Firstly, I saw in the preview they have some female models pissing on other female models, is that major niche of the site or there just a few sets that fit that category?
Secondly, a lot of the models in the preview look, well for lack of better word, homely - is that a misrepresentation or unfortunately spot-on-the-money?
Lastly, can you download the videos in one single file instead of the various chunks you mentioned and what dimensions are these videos? 640x480?
Indeed the brutality of some of the scenes is quite too much for a large percentage of the porn audience; and that is the reason you really need to look through Kink's stuff, check out the free site and make damn sure you know what content you'll be getting access to. Otherwise it's just a bloody waste of money and might upset your day as well.
Of course for me, I'm part of the audience they are pandering to - so its all good, lol.
The animation is really rather poor and I would strongly dissuade anyone from joining if they don't really fancy photos. You do get sound, but it doesn't really sync up with action and the videos only last a minute or two at best.
As for the content - yes, Lolicon would be one of the fetishes I'd say they explore. They would adamantly deny this as they declare at the bottom of their tour pages in big bold letters: "We create all our digital models to be 18 years of age or older." I suppose they could claim a few of their digital models have hormone disorders and thus look like they are twelve. They also do a bit of prego models, futanari (girl-boys, or transsexuals if you like), bondage, a wee bit of twin on twin incest - all sorts of things in the name of good ol' fashion fun.
Long story short: All pictures. One of the best among its peers. A little on edge with some of the fetishes. Still not worth the money.
The Uncanny Valley is an interesting thought-experiment on facsimiles of humans and how humans respond to them. Some roboticists complain about it because it was conjecture, and while it may not be hugely accurate I find it to be a pretty good explanation as to why androids can be so disturbing. Wikipedia has a nice article about it here:
As for other similar sites, Crazy XXX 3D World is interesting - good 3D work and explores about every fetish known to man, especially if you check out their uncensored work. I dunno, all 3D porn suffers from the same - not quite right problem - I think Hentai is usually a better option - and there are plenty of good sites for that. Titanime is a good choice for that.
Haha - indeed I'd probably have to bring along my opera glasses to see the dancers as closely as the websites can provide.
On the other topic though - it is indeed saddening to actually converse with some of these impoverished girls, it was the main reasons I stopped dealing with pay-per-minute live cam sites. It was all very depressing. The girls really didn't have a lot of choices for income and they were rather uncomfortable with the whole deal.
On the other hand, I did like the cam service Met Art provided - there the girls did whatever they wanted and would simply chat with whomever they found the most interesting. Much happier environment - I'm guessing the girls got paid better as well.
There's nothing really wrong with fisting, as long as your careful not to damage anything. There is always the hand-cramping issue, but you just gotta wait it out if that happens.
I really do like Kink and their policies - while granted it is pretty difficult in publishable porn to go beyond my comfort zone, I do really appreciate Kink's policy of pre and post interviews to show that everything is done in good spirit. I have to say that Sex And Submission is one of those sites I'm really looking forward to joining in the future - I just have some other high priorities picks ready first.
I do have to say though, in regards to my experience with Ultimate Surrender and my limited experience with Fucking Machines - their production style and capability has come so mind-bendingly far that you don't want to really look at the old content. It is sort of like looking at younger pictures of yourself when you thought you looked awesome with that Dukes of Hazzard t-shirt stretched across your stomach - you just cringe and desperately find something better to look at.
I don't know if it is actually the case, but Porn Users lists all these sites as Non-Nude porn. I've just never quite grasped the point of NN Porn - that is like trying to buy one of those cheesy softcore pornos from Blockbuster, save your cash. I was a member of CL Erotic a long while ago - but even half of that site was NN Porn, if I wanted to see attractive girls doing splits and what not, clothed, I can just go buy a ticket to a ballet and watch it live.
I know what you mean about the odd props and uncomfortable expressions on the girls, CL Erotic had the same problems. I feel like these are ballet drop-outs that decided it was a better gig than unemployment. Some of the girls were exquisitely beautiful, but the cringe factor could be pretty high.
There is a definite problem with typos on the site - only one Sofia - and as far as I know, there is only one Tatiana video currently on the site, I hunted through.
As you said - that is a high score, but the content, what there is of it - is great! Being that this is 640x480 video, it is really quite crisp - what would put it over that 90 barrier? More content, some indexes that are organized in an understandable fashion, HD video, even larger photos and more content. That is the number one killer, I'd love to give this site a 95 - I honestly like the network that much, but there just isn't much content at all. The subtitles are great, the fact that they took the time to do that is really inspired. The camera work is great and the models are all quite cute.
As I said before, you really won't be seeing any beauties like you get in eastern europe, but these girls have their own style and flare that gives the network that x-factor that really pushes it up about 10 points for me. If basically the same content was being done with a bunch of fake-breasted bottle blonde Americans, and if the cum shots were more like the spittle that passes in most main stream porn, yeah - this would probably be scrapping 75 - but it's not, and that is all that matters :-)
While there is a ton of strap-on sex - seriously, seriously rough strap-on sex - anal sex is a less common. Only a few of the models do it - largely I think because since strap-ons haven't any nerve-endings the model controlling it doesn't exactly know how rough she is being. That said, it isn't too uncommon. Anytime Amber Rayne loses you can expect to see copious anal sex - as she is a big fan of it. In fact, tag-team matches with her often see her getting DPed. It kind of pains me to know that she keeps becoming a better wrestler, as we see less and less of her on the receiving end.
None-the-less, this is still some of the most aggressive strap-on action I've seen - complete with gagging and all. And the wrestling matches themselves are quite engaging. Some point in the future I'll be rejoining to check out their new super-sized wrestling mat and how that changes the competition.
Good review - I couldn't agree more. The question is.. are any of us going to ever pony up the cash for Tussinee Gold? That's a whole lotta dough for one month...
I didn't know about the British variant - that I'll bookmark that. Indeed, after looking up the WHOIS on both the sites, Phil Knight owns both sites - so they are sibling sites.
IAFD is quite the grand daddy of pornstar indexes, but they simply miss some of the small names in the more obscure markets. Certainly can't beat them for user friendliness though. I even have a search widget in Firefox that lets me quickly look up video or star using their engine.
Not really much of an issue - I've actually willingly deleted my porn collection because I needed a hard drive in the past. My current collection is probably iteration number 10 or something near there. One way or another my porn collection rarely lasts more than 2 years. A couple of months ago a drive failure toasted about 250GB, I've already got 200GB of porn to replace it.
I don't think I'd ever keep multi-terabytes of porn - I'd never remember to look at it. Honestly, if I had boat loads of money, I'd just subscribe all the time to all of the sites I even remotely like and then invest is a beefy ISP so I can download whatever catches my fancy at that moment. Plus I often get a bit bored by older content. My collection exists simply because I'm not rich enough to not have one.
Thanks for the info! That's pretty good res for those newer videos, and WMV is fast becoming the standard for all porn sites, so no bad there. Yeah, the price is a bit high, but I gotta say I haven't seen any of these girls anywhere else, so it looks likes it worth it. I'll have to join up in a bit. Cheers!
Well I've had a few sites in the section, and now I just popped a few users in to see what happens... I really don't quite see the value of the section that much. All it does is list sites I like, which I know I like because well, I like them. It also lists users whose reviews I like - but it doesn't list their reviews.
Certainly I could click on each one and see if they've posted anything new, but I think it would be much more useful if it listed say the latest 10 reviews from the combined group. Not 10 from each, more like if you made a list of all the reviews by those users, sorted them by date, and then showed the first 10. Then it would give me the option of going back farther and farther in the list. That would be quite useful. As it is now, meh - I doubt I'll use it much.
This is definitely one of those situation specific things - if they, the content producers, are aiming for the cute school girl look with the pig tails and the works, nothing seals the deal better than a cute spinner in braces. Much like other body modifications like tattoos or piercings, it can make already hot girls that much hotter. Generally I would prefer girls not to have braces, but since it is rather, it is often a treat when you seen a beautiful model with them.
And yes, as Drooler pointed out, I too will assuming that the poll is referring to dental braces. Forest Gump is just not hot.
While on a purely academic level I'm certain this is an interesting query: However I fail to understand what this has to do with porn. Be it viewing it, acquiring it, storing it or what have you. Perhaps if you are making it...
I suppose it might apply to Tantric Sex - but usually that doesn't make for interesting porn - it is really designed more for the participants.
I just joined a few days ago - but I haven't really noticed that yet. I'm exploring the content still but there seems to be plenty of Bukkake for new users. I gotta say though, I tend to like a little variety or I'll get bored, so if they are mixing it up a little while still holding on to the bukkake trend a bit, I'll be happy. I could understand it upsetting purists though.
If you can list a con, it can't be a 100 - come on now. A little realism in the score would be nice.
How about telling us the number of models, videos and photo sets. Are the videos DRM protected? What are the dimensions of the vids and photos? Is the site easy to navigate, are all the models hot, or just some? Is it solo content, or g/g or b/g?
I understand that not everyone spends hours on their reviews, but a little effort would be appreciated.
While I honestly didn't expect anyone to basically say what you did, you bring up an important strength of Porn Users as a resource on a whole. There are so many reviewers, with so many tastes and interests, that there are reviews, even if they are real quick ones, for lots of very tiny niche sites. Sites that aren't worth the time of the big review sites yet, but here someone pops in and gives you a glimpse at what you are getting - and that can really save you from wasting 30 bucks.
Basically, the point is, that while some reviewers take quite awhile preparing the review (my average review writing time is 1.5 hours, not counting the "research" time spent prior on the site) and others just write up a quick opinion style overview - any review is better than no reviews, even if it is as simple as: "Rubbish, only 10 videos."
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
