| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1276
|
Action JAV
(0)
|
|
07-25-08 06:02pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
1277
|
Asia Movie Pass
(0)
|
|
07-25-08 11:00am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I only read them when they pertain to sites that interest me - otherwise, no. A lot of times the comments and the responses to comments have a lot of info - but if it's not a site that interests me, I couldn't care that much.
|
07-22-08 10:30pm
|
Reply
1279
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
TBP price is $17.95/month for Reality Kings, which includes this site - good stuff at Pure 18 and Cum Fiesta as well, in my opinion - and 8th Street Latinas has some nice stuff too
|
07-21-08 10:29pm
|
Reply
1280
|
Adriana Sage
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I haven't been a member for quite a while, but I used to be and Adriana is a jewel - her webcam shows are great, if you can get to see them. She likes chatting with her fans, likes it when her fans talk dirty to her and seeing her fuck herself with one of her huge dildos while going "Ai-yi-yi-yi-yi" is very hot!
|
07-20-08 08:02am
|
Reply
1281
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Obama has his "porn and personal responsibility - what it means for the economy and national security" speech scheduled for February 2009.
|
07-20-08 07:57am
|
Reply
1282
|
Euro Foxes
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Agreed - and Shap, I certainly wasn't implying any dishonesty on the part of Twisty's - as I said, it's perfectly legitimate for Twisty's to establish niche sites using your existing and new Twisty's content - as someone who values TBP and want them to be as accurate as possible in describing listed sites.
|
07-17-08 07:56pm
|
Comment
1283
|
Euro Foxes
(0)
|
|
07-12-08 04:58pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1284
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I've been making this point for quite some time about this site and the Mya Diamond - I consider the people that run these sites among the most dishonest on the net and have been saying so as loudly and repeatedly as possible.
Have problems logging onto their sites and you better have the persistence of a demon because you'll need to follow these fucking thieves to every possible place and scream loudly in order to get them to ever respond.
Look at Freeones.com and you will see dated 2005 material for Eve Angel and Mya Diamond that was then re-posted as new. The people that run these sites are operating dead sites and just recycling the material.
It's nice material if you haven't seen it before but there hasn't been any new material posted to either site for a good long time - to figure out how long, one could figure out from the samples posted at Freeones.com approximately when the sites actually started, compare that to the earliest currently available and then you'll know how much was cut off from the beginning to repost as new.
It's not that hard to figure out.
|
07-12-08 04:41pm
|
Reply
1285
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
IKnoPorn's Review
Damn - I tried to warn you in my comments in the other review - the update rate of this site is just ridiculously poor.
|
07-07-08 09:46pm
|
Reply
1286
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
runefist's Review
I've checked out this Freeones.com deal and it's kind of a mess. On the first "Join Now" page, it refers to a price of 9.95/month whether you are in a country that uses euros, US dollars or British pounds. Then when you go past that page to the Epoch.com page, the price changes to 9.95 euros for 1 month, recurring at $24.95 euros/month, which is a LOT more expensive than the deal first promised. I've e-mailed Private.com. It will be interesting to see if I get a response.
|
07-05-08 07:51pm
|
Reply
1287
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
I think Kink.com is putting the "I did this intense stuff consentually and enjoyed it" disclaimers as a way of protecting themselves legally. It would at least be more difficult for a jury to find them guilty of brutality or whatever charges some DA wanted to bring against them if they saw that, in the end, the performers were hugging and smiling.
|
07-05-08 04:34pm
|
Reply
1288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've written before that I won't review a site until I've been there for several weeks, but that's not a standard for PU and I believe that there are numbers of people that write reviews for sites that they have been members of for only a few days.
If a reviewer is open and accurate about their membership and the membership is recent (the thing that burns me is when I see reviews of sites where the person hasn't been there in months), then I think it's OK. It's more info being shared, and that's the whole point, no?
|
07-04-08 07:43am
|
Reply
1289
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
IKnoPorn's Review
Their set-up/navigation/category division is a major pain in the ass.
Price - the official price is $29.95/month, or 3 month recurring membership for $59.80/three months. But when you check out the "Join Now" page, the price that pops up is a Special Offer of $22.90/month. This is one of those sites, like Suze.net, that has very frequent special offers, so if anybody is interested in the site, they should check back often and then just join when they like the price being offered.
|
07-03-08 06:45am
|
Reply
1290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Good idea. I know that I've rated sites highly that then flew down a rat-hole and other sites made some necessary adjustments to improve.
|
07-03-08 06:31am
|
Reply
1291
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
Canyon's Reply
Kate's a hot MILF now - married, or in a committed relationship anyway (not sure which), with a baby
|
07-02-08 10:35pm
|
Reply
1292
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
Canyon's Reply
They've been doing this blurred heavy painting to her pics these days, from the samples/promos of the new sets that I've seen, so now I feel like I don't even know what she really looks like.
Too bad, cause she was a truly stunning girl. I remember when I was a member of Kate's Playground years ago, Kate would come back from those Internext conventions of web models and would post candids and Kelly was easily one of the very few stunning girls in the pics.
Phil Flash posted great stuff that he shot of Kelly with Tiffany Teen - so freaking hot together!
|
07-02-08 10:27pm
|
Reply
1293
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
juicylucy's Review
I can relate to jl's review. I respect Shap and the whole Twisty's crew quite a bit, for their consistency of updates, the attention they pay to their members and their obvious desire to keep the site fresh in various ways.
But I've grown tired of the predominent style at the site - the photo-shopping makes some of my favorite models look just washed-out so I was finding myself most disappointed by sets of models that I like the most.
There are rays of sunshine. Some sets of Mari Possa that are just wonderful, for example, some really great strip tease vids, and some photo sets, such as the most recent Lanny Barby set, that are just snackalicious.
Still, with days when I was unable to find new updates that I cared much about, it's time, at the end of my current subscription, for me to take a leave from Twisty's for a while.
|
07-02-08 07:59pm
|
Reply
1294
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
juicylucy's Review
Just to lend a dose of cold water here. I think this site is definitely a taste-tester with some, like juicylucy, obviously loving it. I've been a member a couple of times and find it just terribly boring - I don't think the pics have anything exciting about them, I don't find the models all that attractive, in the main or very engaged in what they are doing and I find the interaction between the models incredibly mechanical and flat-out boring. I let my membership lapse after 1 month with no regrets whatsoever.
Enjoy your membership, though, jl - it's always good to find a site that you enjoy thoroughly.
|
07-02-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
1295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's hot if it seems like the girls are really enjoying it, like with ALS Scan's vids. It's not hot if it seems like the girls are only kissing each other because they were hired to be in a scene where they would be kissing each other and they expect the check to clear - like Sapphic Erotica - booooooorrrrring!
|
07-02-08 07:44pm
|
Reply
1296
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Canyon's Reply
Sites that update daily with super-hot girls & exclusive content
Met Art
LSG Models
MPL Studios
Femjoy
Babes.tv (6 days a week - 3 days of pics, 3 days of vids)
Sites that update several times a week with super-hot girls & exclusive content
ALS Scan (with 1 remastered update a week)
FTV Girls
Watch4Beauty
And then you look at Superglam's updates
sometimes 3 days, sometimes 15 days between pic updates
sometimes 2 days, sometimes 2 weeks between vid updates
You can convince yourself that's reasonable if you want. I'll vote with my wallet and stay the hell away from it. It's just not a reasonable rate of updates as compared to what else is available.
|
07-02-08 07:41pm
|
Reply
1297
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
You're mis-understanding the history of this site. This was not a stand-alone site that then added other sites. This site was a new addition to the SexyBabes.TV network of sites - and a great addition. Every single update isn't a stunner, but there are a whole lot of them that are. Overall, the network is a great deal. It should be even better when they start consolidating the updates that are currently spread among SexyBabes.tv, EuroBabes & DreamBabes.
|
07-01-08 06:41pm
|
Reply
1298
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Canyon's Comment
Regular updates coming? As Denner noted in his other comment, their update schedule is a joke when you compare it to other high quality glamour sites that give at least one new update a day. That's pretty much a deal-breaker for me.
|
07-01-08 06:36pm
|
Comment
1299
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
|
06-29-08 09:51pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1300
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Review
How do they get the girls so smooth and bump-free? Photo-shopping. Alex once showed some before-and-after pics because members were asking how much photo-shopping they did and he is an honest guy. They just photo-shop the bumps and blemishes etc and leave everything else the way it it. As to the vids, it's an interesting question, since they look just as clean and bump-free - soft lenses?
A videographer have to answer that one.
|
06-28-08 09:22am
|
