I understand what you are saying, but your review lists a con as, "Lousy video quality". It isn't specific to the "other sites" as a matter of fact, in your bottom line you are specific to say, "I concentrated on those two sites". All sites that have been around for a long period of time have some bad quality clips. You mention ATK, where most of their videos are in parts and can't even be downloaded in full clips and are not any better in resolution on the videos. ATK also does not have full zip downloads and doesn't have half the resolution of the picture sets found on babelicious or sexy babes.
And most of all, I cannot understand why when you join a site that you would take off for "bonus" sites. That isn't the least bit logical. There is the old saying that you don't have to go to those sites. I would even question most of the logic in the review. Like saying it is hard to get the content on your hard drive, only to then say the zips are good and something other sites don't offer. I'm not trying to be negative towards you, quite the opposite in fact. I am saying though, that your review borders on looking like a review posted by someone trying to lower the overall score of this site. Especially since you mentioned that you read the other positive reviews. I've said it on here before, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but there still is a point where we have to consider that society today is known to have some members that dislike the "popular" whether it is sites, people, etc.. And that is what this review sounds like.
Just wanted to add here that while some of the content is available on other sites, it isn't available in the quality that it is on Babelicious and to a lesser extent Sexy Babes. If Babelicious has a set that I already have, I replace the set I have with the Babelicious set since it is usually close to double the resolution. Also not for sure what the reviewer considers "lousy" video quality. Looking at my hard drive and the Babelicious network videos, I see what looks to be a standard of 640 high end on those with what looks to be a minimum of 2000 bitrate.
If you consider that lousy, you haven't been to many sites, it is well above the average.
I couldn't agree more. I always considered myself a video guy, but that was before finding Eve's solo site, while her videos are some of the best solo on the internet, her picture sets back in 2006 were and still are some of the best I've seen. May have more to do with her than anything else, but even now, I find myself joining sites because I like the color/lighting they use in their picture sets. Xisty comes to mind in their exclusive sets. Speaking of, they have 3 new Eve sets, so maybe she hasn't retired or gone away and was only taking a vacation. Babelicious also has a new set coming just in time for my birthday!
I've developed a new system. I go to freeones or one of the TGP sites and try to find samples of my favorite models from the site that I am considering joining. I won't post the the link, but Tiava's TGP is really good for doing a search by model's name and you can even search the site's name to find the samples the site has on there. I've found these samples, usually dozens of them per site, to be better than the samples the sites have in their preview.
As far as the content goes, I usually look at the picture samples to see the "style" of colors they use. Getting picky, I know, but I really prefer the warm color sets.
Hey Drooler, I haven't seen any on there that are 1280. I still can't tell the exact dimensions of the newest ones that I have, which would be from summer, but looks to be in the 650 range and are mp4 files instead of .avi
Makes me wonder about the pictures, that poll has been there since July. The sad thing is, because more members are into the videos, they will focus more on the videos than the pictures. Though, I am usually 50/50 on pictures/videos. I have always loved the color and lighting in the 21st Sextury pictures. I will probably join again next month since I've all but ran out of sites to join.
I like bangbros better, they seem to focus more on butts than boobs. Though it is repetitive as well. I do like their site Ball Honeys that comes with the network though.
Hey Drooler, yeah, I usually do try to get the sites that use ccbill or paycom or even VXS, but to get the special deal at Brazzers for $10 a month, I take it you can only sign up directly through them. There wasn't any mention of a payment processor on the welcome email. It is similar to how Karups PC is with a link to go to.
What I thought was funniest though, I'm sitting there answering their poor attempts at making me want to stay, "Make the worst decision in your life" I wanted to believe it was humor, but I really felt like they were trying to play some kind of emotional/mental game like the one that said "I would rather download poor quality content for more money". Kind of like those pop-up ads that say, "Click ok if you want to close, and receive a lifetime membership to gay sites". I mean, what if the person reading that ad is gay? They are clicking ok over and over! Figures, now that the dollar's value is going back up, gas prices are dropping, porn is dropping off too.
I also had a problem with the "moods" of the models on Met Art, I think I referred to as, "What is that on that far away mountain away from the cameraman?" They look like they are trying to pose naturally, like they are distant and caught in a moment of thought. My attempt to show that the pictures are too dramatic for their own good isn't working ha ha.
I do like the models, but one thing that really hurts is that a lot of the models have been seen on other sites, in much more playful, fun sets where they give off a whole other vibe. That's it! The models look too serious on Met-Art. On the basis of the site's quality though, there is very little, if anything to ever complain about as you pointed out. It just feels like the personality from the models is lacking. Great review.
If you like oral, facials and beautiful women, nearly all of them are top level in looks, you will love this site. I'm surprised it hasn't had more coverage here!
I had this happen to me on Eve Angel's site last year. The payment processor said that there is only a certain amount of months they can recur your account, without opening a new account. I don't know if this is some kind of new rule or maybe it could even depend on who you have your card with, they could be stopping it after so many months since there are so many scams these days that charge a person's card every month without them even noticing. The limit on mine was 12 months, after that, I had to go back and re-register. So, I wouldn't count on it being VB's fault. I know there has been a scam going where a place calls and says you have won X amount of free gas, to confirm your birthday, by pressing it in and somehow, they then have you "confirmed" into a coupon club that costs $15 a month. Then again, you aren't likely to get an answer from VB, I've sent them a dozen or so support mails over the years and never received a reply.
Which site did you join through? I have been a member two times, joining through tasty pass, not any of the individual sites, and I have larger resolution videos. The tasty pass sign up page doesn't even give a trial option. I'm wondering if they are using lower quality videos for the trial? I have around 42 videos from the Tasty Tara site and all are at least 740 high end, some are even approaching 900 high end. The videos I have from Tasty Julie are a minimum 640 high end. I'm mainly asking if it is possible that they aren't letting trial members have the full size videos. My main interest in the site is Tasty Tara, and I found the quality of content on her site to be well above average.
Hey Cybertoad, now that is a great review! I haven't seen this site, I do know of Catalina, but didn't know she had her own site until you mentioned it and I also see that Jessica Jaymes is on that network, and I have always liked her. Not to mention Sienna. I will check this out, I'm always looking for a new site or network to join.
I just noticed this review after you mentioning for me to comment on your reviews. Does the site have zips for pictures? That is a big selling point. How big are the pictures, the resolution? What resolution and bitrate are the videos? When you mention the older videos are not as good, you say the format isn't as good. What format are they? Is it the resolution or bitrate or both that is bad on the old videos?
Most of all though, you say this isn't the best site of this network, which is the Brazzers network, but in your reviews, it is the highest rated by you, which site from the network is better?
My best advice to you is to stop trying to talk down to me. "Thats how this stuff works" and "Comments are not supposed to become a debating issue."
According to the site, "What's the intention of replies? #4 says, "Engage in a related conversation or debate." When you question something I put in a review, it is my right to explain and if need be, debate my point. It is one of the rules of what the comments are for. I've been here since the site started, I know how the site works. Also, I noticed in one of your reviews that you talked about not being able to edit a review that you wished you had scored lower. From my own experiences, you can click "edit review" and change the score. I've done it on several sites that were not as good after the initial thought that a site was great. Try it and see.
I don't know what we are agreeing to disagree about. I glanced at your reviews, you gave Rachel Aziani's solo site a 91, it doesn't have half the content of Eve's site that I reviewed. And it only updates once per week, so it isn't going to get near Eve's amount of content anytime soon. So, I don't know why you would mention content vs. cost.
You think getting a negative review for giving a high score is bad? I took 20 points off a site's score because they had a 10 GB monthly download limit. I put in the review clearly that if the limit wasn't there, I would have gave the site a 90, instead of a 70. The site actually went back and removed their download limit and made it unlimited and I went back and added the 20 points back to the score, the negative review is still there though.
You said, "I tend to be picky and honest" the review is 100% honest, I tell that there is no new Eve content coming out, the amount of content, the quality of that content and so on, nothing dishonest there.
You don't seem to follow my concept of Eve not being involved anymore when you say the model should be involved in updates and should do a name change. There are 200+ videos of EVE, 200+ picture sets of EVE that are still there for download, why would they change the name? Also, about the name change, that isn't something for me to say. I think they should make it clear that they don't have any new Eve content, but why change the name of a site when more than half of the content there is of Eve Angel? That wouldn't make much sense.
Last, I do put the cons I can find, but I don't see why a con would stop a site from getting a 90+ score. If you look at the TBP reviews, the sites with 90+ have cons in the reviews. Also, if you look at solo models in the TBP reviews, you will see that Eve's site is listed as the #3 solo site by the TBP reviewers by score. At one time, it was #1. I do think that you agree that these are individual views, but then again, you are telling me how YOU would do a review or what you think should happen with the site name. If you ever need a site to join, try Eve's out, it is cheap at $15 and download all of her content off there. Like I said earlier, if we put these on DVDs there would be 30 four hour DVDs or 60 two hour DVDs worth of content with Eve in all of the scenes. Surely not having a daily update would be offset by getting what is equal to 25 cent two hour DVDs?
Few things on your comment. First, there is way too much emphasis put on current updates on all sites. Let me give you an example.
Lets say site A opened last month and has daily updates of Eve Angel content. By the time your month was up, you would have access to maybe 10 GB of content. This site has over 80 GB of Eve movies and around 30 GB of her pictures.
Each month, content of her on this site ranged between 3-8 new GB of content, when you look at the total number which is one of the largest sites of a solo model, it still has more content than the next 10 sites combined, that feature Eve. Going by that, the daily update isn't a big deal to me.
If you also notice, I reviewed it as a one month join site. It would take a month to download all of the content on the site, unless you downloaded it for 24 hours a day.
What I'm saying, which is worth more 3-8 new GBs of content per month or around 120 GB?
As for the updates, it still updates, the friends content is new to the site, the Eve content is old content they are recycling. And my main point is still, this is an Eve Angel site, for fans of her, 120 GB of just Eve for $15 is the best deal on the internet. That would be like getting 30 full length DVDs of her for $15.
The only way that the no new updates is a con is if you have all the content already on the site. If you have none of it, there are over 200 movies and 200 picture sets of Eve, you could just download one video and one photo set per day and say those were daily updates. See what I mean?
Last, I didn't take it as sarcastic, and can understand why you would question a score, but keep in mind that all of us are different in our tastes, in our understanding or in the concept of numbers, so the number I give the site shouldn't be the first thing you look at. Instead, look at the facts in the review, 400 video/pic sets of Eve Angel, that to me is near perfect.
I put fantasy genre only since an animated figure can do things humans can't. I've looked at some animated cartoons for humor, like the ones that have known cartoon characters in them, like Scooby Doo. Some are as good as porn, if you get your fantasy mindset ready before watching. Especially the Hentai, which I would have most likely never looked at if not for being on a DVD site that had a Hentai section and one video came up as the highest rated of the day.
At least the stories are more interesting than real people porn!
My wife likes it well enough. She is more into the softer content videos, solo and girl/girl. She sees the b/g scenes as, "Why watch that when we could do that?"
But when it comes to g/g she is usually into it as much as I am.
I don't know about solo content, I don't think there is any, from what I remember from a few months ago. There is lesbian content though, it is scattered throughout the network. I know there is some on the "My First Sex Teacher" which is a MILF site where the MILF teaches a younger woman about lesbian sex, not the whole site, but there is some. Also, there was at least a few on the Naughty Athletics site that is included, mostly girls in showers together and in locker rooms.
If I were to put an estimation, just based on memory, I would say maybe 15% is lesbian content, if lucky, might be closer to 10%. Still don't remember any solo content though.
Hey badandy, I couldn't help but laugh when I read your reply and realized that is Lisa replying, "Got you by the balls" ha ha. Anyway, I think she explained it better in the replies, and I will try it for a month and review it soon.
She will probably read this, and I say this again and again. All most of these models need is a good push into the spotlight. Between her hair, which is a big deal to me, her pretty eyes which is also a big deal to me, her big natural boobs which is a big deal to 90% of our members here, nice butt which is a big deal to me and hardcore content, also a big deal to many. Her site could do great. It is like Real Estate, location, location, location. Except this is, exposure, exposure, exposure and most importantly showing that they are a regular person like us, the members will eventually start showing up.
As we have said before, this is the beauty of Porn Users. It shows that not all of us are porn freaks that watch porn 24/7 and it shows that the stars/webmasters aren't just here trying to take our money for little in return.
I wouldn't say not clarifying what you said is why you are in the porn business, that is more in a lawyer's territory ha ha! If I could at least say that this site PU, is a great place to get ideas about improving your site and getting mostly honest opinions from porn fans. When we see a webmaster replying, it makes us pay more attention to their site, because it at least shows you are listening.
You're right, I haven't read anything about you ripping anyone off and since you explained what you meant by saying that content is stored up and released, you are making it clear that no one is going to get ripped off.
You would be surprised to find out that several of our PU users have degrees in Business and Marketing, so we can be of much help, for free.
On one part that I am mainly replying to in this. The words full access, on the ground level, the average porn consumer sees that as "All of the content" there are several sites that offer trials that have downloads of movies in them, but are very low quality video versions of the member section movies and those are generally listed as limited trials. Khan can correct me if I am wrong on that.
But from what I read here, you were just frustrated by the post about being able to download the whole site with a trial.
After checking your site out, though I am not a big boob lover in general, the video that played while I was checking the join options that shows you from behind, I am more a butt/legs lover, combined with your willingness to take criticism and discuss with us Porn Users, that I will join the site for a month. I'm always looking for something different. I'm usually joining Euro glossy sites, but do like some hardcore blended in sometimes.
I will review your site here after a few weeks of seeing the update schedule, quality, etc... As you can see, there are many of us, that never even use trials. I can only download a few hours a day max, because of my job, so I couldn't get everything in 2 days anyway.
Last, despite the initial negativity that firu's comment brought on, there is no way I would have ever heard of your site, if not for his comment. My hardcore likes are usually just a few models, Eva Angelina, Tera Patrick, Kayla Marie, and I hadn't heard your name before this. So, look at the positive of this comment being posted, you made 5 bucks and got a whole lot of advertising. Even better that you show you will talk to your members or the members here. Thanks for taking the time to explain.
Lisa, first, thanks for both replies. I will answer them separately. My first point and I think you are touching on it your reply to badandy and the second reply to me is that you said in your first reply that your cms doesn't put all of the content in the trial, then in this reply you say that the trial has full access to all of the content available at that time.
I think you did see how that can be confusing. No, don't get defensive and ask if you are going to be questioned when your site updates. We aren't questioning anything except what you originally said in your first reply.
As porn consumers, not for sure if you also watch more porn, but as consumers of porn we have been screwed time and time again by sites that recycle content. Just like you have to pay your bills, we do too, and most of us make less money than you. So, we have to be careful with how we use or porn budgets and are concerned with sites that recycle content.
Maybe you aren't familiar with that practice. So, I will give you an example of a site that you can actually go see recycling content right now, right before our eyes. My favorite model is Eve Angel. Her solo site up until 2008 had been updated daily with new content and it had an archive of daily updates back to May 2005. Now, if you go to the site, the 2005 archives have been picked apart by the webmaster, as Eve quit the site in December 2007. The webmaster has now removed all of the content from 5 months of 2005 and is releasing it daily now, as new content. Even worse, he was clumsy enough to remove the October 2005 archives, but left a set in the September one! So, the archives to anyone viewing even the preview, is missing a month.
Anyone who joined this site say last year, now goes back and joins again, is getting the same exact content they already have and their money is wasted.
By asking you those questions, I hoped that you would clarify it, which you did, because just like you all, as webmasters are worried about losing money, we as buyers are as well. Anyone who read your first reply would question your site's honesty and with thousands of sites available, many would have just moved on to the next site to join.
Last on this reply, the biggest reason that your site got my attention in the comment is because I know a lot of our members here love natural models with big boobs. By turning this into a positive discussion, it will probably make more members here interested in your site. I will reply to the other now.
I just checked your site and have a question or two. Did you just admit that your trial does not show everything available on your site? If so, you should talk with whoever programs your site because on the join page, it says, "FULL access" for 2 days for $4.95.
Also known as false advertising and dishonesty on you or your site's part.
I'm not for sure if you are Lisa or the webmaster for the site, but this reply you have left might be the worst thing you could have done. At least the original comment was bringing some attention to your site. Most of us are honest folks here, and if we like the trial, we will go back and join for a month or two, but by reading your reply, it sounds like you all are running a dishonest site.
Just like you don't like thinking that everyone would join for the trial, download everything in 2 days and not let it recur, we don't like being told that a site promises something that it doesn't deliver.
It says FULL, see your reply that says it isn't full.
Last, what does this mean, "You get rewarded the longer you stay"? Does that mean there is even more content that I wouldn't get if I only stayed a month or is it just saying that by staying, we get the regular updates?
And no, this isn't how a site should be ran. A site is either honest and straight-forward or dishonest and deceptive. Which is your site?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
