| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1601
|
Chloe 18
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
The problem with this company's sites is that the models have all moved on so they have no more updates. I was a member of Little Summer's site during the brief time that she and Kimmie were doing web cam shows - those were freaking hot - especially one where Summer left and the gorgeous Kimmie had to entertain all us horny dogs by her lonesome - did a great job too!
Anyway, sites where the model has moved on in her life and existing material is being slowly removed are not much of a value - and those kind of sites seem to be what this company specializes in.
|
05-31-07 11:28pm
|
Reply
1602
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I love this stuff! Tease me - please me - that's my slogan!
|
05-29-07 10:31pm
|
Reply
1603
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
There are sites that are part of a network and that bonus content is definitely part of the value of the membership to me - but the "feed" bonuses are generally crap and I always feel that I'm risking viruses whenever I click on them, so I stay the hell away from them these days.
|
05-29-07 10:13pm
|
Reply
1604
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
MrHappy's Review
Why is this a review? Why didn't you just contact the site's Customer Service Dept if the site was down? How bizarre!
|
05-28-07 03:40pm
|
Reply
1605
|
Crissy Moran
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
In early October '06, Crissy announced on her Myspace page that she had found Jesus and decided that sexual modelling was in contradiction to her new-found beliefs. Here's a link to a page that talks about this:
http://www.fleshbot.com/sex/news/crissy-...nds-jesus-206218.php
It's not just this site either. It's a well-known fact. The guys at Twisty's talk about this at their forum and thank their lucky stars that they have lots of un-released Crissy Moran stuff stockpiled to release as they choose over time.
|
05-28-07 03:38pm
|
Reply
1606
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Cenobite75's Review
Cenobite, if you're looking for high quality solo/les pics and vids, I highly recommend ALS Scan - amazing stuff being done there these days if you like gorgeous, young women being shown in all their glory.
|
05-28-07 11:12am
|
Reply
1607
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
4nic8's Review
Expensive? That depends on how long you want to join for - at $99/year, it's damned inexpensive - especially when you consider the amount of content that they put up.
|
05-25-07 07:45am
|
Reply
1608
|
Next Door Nikki
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
I've been a member at various times - Nikki's damned hot, though I have to say that I'm not as hot for her these days as I was at one time - the main justification for the price is the size of the site - she's been doing this for a few years and with weekly updates at least, most of the time, there's a lot of Nikki material here.
My biggest complaint about the PF sites is the zip sets used as upsell - the prices of the regular sites is high enough that they really ought to include the zip material in the regular site - that's my opinion, anyway.
That's an issue throughout the NN-model world, though it's a trend being bucked by models that are doing a lot more full-nudity and even HC material in their (formerly) tease sites.
|
05-23-07 07:04pm
|
Reply
1609
|
Aria Giovanni
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
Good question, SnowDude - it would make a good poll, in fact
How would you define hardcore?
This came up on the NNBoards forum the other day. Naughty Girl Sandy has decided to put all her goods out there for her members - full nudity, including pussy display, with scorchingly hot masturbation and girl/girl photo sets and vids. She did a cam show last night that blew my mind with her pussy sitting on top of the cam, basically, while she thrust her fingers deep inside.
To me, that was hardcore - and she's calling it hardcore. For other people, unless a guy is drilling her ass while choking her, it's all softcore.
|
05-22-07 09:12pm
|
Reply
1610
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Agreed - this is a really juicy site that is held back by a hideously poor navigation system. New Sensations has had most "name" porn babes coming through their hands at one time or another, but finding all the good stuff on their site is a struggle and a half. Once you find it, though, there is a lot to enjoy, though I found their vids rather repetitious after a while.
I'm often tempted to go back for more diving through their archives though and probably will at some point.
|
05-22-07 09:05pm
|
Reply
1611
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
MrHappy's Review
I don't really get the complaint about limited content. This site alone has 5 full photo-set updates and 1 full vid update consistently every week. The archive is also fully available and it pretty dang extensive. The content of the updates tends to be about 1/3 hardcore, 2/3 softer stuff.
Then the fact that it's part of a network of sites means that you're getting multiple updates on most days and at least one update every single day.
That's not terribly limited.
|
05-22-07 09:00pm
|
Reply
1612
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
Glad to hear it, Nick - I continue to enjoy this site a lot and look forward to seeing it get even better.
I like the navigation of this site - I like the way the site uses members' ratings to push and pull you to check out other hot stuff.
|
05-17-07 06:14am
|
Reply
1613
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
Models are definitely most important, but the other factors can't be neglected either.
I was a member of Jannah Burnham's site for one month. As soon as I became a member and realized that the site wasn't allowing members to save any pics, I knew I wouldn't stay a member no matter what else was going on.
Then there's resolution of pics and vids - quality standards at many sites are quite high, so all sites that are charging more than a nominal fee better be paying attention to this - there's just no excuse for posting pics and vids that aren't high res and expecting anybody to pay for it at this point.
Then there's "heat" and this is very subjective. The best example, for my taste, of a site that gets the Great Models and High Res parts right and the "heat" part neglected is InFocus Girls. I don't seem to be the only one since most reviews mention that this site is just lacking that "oomph" or "heat" factor - a deal-killer for me, despite the other things they get right.
Price - yeah, price is a factor - if a site is going to be charging a premium price, they damned well better be delivering premium content and lots of it. But, personally, I'm not going to stay a member of an inexpensive site if I don't find myself excited by what I find there.
|
05-17-07 06:10am
|
Reply
1614
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
It's funny - I found more tech issues with Eve Angel's site than this one during my short membership (1 month) at that site and I found very little involvement by Eve as compared to Mya, who is sporadic but there. I never saw any real involvement by Eve - I guess that must have changed.
|
05-15-07 06:49am
|
Reply
1615
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
For me it depends on the site. I'll watch vids full screen if they look great full screen. If they are going to look better smaller, I'll watch them smaller.
|
05-09-07 07:24am
|
Comment
1616
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
|
05-07-07 07:04am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1617
|
Sweet Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I agree - for me it was a teaser for 1-by-Day. I enjoyed a brief membership at Sweet Models enough to try a 5-month membership at 1-by-Day, which is a much better run site, being the flagship and all.
I found periodic links and other technical issues at Sweet Models, though problems would be cleared up in a day or two.
|
05-06-07 11:21am
|
Reply
1618
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
To me, it's a question of keeping my interest more than anything else. I like cam shows, so a site like Phil-Flash.com, which I rated extremely high, that has frequent HOT updates, adds bonus material to keep me glad that I'm a member and has lots of cam shows, which are events that you have to be there for to get the full effect, well I ain't leaving.
ALS Scans uses a different incentive - their vids are only available for 1-2 months, then they're gone for quite a long time, so since I love their vids I maintain my membership on an ongoing basis.
If a site gives me no special benefit to maintain membership on an ongoing basis, though, I'm more likely to leave and come back when the mood strikes me again.
|
05-05-07 06:43pm
|
Reply
1619
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
|
Reply of
cakeweasel's Review
So THAT's how they're making money with these sites!
I've got this site as part of the network available through my membership to DP Fanatics. My sex-site-spam definitely increased considerably after I joined, but I didn't have the means that you did to connect the dots in any clear way.
I like the network of sites, though I can't say that I've spent much time in this one.
|
05-05-07 06:36pm
|
Reply
1620
|
Kat Young
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I wouldn't join now with someone else's money, never mind my own!
As far as I'm concerned this site is a complete rip-off - they didn't even have the decency to respond to my e-mail to them - join at your own risk, that's what I've got to say about this site!
And I still don't see the reviewer's special being offered - I just did a clean-up of my system this morning, so I dunno what's up. I wouldn't be interested in taking advantage of it anyway, after finding out what a rip-off their trial membership is. Why would I expect to be ripped off less if I gave them more money?
My view - if a site is going to limit access in their trial memberships, they ought to spell those limits out clearly, otherwise it's a flat-out rip-off and is a site to be avoided like the plague, in my book.
|
05-05-07 06:09pm
|
Reply
1621
|
Lisa Boyle
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
Wow! I just clicked on Lisa's site for the first time in a helluva long time and it's changed big-time - new name - now www.flauntgirls.com, new price, new look, looks like a bunch of new content.
Good for her, the old site was sliding into the abyss for a while.
|
05-04-07 09:55pm
|
Comment
1622
|
Kat Young
(0)
|
|
05-04-07 07:21pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1623
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
iporn's Review
I agree about the lack of passion, sensuality, imagination - I felt like I should have been a lot more excited about it than I was.
|
04-23-07 06:33pm
|
Reply
1624
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Review
When were you last a member? For the last few weeks, this site has been hyping a picture of an open lock in their member's area with "Goodbye DRM" underneath the pic.
I believe that DRM's are a thing of the past at this site.
|
04-17-07 12:00am
|
Reply
1625
|
Fassinating
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Review
I'm a member of DP Fanatics, which is part of the same network. When I joined that site, I thought that they were pretty clear as to what I would be getting right away and what I would have access to later. I'm definitely happy with how that has gone, since I really like the 21st Sextury style and especially their pics.
But after reading your review, I checked out the "Join Now" page of this site. I couldn't make heads or tails out of what they're saying to understand what I would and would not be getting - lots of options, none of them very well spelled out.
|
04-14-07 03:39pm
|
