| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
That is what led to my situation.
'Oh I'll edit it later.'
Been doing that for about ten years.
Now I am actually tackling this mammoth task.
Been at it a few weeks now.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-29-11 02:53am
|
Reply
1077
|
Alp Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
' piling a bunch of cuties into a VW 1300. '
Been there did that....
It threw a rod through the crankcase :0(
So I put a bigger engine in! :0D
Cap'n :0)
|
01-28-11 03:36pm
|
Reply
1078
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That really depends on the size of the archive.
Yes, I could buy more space, but I am currently going through the gory job of slicing down decades of collecting, which will free up a fair amount of space, but I am spending a godawful amount of time looking at & deleting 60% odd of most sets.
Especially the recent greatly larger, poorly edited ones.
It is a PITA.
Ticks the ones you want, zip made download.
Job done!
None of this gory mess I have now.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 11:41am
|
Reply
1079
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Like I said.
I know that feeling well.
I don't know if it is better or worse.
With CCBill I get the Goldfish Scenario.
'Oh is there a problem.'
Here we go again! :0/
In your case it is difficult to know if the problem is the Webmanager or the billing company.
Either way there should hsve been some response by now though.
Hang in there.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-28-11 11:14am
|
Reply
1080
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes it is frustrating.
Mind you, so is 6 weeks & counting for CCBill to get their GEOIP database sorted. STILL waiting!
All a matter of scale, I suppose.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 10:30am
|
Reply
1081
|
Alp Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
The impression I get from that is.
Nice idea. A shame about the implementation.
One of my pet peeves is toy play in preference to a nice ration of soft full frontal nudity.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 05:23am
|
Reply
1082
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Poll
Very much in favour of them.
The user only has to cherry pick & saves a lot on download time & harddrive space too.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-28-11 12:24am
|
Reply
1083
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
RS?
Not heard of them before.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 12:21am
|
Reply
1084
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I thought those were the billing companies they used?
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-27-11 01:32pm
|
Reply
1085
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Yes, it all comes down to models levels with soft / midcore material.
Teendreams, I know & like.
I will take a look at Phil-Flash.
Thanks for the extra info.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-26-11 08:38am
|
Reply
1086
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Basically it appears to be stuff that is maybe 3 years old or so moved from their other sites.
The material is selected though, the turkeys don't make the cut. ;0)
Simlar to their other sites though the actual site itself has been revamped to current standards.
Whilst current updates are not quite current state of the art size & quality, the recent material at least is quite acceptable.
The really older stuff you have to make allowance for.
There is good value to be had here, because there is material from all their sites uploaded.
Unless you have been a member of all their sites all the time, you are going to regularly find material you haven't seen before.
Is it worthwhile?
Yes, most certainly for photos, probably less so for video.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-22-11 02:00pm
|
Reply
1087
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Comment
The link from PU is dead, so it doesn't look good, I'm afraid.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-22-11 03:39am
|
Reply
1088
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
No.
What I am looking for hasn't changed in over 30 years.
Very simple.
Full strips from fully clothed to fully nude.
No masturbation, toyplay, gyno. or les.
It really isn't that difficult, but so often part of the sequence is left out or full nudity isn't reached, or toys appear too quickly.
There are some sites, but not many.
There are many sites so close that they really frustrate!
Onlytease is a prime example of that.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-22-11 03:31am
|
Reply
1089
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I am pleased you are enjoying the site, my friend.
It is generally of good quality & consistent.
It is always on the list for a rejoin for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 05:21pm
|
Reply
1090
|
Nanshakh
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
Well, I have said 'niche' is the way to go with sites.
This one is certainly that.
Not for me, but I can appreciate the effort that has been put in.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 08:57am
|
Reply
1091
|
Spin On My Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Yep, I think that is what Brits refer to as a Chinese Burn.
It certainly adds reality to 'screwing' another Brit slang for a fuck!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 05:11am
|
Reply
1092
|
Spin On My Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
It brings tears to the eyes just looking at it.
Pre-book an ambulance before trying that one!
Make sure you have a good story for the Doctor too!
Cap'n. :00
|
01-21-11 04:07am
|
Reply
1093
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
I suppose given that we now have a Sunday photo update, photo lovers aren't actually losing out on updates.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-21-11 04:03am
|
Reply
1094
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
A very fair assessment.
I am with you on the 'enhanced' breasts issue.
Quite often they appear to be best viewed clothed, which to be fair I suppose they would be 'designed' to look good that way.
On a few occasions there I have been mightily impressed with the clothed shots, only to be a little taken aback when they are revealed :00
Another thing that used to be an issue for me there was the preponderance of the shaved look. :0/
I agree with your score though.
A good solid MILF photo site really, just with a little too much 'enhancement.'
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-20-11 01:50pm
|
Reply
1095
|
Girls I Met At
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
I was intrigued & wandered cautiously around the free area, prodding here & there....
My first impression is that it is a sort of a more cerebral version of Youtube where you upload a video showing whatever your particularly kink is..
I think... :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-18-11 04:40pm
|
Reply
1096
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
It is probably their servers.
It is a relatively small photo site, after all.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-18-11 03:19pm
|
Reply
1097
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
Yes, it is that same old bug bear for me.
The models sets & photography are great.
It just for me it REALLY needs the full fronal nudity pay-off every time.
Otherwise it only serves to frustrate, not satisfy!
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-18-11 01:41pm
|
Reply
1098
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
quekchoze's Review
Well, it is good to hear that the models are treated nicely.
That makes a big difference for me.
I really don't like all that mysogynistic crap that this style of video can resort to.
Not much in the way of pics, I take it?
Oh, and welcome to PU!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-16-11 03:22pm
|
Reply
1099
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Well, that is a step in the right direction at least.
Hopefully they will roll that out to their other sites soon.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-16-11 02:16pm
|
Reply
1100
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I think you are right that the ATK sites are photo oriented.
For sure they are, & none the worse for it.
The skill sets required for video & still photography are more diverse than might initially strike you. Whilst a lot of sites are trying to do both few do both well.
As it is a photography site though I wish they would get away from the idea that bigger is always better.
Some of the zip sets on the other ATK sites are well in excess of 100Meg. That is a lot of stuff to sort through to find the small bits you like.
I am missing custom zips even more now.
Sorry I ranted a little off the point there!
Cap'n. :00
|
01-14-11 11:16am
|
