| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1651
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
There goes another one!
Cap'n. :0(
|
04-15-12 02:51am
|
Reply
1652
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
Doubtless it is a turn about. Normal become a fetish?? :00
That said there are unfortunately some genuinely bizarre hair freaks frequenting ATKNH! ;0)
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-05-12 02:01pm
|
Reply
1653
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
You like it then? ;0)
Cap'n. :0D
|
02-05-12 01:13pm
|
Reply
1654
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Comment
I'm glad you are liking it, BG.
Should you need to contact him, you will find Basil a most helpful Webmanager.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-03-12 06:35am
|
Reply
1655
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
Functionality is superior at WAH & the Webmanager is very responsive.
ATK is a much bigger outfit & therefore more ponderous in getting improvements implemented.
ATKNH have shedloads more content, WAH has only been going a couple of years.
Models & content is a very personal thing.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-30-12 12:32pm
|
Reply
1656
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Welcome back, RB, good to have you around again! :0)
As you say the site has grown and has many positives, most importantly the 'can do' attitude shown by Basil.
For my tastes, there is still far to much 'touchy, feely' & toy play.
Clear, full body nude shots are still unfortunately way underused.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 12:24am
|
Reply
1657
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Hi Monty,
There is a good deal of variation in quality as they use quite a few photographers at once and not all are first rate.
That said, it isn't usually lighting that gives a problem, it is usually focus & framing issues.
The poses vary with models, but generally there is a weighting in favour of held open & toy use, neither of which I care for.
The site owner has been asking for more standing full body shots;always at a premium; with limited success.
1) You get some of, although a lot are spoilt with excessive 'touchy, feely.'
2) Is usually fairly well covered.
3) There is some of that but usually they go for the closer in shot.
The coding on the site is arguably its best feature. The user defined custom zips are very slick & useful. Basil is always very helpful & attentive, but is limited by what his contract photogs supply.
I don't want to urn this into a mini review, but I would say it was worth a month's punt to see for yourself.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-12-11 04:09pm
|
Reply
1658
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I have returned myself recently, due to a generous discount offer received via email.
Yes, it is improving, but TBH there is still too much toy play & gyno for my liking.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-26-11 05:37am
|
Reply
1659
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I have to agree with you here, M.
As usual, content tends to move towards the harder end of the spectrum, driven by a vocal minority & those that like things softer & more erotic lose out.
What I can never understand though are those sites that shy away from full nudity, but are quite happy to show gynacology, masturbation & dildos.
Cap'n. :0(
|
07-07-11 09:23am
|
Reply
1660
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
Nice one, Basil!
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-29-11 09:20am
|
Reply
1661
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
No Name's Comment
NOT true!
You aren't going to win many friends around here by making a first post with that allegation.
Cap'n. :0(
|
06-28-11 12:41pm
|
Reply
1662
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
I don't think it is as premeditated as that, it is just that forum access is via the member area & therefore precludes non-members from taking part.
Cap'n. :0(
|
06-20-11 09:18am
|
Reply
1663
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Hi Mr.Smut,
I received your WAH Forum friend request via email today.
Unfortunately, as I am no longer a member there I do not have access to the forum. :0(
I'm pleased you are enjoying your time there though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-19-11 12:38pm
|
Reply
1664
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Pretty much seems to be what is ongoing there.
A shame & a missed opportunity IMO
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-17-11 01:47pm
|
Reply
1665
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
I thought you would respond, Basil, and I am pleased you did.
Basically, I was just calling it upon perceived recent trends.
I am intrigued by those changes that are in the offing. ;0)
Best regards,
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-21-11 04:28am
|
Reply
1666
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I think you are spot on with that, my friend.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-20-11 03:26pm
|
Reply
1667
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well, as I understand it, new photographers & models are coming online.
It is slowly filtering through at the moment.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-23-10 01:19pm
|
Reply
1668
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Comment
Yes, it is the old conundrum of not being able to please all the folk all the time.
What floats one persons boat is a real turn off to another.
I do think things are improving, but it is a slow process.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-23-10 09:18am
|
Reply
1669
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I am a bit ambivalent to arm pit hair & am with you on the leg hair issue.
Other than the head the only other area I really like to see hair is the pubes.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-03-10 10:21am
|
Reply
1670
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
You will not find a more helpful & capable Webmanager either!
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-02-10 02:16pm
|
Reply
1671
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
I have often said it is impossible to please all, Basil. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-28-10 02:00am
|
Reply
1672
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
'Much Better Ratio?'
Why change it?
It works well as is IMO
Too much of a shift to video & I will be gone elsewhere.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-27-10 05:29pm
|
Reply
1673
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Yes, the weighting is very much towards photosets.
Non the worse for that IMO ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-10 09:57am
|
Reply
1674
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
There is something of a change of direction in the works which may well address some if not all of your concerns.
Well, maybe not as strong as that more a course adjustment! ;0)
New photographers should be coming on stream with more focussed instruction.
I am giving the forum there my best shots, but do need more participants to get some conversation & exchange of views going.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-21-10 12:03pm
|
Reply
1675
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
He likes constructive feedback, which your comment is. :0)
|
02-10-10 03:03pm
|
