| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I voted "no". Is there some repitition, yes. Is it out of control, no. About the only thing I could see for now is a slightly more sophisticated search function but that would be too much effort for anyone to invest their time into for now.
|
12-17-08 01:24pm
|
Reply
477
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Probably every few weeks for me but mostly because the majority of sites I join are the less expensive trials so you only have access for a week at most. Otherwise, I'll stick with a site until I've got all I wanted and then move on.
|
12-13-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
478
|
Peter Janhans
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this one, I might check it out. Bye the way, nice holiday avatar update there.
|
12-11-08 12:42pm
|
Reply
479
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Mmmm, this is a tough one. Are they breaking the law? In the US some states have laws against public nudity but they can sketchy and not uniformly enforced (some states might also have laws against public sex acts but I don't know). If there is one distinction to make it is between exposing children to pornography and children coming across sex acts. If the producers showed porno movies in public then they would be in big legal trouble if children saw it. Filming people going at it in a public setting is a grayer issue. Hard to say. Sounds like a great PU forum topic, I would suggest reposting your comment there for more feedback.
|
12-11-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
480
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I also have to chime in as a picture guy and agree with Drooler's post. TBP lists the screen size of the vids so why not the pics too?
Overall, I rely a lot on the TBP site statistics. Some you have to take with a grain of salt, especially claims of exclusive content. If you prefer quality over quantity then you really need to be thinking about the technical stuff and statistical facts about a site.
|
12-11-08 11:58am
|
Reply
481
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Thanks for kudos on the review. I just looked and it appears that there's about 320 anal scenes throughout the network. They do a pretty good job of tagging as I don't recall seeing any anal scenes that didn't have the tag but, then again, I don't look at every scene. Either way, if you like it backdoor they do have a good amount of material for you.
|
12-11-08 11:54am
|
Reply
482
|
N/A
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I agree, if you're going to do a solo shot then you should have a litte tease factor and start with the model clotehd or wearing whatever skimpy thing she dug out of her closet. Personally, I prefer toys over a straight softcore shoot but when she starts toying ... well, I leave that up to her.
|
12-09-08 05:22pm
|
Reply
483
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I think the soul searching goes on here because PUer's take their porn seriously. If you're here and you're not serious, you're going to be ignored or lambasted by the rest and you'll probably just get bored or p.o.'ed and move on. That leaves the rest of us, trying to define the PU Cultural Ethos (isn't PUCE a nice acronym) that rivals a conclave of Cardinals symposium.
|
12-07-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
484
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I think it comes down to how motivated people are by the idea of getting some raffle winnings ... unless you're gunning for a "hardcore" badge but strikes me as a ridiculous concept and one that would be too hard pull off without piling up the negative trust votes.
Regarding the raffle, it still would take time to cook up a passable fictional review and for what? Increasing your raffle chances by maybe 1% or 2%? Not really worth it in the grand scheme especially in a community of this size where the regulars and big point leaders pretty much know each other.
|
12-07-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
485
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
OMG, if they did a Met-Art hardcore site I would be in heaven, especially if they used the same high quality production and quality at the flagship site. However, I am also of the opinion that I don't really see a h/c site fitting into their marketing scheme. At best it would be a small site since most of the models their probably wouldn't do hc and why ruin a great thing they already have going.
|
12-06-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
486
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm with you, doesn't matter what it is so long as the model is hot and the acting isn't cold. I think Drooler sort of summed this concept up best with his quote from the forum "A soda bottle in her twat! Now that's what I call product placement."
|
12-05-08 04:18pm
|
Reply
487
|
Amateur Facials UK
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Actually, I saw some previews on a tgp post a while back and took a gander at but didn't sign up in large part due to the lack of TBP/PU reviews. The only thing I could ever find resembling a review, and I can't till if it's a schill or not, is here: http://www.free-handjobs.com/reviews/amateurfacialsuk/ . Sorry can't be of more help.
|
12-04-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
488
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
sitsat's Review
Just wanted to say very good review there Sitsat and welcome to PU. Hope to see more reviews our coming our way. Glad to see you've found the forum too.
|
12-04-08 07:36pm
|
Reply
489
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Isn't really the holiday we should be celebrating this season. Screw to food; go straight for the good stuff ;)
Yes, Prohibition is once again proof that when the government tries to take away something most people think is good you're going to end up with nothing but problems ... until the government figures out that you can tax the hell out of it and make a lot of money from it.
|
12-03-08 12:31pm
|
Reply
490
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Mmmmm, I just snagged this deal about 30 minutes ago. I'll see what I conjur up (play "Jeopardy" theme music while I open a new page).
You are right, it now looks like the $7.50 is now only for the multi-month membership. However, they still have the $10 per month offer going. Here's the url: http://tour.brazzersnetwork.com/tour/?action=home
Hope that isn't a big disappointment. I'll re-edit the comment to reflect this.
|
12-02-08 07:45pm
|
Reply
491
|
Her First Big Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
Hey, thanks for the good review on this one. I was a member there years ago. They had decent sized pics then, just wondering what size the pics come in at now and if there are zips.
Pity about the streaming vid thing. My take is that streaming is going to replace DRM as the next big net limitation ... giving us all something new to beef about, especially when they make streaming harder to download.
|
12-02-08 07:35pm
|
Reply
492
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
If I want "drapes" I'll shop the K-Mart Martha Stewart collection. Until then, I'll stick with the clean and subtle modern look.
|
12-01-08 01:14pm
|
Reply
493
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
For me it's one of those things that I find interesting once in a great while. I find no interest in the really hardcore s+m stuff, just some mild stuff every now and then. It's not something I'm into in real life so it doesn't have a big draw for me in fantasy land. But, to each their own.
|
11-29-08 10:12pm
|
Reply
494
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Can only say a month. My whole motto is to take what you want and if you really like the site come back later on and check out the updates. I just haven't found any place yet that I could justify staying for longer.
|
11-27-08 12:02am
|
Reply
495
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I figured Andy would be the heavy user here, at least you won some bucks this week to support the next external hard drive ;) I'm like Drooler, I join sites but don't download vids that often, especially since I'm more of a pic guy I get most of my vid downloads in one shot.
|
11-25-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
496
|
Torrid Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Comment
I think Drooler and Roadie answer your question in their reviews of this site.
|
11-25-08 02:50pm
|
Reply
497
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Agreed, good review. I've always been impressed with the quality I've seen on tgp sites but the high price has sort of held me back. Should they offer a discount I'll probably be there but not at $35 a month for a nonhardcore site.
|
11-25-08 02:48pm
|
Reply
498
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I checked "other" simply because I don't think anything will change. A while back I thought there would be more trial offers and discounts with the downturn but I really haven't noticed any changes. Porn is cheap enough that the bulk of the porn consuming public (they probably don't spend as much on it as us regulars here at PU do) probably won't change their buying habits. I don't see updates changing because as the economy tanks model fees and production costs won't go up and probably go down. About the only change I could see is more nonexclusive content or content recycling increasing but that only covers a small percentage of sites that regularly offer exclusive content.
|
11-23-08 12:46pm
|
Reply
499
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mmmm, tough one to answer. There is definitely the fantasy of aspect of porn that does not mirror reality. For example, I am not eternally 21 years old and hung like a horse ... though sometimes I might think I am ... but that's my own neurosis to deal with ;) As such, I don't expect perfection from my other simply because "the wild thing" isn't biggest part of the relationship like in porn so sometimes you compromise on the bod to get the best for you. However, I ain't complaining.
|
11-21-08 03:56pm
|
Reply
500
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
I have to admit, yours is the most original mathematical scoring system on a review that I've seen so far. Thanks for the heads up on this; I sort of figured it didn't have much new to offer.
|
11-20-08 10:06pm
|
