Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Reply
I was looking all over for info about bang.com. I found out about it when the pre-cross check devils on Team Skeet hooked me into a trial. I guess I was looking for info in the wrong places.
I downloaded a few videos and was intrigued. I had no idea that they were affiliated with videosz until I was pointed to these comments. Bibo, I think it's the opposite of what you said - joining videosz gives one access to bang.com plus lots more. Joining bang.com only gives access to bang, though I could be mistaken.
Anyway, this site is not worth the bother for the simple reason the quality is mostly not up to snuff, at least the videos I encountered. Downloads were often only 540p or less. On the other hand, It's quite a weird site offering very diverse genres. Then again, I don't think the videos offered anything different than the other bazillion sites.
|
12-01-16 04:10am
|
Reply
127
|
Vintage Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I was happy to see that vxsbill did the right thing by refunding my money. They did so a few moments after I emailed them links to 7 broken video downloads, or at least sent a confirmation notice that they were refunding my money.
As I mentioned in the forum, I'm confused with the relationship between billers and sites in the porn industry. In no other industry that I know of does one deal with the biller under any circumstances - all issues are handled by the merchant. I'm guessing that one reason may have to do with the merchant (site) not having the resources to deal with billing issues.
As for CCBill, I've had my issues with them and only yesterday had a problem. Nothing major though, like suffering a monetary loss. Regarding your inability to get a refund under similar circumstances as me, I would probably fight it, though I'm not sure. The concerns with fighting it are first, the hassle and some embarrassment of dealing with my bank for a relatively small amount of money and second, the outside chance of getting blacklisted by the biller. However, knowing myself, I'd probably fight it out of principle -).
|
05-27-17 05:34am
|
Reply
128
|
Vintage Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
The video section is organized by time period:
1900 – 1940 (~100 videos)
1940 – 1950 (~100 videos)
1950 – 1960 (~175 videos)
1970 – 1980 (~350 videos)
*Retro Stars (~200 videos)
The videos average under 10 minutes. The earlier videos are difficult to watch simply because of lack of the technology, poor lighting and oftentimes jerky camera handling. Color films weren’t introduced until the 1950s. If you can put such things aside, they are a real treat. Some of the scenes even look surprisingly good all things considered. Innocent smut? Is that a category? Well, it is now! Not much acting goes into the scenes and the “actors” generally get right down to business. Many sport disguises like fake beards, masks and sunglasses. I was surprised that the scenes run the spectrum and include straight sex, threesomes and group sex, outdoor sex, lesbian and anal.
Signing up and taking advantage of the free trial and offers of half-price membership was a painful and time-consuming experience. I won’t get into all the gory details, but suffice to say I was successful in getting a full day trial though had an uncharacteristically bad experience with CCBill in canceling. My credit card was also authorized a full month’s membership at the regular price when I opted for the free trial, perhaps customary in the business. In the end, I was able to cancel with CCBill, got the half price offer from Epoch, the secondary processor, who came through and was very helpful.
While it would be a real hoot if there were descriptions of the photos or videos such as model names, scene descriptions, ages, etc., I imagine that info is lost to history, or never recorded. However, the videos include the next best thing in listing informative statistics such as year, size, etc. The photos generally had little or no information.
Vintage Cuties is a comprehensive site for all your modern era vintage photo, magazine and video needs with some extras thrown in for good measure. Frankly, I can’t imagine any other vintage site containing more content and one that dates to the invention of photography. If the photos were available for download or at least with the ability to view simply, I would say that VC is the only vintage site you’ll ever need to join. But sadly, that is not the case. The site also suffers from several serious technical issues and it really is vintage from that standpoint. All things considered though, one can’t ask for much more in the way of vintage content. For that reason, I highly recommend it.
|
05-29-17 06:18am
|
Reply
129
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I agree, this was one of the better reviews on PU. Sure thing for a raffle winner so I'll lay off this week. ;)
Question: The TBP review from 2015 is somewhat contrary to your review regarding hard sex. Can you comment? The following is an excerpt:
"The content here may not be for everyone, the bulk of it, at least. Out of the total number of scenes 1,939 of them are mere interviews up to the 12 or so minute mark before there might be something like nudity, pussy spreading, or possibly some pussy play. If you're the type who really likes to get to know your models before they might be seen later in a hardcore shoot, go for it, but just know that's what you can expect from the bulk of the sites content."
|
03-07-17 11:46am
|
|
