| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1901
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Amen to CC processors losing some of their clout. It bugs me when sites are compelled to self-censor to appease the bankers.
On a semi-related note, I really like finding peeing in scenes where it is unexpected. Last Year Maddy O'Reilly had an incredibly hot scene at Brazzers (http://www.brazzers.com/tour4/scenes/vie.../8361/sex-on-wheels/). The scene was hot anyway but at the end the guy pees on Maddy. I wasn't expecting that and that scene will be a favourite of mine until I can't watch porn any more. I've read that Maddy has since developed a bit of a pee fetish. I should see if I can find more of that.
|
01-10-16 08:46am
|
Reply
1902
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I didn't realize that peeing was such a narrow niche. It isn't something I'm into all that much but I'm definitely not opposed to it. I suppose that to someone who is opposed to peeing content might look at my collection which includes past memberships to VIPissy and Pissing.com and wonder why I say I'm not a peeing content collector but I guess I just don't see myself as being on the same level as someone like you.
That's too bad that this seems like a tough niche to crack into.
I wonder if this isn't a sign that we're coming into a time when censorship (including self-censorship) is more in vogue?
|
01-09-16 07:13am
|
Reply
1903
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Thanks for the detailed answer. It has always baffled me that people bash stuff that is outside their main interest without realizing that there are lot of customers who like specific things. So maybe that particular forum was a bad choice for Kink to discuss the new site since Kink is all about hardcore. The reality too, is that for a lot of BDSM people, watersports can be a big part of D/s play so maybe if Kink marketed the site to a specific audience they could have done better.
But, as you say, they were pushing the limits so this outcome was probably inevitable. I wonder if this is what happened to Water Bondage? But I suspect the risks on that site probably caused them to rethink it.
I can definitely say this though: I'll never delete the Pissing.com scenes I have. Same with Water Bondage.
|
01-06-16 03:28pm
|
Reply
1904
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
I had subscribed there a few times and liked it, but the content certainly had changed. I remember when the site first went up it was much harder than it was when I went back more recently. I didn't follow the site closely enough to see storm clouds though. What happened? What did you notice? Did they go so far as to remove the content?
|
01-05-16 01:55pm
|
Reply
1905
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I'm glad they keep the site available even if it isn't updating, but I do wish that they'd be very clear about that and reduce the price accordingly.
|
04-05-12 08:45am
|
Reply
1906
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the comments.
I agree with your assessment of the site. I alsways skip the pre-scene interview because while it's probably there for a legal reason it can be a bit of a mood killer. I do wish that the site had stuck to Kink's BDSM theme more.
|
04-01-12 06:45am
|
Reply
1907
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I got burned by "a" Playboy site once too. I say that I was burned by a Playboy site because I think there are several that use the brand. I was signing up for a one-month membership and as I went through the screens to confirm the purchase I didn't notice that the site defaulted to an annual membership on one of the screens. Needless to say, the site wasn't sympathetic. It would have been a poor value for a month but it was a complete waste for a year. I downloaded some stuff but I've since deleted it.
|
03-04-19 04:32am
|
Reply
1908
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks to the staff here at TBP, especially Mike, there was a solution. I didn’t get the refund I was asking for but I was compensated. I still think my request for a refund of the annual membership and me paying for a one-month membership was a reasonable request. As I understand it both Playboy TV and Brazzers are under the same company though the individual sites are owned separately. The parent company obviously couldn’t persuade the Playboy TV site owner to issue a refund so they compensated me with a membership at Brazzers. The parent company didn’t need to do that so I am grateful for their generous offer.
I wouldn’t exclude joining Playboy TV because of my issue. I made a mistake and if I was paying attention I wouldn’t have made that mistake. Think of it as being like not noticing a pre-selected cross-sell. I think the Playboy join page is a little misleading in that the TBP one-month discount is highlighted but the annual membership is pre-selected. But still, I should have paid more attention.
Thanks for asking.
|
12-05-15 07:38am
|
Reply
1909
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Thanks. I appreciate the (potential) offer of assistance. I emailed MBI Probiller several days ago and haven't heard from them. Even if you guys had a way to contact Playboy TV that would be a big help. All contact links on that site redirect to MBI Probiller and it seems they aren't interested in helping or even giving me an email contact for their client.
|
10-13-15 09:05am
|
Reply
1910
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Maybe I'm out of line here, but I don't think that what I'm asking for is unreasonable. I'm not asking them to cancel the membership and let me walk away. I want to pay for what I intended to buy. If this were a bricks-and-mortar store this wouldn't be an issue. I'm hoping that the person on the 'support' chat this morning was just having a bad day. Heck, I'd even pay the full monthly fee and not the TBP discount price.
So I've emailed MBI Probiller and asked them for one of two things: either reconsider their unwillingness to help me or give me a contact email for the Playboy site. Every contact link on the Playboy site directs to Probiller so when Probiller tells me to take it up with Playboy that rings hollow.
Whether Probiller even responds to the email is another question though...
|
10-11-15 11:41am
|
Reply
1911
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
Having to call someone to cancel is a deal-breaker for me. I wouldn't join this site for that reason alone. Thanks for the warning.
|
01-04-14 09:34am
|
Reply
1912
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Too little, too late really seems to sum it up. Playboy is a brand with a lot of recognition and like so many older studios and brands (I'm looking at you, Hustler) they seemed to miss the boat with the internet. I haven't looked at the Playboy site in a while, but the last time I did look I wasn't compelled to join. If Playboy wanted to do it right they could have a huge success on the internet.
It speaks volumes that most of the active PU members are of an age where Playboy means something and no one has posted a review.
I suspect I'll stop in and check out their tour pages.
|
11-05-11 09:00am
|
Reply
1913
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
Trump2020's Reply
I had seen some Twitter threads from performers who spoke about some of their experiences with Ryan. What's odd is that his wife is part of the business too and she has to be complicit in letting her husband prey on these young women. And as I said before, agents were implicated too.
It's pretty creepy.
|
02-15-21 09:06am
|
Reply
1914
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
Trump2020's Comment
Download limit now?? Ugh...
As for the missing scenes, the recent allegations against the site owner / male talent (Ryan Madison) may have something to do with this. The allegations are he plied models with drugs and alcohol (some of whom were under legal drinking age) and also or because of the drugs and alcohol did things without consent. Internal cumshots being a big one.
To make matters worse, not that this isn't bad enough, the allegations are than many shady agents knew exactly what they were sending the models into and did nothing about it.
Just a hypothesis...
|
02-10-21 01:38pm
|
Reply
1915
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Not a stupid question at all... The CC charge came through as "413Prod.com" While there was some indication on the TF/PF site that this was the 'biller' there was other information that said the biller was either NETBilling, Epoch or CCBill. The 413Prod site isn't exactly helpful either. This is the full extent of the entire site:
Hello. This is 413's Customer Service web page.
We are here to assist you. Our customer service staff is happy to answer any questions or resolve any problems. We want to service you the best way possible.
If you have a charge from our company (413prod.com or 413pro) on your credit card statement and wish to inquire or if you tried to reach us by phone and were unsuccessful (see business hours below), please e-mail us at:
support@413prod.com - We will respond within 48hrs.
If you are having any technical difficulty with any of our websites, please e-mail us at:
webmaster@413prod.com - We will respond within 48hrs.
Thank you.
Our business hours are:
Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.
Within United States call us toll free at 866-413-3222
Outside the US, call us at 714-997-3850
I have to confess to being very concerned at this point since I'd never heard of 413Prod and I was worried that cancelling may be almost impossible. It turned out okay though. But... what I'm still annoyed at is that TF/PF lists their billers as NETBilling, Epoch or CCBill when they don't appear to use those services. That and the 413Prod links on the TF/PF page are dead. All of that indicated a real 'uh oh' moment for me.
But it looks like everything turned out okay. I'll keep an eye for odd charges for the next while though.
|
04-11-19 03:59pm
|
Reply
1916
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree with you and I've certainly re-reviewed many sites when they've changed (for better or worse) or my opinion of them has changed over time. I am definitely not against re-reviews.
I think part of my dry spell is actually a positive thing. I recently went through my collection and deleted stuff I'm not interested in or have never watched. This still leaves me with a collection probably somewhere around 15-18TB. So I've partly been exercising some self-restraint and have vowed to spend some time browsing through some of the dustier corners of my collection rather than always be looking for the next big thing. I'm actually enjoying myself quite a bit doing this. I've been watching a lot of my favourites from the mid-1990s and into the 2000s. The video quality is terrible by today's standards but I'm having a great time watching some of my favourite scenes from all those years ago.
And I'm not worried... I know the desire to load up on active subscriptions will come roaring back soon!
|
03-20-19 02:54pm
|
Reply
1917
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Only two more reviews and you'll have the #2 spot... But considering how many points our friend exotics4me has I doubt he's in any danger of either of us overtaking him.
My 'problem' with writing reviews is that I'm just not subscribing to many sites these days and when I do they're most likely sites I've joined in the past and have already reviewed. This is the longest 'dry spell' I think I've ever had.
|
03-20-19 09:07am
|
Reply
1918
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Thanks for posting this. I've been having a dry spell with memberships these days but this might be an offer that's too good to pass up. I'm a big fan of Teen Fidelity and the teen scenes at Porn Fidelity.
I noticed that you're only two reviews away from kicking me out of the #2 spot here. I'd better get over my dry spell, join some sites and start reviewing again!
|
03-16-19 10:05am
|
Reply
1919
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
FuzzyBunny's Reply
I'm purely and A and B man myself, but I certainly understand liking REAL large breasts.
|
08-03-13 05:57am
|
Reply
1920
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
FuzzyBunny's Review
Interesting review. Like you, the emphasis on big breasts (fake or real) means that I'd likely not consider joining. But since your review made that clear you may have saved me some money!
|
08-02-13 08:12am
|
Reply
1921
|
Porn Mastermind
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Interesting group of sites. I was a member of one of the sites a few years back but I don't remember it being part of a network. If that's new I might need to take another look at this. Access to some select bonus scenes is a big plus too. Thanks for pointing this out.
|
01-16-16 10:11am
|
Reply
1922
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
insomniacxxx's Review
It baffles me why sites and networks do this to their paying customers. This network used to be among my favourites but I haven't joined in several years and based on your review I likely won't. Massage Creep and Jurassic Cock were among the best available in their specific niches but I don't think Massage Creep updates much anymore, if at all, and Jurassic Cock hasn't updated in years. If those two sites ever start updating again, especially Jurassic Cock, I'd probably still join but use a disposable card and tread carefully.
Of course, since their tour pages are crap there really is no way for me to ever tell if Jurassic Cock starts updating again.
|
03-18-18 12:26pm
|
Reply
1923
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
turbopancakes's Comment
It seems that trying to figure out porn billing practices and billers is a mug's game...
|
02-28-18 02:26pm
|
Reply
1924
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the link. I have a couple of index sites bookmarked but I was looking for one that tracked by website. I guess I'm stuck in the Dark Ages with IAFD, though, to be fair, they are listing websites now.
|
11-07-16 04:42pm
|
Reply
1925
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
You're right... I have been a member there. It's a great site too but I like to follow specific models and Russian models change their names so often they don't make that easy. I guess I'll just have to be happy with the flood of old/young videos studios are putting out as stepdaughter /stepfather.
|
11-07-16 03:47pm
|
