| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
Not really relevant to me, but I don't understand why condom use would put off the viewer in hetero porn. Your focus on is on the girl, presumably? Why would the cock having a condom on it be a problem?
I chose director instructions being heard, but even that depends on the video. I can ruin a scene if there's a fantasy to maintain, but I quite like to hear it if it's made sexy, like the director is getting into it!
|
05-18-12 05:30pm
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Anything more than once a week is frequent to me. Weekly updates are regular but not freqent.
Does depend a bit on the content though. If the site makes long videos once a week is more acceptable than if it's a site that breaks a movie up into short scenes - then I expect more updates.
|
05-16-12 06:02pm
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Websites first, then by model name within the website folders.
If the model is on more than one website, I cross-reference them in the titles.
|
05-14-12 01:29pm
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
As in so many things, quality is more important than size! I'd rather have a good quality smaller screen than a big cheap one.
|
05-12-12 07:57pm
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can cope with a few, but I don't like there to be loads, as I am already paying for access to the site. What especially annoys me is when a site is particularly expensive but they still do it - sites like CFNM, CMNM and First Auditions are particularly bad for that.
I also hate it when they mix banner ads for similar content in between the videos - for a second I think a banner ad is content on the site, go to watch it and find it's an ad!
If it's for another site in the network I also think the ad should be showing a discount unique to you as a paying member of one of their sites, so you get some kind of reward for the loyalty you've already shown. It amazes me how few companies give even a small token discount to a sister site - I think they'd make a profit that way and encourage loyalty and rebills.
I know porn companies have to make money, but we're the honest paying customers who have paid for their content, so ads can be a little too much on top.
Still, I suppose I see ads in magazines I've paid for. As long as it keeps the site cost down and they don't make it look like content I can cope, but I think sites should be careful.
|
05-10-12 08:44am
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'd say several weeks - sometimes I go through periods when I'm a bit "porned out" and don't really look at them for a while - but it never lasts long!
|
05-09-12 03:29am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Ooops! Yes I think I do! I guess I was thinking of jacking it! I've never tried one TBH, I don't really use toys, but they seem very popular and are appearing in more and more gay porn films which is why I suggested one.
|
05-07-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
So sorry to hear that graymane. If I lived close I could over and help you out - but as I'm a guy I guess that wouldn't be so hot for you!
Have you tried something like a fleshjack? They seem to be very popular now, and I'll bet you could fix one somewhere so you could use it without having to use your hands to hold it.
|
05-07-12 03:14pm
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Can't comment on girls, but I'd say it depends on the person - glasses suit some people and not others. Also depends on the scenario - a suited businessman looks more appropriate in glasses than a manual worker might somehow.
|
05-04-12 03:57am
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No - it didn't occur to me. I do always look at profiles just out of interest, though - just not specifically to check their age, and age didn't occur to me as a factor in understanding their reviews.
|
05-03-12 11:58am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Definitely novels and books for me - I love reading. I enjoy reading articles online too, but nothing can beat a good old-fashioned book for me - and I've no interest whatsoever in getting a Kindle or any other e-reader.
|
04-30-12 07:32am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just joined my first one in several months but they subscribed me to the wrong site!
|
04-28-12 05:35pm
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I haven't seen any I've thought looked too young but if I did then yes I was avoid that site completely. It doesn't really come up for me as I tend to prefer older men anyway.
|
04-26-12 03:10pm
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Revisit the dead one, definitely - otherwise you just get multiple threads about the same thing and it gets confusing. I know threads sometimes go off topic, but you can just post a new message dragging it back to the original topic!
|
04-24-12 06:03pm
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Poll
Should be a "don't know" option really as every case is different and what works for one couple may not work for another.
I've never had a relationship so I'm not sure.
|
04-23-12 04:23am
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've generally always had a speedy reply, but the advice is variable. It's too easy for them to blame problems with your computer or broadband.
|
04-20-12 06:00pm
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
All the time, there are so many out there! I wish they'd use consistent "porn names" across sites so to keep track of them more easily. It would help them build a fan base!
|
04-14-12 10:44am
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, and no desire to.
|
04-12-12 12:11am
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
If both partners are okay with it I see no harm - I've spoken to swingers in the past and they've seemed happy with it - but I don't think it's right for most people.
|
04-10-12 12:15pm
|
Reply
270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes always - I take more recent ones into account a bit more as they're more up to date but generally I find sites tend not to change much - ther basic ethos and standards depend on whether or not the site owers care or not and that rarely varies much.
|
04-08-12 01:58pm
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Other - I like scenarios like offices, police stations, prisons etc
|
04-06-12 11:37am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
My hand! Sadly nobody knows me or my needs better than my hand does - it's being taking care of them since I hit puberty after all and it knows my needs cause it's part of the same body!
|
04-04-12 03:38pm
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I know what you mean but what annoys me is that Apple are introducing "new versions" of OSX which really aren't major upgrades at all - they're basically the same thing with a few extra features - and they're cutting off support to older systems.
I have a friend who uses Leopard OSX and can't use the latest versions of Apple software - but his boyfriend who has an ancient Windows XP PC can! So Apple will support old versions of Windows, but not of OSX.
OSX Leopard only came out in 2007, Windows XP in 2001 - Apple will support XP but not Leopard.
|
04-03-12 02:44am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Windows 7 here. I used to have Mac OSX but it doesn't always play nice with porn so it had to go! Besides, I got sick of Apple constantly bringing out expensive "new" operating systems and making it harder and harder to use old ones. Microsoft is still supporting XP now!
I heard Vista was a car-crash but I like 7. XP was still a good system though.
|
04-02-12 10:55am
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I love em both - on men!
|
03-31-12 07:23am
|
