| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Yes, but it would be interesting to see the split.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-02-10 09:59am
|
Reply
1177
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
TBH I am just surmising from the layout & wording of their homepage.
Not much suggests softcore there.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-01-10 05:00pm
|
Reply
1178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I think it would have been more informative if the gender of the voter were included in the options.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-01-10 12:04pm
|
Reply
1179
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I don't know about that.
They are obviously pushing the HC content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-01-10 12:01pm
|
Reply
1180
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I think there is a couple of clues on the header page.
A reference to Hardcore Matures in the title & the only button for reviewing models is Hardcore Models.
A shame really. It was always hovering on my 'possibles' list.
No longer.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-01-10 10:59am
|
Reply
1181
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
An informative & comprehensive review.
I may rejoin at some point, but certainly not whilst regional pricing is in force.
TBH I am very disappointed in them that they are using it.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-01-10 10:53am
|
Reply
1182
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Personally, I think it is more of an issue that you cannot score poor sites below 50.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-30-10 12:24pm
|
Reply
1183
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I will go with D on that one! Cap'n ;0)
|
10-22-10 06:36am
|
Reply
1184
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
It is a pretty good option.
WeAreHairy is worth a look too.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-21-10 03:03pm
|
Reply
1185
|
White GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
drcocktor's Comment
Thanks for posting the warning.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-21-10 09:46am
|
Reply
1186
|
No Rest Network
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Yep, they're shafting their European customers as well as their models!
I won't subscribe to a site that does that.
Cap'n. :0(
|
10-21-10 09:41am
|
Reply
1187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Number one for me.
Porn is a constant for me anyway.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-20-10 09:30am
|
Reply
1188
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Any site that uses regional pricing has lost my business for good. I am not interested in getting around it. It is a matter of principle. :oE
I don't mean that to sound ungrateful.
It is just the way I feel about it. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-10 11:35pm
|
Reply
1189
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
For the modest price I would say it is well worth a look, I doubt you would stay long though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-10 01:41pm
|
Reply
1190
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Although it is featured in a few sets, it is certainly not a forte of the site. Often where you would expect to see lingerie you do not.
Largely, if it is featured, it starts out from lingerie.
I would view it as a refreshing change from many mainstream artsy softcore sites.
There is a lot of warmth & intimacy in a lot of the sets & I think it is worth the current bargain asking price just for that alone.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-10 01:27pm
|
Reply
1191
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes, I am using similar software.
I would just rather not download 100MB & have to delete 80MB of it.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 11:43am
|
Reply
1192
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I know I have been banging on about this for years, but this site would be sooo much better if they consistently proceeded to full nudity in each set.
They have great outfits & models, and I appreciate that some won't do nude, but there are plenty that would & do.
A tease is no good without the pay off for me.
They have a very shaky definition of nude too, as some of the sets they claim to be nude aren't.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 10:06am
|
Reply
1193
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I rejoined recently myself because I got a good promo offer.
Whilst I am pleased I did, I still think user selected zips are required.
Some sets have as many as 250 pics in, telling a story that could easliy be told in 100pics or a bit less.
These sets feature a lot of duplication of poses so could be regarded as padding.
I have started pruning after download, but I find it a PITA!
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 09:58am
|
Reply
1194
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Looking in the tour area, it does look to be good quality photography.
Do they ever break out of the cliched nude glamour shoot approach though?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 09:51am
|
Reply
1195
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
A very lucid assesment.
Worthy of being the start of a thread in the forum, I reckon! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-10 09:45am
|
Reply
1196
|
A Measure of Curiosity
(0)
|
Reply of
Ed2009's Reply
I am really very pleased to hear that, Ed!
I shall be rejoining soon! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-17-10 08:43am
|
Reply
1197
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
Auxilia's Reply
I can hear my bloated harddrives groaning now! LOL!
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-13-10 11:10am
|
Reply
1198
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
Auxilia's Comment
Is there much in the way of softcore nudity, before the hardcore starts?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-13-10 11:03am
|
Reply
1199
|
URA-Channel
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
A pretty comprehensive review there.
Thanks.
A shame about the lack of photos. :0(
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-13-10 09:43am
|
Reply
1200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
A rational reply. :0)
|
10-13-10 09:31am
|
