| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
Only Teen Blowjobs
(0)
|
Reply of
PornoPro's Review
Whilst I agree with your distaste for abuse, it does seem to be popular.
That said, I do think the pendulum is swinging back against it.
It was even more prevalent two or three years ago.
I hate filler content too.
I would much rather not have access to the 43 or whatever additional sites which are of no relevance to the niche site I joined & 42 of whom are static.
Stay true to niche & do it properly. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-07-12 05:33am
|
Reply
677
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Frequently do. As a collector, I am not prepared to allocate a relatively large chunk of storage to what amounts to a single item.
Like tangub I go for the mid picture size, 1500pixels is fine for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-07-12 02:36am
|
Reply
678
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Tiana. Oh yes....
A strikingly beautiful lady.
At one point I was asked to help in a project doing a 3D clone of her, a project which unfortunately never quite materialised. :0/
There a a few nice sets of her at Bare Maidens, which is itself a quirky & appealing site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-06-12 07:59am
|
Reply
679
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Mitch74's Review
Hi Mitch,
Welcome to PU.
It is nice that you have picked up on a site not previously reviewed here as your opening gambit.
I would urge you to read around the reviews & comments here. Not only will it give you lots of related information, it will also show you what details to feature in your reviews to improve them.
To return to the subject of the review.
What percentage of material here goes from fully clothed to fully nude, please?
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-04-12 09:12am
|
Reply
680
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
At over 1000 posts???
Yes, I think so! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-03-12 09:33am
|
Reply
681
|
A Measure of Curiosity
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Oh yes, it is so far as I know.
That is another site of a similar nature run by the same Webmanager.
The link from Strip Game Central should be up to date.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 11:29pm
|
Reply
682
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
What sort of 'glam' are you talking of...
Is that mainstream glamour/play wear or elegant outfits?
Thanks,
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 12:39pm
|
Reply
683
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Is there any chance of a broader coverage in the Archive site?
Material from Exotics & Premium would be more of a draw, along with Petites in due time. ;0)
Then it would live up to it's name.
Whilst I am on a roll, how about a mature ladies site?
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 12:35pm
|
Reply
684
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Welcome back, RB, good to have you around again! :0)
As you say the site has grown and has many positives, most importantly the 'can do' attitude shown by Basil.
For my tastes, there is still far to much 'touchy, feely' & toy play.
Clear, full body nude shots are still unfortunately way underused.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 12:24am
|
Reply
685
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ditto that!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-01-12 05:32am
|
Reply
686
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It was the first time I had come across it.
I haven't been a member that long ;)
Its use doesn't strike me as being fair to folk that may be in favour on any poll :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-31-11 08:38am
|
Reply
687
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Actually.
I object to the 'Waste of Bandwidth' option in the poll.
It is the first time I have seen it included.
All very well if something doesn't appeal, but 'Waste of Bandwidth' is very subjective.
I regard any video as a waste of bandwidth really, but I wouldn't be so dismissive of other folks preferences as to vote for it!
Cap'n. :0E
|
12-31-11 05:36am
|
Reply
688
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
No, I don't think so.
I share your concerns.
Perhaps that was what gave me an element of unease whilst browsing the site.
With a few sites the personality of the model leaps out at you, which I really like.
With a lot of others it is noticeable, here it appears to be dourly supressed, in the name of 'art'.
Not good!
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-30-11 07:41am
|
Reply
689
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Ah...There is glam - elegant there?
I was referring to glam - tarty.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-30-11 04:37am
|
Reply
690
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
I agree with you, otoh.
It is another one of those frustratingly 'nearly' sites.
Rather than striving to crash through the barrier and make a rivetting site, they do more, more & more of the same, which obviously does work for some folk.
This only serves to add more to the frustration for the likes of ourselves wanting a step or two beyond.
What I found most frustrating was that the thumbnails for each set looked identical after a little while searching.
I think it is a problem with sites that have pretentions of 'art'.
Cap'n :0/
|
12-30-11 04:18am
|
Reply
691
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Now, I have to be careful how I answer this one.
A Non-Nude amateur site, along with the proffessional non-nude sites, such as the 'Only' network, CAN deliver very good teasing eroticism.
Softcore tease material is really always what I am hunting for.
That said, non-nude does NOT do it for me.
For me, there HAS to be full body nudity.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-30-11 03:57am
|
Reply
692
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Well, the live cam shows, the forums, hype & razzamatazz etc. ;0)
So you are saying it is a glammed up version of Galleria.
Probably not for me then.
Thanks for the info.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-29-11 12:06pm
|
Reply
693
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Yes, they are starting to get it together a bit now.
Ideally, for all sorts of reasons, I feel they need to have a similar format for all their sites.
It would be easier for the paying customer & easier for the techs to maintain.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-29-11 06:36am
|
Reply
694
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You are welcome, my friend.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-29-11 06:31am
|
Reply
695
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Well, the deal basically is that selected older items ( over 4 years old, I think ) from all their other sites is moved here.
It isn't just the amateur stuff.
If it is old but popular content, it has a fair chance of showing up here at some point.
As yet there is no content from Petites, as that hasn't been going long enough yet.
It is very good resource for photo freaks.
Especially to catch up on older content from sites you have never or seldom subscribed to.
Probably less use for video folk as the quality won't be state of the art.
Hope this helps.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-29-11 06:21am
|
Reply
696
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
About the same. :0)
|
12-28-11 03:39am
|
Reply
697
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not into it at all.
If I know it is in any material I will give it a wide berth.
There wasn't an option extreme enough to accurately describe my view so I went for the typically Brit restrained 'Not my cup of tea!'
Cap'n. :0(
|
12-26-11 03:11am
|
Reply
698
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not at this time of year.
It is expensive enough for most folk, but I also have two daughters whose birthday falls in December.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-24-11 12:19am
|
Reply
699
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Very nice to see the welcome return of the enigmatic Roseman! :0)
I do hope we shall see you around here regularly again.
To comment on the detail of your review, I am surprised and disappointed to see that not only do you reckon the package is expensive, but they also have the gall to charge you again for content!!??? :0E
Well out of order, IMO.
All that & no nudity! :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-23-11 04:15pm
|
Reply
700
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Maybe.
It really depends if it has exclusive content that appeals.
It would almost certainly be a one hitter though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-22-11 03:05am
|
