I was a member a few months ago, the recycling isn't as frequent since this one is based around the feet/leg niche, but there was a few sets that I had from 1byday on it. DDF Busty and Hands on Hardcore seem to be the two that are the worst for recycling from 1byday. The biggest change I noticed is that Hot Legs and Feet is still a feet/leg fetish site, but there is more masturbation and more b/g sets than there used to be. The last time I talked to anyone at 1byday, they still are saying the "recycled" sets on their sites are not identical. I had mentioned some of the Aria sets from 1byday showing up on DDF Busty, the explanation they gave was, "Same outfit, same setting, different poses". Kind of like buying a alternate take cd. I haven't taken the time to check this out though.
If you still have your membership and want to get a laugh out of a music track, check out the Eve Angel/Black Puma video, it was filmed in two parts. This was either the first or second video set Twistys had of Eve. The music is a direct loop all the way through, but it gets damned catchy after awhile!
Hey GCode, I never tried this site because it is owned by the same guys that run FC Nudes. My review has probably expired of FC Nudes, but you can still check it out. To put it mildly, they over-exaggerate in their tours and once on their site as a member. I barely remember FC Nudes, but I do remember that the advertised something like 70 models including my favorite Eve Angel. I joined it. Got inside, the model list starts listing the models...no Eve Angel! I finally find her and click her picture. It says, "Coming soon". There was around 30 of these different models that were "coming soon", so there was really on 35-40 models available. It was probably the worst I had ever been duped by a site. I still didn't give them a 50, I believe a 59, but I really wouldn't recommend their sites unless someone posts and can confirm that they have improved their business practices.
I looked on Euro Babe Index and there is a Leticia there that looks very similar. I won't link it, try Euro Babe Index then click Babes and the L. The picture and galleries it shows are from the 21st Sextury sites, so she is going to look overly-made up, but that looks like her to me.
I gave the site an 85 just for the beautiful women. I looked at it as if it were a model site and since most of the women haven't been on any other sites, I had to give it an 85. There was a couch? I do think the price should come down, but I'm guessing Thomas has to pay a hefty chunk of money to get those gorgeous women to swallow him! His site and Dream Stash are two of those sites that bring up the whole "why is this legal, but prostitution isn't" question. Oh and that maybe answers the question of why it is always the same guy. The two guys that run Dream Stash and this site have both all but said they don't film just for the viewer's pleasure. They're getting their money worth!
I didn't realize they advertised as exclusive. I thought that was just a error on the TBP page, remember that those original pages could have been posted awhile back. I do think there is some of what badandy is talking about, the content was exclusive at some point. I know that they use Fred the photographer and his work is on many sites. If you will look at Spencer's review he lists it as "semi-exclusive"
The way I would compare the two sites is that everything Babelicious has on Sexy Babes, UK Babes, is non-exclusive. The actual content on Babelicious though is probably 70% exclusive, but it only makes up about 1/3 of their total content. Xisty has a bit more exclusive content, especially the hardcore b/g sets they have.
To answer JD's question, the sites aren't ran by the same person. Babelicious' main guy is Nick. Xisty's is named here as Crazy8, but having talked to him as a member, I can say that his name isn't Nick.
The sites are similar though, and both sites are similar to Teen Dreams, Twistys, and the rest of the multi-model supersites. There is overlap of content on each site.
I still want to say that Xisty has more exclusive than the others, but I haven't been a member since December 2008. Have no idea why, but Xisty has the best looking photos of the sites listed. Their colors really jump out at you. In exclusives, I would say Xisty, Twistys, Teen Dreams, Babelicious, in that order.
I've had technical issues with VB as well. One thing you can try if you are streaming videos is to clear your cookies out. I would recommend CCleaner's software for that. I think they have had other problems with streaming as well. Doesn't seem like they've had that option for that long.
As far as the emails, I've been there with VB as well. I've sent probably 6-7 over the years and never received an answer to any of them. My guess is they have gotten too big for their own good. Not enough staff to give good customer support. I still rate the site high though. My problem comes when downloading videos, I will maybe 1 out of 10 videos that I try to download, get a screen that says something happened to the server and the system is notifying a backup server, "Try again later". Good luck with getting an answer, though you never know, posting here could bring an answer since the VB webmaster (Jeepster) has been active here at times.
The content on both ALS sites has a little of everything except boy/girl. There are no boy/girl sets on either site. The majority of the videos are solo masturbation, these can be fingers, dildos, wand vibrators. There is a little girl/girl, ALS Scan has more girl/girl than ALS Angels. Both sites have "photoshoot" videos. These are generally not very popular unless you like watching a video of a model posing. They do label those clearly in case you don't want to waste your time with those. They also have fisting. The fisting can be self-fisting or assisted fisting. I'm not a big fan of fisting, but the assisted ones are very good. They bring in one of their tiny ALS Scan models to fist the model from ALS Angels. There is an Eve Angel being fisted by Nadia Taylor that is one of the most believable and erotic videos I've seen. Eve smiles while being fisted and says, "You are very good". That's a big deal since Eve rarely speaks, and even rarer to hear her talking in English. She has 3 years of daily videos on Eveangel.com and never said a word in any of them.
Comparing them to the super sites like Xisty, Teen Dreams, In Focus, Twistys. I don't think the sites are that similar. Those sites seem to be more polished/planned out. ALS will give you a little more of a natural real feel. The thing that pushes ALS ahead of most sites is that they treat models with a ton of respect and don't badger them with stupid questions. ALS will say things like, "Hi Eve, glad to have you back. You look gorgeous as usual" and it is like magic. The girls start smiling more and act more natural.
One other part on their videos, they do have some speculum/gyno object videos. I don't mind these.
The big complaint I have is that ALS Angels should be merged with ALS Scan. An example, ALS Angels has 6 video updates in June. ALS Scan has 31. ALS Scan also has four 1byday bonus videos. They could realistically squeeze those ALS Angels videos in the place of the 1byday videos. Don't let this complaint push you away though. As a new 1st time member, ALS Angels has nearly 300 videos in their archive so the lack of new updates isn't that big of a deal to a new member.
Some of the models. They have Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Regina Ice, Sandy Waltrick/Summers, Andie Valentino, just to name a few of my favorites and they have 6-12 sets of each. One other con, many of the older picture sets are separated into parts. This is very "old" style for a website. This means to get say Eve in Blue Bikini, you have to download 4 files, 1st file will be pic #1-#15, second file #16-30 and so on. You just get the feeling they treat Angels like a second rate citizen when compared to ALS Scan. I've tried to convince Alex (the owner/webmaster) to merge but he won't. Last tip, not to cheat on TBP, but you can get a discount for both of their sites at paysitediscountdotcom, $5 off. And they usually will send you emails with discounted rates. Sometimes even $10 off. Hope that helps.
Yeah, I had noticed the set on Mike's Apartment as well. It seems they get as many of the top Euros as any of the Euro sites do these days.
Cindy has definitely developed as a model. I have some content of her from 2005 or 2006 that is just plain boring, she doesn't "come off" as innocent, she really is innocent in those. She acts like she is scared to death.
Club Sandy pictures and the other 21st Sextury sites are still rolling out the 1280 high end pictures. They keep saying there is going to be a raise in the quality, but I haven't seen it yet. I will give them one thing though, they are bringing in some new models that are much better than the new ones the other Euro sites have. Oh and they have a new set of Cameron Cruz/Mona Lisa that just blew me away. She has cut her hair even shorter, but it is layered. Looks stunning on her.
I saw a new Cindy set recently on Club Sandy, had no idea Cindy was getting implants. They look okay if you haven't seen them yet, she looks to be a B cup now, so she didn't overdo it, but she does have two very visible scars and she is blonde in it. That surprised me even more. She kind of has a whole Christina Aguilera look in the set. The boob size difference is similar to when Sandy got her implants.
I was hoping that you wouldn't take my post as anything more than a continuation to the discussion, and I think you picked up on that. I think, I could be wrong, but the way I take it is similar to Chris Rock's "Negro" skit. He would mimic a rich stereotypical rich stuck-up white guy. He would say, "Oh great thanks to Tiger another negro is on the golf course" and "Oh look at that negro with his white girlfriend, she must be a whore". I really didn't take it that way until I read the the little stories with each preview video and saw, "Gated community". I think one of their other sites is also based on a comedy routine, the "I fucked your stupid face" one. I'm thinking that is an old Will Farrell comedy routine where he is acting like a non-English speaking person and says, "Shut your stupid face or I'll fuck your stupid face".
I guess more than anything, it is another reminder to how unoriginal porn has become.
After reading the answers, I'm not for sure if the question is asking if I believe the models are under 19 and 18 or above. One of the best discussions we have had on here was awhile back about how we have to remember that some of the sold as "teen" models have aged since the content was made. A few examples, I still see Eve Angel being sold as a teen model, Twistys even has her age listed as 19. Yet, they have content of her that goes back 5-6 years. I believe Eve is 26 or 27, going by her birthday on her bio.
The other side is the models that just look young. Cindy Hope to me looks all of 18 or maybe 19, she is 23 or 24. Anetta Keys is another like Cindy, she looks 18 or 19 but is 25 or 26.
I don't know if I would call it racism. Racism is a form of hatred. Looking at the preview, it actually looks more like reverse-racism shrouded under an offensive name. The site mentions "watch powerlessly as your wife feasts on black cock" Later it says "The scandalous white wives"
More importantly once you get beyond the main page, you get one video description from one of the husband's that is titled, "Don't tell them about my baby cock" and the white wife is showing the sub-one inch size with her fingers while giving the black guy a blowjob, the husband's response is, "I'm sorry I can't satisfy you and that I'm fat and lazy. I love you. Why did you bring home this scumbag and why are you sucking his dick on my sofa, laughing at me? I'd never hurt you like this, you fucking bitch. I wish I could leave you, but I'm too weak. I guess I'll just endure this humiliation. Fuck."
Each of the other samples has another supposed response from the white husband and here those are, "Look at that smug look on his black face. Why did she bring him here? She had to know you'd come home and catch her with this degenerate. God, look at his giant black balls. Why the fuck is his dick so big? What's the point of that. She won't stop sucking it, and there's nothing I can do about it. Fucking bitch!"
Another, "I did everthing I could. I live in a gated community. I have a top notch security system. How did this hoodlum get in my house? My fucking whore wife let him in. And now she's going to suck his giant smelly cock why I watch in shame. I wonder what we're having for dinner tonight."
Another, "I can't believe she's doing this to me. Where the fuck did she find this guy? I tried to be a good husband, but nothing I do is good enough for her. And now she's humiliating me by letting this black scumbag defile her mouth and rub his black ass juices all over my couch. Marvelous."
So in the big picture you have an offensive site name towards blacks, but inside, the black guys are getting all the women and the white guys are amazed and blown away by how endowed the black men are while they have sex with their wives. If there is hatred, it is towards white men. There also is the assumption that the white man couldn't physically stop the black man, "Watch powerlessly as your wife feasts on black cock".
Blame Drooler, he made me do it! Seriously Alex, wouldn't you rather us joke around AND point out the mistakes, instead of cussing you and your site out over mistakes? I've noticed that many sites have taken the comments left here and put them to good use in improving their site, plus we all get a chance to laugh a little. And if you fire everyone, who will be checking your work?
The main thing I will say is if you find the models unattractive that VB has, you most likely shouldn't be planning on joining many other sites. They have one of the biggest collections of TOP models on the internet. Hard to possibly believe that you are that disappointed in the models' looks.
Also not for sure what you mean by the technical quality. If you download the DVD versions of their movies, the minimum resolution is 640x480 (standard view) or 720x480 (widescreen) with bitrates that vary between 3,500-7,000 kb/s. The industry standard for DVD resolution is 640-720x480 with bitrates between 3,000-10,000.
Either way, you mention that thagnut didn't put up an intelligent debate, you didn't put up anything to debate! Just a few mass generalizations to justify a 70 score with no examples. That is the main reason you're getting this much flak. If you truly believe it is a 70 and gave some really good points, even if just your opinion, I doubt you would have had as many negative replies.
Heh, I never figured out much of anything on the site! I ended up leaving the site after the 3rd day of the 5 day membership and not going back. The content I downloaded is pretty good, some of the girls are really cute, most are Brazilian and the quality is excellent, but there are some really softcore shoots too. Nothing more frustrating than downloading a 1 GB file that is a girl rolling around on a bed for 15 minutes! What I think the big problem is, the site/network is trying to be too many things at once. Some of it looks artsy, some of it is raw hardcore, some of it is trying to be very erotic, and so on. Its like they need to find a happy medium and at least make that the basis the sites are built on. The pictures are a waste, no zips, and that is a shame since they do have nice coloring and feel to some of the picture sets. Reminds me a bit of the 21st Sextury sites quality of photos, they have a warmness to them. Oh and some of the videos, hardcore b/g especially seem to end before they are supposed to. No cumshot of any kind. Add to this that these models are mostly unknowns, making the search feature pointless since we don't know their names.
I will say this for them. After reading through their forum, if nothing else, they are trying very hard. I don't know if they are doing it yet or not, but they had a thread that talked about if guests would join their forum, they would give them 4 full length clips to sample. They really know their video quality is that good and it is. Just seems to be production problems stop the quality from really showing. Also the language barrier. I speak pretty fluent Spanish, my wife's native language is Spanish as well, but some of the girls are speaking Portuguese. I remember that some part of Rio, maybe half of it speaks Portuguese instead of Spanish, so that hurts too. Ending with, the girls are still very cute ha ha.
Glad to have helped on that one. I did give Twistys and Teen Dreams bonus points in their reviews for this feature that makes downloading lots of content much easier than most sites do. Earlier today, I loaded 135 .wmv and .zip files into on Teen Dreams in less than 5 minutes. Laid down and took a nap, got up a few hours later and everything was downloaded perfectly into the folders I had assigned the downloads to, no broken files, Firefox really is a great browser for porn once you get the add-ons and extensions.
Hey Drooler, I stumbled across that Euro Babe Index announcement a few weeks back while checking for any new Eve content. I was really worried at first since the picture showed Eve with Woodman, and I thought he was going to be running her site. That isn't really a bad thing, but his sites are mostly in French.
Then one day while brushing up on my psychology jargon, I somehow typed in Eve Angel on wikipedia and found out about the new DDF site. Gotta love being paid to search for Eve! Anyway, the site is here www.eveangeloffical dot com. Thing is, now I'm worried about it too. I remember what a mess DDF made of that Cherry Jul solo site and who can forget the ill-fated Sandy's Fantasies? I'm hoping his supposed deep love for Eve and what he calls, "A living sculpture of the perfect natural woman" will make him work harder on her site. We all know Eve can handle the daily update schedule, so fingers are crossed on this one. Also wondering if he will slap that DDF standard $35 a month on it right from the start.
Like I told badandy a few weeks ago when I found the new site, my dumbass will be there credit card in hand as soon as it opens, $35 or not. I signed up for the email updates that is on the splash coming soon page, but have only received one email so far and all it says is coming soon, spring 2009. Oh and if you haven't seen the splash page, be sure to go by and check it out, beautiful picture of Eve on her belly, side view of her butt. I would hope DDF runs with her elegant woman look she has in that one and most of her newer sets instead of trying to make her look younger.
Twistys site is very friendly if you work with it a bit. You can change what your left mouse click button does to download on one click. I have mine set to download .zip/.rar and .wmv/.mov/.avi
When you do this on Twistys, you can download movies by clicking the movie you want, then clicking by which part you want or full scene. Only needing two clicks.
The pictures zips are even easier, you don't even have to open the sets up. You can just left click the little zip icon beside of each set and it starts downloading. So those only take 1 click.
Another tip that the webmaster at Teen Dreams gave me awhile back is to use the add-on for Firefox, "DownThemAll"
If you go to a model's page on Twistys, you can list in the extension filter to download only .zip files. One click on the model's page in a blank area of the page, click downthemall in you context menu and it will load up all of the model's zips in that one click.
Twistys and Teen Dreams are two of the few sites that are programmed this way and it really makes downloading very easy. TD takes it a step further by having their movies on the model page already listed as .wmv, so you can also add the extension, .wmv to the filter and it will download all of the zips and movies for that model with one click. Very handy and efficient.
I don't think we have come close to connecting on any of these posts. You say my logic is flawed. Let me show you flawed logic.
McDonalds advertises breakfast on television and on their outdoor menu. If they up and stopped serving it, but was still advertising it, that would be false advertising. NA advertises "regular updates". You said on the worst case scenario week that they could have 8 new updates and 5 remastered updates. That is regular updates.
Moving on, when I said NA isn't a premium site, that is based on price. They are a bargain site. My comparison between regular unleaded gas and premium unleaded gas was, yes, far-reaching, but not flawed. You are expecting a bargain priced site to deliver more than the premium sites do.
You can look at my reviews to see that NA is ranked tied for 15th out of 160ish reviews I've posted. So, I too like their site, but when they lowered the price, I wondered if that would mean less updates.
For example, the original price had been $25 a month, if they gave you 13 new updates a week, which would be 52 in a month, that would be 48 cents per update.
Now they are charging you $15 a month. And using your example numbers of 13 new updates one week, 8 the next, that would be 42 NEW updates a month or 35 cents per new update.
So, there is no rip-off. They are charging less per new update.
On the cd part, you didn't even start to understand that part. I was not comparing having to buy a cd that was remastered. I was showing that it is NOT unusual for remasters to be sold as NEW. The DSotM remaster is identical to the others before it, same songs, no bonus songs, no bonus DVD clips of the band, yet they legally sell it at the same price as brand new never before released cds.
See what I mean? My first problem was what you have now said was a copy and paste error, so you can understand why I questioned that part. My second problem is why you have a problem with a site doing what the majority of members wanted and still giving you new updates, averaging more than 1 per day, for a bargain price. Let me add, 100% exclusive updates that they have to shoot themselves.
And don't look at it as so much a problem as it was me saying what more do you expect from them? You can see the price per new update above with the new price factored in. There is no false advertising and no rip-off.
I guess you don't think I understand because I don't agree with you? I understand completely. See the site 1byday, they are releasing remasters, or as they call them, "reloaded" sets as new updates. You can even look at their tour and see some of those. So, I'm quite aware of the practice and have been on sites that do it.
The first thing I would say is NA's tour nor join page says 13 updates per day. As a matter of fact, it only promises, "Regular updates" no exact number. So, I don't see why you are saying false advertising.
The second thing, a remaster is technically new. I don't really agree with it, but just go look on a site that sells CDs. Pink Floyd's Darkside of the Moon has been re-released and remastered, I believe 5 official times, just on cd. Same songs, same length, same order of songs and each one costs $12. Nothing new except better sound, just like the NA remasters have better video resolution and bitrates.
Third, I don't understand why you consider NA a premium level site. I'll use 1byday again, $35 a month, NA is $15 a month. To make a far-reaching comparison, that is like buying a tank of regular unleaded gas and expecting super unleaded performance.
On a side note for reference, very few sites can guarantee what they are going to do in the future days, weeks, months. Give Me Pink was easily one of the best premium sites on the internet, 1920 BR DVD quality videos, three different types of picture zips to download for each set, then one day a few months ago, they just quit updating and disappeared completely.
Going by NA's tour pages as long as they are updating, that very vague, "Regular updates" can't really be challenged or counted on.
Last, in your review, I had left a comment to another member Monahan and am interested in why your review is reviewed as you being a constant member over the last 3 or more months on NA, but in your cons you question a DL Limit since you hadn't been a member in about 6 months. You're throwing some pretty hard words out there about NA, false advertising, saying their DL limit is annoying, even though they haven't had a DL limit since October 2007.
I understood what you meant. The thing is, it is becoming fairly normal for sites to remaster and re-release old sets as new updates. I know of at least 3 major sites that are doing it. It goes into the problem I've talked about with those sites. Some members, especially with larger monitors and high end computers are complaining about the old videos. So, the sites can either let that old content die off, even though I think we all know that the older content on most sites these days is much better than the newer content or they can re-release the remasters. Similar to buying cds, when I first bought cds, I bought most of the Pink Floyd cds. A few years later, they released new remastered versions of those discs and by now, they seem to be up to 3rd or 4th remastering.
The main point that I was making is that they lowered their price nearly in half with the TBP discount from $24.95 to $14.95, they are still releasing new content, so I don't see how one can complain about the few remasters they release. I could understand if they didn't continue to release new content or if they were just recycling the content. I can understand why someone would get bored with their content though.
It wasn't so much that I disagreed with the score as it was that I noticed a few things that are odd.
Naughty America made a big move in Fall 2007, they merged their tier 1 sites with tier 2 sites and removed the DL limit. My review of the site in October 2007 talks about no download limit, since it had been a big deal up until then and had stopped me from joining. So, at least by October 2007, the DL limit was removed.
Now, look at the top where it says "how long have you been a member" the review says, "More than 3 months". In the review, the reviewer says, "I THINK there is a daily download limit? There was about 6 months ago when I was last a member". So, which is it? Reviewer is a current member for the last 3 months or hasn't been a member in 6 months?
October 2007 would be 18 months ago and there was no DL limit then either. DL limit is right up there with DRM when it comes to making or breaking a site. I just found the inconsistencies to make the review a little questionable.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
