pic sizes and premium pricing.
P.S. Congrats on winning the $100 raffle, you beat me out (I got the $50). Who knew ordinary Joe's writing about porn could make it big ;)
|
04-15-08 06:43pm
|
Reply
464
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Comment
Colorclimax quit producing all content in the early or mid 90's. Ever since they've been online all they do is recycle their old content. So, don't expect to ever see anything new from them. I sort of like their stuff though, it's pretty high quality considering how old it is and I would still recommend it for a one time join if someone is into older porn.
|
06-16-10 03:08pm
|
Reply
465
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
Colorclimax was a European print magazine that went out of business years ago. The reason they don't open up their archieve is because they want repeat customers/billing. Thus, they just endlessly recycle their content, putting content up and then taking it down only to have it reappear later as an update. It's not a bad site if you like 70's and 80's porn (I joined several times years ago) but don't expect anything new from them.
|
07-30-09 10:59am
|
Reply
466
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I was a member here about 2 years ago and several times before that. I know that they recycle their content and don't do new shoots any more. They keep their shoots up for a while then take them back down. They are simply making a living off of their past (nothing wrong with that). So, my guess, not having been there lately, is that the "new" stuff is simply material taken down and reposted.
|
04-17-08 04:04pm
|
Reply
467
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Let's be real for a minute. 5 new reviews, all in the 90', in one day. The site itself is plain. According to TheBestPorn it has 7 videos and about 200 photo sets. The webmaster is defending himself left and right after never having appeared on this site before. Did I mention that the people posting the highly regarded reviews here have never posted reviews before? This is nothing but a con game so let's leave it at that and move on to more important stuff like how long it's been since I've cleaned my belly button lint.
|
10-02-11 10:33pm
|
Reply
468
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Cooter37's Review
First off, welcome to PU. Unfortunately that't the good news. The bad news is that if you want your reviews to be helpful to other PU users you need to include a lot more information in them. Some site specifics (amount of content, vids / pics, search engine, etc.) would be greatly appreciated. As it is, no one is going to take your review of "99" seriously with the information you have provided so far.
|
04-22-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
469
|
Cozy Toons
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
All I can is thanks for taking one for the PU team.
|
08-11-09 11:30am
|
Reply
470
|
Crystal Klein
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I think most of the high profile models who seem to keep up do it with the help of other companies/producers (Club Nella, Club Sandy, Eve Angel etc. get a lot of support help and casting with other models). I could see where doing it one your own would become a major pain but if you want the revenue you have to keep it up -- the fans of individual models expect more than what they get from the mega sites.
|
06-06-08 02:57pm
|
Reply
471
|
Crystal Klein
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Very good review here, keep it up. It seems like a lot of these single model sites are just not keeping up. The actress seems to get into it for a little while, usually just after the launch, and then let it languish.
|
06-03-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
472
|
Cum Fiesta
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Review
It's a decent network but what just cheeses me off is their lack of interest in photos. 800x600? If it's 1998 that's fine but not any more. They do have an unbeatable backlog of vids to choose from though which is attractive.
|
12-23-08 03:39pm
|
Reply
473
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'll post something after I get access to it in about. However, I should note that I don't get access for another 42 days (apparently this is one of the sites I have to wait two months for before I get). Anyway, it is mostly softcore and it does appear to have lots of fresh faced girls on it. Not a top notch site but at the price levels ($15 US after one month and $10 US thereafter) if you had any inclination at all to check it out then it would be worth staying around in my book.
|
03-04-10 03:04pm
|
Reply
474
|
Day With A Pornstar
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
I've been trying to figure out what identity Mofos has in comparsion to Brazzers? I assumed Brazzers was just branching out to generate more revenue, just rebranding their stuff for the new place.
|
04-03-09 04:07pm
|
Reply
475
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
I have to admit, yours is the most original mathematical scoring system on a review that I've seen so far. Thanks for the heads up on this; I sort of figured it didn't have much new to offer.
|
11-20-08 10:06pm
|
