| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
Superb review, welcome to the site!
|
05-27-12 06:53pm
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
What's GGG?!
|
05-27-12 06:49pm
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
To be fair ergo from a safer sex point of view, if she manages to stop it going in her eyes and her skin is unbroken, it's probably safer than intercourse without a condom, which seems to be standard in straight porn and still shocks me.
It is degrading I guess but no more than S&M type stuff.
|
05-26-12 01:30pm
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Love it but I find I am not attracted to Asian men, and it's difficult to find gay bukkake at all - the main gay bukkake site is Asian guys.
|
05-26-12 01:28pm
|
Reply
380
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I think adult websites think their customers are too embarrassed about their purchase to complain - the service can be awful.
I am disppointed in Epoch - I thought they were trustworthy but this puts me off using them as a biller.
Maybe PU should have a section where we can review billing providers too!
|
05-25-12 05:46pm
|
Reply
381
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Reasonably fast, though I'd love it to be even faster! I'm satisfied though.
|
05-24-12 04:57pm
|
Reply
382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Nope, it didn't really occur to me! I tend not to go in for big stars when it comes to porn anyway - I like the more "guy next door" kind!
I can't stand Twitter and Facebook anyway.
|
05-22-12 05:30am
|
Reply
383
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another top-quality review, thank you!
|
05-21-12 11:28pm
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I never thought I'd be a notebook person but got my first last year and it's the only computer I need now. Of course, now I finally gave in it's all about tablets now so still behind the times!
|
05-21-12 10:26am
|
Reply
385
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
Fascinating review - not an niche I am very interested in but I do understand the frustration of finding a site which seems to cater to your niche only to find the owners obviously don't really understand it and are just putting in a token nod to it with standard porn.
|
05-19-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
Not really relevant to me, but I don't understand why condom use would put off the viewer in hetero porn. Your focus on is on the girl, presumably? Why would the cock having a condom on it be a problem?
I chose director instructions being heard, but even that depends on the video. I can ruin a scene if there's a fantasy to maintain, but I quite like to hear it if it's made sexy, like the director is getting into it!
|
05-18-12 05:30pm
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Anything more than once a week is frequent to me. Weekly updates are regular but not freqent.
Does depend a bit on the content though. If the site makes long videos once a week is more acceptable than if it's a site that breaks a movie up into short scenes - then I expect more updates.
|
05-16-12 06:02pm
|
Reply
388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Websites first, then by model name within the website folders.
If the model is on more than one website, I cross-reference them in the titles.
|
05-14-12 01:29pm
|
Reply
389
|
Daring Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Yep - gotta agree, that's one well-written review with everything in it!
|
05-13-12 06:19pm
|
Reply
390
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
As in so many things, quality is more important than size! I'd rather have a good quality smaller screen than a big cheap one.
|
05-12-12 07:57pm
|
Reply
391
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can cope with a few, but I don't like there to be loads, as I am already paying for access to the site. What especially annoys me is when a site is particularly expensive but they still do it - sites like CFNM, CMNM and First Auditions are particularly bad for that.
I also hate it when they mix banner ads for similar content in between the videos - for a second I think a banner ad is content on the site, go to watch it and find it's an ad!
If it's for another site in the network I also think the ad should be showing a discount unique to you as a paying member of one of their sites, so you get some kind of reward for the loyalty you've already shown. It amazes me how few companies give even a small token discount to a sister site - I think they'd make a profit that way and encourage loyalty and rebills.
I know porn companies have to make money, but we're the honest paying customers who have paid for their content, so ads can be a little too much on top.
Still, I suppose I see ads in magazines I've paid for. As long as it keeps the site cost down and they don't make it look like content I can cope, but I think sites should be careful.
|
05-10-12 08:44am
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'd say several weeks - sometimes I go through periods when I'm a bit "porned out" and don't really look at them for a while - but it never lasts long!
|
05-09-12 03:29am
|
Reply
393
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
Always good to see a webmaster replying positively and constructively to a review - I wish more would, well done.
Well-written review but if you used paragraphs it would be much easier to read.
|
05-07-12 03:30pm
|
Reply
394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Ooops! Yes I think I do! I guess I was thinking of jacking it! I've never tried one TBH, I don't really use toys, but they seem very popular and are appearing in more and more gay porn films which is why I suggested one.
|
05-07-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
395
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
I'm amazed a huge and well-known company like Hustler has such basic technical issues and sloppy labelling on their website - much smaller companies manage to do it much better without their resources!
Really odd.
Excellent review.
|
05-07-12 03:20pm
|
Reply
396
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
So sorry to hear that graymane. If I lived close I could over and help you out - but as I'm a guy I guess that wouldn't be so hot for you!
Have you tried something like a fleshjack? They seem to be very popular now, and I'll bet you could fix one somewhere so you could use it without having to use your hands to hold it.
|
05-07-12 03:14pm
|
Reply
397
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Excellent review. Sounds like something so typical of porn - excellent content let down by lousy site organisation. You seem to get a slick website with average content or great content on a poor webite, but rarely both!
I agree with you about music in porn - drives me insane!
|
05-07-12 03:11pm
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Can't comment on girls, but I'd say it depends on the person - glasses suit some people and not others. Also depends on the scenario - a suited businessman looks more appropriate in glasses than a manual worker might somehow.
|
05-04-12 03:57am
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No - it didn't occur to me. I do always look at profiles just out of interest, though - just not specifically to check their age, and age didn't occur to me as a factor in understanding their reviews.
|
05-03-12 11:58am
|
Reply
400
|
Reality Junkies
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Superb quality review as ever. I do wish sites which are part of a network would at least give a small token discount when you join more than one site - just as a thank-you for being one of their better customers!
|
04-30-12 11:48pm
|
