| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I'm with Toadisth here, porn stars come and go and the quality of their scenes or sets varies a lot from site to site. If I join a site I'll check a few notables out but mostly I'm just looking for what I find interesting.
|
09-23-08 05:03pm
|
Reply
327
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I said $10 to $20 because, like Monahan notes, there is so much porn out there while a site may not have exclusive material it may still be new to me. I couldn't see paying much more (in part thanks to TBP's special offers) because you know you'll be able to find the content you're looking for elsewhere and for less money in the near future.
|
08-27-08 11:18am
|
Reply
328
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
If you have to pick one then you have to go with the sexy attitude. Admit it, we've all seen the hottie only to find her putting in a "punching the clock" scene. In real life, even an average gal can really up her sexiness by having a great attitude and while that's certainly not everything in the porn world it really helps.
|
08-25-08 06:44pm
|
Reply
329
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Man, I go away for a few days and my poll gets run. I checked "Not Sure" for my answer. I think that some small changes have been made but question whether anything big has come from this place. For example, exotics makes the point about 21stsextury upgrading their site. Would this have happened without PU? Can't honestly say that these changes or others wouldn't have been made without us. However, I think it is great that some of the webmasters for the good sites do interact and listen to people here. The e-porn world is probably a better place with PU in it.
|
08-25-08 06:22pm
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Sorry to harsh on you here ;) I see in your review of streamate.com that you have to spend $50 to $60 just to get the model naked on a private chat. Upon reading that it just reinforces my earlier reply that I could go to the strip club and get up close and personal for a lot less moolah.
|
08-19-08 05:58pm
|
Reply
331
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
For $75 could get a hell of a lot of good porn and not worry about getting ripped off. Hell, I could go the local strip club and get a three lap dances for $75. I'm just not that voyeuristic where I get excited by the thought of having a web chat with some girl a 1000 miles who's sitting around naked in her bedroom. Why not just download a video for a lot less and get better quality and more action?
|
08-19-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
If the toad says it works it must be true; but it might be best only when you're off the wagon. As an aside, there's a post for your in the forum under the thread "Your Avatar".
|
08-13-08 12:07am
|
Reply
333
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I would be thrilled if all the softcore hotties did hardcore. Guess I have to keep on perfecting that Funky Cold Medina recipe.
|
08-13-08 12:04am
|
Reply
334
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
"Uh, my name is Wittyguy and I'm a porn addict"
Response: "Hi Wittyguy"
"I just want to say that it's been 15 minutes since my last download and I'm actually feeling OK about it. I mean I'm not tearing up my place and I feel rather at peace with myself. I just wanted to say that without you guys ....
Sorry, my next download just finished. Uh, anyway just wanted to say thanks to everyone for enabling me and my addiction and that my right hand hand has never been stronger. So when do I get my pin?"
|
08-12-08 05:00pm
|
Reply
335
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use porn trials a lot and do about half my reviews from them. However, I only review based upon a full access trial - I don't even bother with trials that don't have full access. I think you can get the flavor of a site pretty quickly, especially if you have a basic review check list, so you don't need to stick around for a long time.
|
08-11-08 11:56am
|
Reply
336
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Man, the college football season starts in a few weeks how can you have forgotten :) All I can say is go Pac 10.
|
08-11-08 11:50am
|
Reply
337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm all for that one my man, all for it. I've noticed that we don't seem to be getting as many poll submissions from users any more, probably because most of the easy ones have already been done. I think it might be worth a carrot; meaning up to one raffle ticket for a poll idea. Don't know though, maybe the PU staff has a boat load of poll ideas but I sort of doubt it. You should send an email to the PU staff about that one unless Khan wants to post a reply here.
|
08-11-08 11:48am
|
Reply
338
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Apparently I am the anti-Denner. I'm proud to say that no one has won less money with more raffle tickets than me. Damn the statistics and full engines ahead.
p.s. My lack of success at the raffle isn't what motivated me (or would motivate me) to get forum posts counted towards the raffle.
|
08-07-08 11:58am
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I thought I'd toss this out as a poll question since, I've been told, the PU staff has taken the idea under consideration for a while now. I'm sort of mixed on this one. In one way it rewards people who actively post and contribute to the site. While the original purpose of PU was for site reviews and comments I don't see any harm in expanding the "rewards program" to include others who may find the forum more interesting. In my view, the more participants here the better off the PU community is and forum offers a different place for people to give their input.
On the other hand, as one of the top forum posters, I don't want to see the forum get loaded up with junk either.
I like Atrapat's idea of including forum posts as "replies" for purposes of earning raffle tickets that way. Realistically, a reply doesn't really have to have any substance to it to count towards the raffle (this addresses Apoctom's issue about quality control - besides Khan does monitor the forum). I'm thinking this might be the way to go.
|
08-07-08 11:50am
|
Reply
340
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If you were interested in gay porn, or bisexual porn, I think there would be better sites to satisfy your wants than b/g gangbang sites. Maybe some of the closet women porn viewers or women who come across their hubbies stash might view it with a different eye but for most of us pervs it's about the babes.
|
08-05-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
341
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What strikes me as curious is why more celebs don't release sex tapes. Come on, there's a whole parade of child stars who turned into washed up adults living off of basically nothing because they blew it all. If you got nothing, including a career, why not churn out a sex tape claim some one stole it and make some money off the thing. It beats flipping burgers.
|
08-04-08 12:43pm
|
Reply
342
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Typically I don't really do anything because most lopsided reviews tend to come from people who put very little into that review or have done very few reviews. For members who have been around and typically write good reviews I sometimes reply to the review and ask why they rated a site like they did (only when I know something about the site they're rating).
I tend not to do this too much because the impression I've gotten, even though my questions are merely seeking to clarify and not accuse, is that people get a bit defensive when challenged about their score. I've haven't really been questioned yet on a score I've given so I'm not entirely sure how I'd feel about it.
Another way I respond is if I like the person's reviews but think they're scoring too high I leave a comment with my trust vote letting them know.
As an aside, I got inspired to propose this poll through some replies with Exoticsforme. There's a new thread in the forum now about scoring/ratings sites -- https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=172.
|
08-01-08 11:48am
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
God yes I'm of those Luddites who still uses IE as their main browser. I usually just look at the pics before deciding whether to zip them or not so it's not too big of deal to have automatic image reisizing (a quick mouse click and the full image comes back). As for "smart image dithering" I have no clue what that is. Is it related to smart image dallying :-) ?
|
07-28-08 11:40am
|
Reply
344
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with most here by defining it as V & A. I would also expand the definition to include toys in the V & A as well.
|
07-24-08 12:39pm
|
Reply
345
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Like most, I think they're useful when you're seriously considering joining a site because they often have commentary about similar sites and they can flesh out some of the details not otherwise discussed in reviews. I tend not to read the replies to one sided reviews.
|
07-23-08 11:25am
|
Reply
346
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Today, I keep everything on an external harddrive but it's not big deal. Years ago I had a near fatal crash that required professional help and no mention was made of the "material" I had. Unfortunately, they also ended up deleting a bunch of my stuff because I forgot to tell them to save certain files.
If you do have financial or other files that have stuff more importent than porn on them then today I'd suggest having the repair tech come to you to at least get your machine up and running (they can usually do that on the spot) and then back up and/or erase certain files before letting them take it back to the shop.
|
07-21-08 11:48am
|
Reply
347
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
What if my real life is all about watching porn ;)
|
07-18-08 11:11am
|
Reply
348
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Color, color and color. I had a few sets with some b+w stuff but just didn't like them. For me b+w makes it seem like the photographer is trying to get too "artsy".
|
07-17-08 08:10pm
|
Reply
349
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I would have to say up to 200. Most sets with less than 100 tend to be a bit skimpy as they only have the model(s) in a couple of positions. Over 200 and you seem to just get endless shots of the same thing over and over again. The brazzers network has some sets with over 2000 photos in them; way too much overkill. Having said all of that, I do have and enjoy small sets that are high quality as opposed to some of the larger numbered sets.
|
07-17-08 08:07pm
|
Reply
350
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I always liked Duke the best. He's consistently the lowest score giver and the least impressed by stuff. I tend to like him as he's a bit more jaded and conservative when rating a site.
|
07-17-08 08:04pm
|
