Thanks! I try not to use DL managers because it tends to...dilute the best stuff with a whole lot of just OK stuff. I already have nearly 2 terrabytes of stuff collected since these sites first started appearing on the Internet and that's after I archived the oldest stuff.
That would make a good survey....how big is your collection...
Nearly all of the videos are behind-the-scenes sets of the photo shoots and are pretty short. A few were done separately at the photo shoot site with nice POV. It seems like the girls that have their own sub-sites have slightly better videos...Monika, for eexample. Nearly all of them are 2-3 minutes or less, probably to keep the size down. I think they are all 720p but a very few older sets, like some of those of the beautiful but retired Marketa, were remastered from lesser resolution. Most of the soundtracks are music and there at least a couple of older videos that have distracting animations or effects in them. Largest video file size I see is about 150k.
I was able to get in after changing my password (for no reason). And I got an email back that said "We see you logged in so everything must be OK now." No mention of the fact that my password was changed without my knowledge and I was charged for but didn't log in for 2 months because I thought the account had expired...the usual case when you can't log in using known-good account credentials. But they are in the business of taking my money, so they did, and technically don't have give any back for any reason, so they didn't.
Part of the problem is that the more obscure billing services, like the one that Diesel uses, Vendo Services, aren't on my checklist to review monthly like ccbill and epoch are. At least they send emails, though. One, ECHST, doesn't even send you a confirmation email when you sign up to a site they service or a cancellation when you cancel so you have no record at all of the charge other than the cryptic information on the credit card bill and no proof that a cancellation was processed.
I need to remember to include the billing service in my reviews...
Nice review. Still trying to figure out how they decide something goes to WowGirls or WowPorn. Much of the content seems completely interchangeable.
Also, just FYI, in Met Art and a growing number of site on their network, there is an "options" link in the upper right hand corner on the main page that allows you to personalize you preferences. One of the options to sets whether or not images open on separate pages. Personally, I like the "open images in new tab" option, although it can create a lot of tabs of the images are really good. :-)
Easy enough to turn it off, though.
Thanks for the review! I've never seen this site but from the previews it looks pretty specialized. As I'm sure you know "monster sex" is an odd but growing niche in the animation world so I guess it was only a matter of time before somebody adapted it into this format. There a few other very good cosplay VR sites and one or two pretty good BDSM VR sites, but I have to say this is the first time I've ever seen VR fuck-an-alien porn. Um. Eww. It is also probably worth mentioning that although this is VR, it is not all POV. Anyway, thanks for letting us know about this site!
OK, that makes sense. Maybe porn is like Chior or drama in high school. If we had known the ratio of straight girls to straight guys in those groups, we almost certainly would have joined in when we had the chance. :-)
Nice review. It reminded me to go back and join again.
OK, got a question. Define Heartcore for me. I am pretty sure I understand what it is and have been looking for a definition for the style, but I can't actually find one for the context.
Ah. My bad. I read X-Art and thought MetArtX. I wrote an X-art review back in 2012 and haven't been a member since 2015, so it looks like it is time to rejoin! Sinc X-Art and Colette are part of the same group, it is entirely possible that some of the sets are duplicates.
I'm a current member of TMW and, again, you are absolutely correct. I'm not sure where I was looking but I must have been confusing it with something else I had open at the time....or I was having a stroke. It was only 9:00 so alcohol or sleep deprivation could not have been the culprits.
Thanks for the response and for the corrections. All good!
Looking around a little more, I do see a few common models on Colette and Met Art. Heck, I just found Leah Gotti on Met Art from 2015 (disappointing sets of her, though, considering she has quickly become a really popular, full blown, do everything porn star now...interracial 5 guy gang bang on Colette? I'm more crushed than curious.) But I am still sure they are not sharing material. I may join Colette since it looks interesting and I haven't before.
Easiest way to figure this out is to look up model names at indexxx.com
I am 99.9% sure that the material at Met Art X exclusive. It is not the same stuff at Colette and TMW. MetartX uses many of the same European models as Met Art and, with the possible exception of Nancy, I have seen none of these models at TMW. TMW is primarily US porn models. I have not been a member of Colette, but it looks like those are mostly US porn models also. If you look at the model listing and check names against Indexxx, you will see that these TMW/Colette girls might be at ALSScan, but I didn't see any at MetArt or MetArtX. There are a few models that might be at both, but it isn't the same material. Now...I do see a couple of lesser Met Art models at WTF, but that is not too surprising since WTF is a European site that collects material from all over. I have never seen any authorized Met Art network material on any sites outside of their network, so I am pretty sure that it isn't the same material there, either.
Thanks for the response. It means a lot when a representative from the site responds.
From what I can see, your VR videos are well done. It looks like your intended audience is lesbian (as opposed to a girl-only "view" site like In-The-Crack), correct? I think it would probably clear things up a lot if you just come out and say that. Nothing wrong with that at all. Call it Sapphic VR. You will still get a lot of men and it will be clear that it is girls only sex. (Of course, I'm a guy and I'm pretty dense so it wasn't obvious to me when I made my first comment.)
When it comes to straight sex, I truly believe that using VR to shoot strictly observational scenes is not the most effective use of the medium. You shouldn't shoot a VR of a roller coaster from the ground, you don't create a VR game in the third person, you shouldn't shoot a VR car demo from the street watching the car go by and you shouldn't shoot straight porn VR sex from a chair next to the bed.
That said, I understand that it is incredibly difficult to do sapphic sex in participatory VR because there is no common position or orientation to shoot from. There are a few non-VR POV sites that do it pretty well, but I'm sure there is less gear involved and the actors are often pros. In your case, it would probably interfere with the genuine lovemaking that you are striving for. Your girls are not pros so working around and staying close to a fixed rig would certainly have an adverse impact on your videos. I can appreciate all of that.
As for the price, yes, 30 videos is just about average or maybe just shy of average. If you look at my review history here, you will see that I've joined nearly every VR porn site out there and am constantly joining more. The price for your site is 30-50% higher than any other VR site out there, even the ones that are approaching or exceeding 100 videos and are part of a large mixed network. But I understand. You've got a budget. You've got expenses. You have to determine how to stay solvent, what the market will bear and what your unique niche will support.
Rather than reducing your price universally, may I suggest reaching out to the folks at The Best Porn and working out a discount deal? It will almost certainly get you positive reviews and will help make your site a bigger blip on the VR map while limiting the discount to the most savvy viewers. Please consider that.
I applaud your efforts and truly hope you succeed.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
