There are always some PUs here - am I wrong...
So:
Have not been a member for almost half a year - took a look at the previews - and again found some really interesting material (wauw - here are some great new latins)
What about video-quality? All those times I've been a member, I never could see much difference in viewing quality between the standard and the DVD resolutions. Not a BIG difference in price, but with some of the 'good ol' material there was NEVER any difference.
What about today?
Don't know why - but joined this site again for - yes, I don't know which time (6.or 9.or 11. or...)
But this term I do not regret - and not only because it's a good price. Videobox has grown - not only in amount of content, but also in quality (never thought I'd say that) - but the tech quality of most later videos is better since my last visit (Feb./March 2008). Before that time it was useless to join for HD-membership - the quality was mostly not better than "high". Now there is a difference, for sure.
Even better: Videobox has made a fine job during this past year concerning better variations in international videos. And some very rare ones, too.
Bottom line: Video Box has made it really fun to spend hours browsing for stuff - and the quality is now mostly tops....
I really enjoy this latest term here.
I do not want the honored members of this fine PU to regard this user as someone who's going for a hassle on VB.
But, man.....fellow users...as a member of VB for who know how many times, I still get the bummer-feeling.
Going for the latest updates, want do I find: Old stuff, videos the bookstore down at the corner have for a buck or less - or maybe even have gotten rid of - long time ago.
AND some of these videos in socalled "HD" is less than shit in tech quality...
If this is what we want, then I back out.
Is this site only quantity and - fuck quality? (for 99% of the content).
Man, how can a site like this remain nomero uno at TBP?
Some, good fellow-PU's have replied to my critics of VB. With fine advices og ditto answers.
I maybe was a bit hard in using the word "warning" in last comment.
But, honestly - from a users point of view, I still don't get it.
VB is a video-site - with old, really old and newer movie-clips. But the vast amount of content still do not just the obvious lack of viewing-quality in what you download - either the cheap one or the bit more expensive one in socalled DVD-quality....
Just joined this half-good site again, and again and again...
Half good because the video-quality is generally less than most other places. Better because of the hugh amount.
BUT, man: Joined the cheap way first (9.95), again, because the more expensive DVD-membership has NOT done it in former membership.
And what do I do - upgrade (again), silly me.....
NO NEED - the SOCALLED DVD-quality is NOT better than the socalled high resolutions in video - just MUCH bigger in file-size.
Did some/several downloads of the same files in those two - alleged qualities, but: NO significant difference in vewing-pleasure - or no-pleasure!!
Hope I can stay away in the future.
Do not like your game with us users, VideoBox.....
VideoBox has a date for the videos when they're placed on the site. Wouldn't it be great if VideoBox also told us which year or even century the videos are produced.
Seems more and more videos are getting older and older.....
Talk about discount.
And friends at TBP:
How about taking a look at that extremely high 98 - even with the fine price.
Maybe it's time to reconsider.
I'm back again and again - taken in by some (few) good videos in their extremely good preview.
But the preview is still the best. Because when you get into the site it's the same as ever.
Their new design is a bit exiting in the beginning - but when you have browsed things everything seems like always: some new and some bad old videos in one big mix - videos/DVDs you can buy for a nickel in discount porn-stores.
But ok, that's what you get for $ 14.95.
Discount-stuff.
This time it'll most likely take a while before I get tempted again
You get what you pay for.....no more, no less. And that goes for this monster-site of DVDs, too.
And it's cheap, but thank you I only payed 18 bucks.
After a week here, I'm bored - bored with a massive amount of DVDs in low viewing quality and too few HD - where the so called HD is seldom near real HD in the same category of "viewing quality" - so it's like going out to a store/supermarket on sale - and you regret your buy when getting home.
You can browse for hours here and find "a hell of a lot" but the finds are diseppointing, generally. Sorry to the fans here of the site - I've been here some years ago and forgot how lousy it (the vids quality) is.
Canceled rebill and am going back to some real quality sites - will probably not bother with a review.
I've turned into a paranoid sucker about these pre-checked cross-sells. (had some bad shit happen with that elsewhere)
So a question: anybody here experienced ignorance of unchecking those pre-sells?
About content after doing some new preview-browsing and thinking about a rejoin (did not have any problems with that pre-checked stuff earlier, here):
asmith12 gave it 75 with a major cons:
"-- with a few exceptions, same old, same old."
This time I do not agree with asmith - I find the updates during the last 3-4 months at VideosZ much better than at the main competitor, VideoBox.
I think the words: "same old" really goes for VideoBox, whereas VideosZ is far more into newer stuff from more different producers - worldwide.
VideosZ is a damn fine site - a site I've become a little happier with than Videobox - lately.
But - alas - there are still some/a few files that are DRM-protected - and even as a member it's not possible to play these files - the license acuiring does not work.
Ok, it's all older stuff, but I found some favorites here, so...too bad.
It looks like they're cleaning up among the older ones of those now 5250 dvds, but still...
Just joined - and after the first browsing, things looks promissing.
A british site with a lot of - mostly - mature uk-models - AND talking dirty - and in oldstyle lingerie.
AND for Michelle Thorne-fans this is good - over 10 videos of this british doll - some very new - some a bit older.
Even got two videos of Lucy Zara - masturbating. (but no videos of Linda Leigh or Misty McCain - alas).
Be back with a review - or a more detailed comment.
Here is a lesson:
We keep looking for good sites - but sometimes we forget our past joins - and by mistake I joined Watch4beauty again - stupid me...(my own fault, by all means)
Reason: The site is selling it self well, too well - a WOW-preview and foremost GREAT models - but the site has turned more weird than ever... remember those pretty strange "hard colors" at Pier999 - Watch4beauty is getting worse - much worse..
And as a vids fan it's down right BAD.....we've had discussions about some site a bit to much art - for vids this site is now worse than some art exhibition with some snobs commenting lines and colors...and how much this looks like Picasso.......jeez.
This is not even softcore - If I'd want material like this, I could go to an art museum....sad with the potential/models...
Some of us talk about sites going downhill - like a snowball headin' for hell......
Really liked this site - ONCE!
Now I joined again - should have not - no reviews since 2009.
And what do we get:
very nice pix and very clear vids - and that's it.
BUT the way they make those vids lately:
One horrible example is cute Ferrara Gomez/Jessica Koks - here "Viviene" in the vid "Bed Pussy":
Max 2 minutes with cute Jessica on a bed - then the entire rest of the video ONLY totally close-up of pussy - fingering/dildo - IT COULD BE ANYBODY...
And Jessica is certainly not the only one with this poor way of filming!
This is it for me concerning Watch4Beauty...a bummer...
Bottom line:
I'm fed up with spending money on sites I used ot like - and naively thought is still good.
I do not understand this TBP-review, nor the score.
Guess all of us PUs are pleased with the ongoing development of TBP (and PU, of course).
And we all have different taste - still there's 'standard' and 'quality'. And the newer 'What's Hot' is great. But here at Wild Porn Pass I get a funny idea: Are all those reviews impartial..?? (Of course they are...)
If so: I cannot understand the score for this site: 86.
NOTHING here is exclusive - all DVD rip-offs. And certainly NOT the greatest quality.
Like PU james4096: In his review the score of 73 was somewhat 'kind' in spite of the cons.
Likewise the cons at the TBP Vanessa-review are so decisive that it can hardly end up with an 86...
So friends at TBP: You have always been aware of the integrity in reviews - is this a slip? - or where did I go wrong in this???
This is one of the finest all round sites at the moment....and even if this Wow-company claims independent of the Diesel production as said by webmaster Dieselman earlier - this site still has most going with two sites: 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn....the same girls, the same design, the same whatever...
And going from one site to another picking out the content of each site can be troublesome....and expensive...
So, dieselman (and both companies):
Think about a network here....like quite a few of your competitors.
The first site to join after getting back from a pornfree vacation...and got to admit, that the 93 in score from rearadmiral is well deserved....maybe I'm talking from a heart without porn for some time...and maybe getting a little overwhelmed - but, this site certainly has that "new and a bit different" material that I've missed...
Who do not get turned on watching those new set/vids with Netu/Avina - here and now suddenly aka Caprice.
But, guys at the paysites: Please keep those names the same at the same network- even with new sites...
Asked earlier about a network for 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn...and Wow Girls. And got this reply from webmaster dieselman:
"Your dream is about to come through :)"
So just wonder: is this Wow Porn along with Wow Girls the new network?
Or will we see a network with all sites?
We have a poll at the moment:
What do you feel qualifies to be called "frequent updates"?
And this WTF is on the down side: Ending membership in a couple of days: One or maybe two updates in a month....Bad!
The same goes for this site: https://www.thebestporn.com/review/lacynylons/
Part of the exprensive Ferro-network.
This looks ok (great models) at the preview - but certainly NOT sure about the content - NOT from brummies newly review, anyway...
TBP states no videos, except streaming behind the scenes - though the preview say 'videos'. Even read webmasters earlier reply to Drooler - but I'm not more clear here.
Like lk2fireone this user would be gratefull for some usefull info/update - if anyone?
Looks better - and still cheap for five days access
Most PUs can grab what's to their liking at most sites within 5 days.. (unless you want to stay on and wait for updates/certain updates).
Xisty still has this sweet deal with five days of full access for ten bucks - I like that. And it's with a thank you to TBP - no other sites alike have that price - not the Rabbit, not the Inspector ect...
And it seems like Xisty keep their updates comming - not that they are entirely exclusive - still this is in a lot of ways a pretty decent site - foremost softcore. And the video-quality is up-to-date. And the HD ditto even great.
Certainly it's worth to keep an eye on...well, just check out the preview...
Judging from the videos I downloaded during these last four hours, it looks like a recommendation here.
Well, this site is the TOP at TBP concerning asians (90,8)
Apart from the fact that the site has a LOT other material than asians (jap-videos) what about the co, the socalled Broadband 99 Network?
No broadband here: Tried to download some of the preview-videos (about 10 Mb) - if you can download them at all - it takes ages.
Man, if it's the same when/if you join - forget it!
To bad, becuase there's some great teen-jap models/videos - it seems....
Joined the site again now - and the word at TBP like "Exclusive" is way out of line:
The content here is NOT exclusive - in general.
Most material here is licensed material or whatever - but most I found here are seen at - especially - Teen Mega World which is S&S Royal Limited, so this Diesel Media is not producing themselves og at least not mainly.
They even got material from Nubiles.....
I was taken in by their (Young Legal Porn) preview. I've seen most elsewhere...
Some newer vids MAY be exclusive - you really need to be an investigator/detective to find out - but mostly: NOT exclusive.
Is this a new version of the old Young Porn net? Remember the site with the green background, some funny guys shown in a comic book way and a lot of not so good and certainly not exclusive material...
Sorry, but maybe my memory aint working that good - age, you know.
I'm stated for a review back in 2007 (https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1956 - certainly in my 'younger days' - what a lousy review, I did back then) - but never seen this site before - and that's NOT a memory lap..
And, btw - the reviews since then are mildly put very variated in both words and scores...
So anybody been here lately - and?.......Today this site looks so appetizing. But?
Been joining a little too much, lately - but still looking for more of the "good stuff".
And thinking about one thread here "Striptease - ect... I have some hopes for this site.
Have not been a member for maybe a couple of years - but seen quite a few trailers.
It looks like the site tends to good "foreplay" - with many vids-minutes of posing/striptease - before the act.
Like a lot here, I dig that posing/striptease - and not only the wham-bam-thank-you-mam....
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
