Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Teen Mega World has a habit of starting new sites and quickly abandoning them.
Not always, but often.
Teen Mega World used to be one of my favorite teen porn sites.
But it's been a few years since I was a member.
But the network has plenty of attractive young teens, which is one of their strengths.
|
03-22-23 07:22am
|
Reply
102
|
Dyked
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
I haven't been a member of the Team Skeet sites for over 1 year.
But when I was a member, a little over 1 year ago, Dyked was part of the basic Team Skeet network, and not one of the premium sites.
Membership in a premium site, at that time, and probably still, only allows you access to the premium site, and not to the basic Team Skeet network.
I'm guessing Dyked is still part of the basic Team Skeet network.
And that you were misled when you thought it was a premium site in the Team Skeet offerings.
My apologies if you think I'm being overly picky.
Actually, in the review I wrote on the Dyked site, dated 06-06-18, I wrote the following:
'Note: when you go to the Dyked site, there is a banner stating that Dyked is a Team Skeet premium site. This is misleading. Dyked is included in the basic Team Skeet network.
They used to call the premium sites in the network "Unlock" sites. Now they call the premium sites "Upgrade Now" sites.'
Your review was excellent, by the way. As usual.
|
01-14-20 12:00am
|
Reply
103
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
Agree.
If you've never been a member of the site, it's worth a one-month join for $9.95, and downloading everything that you can find and think worthwhile.
But I'm very lazy. Just the thought of all the time spent looking for photo sets of my favorite models tires me out.
Maybe old age is creeping up on me.
Or---has it already arrived?
LOL.
Best wishes for the holiday season.
|
11-22-21 07:00am
|
Reply
104
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
You are more efficient than me.
Which is one reason I admire your reviews.
Brevity, conciseness, clarity, are parts of why I think your reviews deserve a premium over average reviews, and you're not getting paid what your reviews should earn.
I suggested awarding outstanding reviews with a better prize in the past, but no action was taken on the idea.
Which is one reason I would willing to share part of any prize I win in the future.
Shen also submitted outstanding reviews.
But unfortunately his participation and reviews have been limited for a while.
I believe that outstanding contributions should be rewarded, to encourage active participation from some members.
That's my opinion, for what it's worth.
|
02-10-21 03:02am
|
Reply
105
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I agree my review is very long.
I put in a lot of extra information or thoughts about issues that were not usually covered in a site review.
The issue of copyright, for example.
I think it's misleading for MetArt to say if you buy the Staff Selection you own it.
You don't own it. MetArt owns it, even if you "buy" the selection.
Copyright infringement is not normally covered in a review, but it's more or less understood by the PU community.
Except that if you get caught up in a lawsuit, it can get very expensive.
PU members would probably not be as exposed to shaming as "straight" non-members.
But for the relatively few people who are targeted, it can be a serious issue.
Even if the target people did not consciously share porn illegally.
But I should make more of an effort to slim down my reviews, and make them conform more to the standard PU review.
|
09-25-20 11:09am
|
Reply
106
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
REVIEW CONTINUES:
And a host of other features/specifications to make the member pages format to your choice.
You also get 4,510 galleries, with 806 models. The models are almost all white Eastern Europeans, so there is not much variety in race or body type or age. The normal debut age for the models is 18 to early twenties, but a few models can last into their thirties. And the models normally range from attractive to lovely. Not a lot of tattoos. (Most MetArt sites photoshop erase almost all tattoos of each model from their photosets. That's the way it was since MetArt started, around 2000. But slowly the MetArt sites are starting to allow some models to show some of their tattoos in the photosets. In the videos, it's more difficult to erase tattoos, so a model's tattoos are more evident.
Technically, the Errotica Archives is first-class.
You get a large number of galleries, with attractive models.
The site is easy to navigate.
Streaming and downloading is good.
Note: I can get download speeds of 20MB/s at the site, which is the fastest download speed I've ever gotten at any site.
The films can download definitions from 270p - 1080p. That's because they stopped posting films to the site around June 2018. (I'm excluding the Staff Selection films, which are still being updated occassionally and can have a highest definition of 4K.)
Note: The Staff Selection items are a different breed of item. Not only do you have to pay extra to view and download these items, but these items are not exclusive to any one site in the MetArt network: instead, a Staff Selection item can be access from any site in the MetArt network. The same Staff Selection item can be accessed at MetArt, the Errotica Archives, SexArt, and all the other sites in the network. The content is exclusive to the MetArt network, but it's part of the network, not exclusive to any one site in the network.
What sets Errotica Archives apart from MetArt?
Basically, nothing.
Errotica Archives is like a junior edition of MetArt.
You have fewer photosets, fewer videos, fewer models, fewer contributing photographers, fewer updates.
Based on those factors, Errotica Archives is a junior version of MetArt.
Any photosets or films could be posted at either site, with no problem.
If you have limited funds, I would recommend joining MetArt, which has far more content, for the same membership price.
Having said that, I think that Errotica Archives is still a worthwhile join.
But I also think that MPL Studios, Femjoy, Watch4Beauty, and some other fine glamour photography sites are also worthwhile joins. The internet offers the porn consumer a lot of fine choices.
I'm giving Errotica Archives a score of 89. I think that, for the same price, MetArt gives you the same ease of navigation, the same excellent quality, and far more content.
|
09-24-20 10:15pm
|
Reply
107
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
"Owning" a staff selection does not mean you really own it. The copyright still belongs to the MetArt network (or whatever legal mechanism they are using). They say you "own" the staff selection video if you buy it, but your use is legally limited to viewing it on your personal devices. Legally, you can't send a copy to a friend or business partner, or upload the video to a commercial internet site. So it's really deceptive advertising to write that you "own" a video if you purchase it. You are really buying to right to download it to your own personal devices (computer, cell phone, whatever). Which is the same rights you have to the normal photosets and videos at the site and network. In simple terms, you have the right to view and download the photosets and videos to your peronal devices, but the legal ownership remains with the MetArt network.
Normally, ownership doesn't matter very much.
But in the past, the owners of one porn site made it a business to sue individuals that downloaded copies of photosets and videos from pirate sites.
They would sue thousands of private individuals for over $1 millon each since around 2012.
The sued individuals would have to hire lawyers and face exposure of a porn-related federal suit.
In one 3-year period, the porn company sued over 2,000 individuals.
The issue can get very complicated: but one factor is that the individual being sued might not have downloaded the copyrighted porn content: It's very common for neighbors to hack into a private individuals' WiFi.
Also, with some programs, you might be unknowingly sharing files with other people. Opening yourself to the charge of copyright infringement.
Even though it seems to be a rare event, if it happens to you, it can mess up your life: financially and socially. And a lot of people, even if they were innocent of porn copyright infringement, pay thousands of dollars to avoid the embarrassment of a porn-related lawsuit.
Errotica Archives Overview:
Errotica Archives is a member of the MetArt network.
As such, it follows the same model as most of the network sites:
You get an excellent site in terms of technical features:
-Https for login and member pages.
-Good to excellent site navigation. Easy to navigate. Excellent search engine.
You can set the page display options to your own preference:
Resolution: low, medium, high
Comments: show or hide
Number of thumbnails per page: 20-1000
Number of search results: 30-720
Sort films by latest, top rated, etc.
Set slide show interval: 2 seconds-20 seconds
Measurements: imperial or metric
CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY BELOW:
|
09-24-20 10:13pm
|
Reply
108
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
Alybator's Review
An interesting review.
Some nice details and thoughts.
It's also interesting how some sites can seem to suddenly become popular.
There have been 5 reviews of this site in the last 2 months.
Then, in 2019, there were 3 reviews of the site in a 2-month period.
The site doesn't attract me, because of the pay system for cam shows, which I don't usually bother with anyway.
I don't like the site splitting scenes into parts, instead of making a scene available as a single video. Also don't like the delay between Action 1 and Action 2.
But your review is just interesting and readable.
I don't know why.
It just strikes me as one of the best reviews I've read recently.
|
04-19-20 05:32am
|
Reply
109
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Review
Excellent first review.
Nice details with real thoughts and reactions.
Hope you stick around, and write more reviews, post comments, whatever you feel like doing.
As far as the raffle is concerned, I believe it's currently being held once a month.
The last raffle was the first one in the once-a-month program.
So the frequency can change, the prize money can change.
But consider the raffle prizes as an extra bonus: the main purpose of the reviews is to give your fellow PU members a heads-up on the value of sites, whether they are worth joining or not.
Of course, a person's interest play a large part in the sites they choose to join.
But welcome to the PU site.
|
03-22-20 09:19am
|
Reply
110
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Excellent review.
Lots of nice details.
I found this one observation to be hilarious: "-there are too many US pornstars for my liking, who I find to invariably over-act when being fucked and slobbering when sucking cock, but that's just me being picky."
You really need to write more reviews, to raise the review standards.
LOL.
|
05-25-22 09:41am
|
Reply
111
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Reply
Wow.
I'd jump on the offer.
$62/year for EA is a great offer.
I joined 21 Sextury over 2 years ago, for $62.95/year, and they threw in Adult Time access for free. And I've kept that membership because of the Adult Time access.
But you're getting EA, which is treated as a separate network.
21 Sextury is now part of the Adult Time network.
So you are saving $0.95 per year, as well as getting a separate network.
A better offer than what I'm getting.
Except I have 0 interest in joining EA.
Tastes differ.
That's what makes the world go round.
The only thing sticking in my throat is the $90 one-time fee.
Would it be worth your time to email or live chat their support, and try to get that $90 fee reduced?
https://www.famesupport.com/
Their support is supposed to be 24/7.
The link I gave you includes live chat, email and phone support.
Live chat is best, it's the fastest way to connect and get answers.
It's worth a shot.
If you're a persuasive guy, maybe you can get that one-time fee down, telling them you've a big fan of Evil Angel, but the price for Adult Time seems very high.
Just a suggestion. Some people can talk and work miracles. Others (like me), have to take what's offered.
|
01-14-21 05:57am
|
Reply
112
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Comment
There are many sites that give you free access to the Adult Time network as an add-on.
Normally, an Evil Angel membership does not include Adult Time, as far as I know.
Although Evil Angel and Adult Time are both Gamma Entertainment properties.
But what prices are you getting quoted?
The annual fee to Evil Angel?
The one-time charge for Adult Time?
Also, can you end your membership to Evil Angel, then re-subscribe, and would you still get the Adult Time access for free? Or would you have to pay extra for Adult Time?
Basically, since you like both networks, it comes down to whether you think the discounted annual price to Evil Angel is a good deal.
I personally think Adult Time is one of the best bargains in porn today.
So if you think the Evil Angel price is a bargain, I'd go for it.
Except I'm wondering how much they are charging you (the one-time fee) to access Adult Time?
If the one-time fee is low, it seems like a good offer.
But if the one-time fee is high (and what is high?), maybe the offer isn't that great.
Another side note: I joined 21 Sextury a couple of years ago, and was given Adult Time access as a free add-on. I kept the 21 Sextury membership, and the Adult Time access has continued.
So, on that issue, I don't think Gamma Entertainment is playing games: They're not trying to trick you by giving you Adult Time, and then try to take it away. Or charge you again for it.
I was given Adult Time access, but I don't know if I'm really a member of Adult Time.
Technically, these can be tricky issues: I recently joined the Wow sites on a special offer, and was given access to Ultra Films as a bonus. For one year.
But when I wrote to their support, stating I did not get a confirmation email that I was a member of Ultra Films, I was told that I was not a member of Ultra Films.
I have access to Ultra Films for one year, but I am not a member.
Strange.
Seems like sites can slice and dice access and memberships any way they want to.
|
01-13-21 02:25am
|
Reply
113
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
"Some of the landscapes in the photo sets are almost as beautiful as the models."
I think a lot of us PU members are becoming jaded to beautiful models.
There are new models coming out all the time, and some of them are so beautiful or gorgeous that their beauty doesn't have the impact that it should have.
Which is why your statement that some of the landscapes are almost as beautiful as the models strikes me as funny, but also true.
I'm not a site member, but some landscape photos can be gorgeous.
Or the fantasy art of Luis Royo can be intriguing.
|
09-09-19 11:18pm
|
Reply
114
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
So those channels work as a form of cross-advertising.
I assume that's the main reason they are added.
Like when a site allows condensed versions of its videos on tube sites.
Some people consider it piracy, but I think a lot of it is allowed by the originating sites.
But I'm not a lawyer, or in the Adult business, but that's my guess.
|
12-28-19 04:16am
|
Reply
115
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
Sometimes it helps to take a break from porn.
I understand that a massive site can be both overwhelming and a disappointment, at the same time.
Especially if you don't enjoy the content.
Personally, I think the Adult Time content is high quality.
And the content covers many niches.
So I think of Adult Time as a supermarket of porn
(instead of a small neighborhood grocery, which usually has a limited selection of national brands).
If you don't have the time or energy to search the network (which can be a time-consuming task) to find content which appeals to you, then maybe you can take a break from porn, and when you return, you might find your enjoyment increases.
Or not.
Depending on your mood. Your tastes. What you stumble across.
There are some channels at Adult Time I really enjoy.
The Pure Taboo site has some videos I find very erotic.
And there are the older channels, like Devils Film and Rocco Siffredi, that have some gems, if you can dig through the videos that aren't appealing.
Just my take.
But I can be bored or disappointed with even sites that were my favorites, like MetArt.
Which is why it sometimes helps to take a break from porn.
|
12-10-19 12:38am
|
Reply
116
|
Fake Hostel
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
"Cancellation of membership doesn't cancel the recurring download add-on, I only found this through the failed attempt at taking the funds from my card which had insufficient funds."
Smart move on your part using a pre-paid credit card.
I've never used a pre-paid credit card, figuring they were more bother than they were worth.
But for this membership, it was very handy.
I will stay away from the site because I think the billing practice is borderline scam.
What is the reason for charging for downloads after a membership has been cancelled/expired?
|
09-03-20 09:49am
|
Reply
117
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
I am not a member of lesbo101.
I am a member of Adult Time.
I think FameDigital still exists as a separate network. but it's also a channel in Adult Time.
I was a member of Fame Digital about a year ago.
If you enter the Adult Time member area, and do a search for lesbo101, what is returned is: 'No result found for "lesbo101"'
If you do a search for Fame Digital, you are returned hits for Fame Digital, White Ghetto, Peter North, Transsexual Roadtrip.
However, the search function at Adult Time is kind of clunky, and does not work very well.
So lesbo101 videos might be buried in the Adult Time network.
The old Fame Digital included a number of hardcore sites.
Silvia Saint
Peter North
Rocco Siffredi
Devils Films
Silverstone DVD
and plenty of other hardcore sites.
So those sites might be buried in the Adult Time network, as well.
Just guessing, I figure your chance of accessing the old lesbo101 content is slim, if you join Fame Digital directly, or join Adult Time directly.
You can check tube sites, which often have condensed versions of some videos from other sites. That would be your best chance of finding some content from the lesbo101 site, but you would only get a small number of hits, and the quality of the videos might be sub-standard, from what was offered at the original lesbo101 site.
Bottom line: redirecting from a dead site to a currently active site is a marketing ploy. There's no guarantee you will find the old dead site content at the currently active site.
|
06-14-20 11:23am
|
Reply
118
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I think all 3 reviews (exotics4me, mbaya, and LKLK) gave a good to excellent review of the channel, as well as the importance of the Adult Time network.
So any casual reader of the reviews should have gained a good overview of what the channel offers. Which should be one of the main reasons for a review.
Except that lately, my reviews have taken a slightly different approach. I'm like a travel writer sampling sites instead of giving a more disciplined approach. So I tend to throw a lot of random thoughts into my reviews.
Which could be distracting.
The PU staff does allow freedom of expression, which I do appreciate.
Otherwise, I would have to follow a more formulaic approach, which gets boring after writing so many reviews.
|
12-17-19 10:17am
|
Reply
119
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Plagiarism (joke).
Or maybe great minds think alike.
I posted a review of Pure Taboo on 12-11-19.
I wrote it was my favorite channel in the Adult Time network.
But I also wrote, as a pro:
"-The search engine searches the entire Adult Time network: it does not limit the hits to a particular channel. This is good and bad: good, because it makes the search for a model's content easier: bad, because if you want to search only for the model's content at a particular channel, I don't know how to do that. Overall, I'm glad the search is network-wide, instead of being limited to any one channel.
But if the programmer added a filter to search a single site, that might improve the navigation slightly."
|
12-17-19 06:34am
|
Reply
120
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Doctor's Review
Very good review.
Honest opinions nicely expressed.
Femjoy is a fine site, but I'm already signed up to MetArt and bunch of other photo sites, so I won't be joining very soon.
But that's me.
Other PU members could very well enjoy this site.
|
05-05-20 10:06am
|
Reply
121
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
"Yes I am a 4k snob".
Maybe you can send a private email to Freddie, asking for a new membership badge for 4K members.
LOL.
Better yet, start a new thread, asking for all PU members to vote on the 4K membership badge.
(The PU staff seems to be hit-or-miss on updates to the PU site.) If there is heavy PU membership support for the idea, that would be cool. Even though I don't own any 4K equipment yet. It might incenticize some of us to upgrade our equipment, if we could get a new PU membership badge.
|
01-13-20 07:36am
|
Reply
122
|
Filth Flix
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
So are you using that download manager.
Which I paid for, because it seems like a handy download manager to have.
Or giving me a compliment for admitting I don't know what's on my computer?
Or something else?
Cheers.
Have a great day. And stay safe. The virus is still out there.
|
05-09-21 07:17am
|
Reply
123
|
First Anal Date
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
If you are satisfied with 3 hits for a redhead model, then the site will give you what you want.
Especially since it includes an emphasis on anal.
But I think the Teen Mega World network, which has one site emphasizing anal, and other sites that include some anal play, might be a better fit.
The Teen Mega World network search is poor: it returns lots of hits that are not related to the search terms entered.
But the page for the model index listing is the best way to search for a model's content at TMW (Teen Mega World).
(Teen Mega World also has a Young-Old site (Old-n-Young.com) that also hits your interests, I believe.
Hope that helps.
Lately, the PU site seems more like a ghost town than an active site.
Is that the result of the virus?
I've read that internet activity has zoomed because of the virus, with people forced to stay home more.
|
08-24-20 06:30pm
|
Reply
124
|
First Anal Date
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
I very rarely use the site or network.
I do have a VPN, but don't use it much.
Mainly because I have Netflix, and Netflix won't allow me to use the service if my VPN is enabled.
So, to make a long story short (I tend to ramble a lot), I almost never used the VPN while entering the 18Videoz network.
Can't be sure if I ever used it, but if I did, it was rarely.
So I don't think it was the VPN.
I could have been hacked, because the site and network pages are not secure, and the browser gives you a warning popup every time you login that the login is not secure and could be hacked.
I was surprised when I got the message my account was blocked.
But getting a new password was easy. Very fast. Just entered my email, received a new password at my email address right away, and was granted access immediately.
So not a problem.
It's just that I feel much better on sites that are https (secure), so I don't have to worry about hacking.
Using a VPN can cause problems.
I was declined a few times when trying to sign up to porn sites, because I was using a VPN, and the software "found" my internet address did not match the location on my credit card.
That's what a customer service rep told me when I called and asked why my credit card was declined.
|
08-13-20 04:11am
|
Reply
125
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Not sure why you have stopped leaving reviews.
Your reviews were worthwhile because they gave your own thoughts on sites, which could be useful or informative.
As a bonus, your reviews could earn you tickets for the monthly raffle.
A review takes more time to write than a comment, but you might want to re-think your position about writing reviews.
Just my opinion, of course. You're the one who decides about writing reviews.
Whether it's worth the time and effort.
wishing you well,whatever you decide.
|
08-21-21 07:00am
|
|
