| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1601
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
A very comprehensive reply!
No overt sexuality, no.....
...but scope for plenty of eroticism.
Thanks for the support. It is appreciated! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-01-10 09:27am
|
Reply
1602
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Yes, I think so. I am trying to promote its use as I think it could be a useful time & money saver.
Quite a few softcore fans don't want masturbation or toy play. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-28-10 01:00pm
|
Reply
1603
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
A useful review, but I would disagree with you on masturbation & toy use. That really isn't softcore. It falls in that midcore area.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-28-10 12:42pm
|
Reply
1604
|
UK Amateur Vids
(0)
|
Reply of
dougie's Reply
Only if you think it will still be around in six months.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-22-11 01:18pm
|
Reply
1605
|
UK Amateur Vids
(0)
|
Reply of
dougie's Review
With all due respect, Doug, I don't think they have the pricing structure correct.
Very few will ante up $50 for a month for the amount of content.
At this stage in its development, even fewer are going to gamble even more on the site still being around in 6 months.
Just my two pennorth.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-22-11 12:37pm
|
Reply
1606
|
UK Upskirts
(0)
|
Reply of
dohboy24's Review
Well, judging by the naming of the 'network' sites, it all sounds softcore.
I doubt you are going to get much in the way of full nudity from these folks. :0/
|
12-12-09 09:51am
|
Reply
1607
|
Uplay IStrip
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
No, I haven't.
I just downloaded demos & bought content if it appealed.
Cap'n. :)
|
08-07-11 06:57am
|
Reply
1608
|
Uplay IStrip
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
No, not really.
I think it is more to do with playing the videos.
I have a 64bit OS & it behaved as you are describing before I installed the proper codec pack.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-04-11 11:29pm
|
Reply
1609
|
Uplay IStrip
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
That is a shame. :0/
It maybe a codec issue.
IIRC They have codecs for 64 bit systems downloadable, if that is what you have.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-01-11 12:59pm
|
Reply
1610
|
URA-Channel
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
A pretty comprehensive review there.
Thanks.
A shame about the lack of photos. :0(
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-13-10 09:43am
|
Reply
1611
|
Urban Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Hmmmm, in view of the fact they supposedly specialise in videos; apparently there aren't any photos; that is not good!
It doesn't really sound as if it has anything going for it really.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-26-10 11:52am
|
Reply
1612
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Two people can easily look at the same thing at the same time.
One might love it the other hate it.
Don't waste time agonising.
Choose your own view, Grasshopper. ;0)
Cap'n :0)
|
02-22-12 04:40pm
|
Reply
1613
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Do you think that was a pang of conscience? ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-28-10 01:07pm
|
Reply
1614
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I suppose part of it may be the fear on missing out on the odd gem.
This is why we continue to collect, despite having vast amounts of material that we seldom, if ever look at.
Greener grass?
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-26-10 02:47pm
|
Reply
1615
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
An important thing to flag up!
Thanks.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-08-10 07:40am
|
Reply
1616
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I wouldn't even download the video!
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-01-10 04:42pm
|
Reply
1617
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
poppadopolis's Review
Yes, it is a shame.
They have an interesting theme, but the website is still stuck in the 1990s
Update rate is pretty poor too.
A shame because the material can be interesting.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-26-14 05:34pm
|
Reply
1618
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That must be really frustrating, as there isn't a lot in a similar vein. :0/
What's Aunt Judy's like these days?
|
09-12-09 01:38pm
|
Reply
1619
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
I think it is a good theme for a site but very poorly executed.
It really hasn't progressed from mid 1990 standard websites.
|
09-12-09 08:00am
|
Reply
1620
|
Vintage Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I have to say the idea of these vintage / retro porn sites does appeal to me.
Unfortunately, I have yet to find one up to scratch.
Cap'n. :0(
|
04-13-11 02:49pm
|
Reply
1621
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Not much decent in the way of photos, then?
Cap'n :0/
|
12-26-09 02:36pm
|
Reply
1622
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
PnP Media's Reply
If it is that emphatic, 'Nude Photography' really needs taking off the PU description then.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-09-10 11:30am
|
Reply
1623
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
PnP Media's Reply
"Unless you are into nylons, lingerie and 'dressing up' to 'dress down', ie: strip, you will miss the point of my sites. Full nudity, is absolutely NOT the point, and most sets end with masturbation with the model in nylons and heels."
I love striptease but.....
That is where the premise falls apart for me.
Proper full nudity is out, with emphasis, but masturbation is in?
Full nudity is a lot softer than masturbation IMO.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-08-10 10:34am
|
Reply
1624
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I thought that most likely.
Many thanks for your prompt response, my friend.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-05-10 02:59pm
|
Reply
1625
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I think I to find this site irritating rather than rewarding.
Not fully clothed to full nude, I take it?
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-05-10 02:37pm
|
