| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2426
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Agreed. They have the ability to produce some great material so if they could improve a bit on the technical side that would be icing on the cake.
have you ever had a membership at Nude in L.A.? It's a decent site too, but lacks on the nervousness aspect of public nudity.
|
12-04-10 10:48am
|
Reply
2427
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Excellent review! As you note, I recently did a review and yet you somehow managed to write a similar length review and give people completely unique information. I thought I was fairly thorough, and when I read your review I kept thinking "yeah, he's 100% right... why didn't I think of that?"
I really like this site and hope they continue to add files and improve their quality.
|
12-03-10 05:37pm
|
Reply
2428
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Agreed. And sometimes (maybe a lot of the time) the tease is the best part.
|
12-02-10 02:28pm
|
Reply
2429
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
While I usually watch b/g hardcore, I have to admit enjoying "coy nudity" (thanks for the phrase Capn).
|
12-01-10 01:36pm
|
Reply
2430
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Red for me, but I can't explain why. Red hair and some freckles just knocks me off my feet. Maybe it's that Irish blood in my veins...
|
11-27-10 05:26am
|
Reply
2431
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks for the comments, Denner. I like a lot of the European public nudity and flashing sites too, but Public Flash is quite different. Many European countries seem to have a more relaxed attitude to sexuality so those sites can get away with more than those in the U.S. With Public Flash, they show less nudity than the European sites but are in a real way more daring because of the risks involved. One thing I like about Public Flash site is that they show the set-up and you get a sense of how much fun the model is having and how excited she is at being 'naughty.' That element is missing from many of the European sites that simply have a nude woman walk naked down a main street. The American site Nude in L.A. is a lot like the European sites in that they do full nudity on the streets of Los Angeles, but they don't show the preparation and the nervousness. It all seems rather clinical.
One other site I'd recommend is FTV Girls. This is a well known site that doesn't market itself as a public nudity or flashing site but that has some great public stuff. All of the models are stunning, and most do some public stuff before going indoors for full nudity and masturbation. If you're a fan of public nudity and flashing and haven't been a memeber of FTV Girls yet I'd recommend considering that too.
|
11-26-10 03:39pm
|
Reply
2432
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Thanks for the comment. I hope the review helps some fellow members.
|
11-25-10 04:09am
|
Reply
2433
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
It had been about two years for me too so I also wondered if there would be enough updates and if there would be improvements. I can tell you that there are new videos, and the highest resolution is an improvement over what they had in the past. In the past, the highest resolution was 630x470 and now it is 1280x720. Subjectively it looks fine.
I think I'll edit the review to give more objective information.
Thanks
|
11-25-10 04:09am
|
Reply
2434
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'll admit that my position is untenable and would be completely rejected by the soccer moms (of both genders), but I think that distractions during work should be prohibited. During a lunch break if Jane wants to do some online gambling and Jim wants to look at some porn with his office door closed, so what?
I remember about 10 years ago a senior officer in the Canadian Navy had his career killed after it was revealed that while staying in a private room in an officer's quarters on a base he plugged in his own laptop to the network at looked at (gasp!) Maxim. The bureaucracy hung him out to dry. To their credit, most civilians came out in support of the guy.
If no one else can see what you're looking at and you're on a break, I don't support the fear of sexuality.
Now if you happen to be having a wank while looking at that porn, that might be a little different...
|
11-24-10 03:44pm
|
Reply
2435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
As long as the review notes that the site is new and small, I'm okay with a good score. I think I did just that with Public Disgrace when it was relatively new and still small.
|
11-18-10 11:28am
|
Reply
2436
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I eventually took the additional channels too and agree that they are definitely worth the additional cost. They don't update as often so they may not be something to keep a membership with, but they are definitely a good value.
|
11-15-10 02:32pm
|
Reply
2437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yuck!!!!
|
11-15-10 03:49am
|
Reply
2438
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I've commented here before that it seems a lot of the big studio sites seem to be an after-thought. Yes, I know that they are in the business of producing movies and not necessarily distributing them, but it seems to me to be obvious that the internet is the most popular way to distribute porn, and certainly will continue to dominate porn distribution. Sites like Hustler and Diabolic just don't seem to take the internet seriously.
I've used Hot Movies and sites like that before, but they can get pretty expensive and most of them have some DRM attached.
|
11-14-10 04:16pm
|
Reply
2439
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Good point. And I'm sure that they decided that losing some customers over the streaming-only issue is worth it to maintain control of their material.
|
11-14-10 10:34am
|
Reply
2440
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
Thanks for the great review. This is a site that I would definitely want to join but thanks to your review and the review at TBP I won't. If all they offer is streaming, then my credit card stays in my wallet. I can understand a company wanting to protect their material, but streaming only will limit their customer base.
Again, thanks for the heads-up on the streaming-only issue.
|
11-14-10 07:08am
|
Reply
2441
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
None of the above for me. After vigorous sex I have to head out to get home to the wife.
|
11-10-10 12:35pm
|
Reply
2442
|
HD Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
messmer - I wish I could give you a better answer, but I really can't remember it that well. My recollection is that there were two bonus sites but that the material wasn't that great. It wasn't worth joining just to get the bonus sites. The primary site, HD Porn, is a great site though and I intend to renew my membership soon. I wish I could be of more help... sorry!
Thanks for the comments on the review.
|
11-10-10 12:34pm
|
Reply
2443
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Excellent review. Based on your one line "This site is for people that enjoy watching cute teens having hardcore sex and getting sodomized" I think I'll check it out. I do want to see your response to lk2fireone re the limited sites depending on how you join.
|
11-08-10 12:58pm
|
Reply
2444
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Your comment brings back memories of seeing 8mm films and low-grade projectors available by the hundreds at the back of most porn magazines. I remember wanting to order some but knowing that they'd be seized at the border. Remembering this makes me grateful for new technology.
|
11-07-10 04:13am
|
Reply
2445
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
For me it is a mix of having lost it and can't remembering it. I remember my favorite scene in it, but the stars and title are lost in the mists of time. For the past few years I've rebuilt a substantial portion of my original collection from searching the internet. I'll likely never replace the first movie I saw because I simply can't remember what it was.
|
11-07-10 04:10am
|
Reply
2446
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm fine with someone giving a 100% score. For me, the details in the review are what count. If a reviewer feels that a site deserves a 100% score, then they have to back that up with some good reasons why that is the case. I recall once giving a 99% to one of the sites at Kink.com (Public Disgrace, I think) because it is so well done and so innovative i really think they deserved a high score. But obviously if you aren't into what the site offers, then you wouldn't share that opinion. I like to think I gave enough detail to justify that score so that someone not into public BDSM wouldn't join the site based on the score alone.
|
10-30-10 07:10am
|
Reply
2447
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
For me it was in catechism class at our Catholic church. We learned all about the various parts of the female body and how they look at various stages of sexual arousal, and we read a lot about how to get them into that state of arousal, which would have obvious benefits for us males. It was a really effective education.
Oh wait... maybe I'm confusing that with found copies of Penthouse, Hustler, Oui, Swank, Club, etc. Yeah, that's probably more accurate.
|
10-26-10 02:00pm
|
Reply
2448
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
As twisted as this is, I have a sister-in-law who could start the blood flowing in a corpse. I'd be lying if I said that her image hasn't crossed my mind once or twice.
|
10-22-10 02:44pm
|
Reply
2449
|
Emily Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveO's Review
SteveO - Thanks for the review. I think this site (and the two bonus sits) will be on my list of sites to join.
|
10-16-10 12:53pm
|
Reply
2450
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
RustyJ - the B C and D thing is just subjective. Many of the posts at Videobox just aren't Grade A material. I also agree that much of the older Private stuff is excellent. I'm a big fan of Private and have been for a long time. The stuff that gets posted to Videobox isn't very good though. This is certainly a personal thing, but I really don't like boy-boy-girl scenes and those seem to be more common than boy-girl in a lot of the Private titles that get posted on Videobox.
|
10-10-10 05:47am
|
