| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Worth noting that there is a level attributed to each model - nude, topless or non-nude - so be prepared for not seeing everything from all models!
But still, as you say, looks promising; am-glam perhaps?
|
08-31-11 02:42pm
|
Reply
402
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
pyrosis's Review
Thanks for the review, this looks like a fun site. The lack of zips is a bit annoying - I far prefer to look at pics full-screen with a viewer rather than in the browser. How are the pictures displayed (just in a browser page, or in some kind of slideshow thingummy) and what resolution are they?
|
10-01-11 11:06pm
|
Reply
403
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
Am guessing that they have a good community/forum there - once the site was listed here a call probably went out for reviews, and loyal members responded. Which is no bad thing - as you say, it sounds honest.
|
10-01-11 11:03pm
|
Reply
404
|
Cosplay Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I'll second that - this is something that interests me too, so if the webmaster is watching, do give TBP access so we can get a review up here!
|
02-05-13 09:42am
|
Reply
405
|
Cosplay Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Neodaemonus's Comment
I think it's fair - it was me that actually asked for the site to be included so I guess I started it! I'm not a member yet, but having seen Cosplay Deviants listed recently, I started hunting around the genre and found this which seems a bit racier. It's on my list...
|
09-25-11 03:00pm
|
Reply
406
|
Dare Ring
(0)
|
Reply of
AlexMercer's Review
^^ What tangub said. Despite all the kerfuffle, welcome here and look forward to reading more of your reviews; you obviously have a slightly off-center taste for smut, which could be interesting :)
|
10-03-11 02:01pm
|
Reply
407
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Great review as ever, tangub - like you this site is vaguely on my radar ; it seems a bit too glam-porn-y for my taste but many of the models I like seem to crop up here so it is tempting... and being a nylon fan, hot legs and feet is definitely appealing. Good to know that it has a lot of quality content - like you, if an offer crops up, I may well give it a go!
|
12-20-12 03:03am
|
Reply
408
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Likewise, sad news indeed. While his style is a bit formulaic, it is nonetheless a good formula and very recognisable - I can generally tell straight away when seeing his sets on other sites. It also seems very respectful to the models - quite glam, but in an alluring, natural way - definitely a loss.
|
02-10-13 02:31am
|
Reply
409
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Well, I wouldn't say that, actually; there are a few site issues, but overall it works well. For me it is the material itself that doesn't quite work; the quality and production values are great, but I found it a bit too slick, and a bit formulaic.
The previews you see are representative; the majority of sets and videos start with underwear or something flimsy. The ones I kept tend to be those starting with a little more, but they still don't fulfil the ideals of a full strip with plenty of tease.
There is a lot of material, though, and the TBP price is good, so if you see anything in the previews that grabs you, it may be worth a try.
|
08-18-11 01:03am
|
Reply
410
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Great review tangub - and you beat me to it, mine is impending too. I'll try to come up with a different angle on it!
|
08-07-11 09:23am
|
Reply
411
|
Electro Films
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Comment
Just had a look at this site - I quite like the alt-porn idea, but I just think I'd get distracted by all those chintzy bedspreads it all seems to be performed on :|
|
10-08-11 12:30am
|
Reply
412
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
I've not joined Ero Berlin yet but it's been on my list... one of the angles I liked was the public/risky locations - how does the site fare in those terms? I wasn't sure if eg Femjoy as you mentioned has anything comparable?
|
12-12-11 11:41pm
|
Reply
413
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
t9chome's Comment
This is a site that's been on my to-try list for a while, so a discounted price would definitely bump it up...
|
05-09-11 12:45am
|
Reply
414
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Thanks for mentioning this site - one I've never heard of but seems very appealing! It's only videos? I'm more into pics lately, but I could do with something different... suspect I'll sign up here sometime.
|
04-06-11 12:41am
|
Reply
415
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Aha, many thanks for the reply - I'll probably skip this for now since I find Met Art a bit lacking in excitement. Instead I'll probably go to The Life Erotic - looks a bit racier of late...
|
11-28-12 12:08am
|
Reply
416
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Thanks for a great review - this site crops up from time to time on my radar. Is there anything that sets it apart from Met Art? Is the content any different in terms of theme or explicitness?
|
11-27-12 05:35pm
|
Reply
417
|
Erotic Snap
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Aha, that's interesting - I had noticed this site too on TGPs but didn't realise they were doing hardcore/artcore/sensualcore/whateveryoucallit.
It looks tempting, but... I can't help feel I'd be much more drawn to these sites if they had a spread of models from 18-30. I suspect one reality is that by their mid-20s, some models have got tattoos and fake boobs, which don't really work in this style of content.
|
09-12-12 09:52am
|
Reply
418
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Concur with tangub - this was on my to-join list, there are a lot of models I like on there. But - assuming all set/videos were accessible to members before, I can't at all see the logic of increasing the price fourfold because the site has stopped updating!
|
03-19-12 02:21am
|
Reply
419
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Looks like an interesting addition to the genre - as you say, a bit sparse, so babes.com is likely to be my next heartcore join - but this is worth keeping an eye on.
|
02-28-13 04:58am
|
Reply
420
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Reply
Thanks for the reply! It's not so much explicitness that I'm looking for (although it doesn't hurt...) - more a sense of tease and eroticism. I've seen plenty of non-nude material that's more exciting than I found Met Art, I suspect they have strict guidelines on how cheeky/sexual the models can be regardless of how naked they actually are. Sounds like Femjoy might be similar...
|
02-20-12 03:34pm
|
Reply
421
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Review
MisterMark, as per gaypornolover, thanks for an excellent and comprehensive review. This site is vaguely on my shortlist, it has sets of a lot of models I like, so it's good to find out a bit more about it.
You mention it trails behind Met Art in terms of features and quality - do you feel it has any more eroticism to it? I felt Met Art lacking in that respect; not to do with the degree of explicitness per se, but more that there is little tease or cheekiness in it.
|
02-19-12 10:29pm
|
Reply
422
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
This is a network I've been tempted by, since I'm quite keen on nylons - but it is, as pat362 mentioned, very expensive. It also looks a bit samey, perhaps? I like something a bit different - perhaps something a bit artsy... but not at the expense of explicitness.
|
06-12-12 11:17am
|
Reply
423
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Aha, thanks for the info, Cap'n - I haven't joined the site since the new photographer started.
I actually quite like the style I see on the previews - but it is a little more glam/mainstream. If the previous photographer is no longer featuring, I think it's a shame not to have the two different styles - there was a more relaxed, natural charm to it.
|
03-19-12 02:24am
|
Reply
424
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
That's a shame - as you say, the price was definitely a draw here. Not to belittle the work, it's fun and quirky - but not quite niche enough to demand the same price as other sites.
Still, I may drop by there again sometime, I do really like some of the models.
|
09-07-11 12:42am
|
Reply
425
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Agree, Capn - was a member here a few months ago and will likely join again at some point to catch up.
Some of the sets didn't quite work for me, but it's good to see a photographer's site evolve as their technique improves; more recent sets are definitely better. I found the same at Breath Takers, where sets from maybe 2-3 years ago were good, but didn't quite have the atmosphere of the more recent ones.
The site design/layout at FB is exemplary, too.
|
05-18-11 12:04am
|
