| Type | Site | Feedback / Review | Date | 
                                    
    | Reply 26 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Love them but I just can't afford them!
 
 
 | 05-01-15  10:33pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 27 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Yup pat362 sums it up. Anything less than twice a week at least I wouldn't class as "frequent".
 
 
 | 04-26-15  06:31pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 28 | N/A | Reply of
                Drooler's Poll 
 As for pat362!
 
 
 | 03-20-15  06:38pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 29 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Same as for Drooler!
 
 
 | 03-14-15  02:57am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 30 | N/A | Reply of
                Colm4's Poll 
 I usually join smaller, more specialist sites and download the vast majority of the stuff, leaving out only the odd model who doesn't appeal to me.
 
 If I join a larger site it's impossible to download it all and I probably wouldn't want to - though I do have a good try! So I picked the "No, but I sure try!" option!
 
 
 | 02-08-15  04:57pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 31 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Firefox and IE, but only because Windows won't let me uninstall IE.
 
 I don't like Chrome as a browser and beides I don't trust Google.
 
 
 | 11-29-14  07:19pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 32 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Seen enough to know I'd hate it - would render the whole thing pointless.
 
 I don't care if it's cultural, it's just hypocrisy. If there is a cultural prohibition against porn just don't make it in the first place.
 
 
 | 08-28-14  10:04am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 33 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 I think mine is the built-in Firefox one which blokes almost everything except damn Live Jasmine, which bizarrely pops up even on the odd gay site.
 
 The only other thing that defeats it is TripAdvisor which loves pop ups!
 
 If anyone knows of a pop-up blocker for Firefox which would kill TripAdvisor's damn pop-ups for good I'd be grateful as I use it a lot!
 
 
 | 03-18-14  08:39am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 34 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 I don't trust sites that have them - they're going to be so limited I'd rather just watch the free previews and then decide from those whether to join in full or not.
 
 If there are no free previews, I'm not paying a single cent to find out if the site is worth paying for or not.
 
 
 | 03-11-14  02:47pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 35 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 No - as long as I can see enough to get an idea of the action, I don't mind - they don't want to give the product away free!
 
 I know what genitalia looks like at this stage!
 
 
 | 03-11-14  02:44pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 36 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 I like certain niches and find general sites kind of dull. There is so much generic porn out there I find I need very specific niches to get past the general "so what?" feeling I get these days!
 
 
 | 02-18-14  02:12pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 37 | N/A | Reply of
                jberryl69's Poll 
 None of the above would put me off!
 
 
 | 02-14-14  11:20am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 38 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Rarely - I generally like to download the highest quality version but some true HD 1080 files are so huge I'll compromise and go for the next resolution down.
 
 
 | 02-13-14  09:20am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 39 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Occasionally on impulse, but I usually do a lot of research first. There are a couple of sites I know are hot as hell but were streaming-only, and I just won't join those sites.
 
 So now even an "impulse" one will mean I have done at least basic research first, though I join the same day I discover it.
 
 
 | 01-30-14  11:38am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 40 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Rather unlikely - even with a big discount it just doesn't seem worth it when I can join for a month and then rejoin in a few months more cheaply.
 
 I know that's probably a but unfair on the site, but hey I have only so much money available for porn and I have to get the best value I can.
 
 It isn't my fault the model they use for running their sites means the customer gets better value with shorter memberships.
 
 
 | 09-10-13  05:22am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 41 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 No and no plans to get one. Tattoos are becoming so ubiquitous in the UK that frankly before long the rebels will be the ones with no tattoos!
 
 I can find them kind of sexy on men, but I know if I got one I would end up changing my mind about the design later, and I also think they can look bad when you get older and your skin changes.
 
 I'm afraid I'm really old-fashioned and just think tattoos look wrong on women. I know that's totally sexist and out of date but it's just how I feel. Of course I don't find women sexy but I can appreciate beauty in a woman and I've yet to see a woman I felt a tattoo enhanced the beauty of. To me even the smallest, best-done and most tasteful tattoos look wrong, because to me tattoos are just not feminine things.
 
 
 | 09-09-13  02:25am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 42 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Happy to use an assigned one and then just use the "remember me" option. I rarely stay a member more than a month at a time anyway, so I'd never remember one I made up any better unless I compromised security further by using one I use on another site.
 
 
 | 09-07-13  03:41pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 43 | N/A | Reply of
                Drooler's Poll 
 I tend not to follow individual models that closely - the type of model who is a known "porn star" rarely appeals to me as they are usually in very mainstream, glitzy porn.
 
 I prefer more "real", down-and-dirty porn and in that you tend to get a first name if you get one at all!
 
 The name does vary across sites, so I tend to use the first name I know they by and then put their other name(s) in the file name.
 
 
 | 09-03-13  07:56am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 44 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Yep - compared to what you used to have to pay for a single DVD (or videotape for those old enough to recall!) I reckon most sites give you a lot more than that.
 
 
 | 08-29-13  05:02pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 45 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 I don't watch it as I don't find Japanese porn to my taste, but I've seen samples of it and it renders the porn completely pointless and unwatchable in my opinion.
 
 I have no clue why anyone would spend good money on censored porn - it's a oxymoron!
 
 So I had to pick "I don't watch Japanese content" and I admit I wouldn't even if it was uncensored - but if I did want to see it, I'd have to pick "absolutely hate it".
 
 
 | 08-23-13  02:36am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 46 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 Yes. Having had bank fraud on my account twice, both times via internet, I am super-careful. If it's not a name I've heard of and trust, I will not join the site no matter how hot it looks.
 
 I trust Epoch, CCBill and Verotel. Any others I'd have to check on here.
 
 Sites that do their own billing - forget it!
 
 
 | 08-19-13  09:15am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 47 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 I think it's about 2.5 years old. It's a laptop and probably coming towards the end of its life but I love it - I was a bargain and has served me well.
 
 I am also reluctant to get a new one as my current one came with Windows 7, which I am very happy with, and I don't like the sound of Windows 8 at all.
 
 
 | 08-17-13  03:06am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 48 | N/A | Reply of
                careylowell's Poll 
 Other - I don't think any of those options will occur.
 
 Pictures still seem to be going strong and there is still a market for them - so I can't see what would change that in ten years. Video has been around long enough to kill pictures if it was going to - there is clearly still demand for pics in the face of video so I can see nothing that would change that.
 
 I agree porn does seem to have gotten progressively more brutal, but not all porn. I also don't see how it could go much further without being illegal, so I think we've seen as brutal as we're going to get.
 
 Less brutal to attract women? There is already porn aimed at women, and porn not especially aimed at women, which is less brutal. Brutal porn is really a genre of porn, not porn itself.
 
 Every night on prime time TV? I don't think so - attitudes to porn may be a little more liberal now but not that liberal - and the easy availability of porn on the internet would make it largely irrelevant anyway. Porn doesn't sppeal to enough people who are willing admit it to get the ratings on prime time TV.
 
 
 | 08-13-13  04:12pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 49 | N/A | Reply of
                Drooler's Poll 
 Also I would say that porn producers sometimes forget that porn is a fantasy. If you do too much "behind the scenes" stuff, you're spoiling the fantasy.
 
 Given the limitations of porn in terms of production values and especially the acting abiities of the models, it can sometimes be hard enough to suspend disbelief when watching porn without them showing you all the behind the scenes stuff too!
 
 
 | 08-11-13  05:38am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 50 | N/A | Reply of
                Drooler's Poll 
 I put "other" as it depends - if it shows them fooling around naked it can be kind of hot, but "bloopers" and just dreary shots of them setting up isn't sexy, and sexy is the whole point of porn for me.
 
 
 | 08-11-13  04:06am 
 
 |