| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have a bunch of online subscriptions to websites.
Although magazines have that vintage feels, if you know what I mean.
I actually never buy a magazine but lately I have been feeling the urge to buy one. I guess I'm too shy or something.
|
06-03-07 11:12am
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Yeah DRM here too. But quality is something that I look for in a good website too. So lack of quality and variety.
|
06-03-07 11:10am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mine change every so often.
|
06-03-07 11:04am
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well technically they are real.
They are unidentified, they are flying and they are object.
|
06-03-07 11:03am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The surfing itself doesn't take a lot of time. The downloading does.
And I download and do other stuff at the same time.
|
06-03-07 10:55am
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Isn't that where most of us learn the moves? ;)
|
06-03-07 10:54am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I recently started doing it more regularly. Some things just can't be found it the stores these days.
Like rare DVD's.
|
06-03-07 10:52am
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Sometimes I find myself not in the mood for the graphic porn of this day and age but in the mood for something I can actually fantasize with.
In that case stories are the perfect solution.
So, sometimes, rarely actually.
|
06-03-07 10:51am
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Indeed it depends on what the 3rd party bonus content is. Live feeds usually don't do it for me either. And very low quality streams neither.
But sometimes there's a hidden treasure to be found and you get all kinds of crazy new stuff, which can be very cool.
|
06-03-07 10:48am
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's funny to see how people stay away from this one.
|
06-03-07 10:45am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have shared an account with a friend once.
I actually don't know how illegal that is...
Didn't work out anyway.
|
06-03-07 10:44am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
It depends on whether the camera is pointed at the whole body.
It annoys me when you have a shot of the the face and then of the ass and then of the legs etc.
So P.O.V can be a good thing and a bad thing. Depends on the girl too by the way.
|
06-03-07 10:41am
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
The individual site facts are the things that interest me the most.
Like if it possible to download or if you have to stream. Or if it's allowed to use a download manager.
|
06-03-07 10:39am
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
For me it's the updates too, plus if it's a site tied to a network I expect the network itself to grow a bit too.
And if the quality drops even a little I'm out usually.
|
06-03-07 10:28am
|
Reply
265
|
Mother Daughter Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Indeed it's not the only site that provides this, but I haven't seen many sites with this "service" either.
And it does add something extra.
They need extra stuff on their site to make it more appealing and this is one way to do it.
But thank you for the nice reply and compliment. You're the first! :)
|
06-03-07 10:11am
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Reverse cowgirl is indeed a standard position in videos these days.
But a good shot with the camera is hardly ever done, in which you can actually see everything very well.
Still my favorite position in porn movies though.
|
06-03-07 09:55am
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
It depends, the good parts I usually watch in full screen, or when I'm away from the screen it's full screen too.
But otherwise I have it windowed, so I can search the video better for the "good" parts ;)
|
06-02-07 12:46pm
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ylover's Poll
I think ylover meant, amateur websites that have a camshow once in a while on their own website.
These usually don't work very well imo, it too has a lot of guys saying stupid stuff. Usually the quality is below average too.
So I'll go with "Sure, but not a big deal"
|
06-02-07 12:41pm
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, I agree. The editing is their job ;)
But I gotta say, if you are able to download the full gallery in one archive, it doesn't really matter to me whether there are some awkward pictures in there or not.
And a crowded hard drive is just nature's way of saying: "Hey! Throw out some old porn!"
|
06-02-07 12:34pm
|
Reply
270
|
Wife Switch
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
No, I agree!
But it's like regular tv, it's those darn reality shows that are taking over!
And even half of those are fake.
Anyway, yes I too would like to see a real reality pornsite with content like this.
Although I don't think it's very likely that this will every happen... and be legal of course.
But I see where you're coming from. Maybe if we get more rants like these it might happen one day.
Keep on ranting!
|
06-02-07 11:25am
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Well, if it contains a good offer to a similar or sister website I don't mind. As long as they don't force anything on you.
|
06-02-07 10:41am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
For me, all of the above too.
But when it comes down to it, you always want quality models. No sense in having a good porn site with girls you don't feel attracted to in any way.
|
06-02-07 10:39am
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If it's like a vintage site, b&w is sometimes the only way to go.
|
06-02-07 10:36am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Always, even if I subscribe for a second time.
You never know what they put into those terms. Maybe you have to model yourself at some point!
Ok, silliness aside, you still never know.
|
06-02-07 10:35am
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It's for things like these iafd.com was invented I guess.
But it can be a hassle sometimes and they can even con you with some sites. Check my TaylorBow.com review for an example.
|
06-02-07 10:32am
|
