| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Hentai Key
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Oh. As they say in some scientific circles, that sucks.
|
08-14-08 12:59pm
|
Reply
252
|
Hentai Key
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Have you tried Firefox 3.0.1? I've used Hentai Key in the past just fine with Firefox.
|
08-14-08 11:48am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Yes.
Please note that my current position as the Top Poster in the Porn Users Forum has in no way altered my vote.
|
08-07-08 12:35am
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't speak for all - so I voted maybe, maybe not. I could certainly understand if a male viewer was exploring interest in homosexuality that a gang-bang video might be a good transitional media.
For me, who does like gang-bang content, it is about the fantasy of a the female model having a unquenchable lust and needing that much sexual attention. I do not deny that the male performers matter, they are on the screen quite a bit, and if they aren't somewhat attractive at least, it can kill a scene for me, even if the female performer is very beautiful. Granted, my standards aren't nearly as high for the males as it is for the females, but I still factor it in. Still, the attraction of the gang-bang content for me is about the female model doing extreme sexual acts, not about what is performing the act on her - this is the same as to why I like Hentai tentacle sex scenes but don't have a collection of photos of monsters with penis shaped tentacles. The fantasy revolves around the girl and the action, not the other players in the act.
|
08-05-08 10:30am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I took the poll as Khan was saying there - not sex tapes but more along the lines of photos. I've got a small collection of celeb content focused a few stars I rather like. Pretty much all of it has been collected by sifting through Google Images, as I've found pay Celebrity Nudes sites to have access to less content than Google.
As for whom is in my collection? Milla Jovovich, Bai Ling, Audrey Hepburn, Kelis, Omahyra, the Hilton sisters, Qi Shu, Lucy Liu, Sandra Bernhard, Halle Berry, Delfine Bafort, Monica Bellucci, Ziyi Zhang, Cyd Charisse, Kay Kendall, Ryoko Hirosue... that's all that is coming to mind. Most of the content is Non Nude, but that is the thing with celebs in the American market at least - doing much nudity is often considered a no-no and gets you type cast.
|
08-04-08 02:24pm
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Yes, but usually only a month off at max.
|
07-30-08 10:01am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Despite rarely using IE (who really bothers with the MS on the front?) I do have image resizing & dithering off, in case I ever do look at large image using IE.
In Firefox (my preferred browser) - I also have the image resizing jazz turned off.
|
07-28-08 09:47am
|
Reply
258
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I agree wholeheartedly that if you join this site for the nudity, you'll get bored and bored fast. It is the same models standing around naked day after day. However, I do like the site for its news content and the personalities of the models presenting it. I personally don't have access to normal TV news - though when I do I find that is uniquely terrible - and NPR just depresses me. The programming on Naked News is too short - I'd prefer 1 hour shows - but I find they are rather balanced and cover a lot of European news that you just don't get to hear about in normal American TV news (and yes, they are Canadian, but they obviously cater to the American market heavily). It is a niche genre, but they do it quite well so I don't mind supporting them.
|
07-27-08 01:24pm
|
Reply
259
|
MILF Lessons
(0)
|
Reply of
ErosGuy's Comment
It is just a standard Windows Media trailer. It works fine. I recommend checking to make sure if you've got the latest version of Windows Media player (Version 11).
|
07-27-08 01:19pm
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Generally, if I see a scene is described as including a DP I expect vaginal and anal simultaneous penetration. However, I would accept and dual penetration involving the orifices that reside between the model's legs. I do get annoyed when a scene involving oral and vaginal or anal sex is described as double penetration - that simply does not qualify in my opinion.
|
07-24-08 09:49am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have no fear of people knowing my interest in porn though I'd probably be rather annoyed if the shop person brought it up as they did with Monahan's experience. The truth of the matter is that I'm quite skilled with computer repair - so I've only taken the computer to the shop once and it turned out to be a memory timing problem on some very finicky Corsair memory. The computer had been reformatted so many times by the time they got their hands on it that I think even if I used to have the Kennedy assassination files on it they wouldn't be able to find them. (And no, I don't do the quick formats.) Still - while it isn't the case, I feel like repair people should treat their customer's property respectfully and avoid discussing anything that doesn't pertain to the immediate problem.
|
07-21-08 11:36am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
moshic's Poll
I've always been a proponent of the highest quality video possible and these days that is 1080p. In reality that is 1920 x 1080 (not 1980). Granted sometimes I don't bother downloading the highest resolution possible - it depends a good deal on the quality content. Bad camerawork or lighting can't be fixed by really high resolution video.
That all said, the real question for me is: Why in Sam Hell would anyone download a 5 minute movie clip? The only site I know of that I would even remotely consider that acceptable would be In The Crack due to the very specialty nature of their content - but that is short even for them. While I still maintain that streaming video is the future of internet video (VideoBox, Hulu and Netflix are great examples that future is nearly here) I also believe that forcing your customers to piece together a scene is just plain silly these days - if you don't have broadband in this day and age you either don't want it or live with a compliment of wild creatures as companions.
|
07-16-08 02:50pm
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Well back when I was younger, even then the model rockets and progressed far from the old light 'n run tactic with the addition of electric starters and a long-ass cord so you could be safe in your bunker... if you had one. Not to say that kept the launch pads from falling over and shooting the rocket at cars, houses and people. Still - as a hobby, there are quite a few die-hards that launch things high enough that they are bound by Federal Law to notify local airports (even if the airports can't tell them not to launch). These days I'm a bit more interested in that type - especially as you can outfit them with video cameras and such.
|
06-15-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I love porn, but it is hardly my #1 hobby. Enjoying movies, music, food and driving are the biggies. Porn ranks in right after those, probably. After that, reading, walking, occasionally biking. Then I have about a thousand of little projects that I mess about with here and there. My biggest problem is that I never have enough time to follow all of my interests. I'd love to take up rocketry again... I still haven't built a remote control lawnmower. I want to learn how to rappel down mountains and such. I have plans for a car computer, but funding is shy on that. Probably money will go into a new movie projection system first. Time and money - always the biggest hurdles for my projects...
|
06-12-08 09:43am
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've never really gotten into the spirit of the various sites or forums that offer direct interaction with the models. Nor have I gone out of my way to discuss anything with a model. I have, on the other hand, chatted with a number of content providers - photographers, videographers and web masters.
I don't really count chatting with a live webcam model as direct contact as it is a public forum and she is focused on selling something you usually. With the exception of a few of the membership web cams, but that was just normal wasting time chatting. The only reason I can think of for directly wanting to contact a model would be to hire her, and right now I have neither the capital nor the equipment to be photographing proper good porn.
|
06-10-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Haha - only if McCain were 3 or 4 thousand years old. Actually, their estimate of the Earth's age (which would also be the Universe's age) might be a bit longer than that - I can't remember.
|
06-05-08 06:51pm
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Oh! I'm an idiot - sorry, lol. In that case - yes! All the freaking time! The web is so incomprehensibly massive, that I often run across articles mentioning some obscure website - especially little project pages or articles on various studies and so on. Science magazines are great for finding nifty little sites for more content on one topic or another. Hmm... that reminds me, I have to renew some subscriptions...
|
06-04-08 02:29pm
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Off-line as in, in the real world? Not really - as I don't have subscriptions to any industry magazines and any site big enough for main stream media to pick up on I've already run across via online resources. As for friends, I am their adviser for porn - so I rarely, if ever, learn about new sites from them. So there really should be a sixth option: "Not Applicable."
|
06-04-08 09:59am
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Sure, just as women get to - aside from a little chiding by their friends and family.
|
06-02-08 12:16am
|
Reply
270
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
It is true - it has a relatively high proportion of cons for the score and if it were a solitary site I'd put it in the high 70's. The site is small; there are a few significant adjustments in the way the scenes are directed that I'd like to see and the content could be provided in a higher definition. However, this site is part of a very large, very easy to use, and feature friendly network.
The functionality of the network is really quite top notch and while I think the webmaster(s) can sometimes be a bit slack on their thoroughness of categorizing the content, the web designer(s) have done a helluva job. I think it is silly to ignore that a site is a member of network if it cannot be joined by its lonesome. The Brazzers Network is of quite high quality, has an enormous amount of content (1660 scenes to date) and while it has its faults you will, excluding if you are totally opposed to the porn star look and behavior, generally find plenty of content that you like.
As for Teens Like it Big specifically - I was impressed with most of the models they have hired for the site, with only one or two of them did I avoid downloading their scene. Do they overact? Yes. Is it distracting? Yes. Is that going to stop me from watching and enjoying it? No. I personally have never and nor do I believe I will ever run across a site that is perfect. Being part of an excellent network helps a lot - and it helps lower ranked sites better than higher ranked sites. Right now Teens Like it Big is being supported a bit by the strength of its network (just like Real Wife Stories), but with some tweaking and growth I think it will become one of the foundations of the network.
Speaking of Real Wife Stories, that site has less cons than this one (except being smaller), but I gave this site a slightly higher rating frankly because the models are more attractive in my book. Real Wife Stories sticks with standard silicone injected starlets for the most part while Teens gives you natural with the exception of one girl (so far). That fact alone boosted the score 5 points for me.
Also - you pointed out the youth of the site as a negative. I really think reviews need to have a certain amount of foresight. I try to review the site both as it is and will be - hopefully punishing new sites less. Brazzers obviously knows the issue of starting a new site with little to no content: in the first two days of its life they added 10 scenes. Not a bad start and they have been extremely regular with their updates at once a week or faster. If a site appears to not be updating, they will indeed be punished severely if they are small - but otherwise, I'm more lenient. Anyway - choosing a just numeric score is often the hardest thing for me as it is so debatable. I hope this novelette clarified my thinking to a degree, if not making it totally transparent.
Cheers!
|
05-29-08 05:05pm
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I will do so if requested by the webmaster personally or if I have some specific point I want to tell them. Otherwise I let my reviews do the talking (assuming I remember to write one).
|
05-29-08 12:54am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I generally get about 80 to a 100 spam emails a day, however I've never actually kept track of what sites were causing it. It isn't all that inconvenient. Sure it would be nice to not have spam, but current spam blockers are pretty good.
|
05-27-08 10:19am
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Very important in two ways - in solo instances the model looks more attractive when looking directly at the camera (this is standard human response that studies have oft confirmed, though sample sizes sometimes leave a bit to be desired), and in scenes with two (or more) models performing together, I prefer to see the models making eye contact with each other. If it is a hardcore scene, they should not be looking at the camera - it is no fun when they break the "fourth wall".
|
05-23-08 01:22am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I generally try not to - as a good preview page usually is the equivalent of a limited trial. However, I understand a webmaster's hesitation for doing a full trial. If I were running a site, I would focus my efforts on a good preview page and not offer any trial.
I have on occasion accidentally joined a limited trial - that was always upsetting.
Btw, there is a typo in the quiz: "depeding"
|
05-21-08 03:07am
|
Reply
275
|
Mature Toilet Sluts
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
That would indeed be wise :-) Though you might be surprised the terms and conditions you have inadvertently agreed to in the past. Sometimes it requires as little acknowledgment as taking the document into your possession. Trains were covering all kinds of crazy conditions by just printing them very small on the train ticket and stating that by taking the ticket you agreed to the conditions. I think in the end they got in trouble for that, but it worked for a while, lol
|
05-16-08 03:48pm
|
