| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
But if they were so angry that they wanted "revenge", what's to prevent them from giving everyone a negative rating, knowing for sure that they got whoever got them?
|
06-25-07 12:29am
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
Reply of
troglodite's Reply
There's nothing to stop a webmaster or shill from giving an anonymous trust rating, good or bad.
|
06-25-07 12:26am
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
My guess is that your anonymous no trust vote came from a webmaster
|
06-15-07 08:21pm
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
What's to stop me from entering with a proxy and giving myself anonymous positive trust ratings? Not a thing. I am baffled as to why they allow this.
|
06-15-07 08:15pm
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Why should someone be allowed to leave an anonymous trust rating? That makes no sense.
|
06-14-07 02:57am
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Isn't French Kissing tongue penetration? Lol
|
06-08-07 12:47am
|
Reply
157
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's easy to find web material for free---it's all over the place. But, if I like something, I'd rather join the site. I will say that seeing material for free has caused me to join many a website
|
06-08-07 12:38am
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Squirting is not fake, but streaming is most definitely fake!
|
06-07-07 08:06pm
|
Reply
159
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
The Power Of PU !
That's a relief and a good decision by them.
|
01-26-09 03:57am
|
Reply
160
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
This is under different ownership isn't it?
Looks like scores are going to be changing, and the once venerable site dropping in the rankings.
|
01-24-09 04:06am
|
Reply
161
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
They really removed content off the site altogether?
Maybe they're planning a new "classic" site!
|
01-24-09 04:00am
|
Reply
162
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
Thanks, I need to study up on my photoshop! :D
|
02-11-08 09:39am
|
Reply
163
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
RGB values? I don't even know what that means. The 1 By Day girls are trollops, brazen, hussies, bad girls your mom and mine told us to stay away from. They prowl the streets as vamps looking for the next man to sink their fangs into. Put your wallet on a chain! Never give them your phone number, or your marriage is history! Get thee to Abby Winters for the "girl next door"!! This is the red zone, and all ye that enter are headed for misery, and death !!!!!
|
02-06-08 11:33am
|
Reply
164
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
CactusJack's Comment
I like make up on a model.
|
02-04-08 01:04pm
|
Reply
165
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Lately I have been very careful when considering the scores I hand out. There are some real shady sites, but I also realize that there are sites where the webmaster puts in a lot of time and money, and I want to make sure I don't just write a quick review without thinking it through. I received the same kind of offer as you from a WM who apparently sent shills here and at first was outraged by my comments. Seeing that I was ignoring him, I received a long letter in my private ebox, but I ignored it also. We worked hard to keep this site honest. So when I see a 75 for such a high class site, naturally a red flag goes up in my head!
|
01-03-08 07:12am
|
Reply
166
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Reply
I don't mean to be overly cautious, but the old timers here will agree that we worked hard to keep this site untainted. I myself was once "bribed" by a webmaster to change my comments at one time. Bela is a great webmaster BTW, extremely helpful. I think your very low score hurt his feelings!
|
01-02-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
167
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Yes, and I also mentioned the potential for abuse.
|
01-02-08 12:42pm
|
Reply
168
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
I am very suspicious of this review, referencing another network complete with hotlink is not what we are looking for here.
|
01-02-08 09:25am
|
Reply
169
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Reply
I'm not here to correct your reviews, your review is just fine. I'm just pointing out that DDF is a professional model company that's all.
|
12-26-07 06:27pm
|
Reply
170
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Review
How can "no amateur content" in a professional site be a negative. Besides, any girl appearing in a paysite is no longer an amateur.
|
12-26-07 02:43pm
|
Reply
171
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I've had good experiences with the DDF admins, in fact, they gave me a free month at the site of my choice once when one of my memberships was experiencing technical problems.
|
11-17-07 10:50am
|
Reply
172
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Danes don't use Euros?
|
11-05-07 09:19pm
|
Reply
173
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Bela's Reply
That is a nice deal! I liked Sweet-Models.
|
10-09-07 06:25am
|
Reply
174
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
And anyone who was a member of Sweet-Models may stay in 1ByDay at the S-M price for as long as they recur
|
10-03-07 07:19pm
|
Reply
175
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
They did have server trouble (maybe it was "filthy" and needed cleaning!) when they had that trouble, they gave me a free month. Cherry Jul is also gone, but I think the archives are still there. I would have liked Sweet-Models if it was all exclusive. But as they say on it's page, most of the sets are on 1ByDay.
|
10-02-07 03:17am
|
