| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
PJGirls is a one-trick pony. It focuses on very explicit gynecological views. I rated it based on how well it does on that basis. You come at the site with different criteria and explained your rating well. I liked your review a lot, and the differing criteria we use to judge the same site is what makes PU so valuable. You pointed out some really cogent points in your review that I hadn't thought about (like the camera angles), and I value seeing other opinions.
You wrote a good review. You might differ with me on how good PJGirls is, but that's what makes horse races, politics, and porn reviews. :)
|
03-03-19 08:32pm
|
Reply
152
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I just spent a few minutes reviewing the webmaster rules for PU. I hadn't looked at them for the simple reason that I don't have any affiliation with any website.
It appears that there are two infractions meriting suspension, (1) that no incentives be given for reviews, and (2) any added text to a site must not ask or influence users to submit a review or comment with a specific agenda.
If PJGirls' webmaster violated either of these, they merit suspension, as without honest, impartial reviews PU is useless.
|
03-03-19 06:44pm
|
Reply
153
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
mbaya, thanks for the review. I too noticed the new download limit at PJGirls. I'm not terribly thrilled with it, but don't find it restrictive at all because I never use a download manager. It's not a limit on how much content you can download, but rather on how many connections you can make to the PJGirls servers in an hour. If you rely on a download manager, you'll find it restrictive, but if not, you'll literally never notice.
PJGirls staff wrote a post to all members explaining the issue, and laid out that too many connections from users were overloading the servers. They implemented the policy of 100 downloads in a hour to balance server usage for everyone on the site. I give kudos to PJGirls for good communications.
I don't have a very fast internet connection, and have never experienced timing out on PJGirls. It has at times been slow, but since the implementation of the download limit, it has been less likely to be slow.
I find it unusual that their webmaster was suspended from PU. Can anyone clarify why this occurred? I'm not familiar for what offences you can be suspended. They were suspended, but the site is still listed. Is that a reasonable reason to criticize the site? You obviously think so, but I cannot say because of lack of information.
Thanks for the good review. We differ in regards to the site's quality and you make a good case for your point of view in your review. Good job.
|
03-03-19 06:15pm
|
Reply
154
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pjgirls's Reply
I checked the bonus updates and their dates of release. The feature was initially offered in February of 2016, and of the first six bonus updates, until April 23, 2016, five of those were posted on regular update days. The site also issued a regular update on those days.
Since then, all bonus updates occur on Sundays when there is no regular update.
|
05-30-17 08:17pm
|
Reply
155
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pjgirls's Reply
Thanks for the corrections. I'm sorry I didn't get that information correct.
You and your colleague run a great site. Keep up the good work.
|
05-30-17 06:27am
|
Reply
156
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
clark kent's Review
I absolutely love this site, but still wouldn't rate them 100%. But there is a whole lot going right with this site and very little wrong. Just a few things off the top of my head: the search feature is limited, only one type of download (mp4s), and I can't really think of another thing I'd ding them for.
The girls are pretty, and they look you in the eyes and smile as they gape for you. It's a pretty solid site that sticks to its niche.
But 100%? Not really.
|
03-09-17 11:32am
|
Reply
157
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Kswissjr21's Comment
what kind of help do you need?
|
03-25-20 10:36pm
|
Reply
158
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
When I joined a few years ago, Kara Duhe was pretty much the main model, and all others were secondary at best. I liked his stuff, but there wasn't enough of it at the time. Still, if he's stopped updating, it is a shame. Ron Harris was shooting models for magazines in the 70's. Maybe he's retiring.
|
12-15-17 06:59pm
|
Reply
159
|
Sperm Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for the review of this site. I saw a preview of the Kirsten Scott vid and it was very erotic and exciting, and I've been very curious about this site. I'd join, but 10 GB in 24 hours IS unreasonable. Too bad, it seems a decent site.
|
02-10-20 04:08pm
|
Reply
160
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I loved Amateur Allure, and have been hoping to join Swallow Salon soon. But with the price hike (yeah, they upped the price $10/mo) I will probably never join now.
|
03-26-19 10:07am
|
Reply
161
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
I will try that. Thanks for the heads-up.
|
01-27-24 03:09pm
|
Reply
162
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
JakeM1's Comment
Premium sites cost extra. You get several sites in the Teamskeet network with a base membership (https://www.thebestporn.com/review_inclu...ed.html?id=teamskeet) but the premium sites are not included in the membership price.
|
07-14-20 01:06am
|
Reply
163
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I try exceedingly hard to be polite and informative with my comments. This is a community that relies on trust--that people will give honest reviews and feedback, and part of that is being polite and informative and avoiding personal feuds.
I knew I hadn't called you a shill, I just wanted to assure you that there was no intention to get into an argument about DL speeds and conflate it into some flame war.
I'm totally stumped about why I've gotten bad speeds at Team Skeet. It's not just their main site either. I was pretty harsh in my comments, but part of that was that Customer Service just never followed through on my attempts to resolve or investigate the issue.
Thanks for your perspective.
|
09-06-17 09:59pm
|
Reply
164
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I was the one who compared Team Skeet with telegraph speeds. I appreciated your feedback, and hope I was polite. I appreciate any help a fellow PU member tries to give.
I've never been sure why Team Skeet sites are all so slow for me. I haven't had DL problems with other sites. I attempted to contact customer service multiple times to correct the issue but they never responded to my emails.
|
09-06-17 05:47pm
|
Reply
165
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Steve01's Reply
It's a real shame, as they have great content. But what good is great content if it takes you days to download a single 2 GB scene?
|
09-06-17 01:50am
|
Reply
166
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Comment
39.6 KB/s - 41.2 MB of 5.3 GB, 2 days left
Now it's two days to DL 5.3 GB.
I responded to PSN's customer service's stock email on 5/20. I never heard from them again. I tried to work this out with the company days ago, but never heard back. I'm so frustrated. I've never had such bad service by any porn site before.
|
05-25-17 07:50pm
|
Reply
167
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Comment
New low speed. Copied and pasted from my browser:
47.2 KB/s - 1,130 KB of 5.3 GB, 1 day left
A DAY to download 5.3 GB??? Really?
|
05-25-17 07:33pm
|
Reply
168
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Thanks, Amanda. I was mostly concerned because lk2fireone had replied to my comment, and when I went to reply to them, my original reply had not been posted yet.
I'm glad the issue is resolved.
|
05-23-17 11:34am
|
Reply
169
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the advice, but I have no intention of asking for a refund. I have downloaded several gigs of content, and have gotten, at a snail's pace, what I contracted for.
I will pay them for the content I've downloaded. It's simply the right thing to do.
|
05-23-17 11:30am
|
Reply
170
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I wrote a lengthy reply to lk2fireone's comment a few days ago. It was not denied, and it did not get posted. I have neither the time nor desire to repeat myself.
PSN has reached epic levels of fail. I have had several downloads, after running for several hours to download a single 3 GB scene, time out due to slow speed. The latest was today. After starting a download for a less-than-3 GB scene at about 3 PM, I came back to the computer at 8 PM, only to find it still downloading, with 14 hours to go. An hour later, the download timed out due to an unknown network error. Peak speed in the short time I observed it, was about 50 KB/s.
|
05-22-17 09:41pm
|
Reply
171
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the input. I'm baffled by the slow downloads myself. I can still get 2.5 MB/s download speeds from other sites while concurrently getting less than 200 KB/s speeds from PSN. I'm pretty sure it isn't my connection, as the PSN speeds are the only slow ones.
I had similar problems before with Team Skeet. The webmaster replied to my comment, and I accepted their offer of a refund then. This time I don't want a refund. I am aware I could get one, but I will soldier on, get the content I want, then consider myself an idiot for not heeding the maxim "caveat emptor."
I admit I was upset with the speeds I was getting, and the stock responses I had gotten from PSN Customer Service. It made me lash out at them publicly, which was intemperate. But considering the comments section says we can comment on technical issues, and I am having a technical issue, it was a valid posting.
Do I regret my actions? Yes, but only to a degree. I reached out to the company first, then was blatantly ignored. I thought my comment was appropriate.
Thanks for your input on your speeds, and taking the time to respond to my issue. As I said, I don't intend to seek a refund though. They have provided me the service I contracted for, I've downloaded several gigs of content, and deserve to keep my money. I just hope they spend my subscription money for better Morse Code lessons for their telegraph operators.
|
05-20-17 05:22pm
|
Reply
172
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Stanky's Reply
Quality of the scenes should improve over time, I agree, unless they are recycling content, which a big producer might do if they have a huge library. I haven't rejoined Team Skeet, despite loving their content, because the download speeds were horrendous for me.
|
06-05-16 12:21pm
|
Reply
173
|
Ura Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
You can still download the HD photos on the site, if that makes a difference to you. I have edited the review to make that more clear.
|
08-17-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
174
|
Ura Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
The site has an excellent FAQ on the tour. They are quite upfront about the fact that the video is streaming only. They go on to say higher price is to pay for the high quality of the videos and the HD photos. The videos and pics are indeed first rate. I enjoy the site a great deal, but as I said in my review, the cost and streaming only video make this a site that will only appeal to some. But you don't find many high quality bukkake sites with cute Japanese girls without mosaic. This is one.
|
08-17-12 03:12pm
|
Reply
175
|
VIP Area
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I joined VIP area a few years ago for the same reasons--high glam photos/vids. I noticed that though the quality of the sets was high, there were sets that were not exclusive and some of stars from years earlier. I was pretty satisfied with the site, but never got back to rejoin it. There were always other sites that I was more eager to join.
|
02-03-20 09:42pm
|
