| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2301
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
Thanks for the review. i found it interesting and informative. I'm a big fan of Private stuff and often wondered about joining. But based on your experience I won't bother.
Two comments:
1) Private seems to have at least two levels of material. Let's say A list and B list. I find that almost none of the A list stuff makes it to Videobox, though some of it does.
2) This seems to be another example of a studio site that begrudginly puts material on the internet. I really don't understand this. The internet isn't the future anymore, it's the present. People want material on the internet now. Having crappy websites with slow downloads won't help any company.
|
06-10-11 07:11pm
|
Reply
2302
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I answered “yes, definitely, but for me, the better question would be “how often do you come across porn that causes a new fetish?”
I can still remember (though the details are lost in the mists of time) when I discovered small breasts. Every guy, it seemed, was into big breasts, then one day seeing a petite lass with small breasts in a porn flick changed that whole outlook for me.
More recently, starting a few years ago, one of my stranger fetishes popped up. That would be seeing women have some liquid poured on them. It probably started with Alex Sanders’ series Tappin’ that Ass where he begins each scene by pouring honey on the models as foreplay to the actual scene. Naturally then, the Elegant Angel series Big Wet Asses is a favorite too – with baby oil being used in liberal quantities.
Developing out of that I watched some of Jay Sin’s work with Evil Angel, particularly his Milk Nymphos series, where a lot of milk is used. This series led me to develop some new anal-themed fetishes too, of which I have no shortage (weird insertions, gaping, milk enemas, fisting, etc.). I’d have to say that Jay Sin is probably my favorite director working today. I just wish he had more material.
|
06-07-11 04:25am
|
Reply
2303
|
Candy Girl Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Whadastudd's Review
" THE SITES WITH THE BIGGER NAME GIRLS LIKE ASHLEY SAGE HAVE INCORRECT LINKS TO THE ZIP FILES WHICH BRING SOME FILES OF VERY SMALL BREASTED GIRLS INSTEAD OF THE MONSTER TITS YOU ARE EXPECTING."
You know, there are some of us here who would consider that a good thing!
Seriously though, this is the first time I've ever heard of a site even denying that it has download quotas. Download caps really piss me off anyway, but to have one hidden and then declared a technical difficulty would probably make my head explode.
Thanks for the great review and welcome to the site!
|
06-03-11 04:10am
|
Reply
2304
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What's available on the site is the most important to me, followed by how easy it is to get at that material. I really don't care about site design as long as it doesn't get in the way.
|
06-03-11 04:05am
|
Reply
2305
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
"When I was a member last (late last year) it appeared to be updating still, though I can't remember how frequently."
If you've never been a member before at all I think that you'll find that it is worth the membership fee just for what is there though.
You certainly point out a serious flaw in the site though: the fact that there is very limited information available to a prospective member. This really bugs me about some sites, especially when you compare them to sites that give full acess to see what is there and the only difference with a membership is that you can actually download. Sites like Public Flash always make me nervous - of they won't give me a good idea of what they have, then what are they hiding?
But with Public Flash you can take a membership with some level of confidence based on the reviews here and TBP.
|
06-01-11 06:31pm
|
Reply
2306
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't buy the stuff anywhere, online or not. But if I ever had the urge, I'd probably buy online.
|
06-01-11 06:24pm
|
Reply
2307
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have a bit of a foot fetish in real life, but have no interest in footjob stuff. Like most of you, I think the real interest is in what that foot is attached to.
|
05-30-11 06:37pm
|
Reply
2308
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
That would be great since it would be an already-discounted way into the network.
I realized this morning that when I had my last Sex and Submission membership that I forgot to re-download a few scenes in the highest def available. They're older but among my favorites. If you get a chance, check out the scenes with Kat and with Sasha Grey. Both are great.
|
05-30-11 06:35pm
|
Reply
2309
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Agreed. And it usually raises the quality too. Being a guy just makes things so much easier...
|
05-29-11 07:40am
|
Reply
2310
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd never say 'never,' but it would be pretty unlikely. In the unfortunate event that my bride were to leave me or die, I'd rent from then on. It's cheaper in the long run.
|
05-28-11 05:16am
|
Reply
2311
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I agree. I'd never considered rejoining most of them, but if I did I'd hope that I'd remember to check TBP for a discount first.
|
05-27-11 04:03pm
|
Reply
2312
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I hadn't thought about the probability that we're subsidizing some of the BDSM scene in San Francisco. You might be right! But like you, that probably won't cause me to stop taking memberships there because the material is so good.
One of the main reasons that I check my email is to watch for offers from Kink. The great thing about them is that the offers actually mean something. I regularly get offers from past sites that are really valueless because they don't actually offer any enticement to rejoin.
|
05-27-11 08:50am
|
Reply
2313
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
RustyJ:
Thanks for the comments. I think we're on the same page when it comes to pricing issues, but we just differ a bit on how big a deal it is. I'm a big fan on most Kink stuff (some cynics might even think I'm shilling in my reviews, but I'm not. I'm a paying customer.) The production values in all Kink sites justifies the price for me. I suspect that they have to charge this much to cover their costs (and make a profit too) and they have to do this from a smaller customer base.
I also agree that the scenes can seem repetitive. This happens for a lot of their stuff. But, for me that only occurs if I'm watching one scene after another. The innovation and uniqueness comes through if I dabble in the scenes rather than dive in head first.
On your question re pricing, it has been my experience that once you are registered as a paying member on one site you get a $10 discount on memberships to other sites. I don't know if this is a hard-and-fast rule, but it has always occured for me.
If you haven't already done it, make sure to create a free account and ask to be on the mailing list. I'd say at least once a month I get an offer for a discount on one site or another. Recently I got an offer I couldn't refuse: 99 cent one-day access to a few sites which was an excellent opportunity to get inside and take a closer look at some a new site. (And when I was in one a one-day membership I signed up for another site I really wanted and got a $10 discount too) I only wish they'd make that offer on more sites because there are several (Ultimate Surrender is one) that I'd like to check out but don't think I'd have enough interest to warrant the monthly fee.
|
05-26-11 09:10am
|
Reply
2314
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
"All of the above."
|
05-26-11 03:41am
|
Reply
2315
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The bad ones are pretty obvious. And 'bad' includes a petite woman who pushes the envelope with size. But I have a hard time telling if the properly proportioned ones are fake. It isn't like the old days with noticable scars.
Still...DON'T DO IT LADIES!!! PLEASE!!!
|
05-24-11 03:42am
|
Reply
2316
|
Bikini Dream
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I am. But part of the reason I took the risk on the site is that it was billed through Epoch so I knew I could cancel the membership easily. And I've already done that. If they billed through an obscure biller, or worse, collected the fee directly, I'd probably have sampled a different bikini site. But apart from a few issues, it is still decent value and is updating regularly.
|
05-23-11 04:52pm
|
Reply
2317
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I agree, but most networks usually have a couple of sites that tickle my fancy and I suspect that is the case with most subscribers. With this network, I joined for Jurassic Cock and everything else was just gravy. So I was pleasantly surprised to find that some of the 'gravy' was pretty damn good.
For me, a lot of it comes down to price. If I'm joining a network for one site then the price better be reasonable. Sometimes, as in this case, the price was very reasonable when I discovered Massage Creep.
Now if they could just persuade the girls to do more anal...
|
05-23-11 04:49pm
|
Reply
2318
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not a big fan, mostly due to the limitations that it has. It isn't the best format for showing the girl off at her best. Having said that, while I don't actively seek it out, I have and will download it if the model is one I normally collect.
|
05-22-11 06:33am
|
Reply
2319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
Put me down for 'no' too. The convenience of downloading porn (legally and with payment) is just too great to overcome. But I have nothing against DVDs except that the price of adult DVDs is bizarrely out of touch with reality. I've commented on this before, but with most adult DVDs running at $40 how is anyone buying them. Unless it was Tanner Mayes finally doing anal. Fuck being rational then. I'd be like a kid who still believes in Santa at Christmas. While tuned up on massive amounts of sugar.
As for magazines, those are something that I haven't bought in a while. They're just too hard to store discretely. The last time I bought a magazine was maybe three years ago when I bought a package of two out-of-date magazines from an adult shop. For $10 I got two magazines. The problem was that while one of the magazines was Hustler or Club or something like that, invariably the second magazine was always something like "Hairy Fatties" or "Chunky Asses."
Not to drag this out more, but on her last birthday my bride asked for a Wii game console. As a joke, to demonstrate how out of touch I am with the modern world, I thought of buying her a copy of Oui magazine (assuming it still exists). Given that my young neice and nephew would be around for the gift opening I figured the humor woudl be outweighed by the anger. Stupid non-porn people!
|
05-21-11 05:43am
|
Reply
2320
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Don't feel bad about it. All you did was tell me that there may be some Pamela Spice hardcore around. Now if you had been the bastard who wrote the virus I might be mad at you! But all is well, with no damage or data loss. But I think I'll not bother looking for those scenes again!
|
05-21-11 05:32am
|
Reply
2321
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I agree. I don’t think I downloaded anything with the fake penis. And don’t forget that there are several sites that rely on huge quantities of fake cum. At least they use so much of it that they aren’t even trying to hide the fact that it is fake. But for its few shortcomings, I was surprised at how good some if it is. Jurassic Cock and Massage Creep really impressed me. They could stand alone. 18 Years Old, Disgraced 18 and Teen BFF are also quite good. I downloaded everything from Public Violations, though it is all staged and most of it is quite silly. And not having an anal-themed site is unusual for a network.
|
05-18-11 03:21am
|
Reply
2322
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, one advantage to being the first to respond to this is that I get to bask in the warming glow of the blue line that says 100% of respondents think there can never be too much anal!
|
05-18-11 03:13am
|
Reply
2323
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I think I might have found the problem – and I think it’s definitely a user-error on my part. I remember downloading all the photo sets, but then when your comment reminded me that there were over a hundred videos I checked my folder and I probably had only half of that. The short descriptions and teaser photo don’t really give a detailed indication of what’s in the scene. Since a lot of them looked like simple toy play I didn’t bother to download them. But obviously I missed downloading a lot of good stuff too.
I joined through Pamela Spice (I read your review a few weeks before finally joining and completely forgot that you suggested joining through Pacino’s Adventures) and I’m not really sure what I’m missing – maybe that’s a good thing!
I do have, and have watched the scene with her at the outdoor shower. That is pretty impressive! I also downloaded the scene you’ve mentioned with her in the car and that is great too. As I write this, I’m madly downloading all of the videos that I skipped earlier. I’m really glad you took the time to comment on my review otherwise I wouldn’t have know what I was missing.
So I think the mystery may be solved. It appears that I made a mistake in not just downloading everything.
I’ll let you know what I think once I sort through the ‘new’ videos.
|
05-17-11 04:01pm
|
Reply
2324
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Based on this I'll go back and look at those scenes again. I just wasn't as impressed by them. Is it possible that some of the better scenes you have were removed for some reason? Maybe there were some legal repercussions.
I agree 100% that seeing that the director is 'buying' security and privacy for what will be sold as 'public' nudity takes away a lot of the allure. One of the worst offenders (though for different reasons other than the ones you mention) for killing the mood is Nude in L.A. The premise here has so much potential but it is squandered. We see the models strolling naked around Los Angeles but they are portrayed as if this is perfectly normal. There is no nervousness, excitement or titillation. Contrast this with some of the European public nudity shoots on ALS (Ashley Bulgari comes to mind) and her nervousness is a big part of setting the mood. Nude in L.A. has none of this. I’ll go back and watch some of the Pamela Spice scenes to see if I missed something.
Thanks for the information.
|
05-17-11 03:53am
|
Reply
2325
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Reply
Wow! 6 or 8 more reviews just waiting. I don't have the time for that many memberships at once. A couple of weekends ago my wife headed away with some friends and I took three memberships out. I'm pretty particular about cataloguing the material and backing it up, so it'll be a couple of weeks before I'm on the hunt for another site again.
Between PU reviews and the "What's Hot" reviews at TBP it is usually fairly easy to find something that I'm interested in.
|
05-16-11 04:27pm
|
