| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1076
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
|
05-02-09 07:51am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1077
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I enjoy fully clothed tease if it's the right girl in the right clothes, filmed the right way, etc.
There are certain celebs I can think of that can get me off just walking around in short skirts.
I'm a fan of pro wrestling and was watching a match the other day from 1999 or so and Pamela Anderson accompanied one of the wrestlers to the ring - OMG!! Just watching her walk around in a very low cut slinky white dress that had slits for her legs and caressed her ass was incredibly arousing.
At the same time, I like all kinds of levels of sex stuff if it's done right.
|
05-01-09 07:00am
|
Reply
1078
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Biggest con from my 1-month membership experience - even more than the plethora of fake-cock sites - they need new or additional servers - download speed was mainly atrocious.
|
04-21-09 06:13pm
|
Reply
1079
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'd follow the great American tradition - I'd go buy an assault rifle and go on a murderous rampage!
And before anybody gets all upset, let me assure you - I'm kidding - totally kidding!
How do I know how I'd react? It hasn't happened yet. The thought of it hasn't caused me to black out in terror, but that doesn't mean much until it really happens.
|
04-20-09 06:54pm
|
Reply
1080
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I do believe that you are correct. Looking at comments on her site, it was noted that the site opened January 2007, but the site currently shows the first update dated July 2007, so it looks like they chopped off the first 6 months to use as "new" updates.
|
04-19-09 08:36am
|
Reply
1081
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Balibalo's Reply
It's not your fault - The company that run these sites are a pack of thieves presenting old material as new - any shame is on them, not you.
|
04-18-09 06:44pm
|
Reply
1082
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Balibalo's Review
This site and Mya Diamond.com are both dead sites - they just recycle the old material over and over again to produce "new" updates. If you go to Freeones.com and look under Eve Angel and Mya Diamond, you can see samples from the sets that they continuously recycle with their original copyright dates.
|
04-18-09 06:21pm
|
Reply
1083
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
Given that their vids have natural sound and don't have the sound of clicking cameras or directors, I think that "yes, they do the vid and photo shoot separately - same location & outfits - I'm sure they have dupes when there's messiness involved." If there's anyone here that knows more the methodology of doing these kind of photo/vid shoots, they ought to chime in.
|
04-17-09 09:06pm
|
Reply
1084
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
This decrease in updates wouldn't be as bad if a) they stopped advertising 2 updates per day, b) they added an extra update when one of their "Jokes" sets was the set posted, or c) they added an extra update when they posted an ALS Scan set posted - I've got to give props once again to ALS Scan - when they post a set from 1 By Day, it's an extra - it's not a replacement to the ALS Scan material that would be posted that day. In my view if a site is going to a flag-ship site - as ALS Scan is - as One By Day is - and if they're going to charge premium prices - you have to join One-By-Day for a full year to bring the monthly price below $20/month - then they ought to be held to quite a high standard of performance.
If they've got one main guy as they photographer, and he's stretched doing work on their other sites, they ought to do what Suze Randall did and cultivate a group of contributing photographers - have those others fill out the updates on the site to give more value to the members.
|
04-17-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
1085
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
Screen stills? You think so? I don't. I think that they are photo sets that go along with, but are separate from the vids. They don't give the appearance of screen stills to me.
I would compare them to the photosets that you see at Pix & Video or One By Day - both of those sites have vids that go along with the photo sets, but the photo sets are not screen stills. For comparison, there are bonus sites to Pix & Video where they do have screen still sets - which look quite different - and much lower quality.
|
04-17-09 05:52pm
|
Reply
1086
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Man, that's the weakest excuse I've ever heard - "some reviewers at Porn Users are saying bad things about our site so we're going to cut our updates by half!" I can't imagine that they would be so petty or dumb. It's a premium-priced site and the flagship of their brand, so it doesn't seem like a wise move - but perhaps they looked at how going to 2 updates a day had affected their membership and just didn't see a difference between joins at 1 update a day and joins at 2 updates a day - so why not save the money and cut back to one a day?
|
04-17-09 06:58am
|
Comment
1087
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
|
04-15-09 04:18am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1088
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
insomniacxxx's Review
The other negative about this site is the download speed. I tried it for a month and my first download was at quite a decent speed - after that -blecccchh!! This sites average download speeds are horribly slow
|
04-14-09 11:09pm
|
Reply
1089
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
It looks like they changed their pricing completely from the TBP-listed pricing. The pricing stated now is:
29.95 first month - recurring at $14.95
95.50 year-long join (7.95/month)
|
04-12-09 10:47pm
|
Reply
1090
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Damn - stupid thing to do with a network that needs more sites and scenes rather than less - at this rate, Mofos is going to take a year or more to be worthwhile
|
04-12-09 05:54pm
|
Reply
1091
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
It's hot generally, though when they have Eastern Europeans speaking English phonetically, as in some Private productions, that just sounds silly & a bit distracting.
|
04-11-09 07:25pm
|
Reply
1092
|
Evil Angel Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
That was probably the most amazing web cast I've never seen - 2 1/2 hours of a shoot that was invaded early on by Aiden Starr and then by various EA folks who couldn't keep their hands off Dana Dearmond - can't blame them. John Stagliano is a genius - get the right girls - get them going crazy and ask nicely for what you want, but mainly let them use their imaginations and filthiest initiative - and then just enjoy it. Lots of face-slapping, hair-pulling, spitting, boob-grabbing, face-sitting, clothespin-pussy-displays and the most body-rocking orgasms I've ever seen. The two women who came in with complete intensity ended looking totally stoned, smiling and utterly relaxed and lovely - loved it!
|
04-10-09 07:33pm
|
Reply
1093
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
Yeah, a was a member for a month when they first opened and had a $10/month deal - when they opened, they started with a bunch of good stuff, but then they really didn't add much great stuff - it's the kind of site that would be worth joining once a year for a month.
|
04-09-09 06:06pm
|
Reply
1094
|
Hardcore Max
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Did you notice the location of the website? Cyprus - ha ha - that's appropriate.
|
04-08-09 09:54pm
|
Comment
1095
|
Evil Angel Network
(0)
|
|
04-07-09 08:43pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
1096
|
I Am Trouble
(0)
|
|
04-06-09 07:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1097
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Hey, Denner - you're so right about the beauty of the southwestern US - Texas, New Mexico, Arizona - great stuff.
At this point, if I got a free vacation, I'd go to Brazil - hot women and great music - I just won't let some Brazilian TS fuck me in the ass - don't want to follow in the footsteps of John Stagliano.
|
04-06-09 07:38pm
|
Reply
1098
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Actually my answer to this poll is deceptive - there really should have been an alternative to vote for "I don't even notice them", because that's the truth of the matter for me. I can't honestly say that I think that they're stupid when I haven't ever checked them out and have no desire to.
|
04-04-09 08:51am
|
Reply
1099
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
Damn - that's really bullshit - I joined for a year because the price was so low and I'm a big Jenna Haze fan and such a fan of Jules Jordan's stuff - I'll have to make sure that I cancel right at the end of the year (if it's a recurring deal)
|
03-31-09 10:32pm
|
Reply
1100
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I never recall them having a deal for 5 months for $85 - TBP's price now shows 4 months for $85
|
03-31-09 10:29pm
|
