| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1101
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
No doubt about the value - multiple photo-sets every single day mean that there's always something exciting that I haven't seen before - their archives are deep, deep, deep.
Add the vids (which I'm mainly NOT a fan of) and the cam shows, which sometimes have smoking hot models, and you've got one helluva site.
I honestly can't think of another site that gives their members more high quality material on a regular basis.
|
01-10-08 06:49am
|
Reply
1102
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm surprised that they don't respond to e-mails because they are such a great site in other ways.
They definitely have their distinctive style, but they have enough variety to keep me consistently interested. While every shoot doesn't have me jumping for joy, I find that I have NO problem finding exciting stuff every time I log in, because the archives are so deep and there is so much posted each day.
I agree with the comments about the boring vids - Met Art could give lessons in how to make high-quality, REALLY boring vids - but the excellent photo-sets and consistent daily multiple updates keeps me a very happy member.
|
12-10-07 06:04pm
|
Reply
1103
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fonzie's Comment
Yeah, the cam chats are a rather "unique" community of regulars - lol. Then there's the rules about not using nasty language like the word "ass". It's funny. I rarely go to the cam chats, though there's a model Masha that I look out for, because she is truly DDG, in my opinion and only does cam chats, has no photo sets or vids on this site.
|
11-03-07 06:45pm
|
Reply
1104
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is one of my absolute fave sites out there. I've got a pretty active imagination, so I like tease sites and sites that show gorgeous women in softer ways than full-spread sites.
This review is accurate that it is not a full-spread site. I don't think this review gives this site credit for the range of models or the range of styles presented. It's that range that guarantees for me that there is one set a day - or at most one set every other day that I find thoroughly captivating.
Why? Gorgeous women, beautifully presented, many waif-like, some more voluptuous, awesome photography, lots of variety in the photography, very high quality.
The vids? This review is SO right. The vids are crushingly boring, for my tastes, though they are also very high quality.
|
07-28-07 04:41am
|
Reply
1105
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Reply
I hope you went with Met Art - it's an extraordinary site if you like hot models and high quality photography.
|
07-17-07 08:55pm
|
Reply
1106
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Comment
I've been a member of Met Art for approx 1 year now. I really love the site, mainly for the variety of the photography and the quality of the photography and the models.
The vids are an aspect of the site that I pretty much ignore for months at a time. They're just not exciting to me. They are very soft vids of their models cavorting in the surf or on rocks or something like that. They are pretty vids with nice music - the sound is sumptuous.
Having said all of that, I downloaded one of their recent vids in the DIVX version - their highest quality download, according to the site. The file was about 350MB for a 15 minute vid. The video quality, watching it on the newest version Windows Media Player full-screen, is pretty damned fantastic - pretty much DVD quality. The sound is truly outstanding. The content is not terribly exciting to me, though.
I'm there for the pics and, every once in a while, the cam shows.
|
07-16-07 08:22pm
|
Reply
1107
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
RobertJason's Review
If you want to get more into the personalities of the girls - and the tease - the Met Art cam shows are a great way to go. Each cam show is 2 hours long, if I remember correctly, so the girls take their time getting naked, spend a lot of time teasing and chatting and playing with the guys in the chat.
The turn-off to me about the chat is it's definitely like little club-house where the guys that are there all know each other and know all of the 'rules' etc. I found it rather off-putting. Others might not.
|
06-12-07 09:47pm
|
Reply
1108
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
4nic8's Review
Expensive? That depends on how long you want to join for - at $99/year, it's damned inexpensive - especially when you consider the amount of content that they put up.
|
05-25-07 07:45am
|
Review
1109
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredible level of updates - usually 4 per day
Great photography really high quality
Multiple sizes of photos - new option this month gives you small, medium or large - this is great!
Zip downloads available in different sizes as well
Good variety of models increasingly - they seem to have gotten away from the all-waif tendency that they had at one time, though there are a LOT of waifish models
Multiple live cam shows a day (6 most days) with hot MetArt models |
| Cons: |
Their vids often aren't very exciting for my tastes
If you're looking for hard-core, definitely don't expect it from this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a tremendous site for lovers of hot young European models. The people who run this site show a desire to give quality in everything they do, from the volume and consistency of their exclusive updates and their cam shows to the increasing quality of their browsing and download features.
Just this month they added a middle size for viewing and downloading that is just perfect for my tastes and added a "next image" viewing mechanism that I've been craving for a while.
Given that their pricing is not higher than other similar sites, it really makes me wonder how they can do this and others cannot.
Since I don't know when I'll find the answer to that particular question, I'll just keep enjoying this truly fine site. |
|
03-07-07 08:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1110
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Actually, I think Ninn is partnering with MetArt for the financing. His stuff is a lot more expensive to produce than the standard porn stuff, so he needs a backer with bucks. MetArt seems to have the bucks as well as a related sensibility.
|
01-14-13 09:59pm
|
Reply
1111
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
The vids - when you click on them to get a free preview - look very good. Ninn's definitely a stylist, so you either like his style or you don't.
Ninn and Met Art are a great partnership!
|
01-13-13 10:15pm
|
Reply
1112
|
Michelle Aston
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
Well, she's not a model, to my knowledge, but if you're in San Francisco in the near future, check to see if Trinity is dancing at San Francisco's Crazy Horse. She's about 5'7", blonde, with self-cropped very short hair, a willowy figure, small natural boobs and a really sexy girl-next-door face and demeanor - just an angel - a naughty one at that!
I don't recall tats, though I can't say for 100% certain that she didn't have a small one at the small of her back or something.
I hope she's still dancing there - she hasn't been in for over a week, but might just be busy with school stuff or have taken a Summer vacation trip.
|
07-29-07 06:25am
|
Reply
1113
|
Mike Adriano
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Great deal - I've joined more than once at that price. The only drag is a) you have to be very careful to be sure not to get snagged on any pre-checked offers - sometimes they have them way off to the right where you can miss them, sometimes they don't have them at all, b) they changed their cancellation system to make it more difficult to cancel.
In my opinion, any site that is harder to cancel than ccbill is just not professional.
|
05-17-13 09:24pm
|
Reply
1114
|
Mike in Brazil
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Comment
It's weird. Click on the "Join Now" button and you're told that membership includes access to 6 of the Reality Kings other sites. You would be crazy to join that way when you can join through the main Reality Kings sites at The Best Porn discount, which is a lower price than the one being offered here, and be assured of getting access to the whole network, including this site.
|
08-30-08 07:56am
|
Reply
1115
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
That's pretty common with Reality Kings. Ramon is in every vid on Pure 18, I believe.
|
04-06-10 06:55am
|
Reply
1116
|
Milton Twins
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Interesting - since Paypal a number of years ago instituted a supposedly strict rule that Paypal could not be used for "adult entertainment-related" transactions. I know people who were using Paypal for their e-bay businesses and had a lot of money frozen.
|
01-15-10 05:33pm
|
Reply
1117
|
Misha Online
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Thanks for the detailed review. I was a member of the site when they first opened for over a year, have thought about re-joining, but was held off by the lack of detailed info on updates - that's usually a bad sign. Your review confirmed it.
I doubt if Misha has retired, but I know she has had a few children, might have gotten awfully busy. One would think, though, that she would be smart and build up a stash of updates to keep the site humming. She's one of the most well-thought-of photographers in the glamour game and has access to the most sought-after models out there because of it.
It's just lame for sites to go dead where updates are concerned.
|
03-16-08 08:45am
|
Reply
1118
|
Misty Anderson
(0)
|
Reply of
JDuB's Review
The other major "con" to this site for me - and one that has kept me from joining - is the infrequency of her updates to the site - at least if the front page of her site is accurate - she has a most recent update on June 10 - 3 weeks ago. Before that she did an update on May 22 - more than 2 weeks before that. Before that she did an update on May 11.
I'm flat-out never going to join a site that updates that infrequently, despite her statements on the front page that she pours her heart and soul into the site. She ought to pour her heart and soul into updating more frequently if she wants more members.
|
07-03-09 01:54pm
|
Comment
1119
|
Misty Gates
(0)
|
|
04-22-12 09:58am
Replies (0)
|
Review
1120
|
Mofos Network
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I'm going to start out with the bad news - as with Digital Playground, Twistys & Reality Kings, Mofos has shed a significant portion of their content in the last several months. TBP reported almost 4,200 scenes in July 2020. They now show 2,794 scenes, including all of the updates between then and now. Updates are currently coming every 3 days, down from every day in February of last year and every other day in May. Unlike Babes.com, Mofos does have an identity - the site has always focused on babes newer to porn & that's still the case, so you're not going to see the same female performers that you've been seeing on every porn site for the past few years. And if there's a performer that has become a fave of yours on other sites, it's fun to go back and see her early work at Mofos. New videos have 4 d/l options - if your membership includes downloads - that top out at 1080 p - no 4K. Each scene has a gallery of approx 80 photos that can be d/l or scrolled on the site. |
| Cons: |
As far as deserted sites go, Share my BF has had 1 update since July 2020, so I wouldn't expect for there to be more updates from that site. Mofos Lab has been dead since October 2018. They don't include Stranded Teens or Latina Sex Tapes in the current list of their sites so I wouldn't count on those sites being updated again, but I am finding material from those sites still available. There's basically 8 sites that are updated these days on a rotating basis. They had a short-lived Border Patrol-themed site, but they got a lot of flack for that and all of that material is long gone. Trying to find a trend in purged material, I checked to see if Bibi Jones' 5 Mofo scenes from 2011/2012 are still here, and they are, available in the same 4 video d/l options as the newest scenes, so Mofos isn't exactly jumping on the most up-to-date modes of presentation. |
| Bottom Line: |
Mofos' thing has always been a more casual, faux pro-am style of presenting porn babes newer to the biz. That's still the case. They seem to be getting less ethnically diverse in their latest updates, less African American, Latina & Asian performers, but that may be a coincidence. The problem with a site that is dropping sites from their network and dropping fully 1/3 of the content of the site in a 7-month span is that you never know what the hell they're going to do next. I would give them somewhere in the 80-85 range normally, but with this messed-up crap going on, I'm giving them a 60. There are just more dependable sites out there. This is another site that I joined long ago as a good-priced add-on so it doesn't cost me a penny to stick around, and they may still be worth a 1-month join if you see a particularly good offer, but know that it's a complete crap shoot as to what will be on the site when you join. |
|
01-31-21 02:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1121
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I'm a member - got this as an add-on to my Brazzers.com membership. Perhaps there are different types of memberships. That seems to be a "thing" these days. I have the ability to download every scene except the not-yet-released scenes, though they are encouraging people to buy a VIP membership that would also give members access to those scenes.
|
09-16-16 02:26pm
|
Comment
1122
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
|
01-30-13 08:32pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1123
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
You can disagree with Vanessa's rating, but she was pretty clear about the rate of updates - specifically said that there were 3 pic/vid updates in the network in the last week and that they needed more content to get a higher score from her.
I wouldn't agree with her saying that they would be a must-join if they go HD, because there are other networks (Reality Kings & Naughty America) kicking their butts in terms of what they offer
The rate of updates means that you could join once every couple of years and get everything worth having in a month.
|
10-08-09 10:48pm
|
Reply
1124
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
chaos93's Comment
Yep - it's that Brazzers Bait-and-Switch Magic
That's why they're the Best Porn Co In The World - except for lots and lots of others
|
08-08-09 11:05am
|
Reply
1125
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Damn - stupid thing to do with a network that needs more sites and scenes rather than less - at this rate, Mofos is going to take a year or more to be worthwhile
|
04-12-09 05:54pm
|
