| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I'd have to say that Monahan's description of the zips is pretty much accurate. It's a pain because they aren't very well described but I tend to rename them or edit my zips so, for me, it's not that big of deal.
|
07-27-08 07:38pm
|
Reply
577
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with most here by defining it as V & A. I would also expand the definition to include toys in the V & A as well.
|
07-24-08 12:39pm
|
Reply
578
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Like most, I think they're useful when you're seriously considering joining a site because they often have commentary about similar sites and they can flesh out some of the details not otherwise discussed in reviews. I tend not to read the replies to one sided reviews.
|
07-23-08 11:25am
|
Reply
579
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey Exotics, not trying to bust you on your score for this one. Just stating my preferences is all. I probably have some scores that are too high/low for others too. I like your idea about the forum post as I've found some members who do a decent job of writing reviews but consistently score too high in my book. When I give them trust ratings I usually note that as part of my comment.
As for the complete sets thing, I think the "completeness" of a set depends on his contract or at least that is my guess. If he's doing a shoot for, say, Teen Dreams he'll probably give out the full set. With his own material, my guess is that he reserves some of the content he leases out to others for his own site.
|
07-21-08 02:21pm
|
Reply
580
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I'd agree that Viv's site is more focused on the pics but, like the other reply noted, I don't understand why he doesn't go larger. A lot of Viv's stuff also appears on other sites like ATKgalleria, Twistys, Sexy-babes and other mega-sites which means if other PU users have been there they've probably seen a lot of his material already. I would note that Viv doesn't seem to release full photo sets to some of these sites so you'll probably find the complete sets at his site. For my money, Viv would have to boost his video quantity and quality to score in the 90's but as a picture lover his site is still pretty good.
|
07-21-08 11:55am
|
Reply
581
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Today, I keep everything on an external harddrive but it's not big deal. Years ago I had a near fatal crash that required professional help and no mention was made of the "material" I had. Unfortunately, they also ended up deleting a bunch of my stuff because I forgot to tell them to save certain files.
If you do have financial or other files that have stuff more importent than porn on them then today I'd suggest having the repair tech come to you to at least get your machine up and running (they can usually do that on the spot) and then back up and/or erase certain files before letting them take it back to the shop.
|
07-21-08 11:48am
|
Reply
582
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
What if my real life is all about watching porn ;)
|
07-18-08 11:11am
|
Reply
583
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Color, color and color. I had a few sets with some b+w stuff but just didn't like them. For me b+w makes it seem like the photographer is trying to get too "artsy".
|
07-17-08 08:10pm
|
Reply
584
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I would have to say up to 200. Most sets with less than 100 tend to be a bit skimpy as they only have the model(s) in a couple of positions. Over 200 and you seem to just get endless shots of the same thing over and over again. The brazzers network has some sets with over 2000 photos in them; way too much overkill. Having said all of that, I do have and enjoy small sets that are high quality as opposed to some of the larger numbered sets.
|
07-17-08 08:07pm
|
Reply
585
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I always liked Duke the best. He's consistently the lowest score giver and the least impressed by stuff. I tend to like him as he's a bit more jaded and conservative when rating a site.
|
07-17-08 08:04pm
|
Reply
586
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
All I got to say is "Thumb's Up" on this one.
|
07-17-08 07:53pm
|
Reply
587
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Review
I've been thinking about going to this site in the near future. I'm more of picture fan and I was wondering what size the pics come in now? I believe the older material is/was 800x600 but was wondering if the newer stuff has gotten larger?
|
07-17-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
588
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Just wanted to say great review here. I'm a little disappointed that the pic sizes are so small (why in this day and age do sites still post anything less than 1070x720 s beyond me) since I dig pics. As such, I'll probably stay away at this point.
|
07-17-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
589
|
Platinum Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Just wanted to say good review here, lots of good information.
|
07-17-08 03:51pm
|
Reply
590
|
Euro Foxes
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Just wanted to say thanks to a webmaster for being honest here at PU. A lot of times webmasters seem to get pretty defensive but I like the fact that you admit this is a business. Hell, if I was running a big site I'd probably put out a clone or two myself.
|
07-17-08 03:47pm
|
Reply
591
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I pretty much view them as garbage. Usually they're posted by someone new who gives out a score like a 55 or 99 on a site. I usually don't read them.
|
07-17-08 03:43pm
|
Reply
592
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I view what I download quite frequently. If not really interested in the stuff it doesn't stay on my machine for very long.
|
07-17-08 03:41pm
|
Reply
593
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Shap's Poll
I can't imagine ever giving out my "regular" email address to a porn provider. I get enough spam as it is. The address I use for porn gets about 30 pieces of spam per day regardless of my activity.
|
07-17-08 03:40pm
|
Reply
594
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
With companies like Comcast already trying out download limits (you pay more for unlimited download) I would expect that more porn sites will follow in the future.
|
07-17-08 03:38pm
|
Reply
595
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I think TGP's are a great way to get a quick short dose of porn and let you know generally about the content that a site has. I almost never join from seeing a tgp posting but it let's me know what sites are out there. Sometimes, you can get discounts not listed here on PU by linking into a site from a tgp.
|
07-16-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
596
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I agree, I'll quality over size most any day so long as you're not getting postage stamp sized videos. The largest sized stuff simply takes up too much disk space for what you get back, especially if all you have is standard sized monitor.
|
07-16-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
597
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks for the heads up on the pic size Khan. Still not enough given this day and age though.
|
07-16-08 02:06pm
|
Reply
598
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Thanks for the update on this one. I'm a Suze fan and didn't know that he started a new classics site. Some of the old stuff is still pretty hot. Sounds small but I might check it out later this year.
|
07-15-08 11:11pm
|
Reply
599
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
I've been looking at this site recently and I'm sorry to here that even the newer pics are still pretty small (from what I've seen on tgp sites they're still 800x600, basically what they were when I was a member years ago). I was hoping they'd beef it up but whoa is the picture lover here at PU. Thanks for the review. I think I'll keep my money for now.
|
07-15-08 11:07pm
|
Reply
600
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Call me a luddite but I prefer wmp. Basically I only want to download but when I view them later is usually use Bill Gates, er, wmp.
|
07-15-08 11:04pm
|
