| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Obviously it's for data as well, because I like to have the average persons opinion as well as a professional reviewer, but hanging out with fellow perverts is probably the main reason! This site has a community feel no professional review site has and that's the main attraction.
|
03-21-12 06:43am
|
Reply
427
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Preview, definitely - if I can't see a good idea of what a site is going to be like, I won't join. I understand why sites want to limit previews, but a generous preview will always make me want to see more.
Interesting how few people are primarily bothered by price!
Take note site owners - deliver quality and show us the quality in a preview, and the vast majority will happily pay for it.
|
03-20-12 05:27pm
|
Reply
428
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Shame, but is the only option now to pay $79 to download everything or is it still a memebership site for now? If so presumably you could still join as a member for a month and download everyone for less than $79?
|
03-18-12 05:24pm
|
Reply
429
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Less - even when I get my prepaid card sorted out, I've tried the handful of sites I was really curious about joining now and the more general sites haven't got a lot of appeal for me.
Plus I want to save some cash as the job situation looks more precarious.
|
03-17-12 04:14pm
|
Reply
430
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Yeah even I've had a look at this site as I love public nudity and I agree about peoples reaction to it being really hot! Excellent, well-written review as always which gives a real sense of why you like the site.
|
03-16-12 03:52pm
|
Reply
431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
Now I have a laptop I tend to just let it go to sleep itself, becuase I use it throughout the day. I sometimes put it completely off for the night but not always.
|
03-15-12 04:05pm
|
Reply
432
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I'd say fetishes simply because although there are plenty of fetish sites, I find so many of them hopelessly bad quality - made by standard sites which totally misunderstand the fetish and just make standard porn with a few "fetish" things bolted on.
|
03-14-12 12:54pm
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I've glanced at them but I admit I tend to rely on the review itself warning me of regional pricing. Even then whilst it annoys me, it won't stop me joining a site I like, so it doesn't matter.
Europeans are used to paying a lot more than Americans for the same product anyway!
|
03-12-12 12:36am
|
Reply
434
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Wow - I see what you mean! They really do look like pale plastic beach balls which have been massively over-inflated, I wonder how she manages in day to day life with boobs that big!
|
03-09-12 08:15am
|
Reply
435
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Now this sounds like a classic case of a site with a new, totally fresh idea with lots of great unknown models making a mess of things by being too amateur! Such a shame - I've come across a lot of sites like this. You need the fresh idea of a smaller site combined with the professionalism of a more established site really. I sometimes wonder if bigger sites could offer their services to start-up sites to get them more professional and then share the profits.
Excellent review - sounds like the kind of site I'd join for a month or so until the issues became too much for me and I regretfully have to leave!
|
03-09-12 07:50am
|
Reply
436
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
A beautifully written review which was a pleasure to read! I agree with you about the immediate streaming - really annoying - and it's sad to see them using the "free membership" trick, but it sounds like a quality site in terms of content. Excellent review.
|
03-09-12 07:44am
|
Reply
437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Non-exclusive content - I always find a site which majors on quantity tends to compromise on quality and exclusivity. I'd rather pay for a small site which has good-quality, exclusive content I know I'll enjoy than a big network of sites with stuff I've seen before and low quality.
|
03-09-12 07:31am
|
Reply
438
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
2 days is fine for me - I check in most days and it's nice to have a new poll to vote on regularly!
|
03-07-12 06:26am
|
Reply
439
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't really think I could - I mean I use porn but that doesn't mean I have any contacts in it. If somebody asked me my opinion on doing it I'd talk it through with them, but I wouldn't suggest it to anyone - they might think I was being rude.
|
03-04-12 11:52am
|
Reply
440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely - even if a site is fantastic quality, if there's another site that's just as good but does it cheaper, then that site is better overall as far as I'm concerned.
I'm reasonable though - I don't look for "cheap" sites - I look at the value for money the site provides, taking into account quality, frequency of updates, how much content there is available already etc. I expect to pay more for quality, but I still expect good VALUE for money. If a site is expensive but high quality that's fine.
|
03-01-12 10:10am
|
Reply
441
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Other - I like big, beefy, tough working men!
If it's just for sex, I don't care about his personality - he's just a sex partner. If it's for a relationship, then a caring nice guy does it for me every time - and I didn't used to believe you could find someone attractive after a while because of personality - now I understand you can.
|
02-17-12 09:19am
|
Reply
442
|
Cuckold Cream
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Uh-oh - the second I hear of the slightest problem with cancellation that's enough to put me off a site, so reviews like this are especially helpful. Sites have to be 100% hot on cancellations in a business like this where trust is low!
|
02-13-12 08:12pm
|
Reply
443
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Review
Superb quality review very well-written and comprehensive. Well done!
|
02-13-12 08:09pm
|
Reply
444
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
nickisthename's Review
Welcome to PU! Your reviews seem good quality and it's good to welcome you on the site. I have used the male version of VideoBox which I have yet to get round to reviewing and agree with you - great content but the filtering needs work.
|
02-13-12 08:07pm
|
Reply
445
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I took the third option too - I tend to write a comment or prelimary review which makes it clear it's only a first impression and that the review will be updated and the score revised the site develops - just to let people know if the site seems to have potential and is worth watching, or is currently disappointing and seems to be on the wrong track.
|
02-12-12 12:48pm
|
Reply
446
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, though I think I once had a picture of Billie-Joe Armstrong getting his dick out at a concert - always found him so attractive but sadly lost the pic.
Celebrity stuff tends to focus on women - apart from the above I don't think there's ever been any sex tapes or naked shots of male celebs I'd be interested in.
So many sites which pretend they'll show you celebs naked just photoshop their heads on nude pics which is just pointless.
If a celeb I did like did pose naked or do a sex tape I'd certainly pay good cash for it, though I often like men who others wouldn't find attractive - John Goodman sex tape anyone?! x
|
02-08-12 04:05pm
|
Reply
447
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
On average once a day, always something new to see and keep my interest!
|
02-06-12 10:28am
|
Reply
448
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Varies depending on if I've just joinedf a site or not but overall less than 10%
|
02-04-12 02:42am
|
Reply
449
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for another great message greymane, sorry for the delay in replying. I'm really, really touched!
|
02-03-12 08:47pm
|
Reply
450
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Hey man - I am really, really touched by your post - thank you so much! I did begin to wonder if perhaps I was kind of intruding - not that anyone said anything, I've been made more than welcome - but there are so few gay reviewers on the site and it does feel set up as basically a heterosexual male site - and hey there's nothing wrong with that. So I just kinda wondered if people really did want gay sites and gay reviewers around.
So your comments mean a lot to me - thank you.
|
02-03-12 08:44pm
|
