| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
Orb Ltd's Reply
Hi Andy,
True enough, but a static non-member page may put potential members off.
I thought you would reply. Thanks for doing so promptly.
I appreciate you have a whole brace of sites to maintain.
Thanks again for the detailed reply.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-30-11 09:18am
|
Reply
777
|
Take 5 Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Yes, you may well be right that the Take 5 progression will prove to be limiting.
Perhaps if they classified sets/videos as being from one to five in some sort of progression from fully clothed, through softcore full nudity to midcore, then hardcore?
Anyway, as it stands no zips would be a deal breaker for me.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-30-11 07:35am
|
Reply
778
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I am with tangub on this one.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-30-11 04:36am
|
Reply
779
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Beer & porn go together well.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-30-11 04:35am
|
Reply
780
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A shame this wasn't multiple choce.
'Boobs' & 'Pussy' for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-30-11 04:33am
|
Reply
781
|
XL Asians
(0)
|
Reply of
Watson's Review
If only the owners of that site would put in as much effort as you have with your review, they would have a site which is 3 times better than it is.
Very commendable work reviewing a mediocre site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-30-11 04:30am
|
Reply
782
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Oh,it is real.
I have seen it myself on occasion.
It is very erotic.
Unfortunately it is rare, and limited to a few 'gifted' ladies. ;0)
It is no where near as common as porno producers would lead you to believe.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-30-11 04:25am
|
Reply
783
|
Take 5 Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
I think they are half heartedly trying a 'new' progression idea.
Start with very soft content & progress to harder material.
From what I can see in the preview area though, it is existing material picked and sorted to suit rather than bespoke, targetted material, which would give the site a better chance of working.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-30-11 04:17am
|
Reply
784
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Review
A very good review of a lacklustre site.
I think most of these single model sites are taking the piss on all fronts, to a greater or lesser extent.
Price, quantity & quality need to improve in all cases.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-30-11 04:13am
|
Reply
785
|
Next Door Lana
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Hmm, another of those, 'Let's Make A Quick Buck Without Much Effort' Sites.
As you say, it is a shame when the subject is cute.
Cap'n. :0(
|
10-30-11 04:06am
|
Reply
786
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
Yes, Tony has an unique site here.
Long may it continue!
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
787
|
Femme Fight
(0)
|
Reply of
S A Web's Reply
Hi John,
Thanks for the unexpected & prompt response.
I shall email you shortly.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 11:11am
|
Reply
788
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Well, I was asking about a 'favourite' site.
Based on your reply, perhaps go for the 3-6 month option?
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 09:54am
|
Reply
789
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Yes, it is getting a bit creaky in some respects.
Perhaps the page format & their policy re. updates.
I don't think it is that surprising though given the amount of content they are getting through.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 09:47am
|
Reply
790
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Basically in full agreement with the above posters.
If you haven't been there before, it is worth a one hit membership to get a taste of what they are about.
They do have some fine models & good material, but they are catering towards the glamour end of the spectrum.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 09:35am
|
Reply
791
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Many thanks, Khan!
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 09:30am
|
Reply
792
|
N/A
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Yes I had difficulty with that.
When it worked I found I had used the wrong one!
Think of it as an 'up to' arrow ;0)
Cap'n. :00
|
10-19-11 09:12am
|
Reply
793
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never.
For me it is a healthy, harmless pastime that ensures my thoughts & actions do not stray from fantasy into the real world.
If I stumble over something that doesn't appeal, I move on quickly.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-17-11 10:07am
|
Reply
794
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
What's that then?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-15-11 02:24am
|
Reply
795
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
I'm with tangub.
I really do not care for it.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-13-11 09:24am
|
Reply
796
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Are they usually starting out fully clothed or only partially?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-13-11 09:23am
|
Reply
797
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Nice trollish try, WG, but I ain' biting!
DOH!!!!!! :0D
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-12-11 04:20pm
|
Reply
798
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
tasha's Review
For me, whilst I really do love the tease, I also really need the pay-off.
The lack of full nudity on their sites is at the very least very frustrating for me, & in recent years a total deal killer.
As one of my buddies on here once memorably said:
'All sizzle & no steak!'
I think that succinct summation still holds good.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-12-11 04:17pm
|
Reply
799
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
Well, as far as I can tell, Karup's do sponsor a lot of content.
What happens when they are done with it is more of an open question.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-12-11 04:12pm
|
Reply
800
|
Stocking Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
ECMX's Review
Items 1 & 3 are pretty heavy 'cons' also lack of updates.
Why do you score it so high?
BTW take a look at some of the other reviews. You could do with a lot more detail & stats! ;0)
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-12-11 04:09pm
|
