| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
spot's Review
Yep.
Pretty much as I expected.
I had a free account, but soon got tired of the faked material.
Cap'n. :0(
|
04-10-10 09:57am
|
Reply
1402
|
Sweet And Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
Not much in the way of stripping then?
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-10-10 07:27am
|
Reply
1403
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
That'll do.
It gives me a good idea of what it is about.
Thanks.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-08-10 04:37pm
|
Reply
1404
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
I think you know what I am going to ask, D. ;0)
Is it all nude? If not roughly what percentage are strip sets?
Are the settings mostly outside?
Thanks.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-08-10 03:58pm
|
Reply
1405
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Just taken a look around.
It actually looks a little 'glam' for my tastes, certainly in choice of outfits.
There are some lovely models.
One thing that turned me right off though was this!
'High-Res photo sets in zip files are FREE for all Premium
Members. Standard Members may purchase zip file sets'
So a photo loving member has to pay twice!!!
Cap'n. :0(
|
04-03-10 04:02am
|
Reply
1406
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Comprehensive review with some very pertinent & well reasoned suggestions, D. ;0)
If they pay any attention to following them, it would certainly be worth a look for me, I reckon.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-03-10 03:29am
|
Reply
1407
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
1680x1050
|
04-03-10 03:24am
|
Reply
1408
|
Dry Humping.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
Looking at the tour page, I would tend to agree!
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-02-10 03:38am
|
Reply
1409
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
EmptySky's Review
Having been a member there a few times, I understand your frustration.
IMO it does need to get out of its rut a bit.
What I found particularly frustrating is the poor 'artsy' high contrast lighting of most of the sets. Often it is so extreme as to lose the detail.
On the issue of striptease, there is a thread I posted in the forum which makes interesting reading.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-02-10 03:33am
|
Reply
1410
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I wouldn't even download the video!
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-01-10 04:42pm
|
Reply
1411
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I'm with you Zips are a must.
Preferably custom user defined ones ;)
Cap'n :0)
|
04-01-10 08:58am
|
Reply
1412
|
British Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
That is much as I expected TBH
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-31-10 12:38pm
|
Reply
1413
|
British Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
It is just such a shame they are not updating.
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-31-10 08:59am
|
Reply
1414
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
User Defined Custom Zips ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-30-10 09:32am
|
Reply
1415
|
Donny's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for the input, D.
Not much in the way of progress by the look of it then.
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-29-10 11:30pm
|
Reply
1416
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
To be honest the conversions used by CCBill have always been a little on the 'mean' side so far as Sterling customers are concerned.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-29-10 12:21pm
|
Reply
1417
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Well according to current conversions it comes out at just under $22.00, so at least it is closer than usual.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-29-10 11:48am
|
Reply
1418
|
British Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Yes, the content is pretty good & on topic.
I just wish the updates were coming.
Updates are undated & the site has been static for a long time.
A great shame. I wish they would re-invest and put more on topic content up.
|
03-28-10 08:17am
|
Reply
1419
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Whilst I would participate anyway, I feel it is a novel, effective and interesting way of generating extra activity. I think it has a valid function.
I certainly reckon it has some effect, yes.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-28-10 05:33am
|
Reply
1420
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
I have often said it is impossible to please all, Basil. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-28-10 02:00am
|
Reply
1421
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
'Much Better Ratio?'
Why change it?
It works well as is IMO
Too much of a shift to video & I will be gone elsewhere.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-27-10 05:29pm
|
Reply
1422
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Yes, the weighting is very much towards photosets.
Non the worse for that IMO ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-10 09:57am
|
Reply
1423
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Yes, 'Few videos' seems to be more of a recurring 'con' listed by TBP reviewers rather than anyone else.
I have never seen them list 'Few Photosets' as a 'con'.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-10 09:54am
|
Reply
1424
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
A lot of sites, even 'softcore' push their videos in the tours.
I still think, over time, we will get greater polarisation of sites to either specialise in video or photosets.
There are already many exclusively video sites.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-10 07:09am
|
Reply
1425
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I think some of that may be the Video Clan v. the Photoset Clan.
TBP seems largely video dominated in its reviewing.
They count few videos as a minus.
PU have at least an element of Photoset Clan in evidence, myself included in that.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-27-10 05:25am
|
