| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1451
|
Pin-Up Wow
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
OK thanks for the info.
A shame that.
Another one close but not there! :0/
|
07-25-10 03:13am
|
Reply
1452
|
Play With Faye
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
One swallow doesn't make it Spring....
Or should that be one swallow makes an update?
Yes, as you say....Just keep an eye on it & see what happens.
I would like to see more material of her so let's hope it is a sign of renewed impetus to the site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-17-10 09:51am
|
Reply
1453
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
ex1am's Comment
That is really bad.
That kind of underhand behaviour seems to be getting more prevalent.
Not good!
Cap'n. :0(
|
04-29-13 10:38pm
|
Reply
1454
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Too little too late indeed!
All I see in the tour area is hype & razzamatazz.
You can get access to a free gallery if you give them your email address so they can spam you!!!!
Whoop de doop!
Cap'n :oE
|
11-05-11 09:48am
|
Reply
1455
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Robbi81's Comment
I would just cancel the credit card, or better still report the charges as fraudulent to your credit card company.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-01-13 10:48am
|
Reply
1456
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
pantsmulligan's Comment
To be fair, I suppose hairy is really another niche.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-07-12 09:56am
|
Reply
1457
|
Pornstar IQ
(0)
|
Reply of
Auxilia's Comment
What a novel idea.
I quite like that.
To answer your question...
I suppose they might have been filmed at different shoots?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-13-10 03:36pm
|
Reply
1458
|
Pretty 4ever
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
That is very disappointing.
The claim is misleading & should be corrected.
Cap'n. :0(
|
09-17-11 01:09am
|
Reply
1459
|
Pretty 4ever
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Righto.
Much as I expected then :0/
Thanks for that, tangub.
My quest continues.....
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-30-11 09:32am
|
Reply
1460
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Greatest studio???
I think that is a matter of opinion, it certainly needs qualifying some. As a softcore photo guy, I don't think I have ever visited it, let alone joined.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-02-12 12:07pm
|
Reply
1461
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
An informative & well reasoned review.
Welcome to PU. :0)
I think what we are seeing here, is the results of a half hearted attempt made by a short sighted company to enter the modern virtual media.
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-11-11 02:28am
|
Reply
1462
|
Pure Kelley
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Could be any of a collection of reasons.
Ranging from stopping modelling, losing enthusiasm or falling out with the webmaster.
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-13-10 01:58pm
|
Reply
1463
|
Pure Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
I suppose you have to be thankful if they are not tattooed to hell as well.
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-25-12 09:54am
|
Reply
1464
|
Rage Story
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
All videos here, I take it......No photos?
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-07-11 12:37pm
|
Reply
1465
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Quite agree. CCBill seems very prone to doing this! :0E
|
11-28-09 01:57pm
|
Reply
1466
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
They obviously appear to think so.
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-24-11 06:45am
|
Reply
1467
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
Dildos perhaps?
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-24-11 06:41am
|
Reply
1468
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
A worthwhile warning for some, no doubt!
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-25-10 10:43am
|
Reply
1469
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
NIGE2239's Comment
Welcome to PU.
Thanks for flagging up your problems here.
A very rational, & useful comment.
All the better for showing a commendable level of restraint.
It is good for potential customers to get info on customer service levels before deciding to join a site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-10-10 09:44am
|
Reply
1470
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveO's Review
Nice, informative detailed review.
Thanks.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-19-10 03:33pm
|
Reply
1471
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I just made the mistake of looking at the 'tour.'
Popup hell!
Never a good sign.
Cap'n. :0(
|
08-25-11 11:32pm
|
Reply
1472
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
This is part of the problem.
A lot of these retro sites seem to have stopped updating.
It is a shame because I am sure there would be more of a market if it were done properly.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-13-11 02:53pm
|
Reply
1473
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Yes, it gets repetetive really quickly.
If only they would apply a similar approach to a wider variety of outfits, the appeal would broaden considerably.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-06-11 12:20pm
|
Reply
1474
|
Ripe Flesh
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
It seems likely.
It is strange how you get a feeling for these things.
With some sites of course, it is obvious from the watermark dates in the Update area.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-20-11 02:50pm
|
Reply
1475
|
Ripe Flesh
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
I can't really help on this issue.
One thing that did quite impress me on the tour though was that the sets are clearly marked with the level.
From Non-nude through to explicit nude.
Very helpful, I wish other sites would do that.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-20-11 02:36pm
|
