| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Thanks for the heads up, appreciate it. I'll do some further research on this, you've given me a good explanation to understand the basics of it, which I appreciate,
|
05-04-13 02:37pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Novels and books, I love reading. I'm holding out against eReaders too - I can see the advantages but I am old-fashioned in many ways and I just prefer physical books.
|
05-03-13 04:02am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Oh dear, I didn't even know there was such a thing!
I am a bit cautious though - I used an Ad Blocker once which was wonderfully effective, but also stopped things I wanted without me realising. For example, I use cashback sites whereby if you do your online shopping via their site, you get cashback on your purchases.
Suddenly my purchases stopped tracking and I couldn't figure out why until I guessed it might me that - when I turned it off, the problem went away.
So I tend to live with the ads now.
I suspect a Script blocker might do similiar stuff?
|
05-02-13 02:53pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think my browser (Firefox) comes with one as standard. It seems to block 99% of pop-ups, but one or two porn sites defeat it (that "Live Jasmine" one seems best at by-passing it).
The only non-porn site which seems able to defeat it is TripAdvisor, which always manages to sneak a pop-under past it!
|
05-02-13 10:30am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Barefoot for me please... looks odd if they're otherwise naked to be wearing anything on their feet.
|
04-29-13 01:42am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've put "other" because I'd say the majority of the time I've had a good fast response, occasionally I don't. Depends on the site, but most are OK.
It tends to help if you join well-regarded sites using sites like PU as a guide of course.
|
04-27-13 03:35am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
None of them... and I had to Google "hackey sack"! I voted for that though because it looks kinda fun!
|
04-23-13 03:21pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Much the same as now I think. I can't see them trying to tighten them up in most countries as it's largely fruitless, but I can't see them taking the time and effort to make them more relaxed either - generally unless there's a big demand for something these things get ignored.
If existing laws are unenforceable they tend to just leave them on the books and pretend they're not there!
|
04-21-13 05:29am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, as long as it uses a trustworthy biller and there looks to be good content.
If I liked the content it would be a shame there's no more to come, but it's still there to enjoy what there is.
|
04-19-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Sometimes I'll take the plunge - I'd be cautious but if the preview is really good it's hard to resist sometimes.
If the site is new then it's understandable if there's no reviews, but if it's an older site I'd be more suspicious I guess.
I have submitted a few sites to TBP/PU and nominated them for reviews... but ultimately the first review has to come from someone - I've benefited from reviews from others so I have to return the favour!
|
04-17-13 04:42pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like to see flaws - all humans have them! I hate porn which is over-produced and seems airbrushed - to me the sexiness of porn is in its gritty reality. I want to see real people having passionate sex, not flawless models worrying about camera angles and their best side!
|
04-15-13 12:15pm
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not my cup of tea, never seen the appeal.
It's actually quite rare in gay porn - bit of a niche I guess.
|
04-13-13 08:05am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I suppose quality of the videos and the freqency of updates. I don't care about pictures.
They basically have to show me enough of a preview to give me a "feel" for the site and leave me wanting more!
|
04-12-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
That's an excellent point Jay G - I too have often found the most expensive sites are disappointing. It's certainly no guarantee of quality - but I'd never really thought about why. Your explanation make a whole lot of sense!
|
04-09-13 03:42pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, always.
It's a part of the whole package after all, you can't ignore it in your overall rating in my opinion. If two sites are identical in quality but one costs double the other, then it would seem odd to give them an equal score to me.
|
04-09-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
It'll happen, but not in the next 10 years.
Hell, some people are prepared to have sex with plastic dolls already!
Personally, I'd rather use porn and take matters into my own hands!
|
04-07-13 02:42pm
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I picked "know they don't tell all". Most sites I've joined the content is accurately reflected by the previews, but you have to be careful.
It's often more the technical things which are debatable - the definition of "HD", for example.
Of course, restrictions like slow downloads, no download managers etc. are rarely mentioned.
I think the most outright dishonesty concerns things like frequency of updates, which often isn't as much as claimed, or the definition of "new" content, which can actually just be rotated old content.
Sometimes the previews showing highlights can be accompanied by text which suggests there's rather more to the video than there actually is.
Certainly the tour is important but I use it in conjunction with reviews wherever possible and take what it says with a pinch of salt!
That's why sites like this are so important - you get the view of an ordinary porn user who has actually got past the advertised, handed over their hard-earned and can tell you the whole unvarnished truth!
|
04-05-13 12:56am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I usually send it to sleep, occasionally I'll power it off.
|
04-03-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I'm not quite sure...
|
04-01-13 12:20pm
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I tried one but guess I'm dumb because I couldn't figure it out at all!
|
03-30-13 04:12pm
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
About 17Mb/sec for me.
|
03-28-13 11:50am
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I had to say other as I am confused about what exactly is meant by virtual sex.
I doubt the real thing will ever be bettered, at least in my lifetime!
|
03-26-13 06:41pm
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I chose guys with guns are sexy cause it's nice to see an option for guys for a change!
To be honest though I don't find guns sexy, though I do like cops and army men and obviously then guns are part of the uniform!
|
03-24-13 06:00pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I tend to like them, but it depends on the set-up really. For first time auditions it can be hot, for an experienced model maybe not so much.
Also some models are kind of sexier when they're not saying anything!
I like post-scene interviews too when they talk about how it went.
It's better if they're split off from the main movie though, so you don't have to download them and skip over them if you don't want them.
When done well they can be hot so I picked "enhances sex appeal" but as with everything in porn, done well it's hot and done badly it's awful.
|
03-22-13 03:56am
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Obviously the question is not aimed at me, but as open-minded as I try to be, I can't imagine why this would be sexy.
|
03-20-13 11:09am
|
