| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
It seems today's progressive porn surfer really does need quite the arsenal of download managers at their finger tips. I must say I'll have to keep IDM in mind for the next time I run into trouble with dTa, which undoubtedly will happen as the internet seems to loathe consistency and complying to standards. I mean Firefox and Internet Explorer can't even agree on how much of CSS 2 they want to support. They even require different commands for some of the same functions - it is bloody ridiculous.
None-the-less, there is a larger field of download managers than ever. So with the wealth of options out there the top tip is to simply keep trying them until you find one that works for whatever problem-child site your trying to wrangle in this week.
|
03-18-08 09:28pm
|
Reply
427
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
You are indeed right, I hadn't noticed that - it appears to only provide file name filters. Well that is certainly a bit of an oversight on their part. Perhaps a later version will remedy that.
Well I'm glad at least Sapphic Erotica isn't intentionally blocking download resume - perhaps there is some odd incompatibility with the download manager. That was the original reason I switched over to DownThemAll! I was getting movies from German Goo Girls and they used one of those annoying "type the characters from this picture" security doodads which meant I couldn't simply give the program the username and password. Since DownThemAll! was within the browser it used the same session id and so on, solved the whole problem. On the same note, I've had some mangers bollocks up the resume ability on certain sites while other mangers would work fine on the same site. It seems like a crapshoot sometimes as to which will work.
|
03-18-08 08:05pm
|
Reply
428
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I use the Firefox add-on "DownThemAll!" - it is completely integrated with Firefox, so I've found it to be more reliable at catching downloads than other programs like GetSmart or Download Accelerator. It is fully customizable - you can tell it the number of connections, the number of chunks for acceleration, max speeds, file filters and so on. Plus if you end up in the unfortunate situation of a site with thumbnail galleries but no zip files, you can quickly page through the gallery and have DownThemAll! rip the image URLs automatically and pop them in whatever folder you picked. All-in-all it is the best download manager I've used - it is free (though they accept PayPal donations if you are feeling generous) and it is updated pretty regularly.
|
03-18-08 06:33pm
|
Reply
429
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I usually limit my manager to two simultaneous downloads and only 2 or 3 chunks per download max - some sites can't even manage that... But no resuming, yeesh, that would be rough. Oh well, I hope they get you a useful response.
Cheers.
|
03-18-08 05:24pm
|
Reply
430
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Have you point-blank asked the support people about it? Usually there is some little trick to allow resuming that they'll know - because not being able to resume a download would really suck for those of us that want to be able to pause a download to free up some bandwidth for a while. (Like for online gaming, for instance.)
|
03-18-08 02:13pm
|
Reply
431
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
That is wonderful news indeed! Please let us know if (or when) the full-featured search goes live :-)
Thanks!
|
03-17-08 02:51pm
|
Reply
432
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Sorry, I didn't make it clear - once you join one of the Kink.com sites, any of them - you can then get 10% off the next site in their network that you join. So you get the discount only for the second and following sites. Again, I think that is the case, it could have changed.
|
09-11-08 03:25pm
|
Reply
433
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks, mucho helpful - me thinks I'll probably join this site in the near future then.
|
09-11-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
434
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I'm pretty sure Kink provides a 10% break on each site you join after you join one. Not much, but something at least.
One quick question though, do they do full video files, or are the scenes broken up into multiple files? They used to do this on Ultimate Surrender and it would drive me nuts as it screwed with my organizational system, lol.
|
09-11-08 02:59pm
|
Reply
435
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Respectable, but not massive - thanks for the info! :-)
|
11-27-08 10:48pm
|
Reply
436
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Wow! That is a seriously positive review, I'll have to check this site out :-) What size are the high res photos? I'm probably about as interested in the photos as I am the video.
|
11-26-08 09:27am
|
Reply
437
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
The preview pages show 164 uncensored movies.
|
11-26-08 09:27am
|
Reply
438
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
True Alex's Reply
Good to know! The Canon 5D is a very respectable camera and usually doesn't exhibit that massive amount of noise seen in the high res samples nor the auto focus mishaps. I wish I could afford a camera of such a level. If he is Canon fan, that would no doubt explain the noise produced by the older camera.
So please do update those high res samples! I doubt I'm the only photography freak that would be worried by those. Thanks to your response however, I will be moving the site up to high priority for review as I do like Skokoff's style in choice of models, poses and sets as shown on the preview pages.
Also, it is always nice to see that webmasters do take notice to the site. Cheers!
|
11-23-08 05:15am
|
Reply
439
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Indeed JPEG artifacts can be a villainous sort, but do not appear to be the perpetrators in this case. Still, the models are quite fetching and the photographer has a well developed style. I will certainly keep an eye on this site. Thanks for the engaging review.
|
11-23-08 02:45am
|
Reply
440
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
How is the full resolution photo quality? I just went through the photo galleries section of their tour and while I like the models and the poses, I was a bit stunned by the lack of image quality in their high resolution examples. The photos had tons of digital noise and it looked like the auto focus might be a bit off. Despite seemingly nice lighting, sets and props, I'm guessing that they are using a rather low end DSLR camera. My Nikon D50 honestly shows less noise in its photos - and it retailed at around $600. Maybe they are using a low-end Canon. Are these examples relevant to their latest work?
|
11-23-08 01:44am
|
Reply
441
|
Stripper Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I think you just saved me $10. Thank you.
|
02-26-16 09:45pm
|
Reply
442
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
LOL - I may have gotten a bit off topic but I guess I was trying to point out that domination/submission fantasies can be solely sexual and have no interest in panning out into other aspects of life. The mixed-gender military rant may have confused the topic a bit rather than providing an enlightening addition, oops. Cheers!
|
12-16-07 01:49pm
|
Reply
443
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Alright - I'll take the bait. Ass-to-Mouth (ATM) is another fetish along the lines of the various aggressive submissive / domination role-play gonzo sex style that has made certain studios, both state side and abroad. "Unclean Practice" - at home, yes you are probably right. Professionally, not necessarily so - most professional stars that do anal have enemas performed before hand so there aren't any unwelcome surprises when the dick is removed.
Do I like watching ATM's? Actually I would be one of those freaks - yes, lol. Not a big surprise to people who have read my German Goo Girls review, I'm sure. I also am a big fan of Brandon Iron - he combines ridiculously dominate and sexually aggressive behavior with a very polite and almost quiet talking style - it is strange, somewhat disturbing and quite cool in my opinion.
Now when I review sites I try to evaluate the quality of the content, not necessarily how much I like the content (if I had more space I would do both) - but as for my personal tastes, well they are a bit contradicting. I love softcore glamour, I love extreme hardcore (with submissive females) - I'm not into pure Bondage though.
I don't know that I've explained the appeal of ATMs exactly. It lies definitely in the fantasy realm for me. It is something I wouldn't necessarily try, but the very taboo nature of it, combined with its domination/submission characteristics, make it fascinating. Half of me saying "holy hell! She is actually sucking that! I wouldn't!" and the other half saying "Damn. That's hot...".
I wish I could really pin down a specific nature of the act that appeals. It is similar to cum shots, Freaks Of Cock proved to me that just like in Hentai, the cumshot doesn't need to be real for me to like it - it is the idea, very much in the same manner of how I can happily enjoy AIF (Adult Interactive Fiction) as much as a full screen video. Porn is a very personal experience, much of the experience is in the brain, not as much a sensory experience as one might think.
I guess for me I like to fantasize about sexual dominance - I have no interest in dominating women in any other aspect of life at all. It astonishes me that people have physically or verbal abusive relationships - and really annoys me when I see women being put down for their intelligence or other ridiculous things people come up with. Granted there are physical difference between the genders, but this just means different strengths and weaknesses. I think it is silly that we don't have a 100% mixed gender military - as women have distinct physical advantages for certain military activities. So going back to the topic at hand - one can be interested in sexual domination and not be obsessed with domination across the board. It is simply role-playing, nothing more. (Again, in my opinion.)
Cheers!
|
12-15-07 10:22pm
|
Reply
444
|
TDF Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Thanks for the warning - sounds like a site I'll skip over. That whole advertising a lower price than what they charge is really sketchy.
The best site for British porn (well non-boy/girl hardcore porn) that I've found is still Simon Scans. I haven't reviewed it because I've been gone for too long (March, 2007). Cheers!
|
12-16-07 01:50pm
|
Reply
445
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I didn't know about the British variant - that I'll bookmark that. Indeed, after looking up the WHOIS on both the sites, Phil Knight owns both sites - so they are sibling sites.
IAFD is quite the grand daddy of pornstar indexes, but they simply miss some of the small names in the more obscure markets. Certainly can't beat them for user friendliness though. I even have a search widget in Firefox that lets me quickly look up video or star using their engine.
|
04-05-08 06:54pm
|
Reply
446
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Indeed they certainly do, two other good model tracking sites are:
www.egafd.com (European Girls Adult Film Database)
Great for a really, really hard to find girls and deals with pseudonyms.
www.sportyone.com (SportyONE)
Much more user friendly than EGAFD, but not as many models listed.
Between the three index sites - you should certainly be able to find your model.
It's like Where's Waldo, but for porn!
|
04-05-08 11:39am
|
Reply
447
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the info! That's pretty good res for those newer videos, and WMV is fast becoming the standard for all porn sites, so no bad there. Yeah, the price is a bit high, but I gotta say I haven't seen any of these girls anywhere else, so it looks likes it worth it. I'll have to join up in a bit. Cheers!
|
04-04-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
448
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Roughly how many videos are we getting with this site? If you can break it down by each site in the network, that would be awesome.
And are the newer videos still 640x480 or are they higher res now?
Also - do they do any matching photo sets or is it all video?
Thanks!
|
04-03-08 09:43pm
|
Reply
449
|
Teens From Tokyo
(0)
|
Reply of
deadelvis's Reply
Well, it has been almost a year since I was a member, so if the models have gotten more bottom of the barrel, that is unfortunate indeed. I'm surprised about the comments on the video quality, as I recall that being pretty good - near DVD quality but of course not HD. Some sites improve with time, others diminish.
Anyway - please post a full review, I'm sure other users would love an update on how much content is available and a different person's opinion of the site.
|
10-16-08 10:18am
|
Reply
450
|
Teens From Tokyo
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
"lab rat" - yes, that is a much more concise description than I came up with and really signifies just how alien the style seems to me.
You are also right about their softcore work - it is pretty universally top notch stuff - often a little too softcore for my tastes, but undoubtedly artistic and impressive. Unfortunately the photography on Teens From Tokyo is quite limited.
|
12-26-07 09:01pm
|
