Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Capn (0)  

Feedback:   All (1886)  |   Reviews (17)  |   Comments (167)  |   Replies (1702)

Other:   Replies Received (778)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1001-1025 of 1702 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1001
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Less. I certainly wouldn't go anywhere that has it.

Cap'n. :0/


04-20-11  09:17am

Reply
1002
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like curvy, but not obese.

Cap'n. :0/


04-18-11  10:25am

Reply
1003
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

Pretty much seems to be what is ongoing there.
A shame & a missed opportunity IMO

Cap'n. :0/


04-17-11  01:47pm

Reply
1004
Visit Totally Undressed

Totally Undressed
(0)
Reply of asmith12's Reply

Righto...Thanks very much for the additional info.

Much appreciated.

Cap'n. :0)


04-17-11  08:08am

Reply
1005
Visit Totally Undressed

Totally Undressed
(0)
Reply of asmith12's Reply

No zips for them, I suppose?

Cap'n. :0/


04-17-11  08:03am

Reply
1006
Visit Totally Undressed

Totally Undressed
(0)
Reply of asmith12's Review

I love the concept. It's right down my street! ;0)

No photosets though?

Cap'n. :0/


04-15-11  04:26pm

Reply
1007
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

I don't honestly see the point.

More preview material would be of more use.

Cap'n. :0/


04-14-11  05:19pm

Reply
1008
Visit Retro Raw

Retro Raw
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

This is part of the problem.

A lot of these retro sites seem to have stopped updating.

It is a shame because I am sure there would be more of a market if it were done properly.

Cap'n. :0/


04-13-11  02:53pm

Reply
1009
Visit Vintage Classic Porn

Vintage Classic Porn
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

I have to say the idea of these vintage / retro porn sites does appeal to me.
Unfortunately, I have yet to find one up to scratch.

Cap'n. :0(


04-13-11  02:49pm

Reply
1010
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Neither are really part of my country's culture, so that would have to be a 'No.'

Cap'n. :0)


04-13-11  02:47pm

Reply
1011
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I tend to give them early as a form of encouragement. If the person has posted a helpful comment is usually sufficient to get a vote from me.

Cap'n.


04-08-11  10:06am

Reply
1012
Visit Rage Story

Rage Story
(0)
Reply of bibo's Comment

All videos here, I take it......No photos?

Cap'n. :0/


04-07-11  12:37pm

Reply
1013
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
Reply of The Bishop's Review

A detailed & reasoned review. A very good start, welcome to PU. :0)

I think you may have set the score a little high, but given your views & reasoning, I can understand why you did.
Like yourself, I am a photo guy, & agree that the lack of customised zips is a notable failing given the protracted length sets are getting to these days.

You list 'No sets numbers at model level, can be hard to keep track/count.' as a con. I don't know how you tend to navigate, but I tend to use the Alphabetical model index when I am playing catch-up after a lapsed membership, in conjunction with the Recent Updates index.

Cap'n. :0)


04-06-11  09:23am

Reply
1014
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

No noticeable difference for me.

Cap'n. :0)


04-06-11  09:09am

Reply
1015
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
Reply of The Bishop's Reply

Yes, I think a lot comes down to personal preference.
I find a lot of models shot by Sean R to be less than attractive.
Largely, I find a lot of his shots focus is detailed gynacology, which really doesn't appeal to me at all.

Cap'n. :0)


04-06-11  09:07am

Reply
1016
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
Reply of The Bishop's Reply

Posting well over half a dozen repeats of the same pose in the same set is just laziness & bulking the set out for the sake of it. We are typically seeing sets of around 250 photos

IMO a properly edited set need not be over 100 phots & cover the same ground.

Cap'n.


04-05-11  11:34pm

Reply
1017
Visit Latin Shemales

Latin Shemales
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Congratulations on your 100 up lk2.

A shame it wasn't a site you liked that did it! ;0)

Cap'n. :0)


04-02-11  01:13pm

Reply
1018
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Yes, always looking for fresh material.

Cap'n. :0)


04-02-11  04:31am

Reply
1019
Visit ATK Exotics

ATK Exotics
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment

If I am playing catchup on an ATK site, I usually work from the model index alphabetically from one end of the alphabet to the other.

It is a long journey, but usually a very enjoyable one.

Cap'n. :0)


04-01-11  11:59am

Reply
1020
Visit Brill Babes World

Brill Babes World
(0)
Reply of XM15's Comment

It is a downer I know, but you are far from alone.

A lot of folk on here have had similar experiences.

Myself included.

Cap'n. :0/


03-31-11  03:05pm

Reply
1021
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
Reply of Trip999's Reply

It sounds to me like your tastes are evolving & refining.
Nothing at all wrong with that.
For me a fully clothed reclining shot can be just as erotic as the same pose nude.

Oh and to expand a little on my earlier comment.
I have nothing against seeing the model nude.
It is just I appreciate the anticipation of a slow build up, given by a decent striptease.
Even if it is a model I have seen nude many times before, I still really enjoy seeing her strip from different outfits.

Cap'n. :0)


03-31-11  11:57am

Reply
1022
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
Reply of Trip999's Review

Had another look.

It may be an odd thing to say but....

Still not enough clothes!

The slow reveal of a leisurely striptease builds up anticipation nicely.

Not BAM...This is what she looks like nekkid.

Nothing to look forward to then.

Cap'n. :0/


03-31-11  04:26am

Reply
1023
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
Reply of Trip999's Review

A detailed review.

Thanks.

I'll give it another look.

Cap'n. :0)


03-31-11  04:14am

Reply
1024
Visit Exploited Moms

Exploited Moms
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment

That copyright being stuck at 2006 is ominous.

That sounds as suspicious as another site I ran across recently which had samples of recent updates.
The watermark on the phots were dated 2005!

To answer you question, I don't know for sure, but I would put the chances around 95% that it is dead in the water.

Cap'n. :0/


03-31-11  04:08am

Reply
1025
Visit Beauty Angels

Beauty Angels
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

A very detailed & comprehensive review.
Thanks.

Obviously this site is weighted towards the videos though.
Material is harder than I prefer too.
Honestly, I don't think it is going to float my boat.

Cap'n.


03-31-11  04:01am


Shown : 1001-1025 of 1702 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.39 seconds.