| Type | Site | Feedback / Review | Date | 
                                    
    | Reply 51 |   
 P Video.eu
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Pvideoeu's Reply 
 No problem; we like to keep you on your toes...8-)
 
 That sounds about right.
 
 Thnx.
 
 
 | 06-21-09  09:30am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 52 |   
 Teen Core Club
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Wittyguy's Reply 
 Also, 4 sites have been reviewed with low scores....while the one he is "promoting" has been given a high score along with comparisons to the others.....this site is the "best on the net".
 
 Note the dates of the other 4 reviews. All on the same day......
 
 Sorry, this person has an agenda...it is blindingly obvious and should be ignored.
 
 As more evidence, after the review had been posted, an unfavourable review appears, and this person then adds another "review" under the comment section.....even longer than his original review.
 
 This is blatent defence of a site, in which he clearly has an interest.
 
 Dmander6, clearly has an interest in Teen Core Club, and his reviews and comments should be removed. you don't need to be Columbo to see this.
 
 
 | 06-16-09  12:39pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 53 |   
 Teen Sleepover
             (0)
 | Reply of
                ace of aces's Review 
 What is it with so many sites nowadays, going live with just a dozen short videos ?
 
 And, why are so many more still making videos around 800-1000kbps ?
 
 This is just a joke........
 
 
 | 05-31-09  03:39pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 54 |   
 8Teen Kitties
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Denner's Comment 
 Hmmm...and no previews either.
 
 Me thinks it is a small site.
 
 I always get suspicious when sites are not 100% transparent.
 
 Think I'll steer clear for now.
 
 
 | 05-31-09  03:35pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 55 |   
 18 Only Girls
             (0)
 | Reply of
                NightOwl's Comment 
 These problems are no more - I assure you.
 
 Plenty of H/C and all sites are accessible. See my recent review.
 
 
 | 04-18-09  03:47pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 56 |   
 Natasha Shy
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Goldfish's Reply 
 Ivana (IvanFukalot.com) certainly does - but only on her own in "live shows" - and they're hot !
 
 But of course she does have her own site !
 
 But you can access to all 6 or 7 sites including hers for $60 I think from any of the Diesel sites.  After you join it says you can access all sites after 2 moonths - which is actually after 3 subscription payments, but you can get immediate access for another $60 (= $90 in all !).
 
 
 | 05-10-08  11:42am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 57 |   
 Little Lupe
             (0)
 | Reply of
                JBDICK's Reply 
 Well to be honest all the vids with the other girls just make her look extremely tiny - too tiny really. Possibly as they're so huge !
 
 In fact the more I watch her vids the more uncomfortable I feel.
 
 But no - the one in the fishnets isn't worth re-joining for !
 
 
 | 05-08-08  02:20am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 58 |   
 Only Cuties
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Davit's Reply 
 Um...it has when you are buying euros with the pound !!!!!
 
 Especially when you had thought that the cost was $30 (£15) but was actually 30 euros (£23.50 !)...which was the point I making...
 
 ...I think I got 20 with mixed up with 30...bit you know what I mean.
 
 
 | 03-02-08  04:10pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 59 |   
 Only Cuties
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Davit's Reply 
 Yes I agree with you to a degree...if the filming takes place at their home country.
 
 I just get the feeling - though I'm not 100% sure of course - that they are probably filming in the west and possibly being taken advantage of.
 
 But of course that could happen to anyone...
 
 
 | 01-06-08  11:51am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 60 | N/A | Reply of
                Vegas Ken's Poll 
 10 by 8 all the way.
 
 
 | 01-05-08  08:08am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 61 | N/A | Reply of
                elephant's Reply 
 Yeah me too - it's difficult scrolling and changing pics with one hand...!  hehe !
 
 
 | 01-05-08  08:07am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 62 |   
 1 By Day
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Davit's Review 
 Totally agree with your commments on bad direction and technical work.  This is made even worse when these "professionals" start playing with Hi Definition.  HD is notoriously difficult to use well.  They should really be sent on a course...what a waste some of these sites are...they have cash and willing girls but can't produce a decent movie to save their lives.
 
 HiDef shoud not be held held unless absolutely necessary.  This type of fil making could easily be 80% tripod based...but no...and the exposure/lighting is all to pot as well.  Some of these guys may as well use a cellular phone...it would be cheaper and give just the same results.
 
 The eastern European ones are the worst culprits.  They really need a wake-up call !
 
 Rant over.......Happy New Year !
 
 
 | 01-05-08  08:06am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 63 |   
 Seventeen Video
             (0)
 | Reply of
                ace of aces's Reply 
 Well if you like young looking teens wearing headbands and tennis socks, you can't really beat it - just search for the high 2000kbps vides - around 20% of the total - each part is around 120MB - and you can't go wrong at any price really !!!
 
 
 | 12-19-07  07:56am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 64 |   
 Seventeen Video
             (0)
 | Reply of
                OneMan's Comment 
 Yes there's no problem with the members area - other than having to download a DVD in 10 pieces and only being allowed 1 connection per time for the high res movies.
 
 Don't know what up with the smaples .... ! ?
 
 
 | 12-19-07  07:54am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 65 |   
 House Of Taboo
             (0)
 | Reply of
                pat362's Review 
 I've noticed that a lot of sites do this.
 
 The scenes are mixed up randomly so it's virtually impossible to track the site and tell how often the "updates" are.
 
 disgraceful, but with review sites like this their days are numbered !!!
 
 
 | 12-11-07  04:01am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 66 |   
 Only Cuties
             (0)
 | Reply of
                cwpuk's Reply 
 Yes, thanks for that.  I just joined and got free access to Hannah.
 
 Gosh she IS flexible !!!!!!
 
 I feel a review of both sites coming on.....pretty good at first sight !
 
 
 | 11-21-07  01:54am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 67 |   
 Only Cuties
             (0)
 | Reply of
                asmith12's Reply 
 Both my friend.
 
 Hannah is Eastern European.  she has started appearing alot, in the more recent Club Seventeen material as well.
 
 Many of the girls in Only Cuties are european - hence they don't say much.
 
 Nearly all the updates in the last few months on ClubSeventeen video feature a large proprtion of them.
 
 They are cheap labour and many production companies are taking advantage of this.
 
 Upside is...they are gorgeous; downside is...they don't talk much...and if you're like me, you end up goping on a guilt trip.
 
 
 | 11-21-07  01:50am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 68 |   
 Only Cuties
             (0)
 | Reply of
                cwpuk's Reply 
 Thanks for that matey.....appreciated
 
 
 | 11-19-07  01:45pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 69 |   
 Gods Girls
             (0)
 | Reply of
                RagingBuddhist's Reply 
 What I meant was a 'proper email address': ie. one linked to an isp as opposed to Hotmail or Yahoo.
 
 It may just reduce spammers if you see what I mean, although I can appreciate some problems with certain isp's as you say.
 
 
 | 08-30-07  02:42pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 70 |   
 Seventeen Video
             (0)
 | Reply of
                diZZy's Review 
 What proportion of the vids would you estimate are in the higher 2000kbps quality ?  The samples seem to be a mixture.
 
 Until recently, Seventeen only allowed streaming of low quality versions, so things are looking up !
 
 
 | 04-27-07  08:33am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 71 |   
 Secret Virgin
             (0)
 | Reply of
                OneMan's Comment 
 Just joined the site for a 3 day trial - the price of 2 beers....as I suspected....no real HiDef at all.
 
 Only around 10% of the Vids are in 2000kbps - not bad, but far poorer than your proper 720p such as Brooke Sky.
 
 The other 90%, although they are advertised as HiDef on the previews, they are not.
 
 They are very mediocre quality - same as the samples.
 Also, Most are in multiple parts - and they are not titled - you gotta do it manually for every part.
 Nice girls though and good photo quality.  Shame about the gross mis-representation !
 
 
 | 02-17-07  12:50pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 72 | N/A | Reply of
                Your News 
 I agree that is a step forward to prevent abuse:  however, another sign that even a "registered" user may well be a person with a financial interest in certain sites and may be attempting to "skew" results, is if an individual is reviewing "too many" sites.
 
 Very few people can afford to join more than say 2 or 3 sites a month.
 
 Also, make sure people can only register with IP email address, ie. don't allow yahoo or hotmail etc.
 
 Regards
 
 
 | 02-08-07  03:28am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 73 | N/A | Reply of
                Rick's Poll 
 Yes indeedy...see my reviews on mayors network......apparently porn studios, or rather the stars, are a little reticent about HiDef....it means complete body makeup   --   yuk !
 
 So, I qualify my "yes" vote - not for stuff that's too hardcore. I wanna porno film in the end, not a gynaecology manual.
 
 The problem I've noticed with the relatively small amount of HiDef available, is the overuse of closeups...the irony is clear of course:  the whole point of HiDef, imo, is that you no longer NEED to use closeups  - so, yes, but thw whole approach to direction and filming needs rethinking !
 
 
 | 02-08-07  03:09am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 74 |   
 Snatches
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Khan's Reply 
 I sent an email to snatches.com, and I have successfully managed to get access using my network pass.
 
 So that's good news ! - if you have any problems - just sling 'em an email !
 
 Bad news is.....well, you'll have to check out the review !
 
 
 | 01-23-07  02:27pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 75 | N/A | Reply of
                Your News 
 Just thought I'd add my 2 cents worth.
 
 I feel the future is HiDef.  I live in a place where we have no freedom of speech - the UK.
 
 The only DVD quality porn we can get hold of, that is not censored, is via the net.
 
 Please help the UK users by pushing HiDef, not so much as a "nich", but a requirement in the 21st Century.
 
 Believe me, playing HiDef vids (720p min,.)- not that there many yet -  via a decent HDMi cable to a large LCD or Plasma is a joy to behold !
 
 The added benefit is that being compressed by wmv HD codecs they are certainly worth the extra space on the old hard drive, or on a regular DVD R disk.  Due to the compression factor, you can still get a full 2 hours of movie on a 4 GB disk !
 
 So I would really like to see the HiDef "niche" on your main site, promoted to full prominence on the site index.
 
 Regards
 
 
 
 | 01-12-07  01:59pm 
 
 |