| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
826
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Okee Dokee - My question to the Clara-G C/S rep was:
"I received this e-mail from you on 10/08/09 telling me that Ass Titans
is no longer a bonus site for Clara-G and vice versa.
Then I read a review that was from a reviewer who said that they were
a member in mid-November and that they DID have the Ass Titans bonus.
I looked at the site just now and see no indication that Ass Titans is
being offered as a bonus.
Could you clear this up for me? Is the Ass Titans bonus back - and if
so, when did that happen, since I was told on Oct 8 that the bonus was
gone."
I received the following prompt response:
"At this point Ass Titans is not given as a bonus for Clara-G and vice versa.
Not sure why the reviewer gave this comment but it is not true.
Sincerely,
Ben Moor
Customer Support
www.Clara-G.com
E-mail: support@clara-g.com "
I've got no reason to doubt that Vanessa's experience in the site was as described - with a link to Ass Titans in Clara-G's site and vice versa. So I can only conclude that somehow the reviewer membership that Vanessa had access to included that link while ordinary members do not - since ordinary members USED to have that link, perhaps this was just an error that she was given a membership with old coding.
But clearly, this is now confirmed a second time by Clara-G's C/S that nothing has changed for ordinary members since the e-mail that I received on October 8 - Ordinary members of Clara-G.com DO NOT have access to Ass Titans and ordinary members of Ass Titans DO NOT have access to Clara-G.com.
|
12-30-09 06:02am
|
Reply
827
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I'm e-mailing the guy that confirmed that it was gone - I had no access to it during a membership of 10/11-11/10 - very odd!
|
12-29-09 06:22pm
|
Reply
828
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
That's totally bizarre! They e-mail me telling me that the bonus is gone and then change it back 5 days after my membership ended - that just seems truly weird!
I'll e-mail the guy that gave me the info in the first place and see if that's the case. I'm wondering if they're giving reviewers a different membership, since on the Join Now page for Clara-G.com, there's no mention of the Ass Titans bonus.
|
12-29-09 06:16pm
|
Reply
829
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
Personally, I download the vids that I like and watch them that way.
I recommend going to 1 site that you can concentrate your energies on.
One of the big problems now is that none of the sites have any individual personality, which makes them more boring than they would be if there were just 1 site.
That's my feeling anyway.
You've always been a good guy in your interactions here, Nick. I definitely wish you the best in bringing your sites - or at least 1 - back into the kind of quality that I used to enjoy. It's a challenging economic environment for sure.
|
12-29-09 06:09pm
|
Reply
830
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
Good to see you're still around, Nick - given the down-grade in quality of this site and the other related sites, I was thinking that all the real people had gotten the sack and that the sites were all set on auto-pilot.
|
12-29-09 07:06am
|
Reply
831
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Yeah, I found the site to be quite slow when it came to download speeds. I found speeds could be so slow that files would simply break off, so starting a download and going to bed didn't give me something to look forward to in the morning.
As per my other comment, Vanessa's needs correction in terms of Ass Titans being a bonus of Clara-G.com as well - it is no longer a bonus - so that's 1/2 the material available to members gone.
|
12-28-09 08:30pm
|
Comment
832
|
Clara G
(0)
|
|
12-28-09 08:27pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
833
|
JJ Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
The rate of updates of all of the Jules Jordan-related sites in this network has slowed down to a depressing level, unfortunately. They've added more porn star sites to the network, but the sites that were exciting in the network - the Jules Jordan sites, Jenna's site, have really gone to hell in the updates dept.
Too bad.
|
12-26-09 05:45pm
|
Reply
834
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
And emulating that would make Videobox better?
Uh, no thanks!
|
12-26-09 05:42pm
|
Reply
835
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I loved the DDF World Cup stuff - There were great sets of Anneta Keys, Monica Vesela and other babes.
The Christmas themed-stuff can be hot if it's slutty enough. Sandy Summers did a great slutty Christmas set.
Halloween is usually a great time to get hot sets, especially from solo models.
|
12-24-09 08:25pm
|
Reply
836
|
Action JAV
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
I know - they reduced their updates for a few days - and reduced their promised update level - and then have eclipsed it with 6 updates/day for the past couple of days.
Merry Christmas. I'd rate this up there with JSexNetwork - they're both very good sites - this one's more consistent. JSexNetwork is more quirky and unpredictable - with more variety - I saw that they had an update the other day that was like Porn Fear Factor - Yucchh!
|
12-24-09 09:27am
|
Reply
837
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Funny, when I take a look at American Vice's recent updates, I'm seeing anal, anal, dp, anal, anal, fat girls, anal, inter-racial, anal, anal, Asian, anal - lol
What am I missing that they have that's unique?
|
12-24-09 02:04am
|
Reply
838
|
Raven Riley
(0)
|
Reply of
Shasta90418's Comment
This was true at a certain point, when Raven had a dispute with the webmaster(s) and walked away from the site for a while, but she returned - I'm not sure exactly when - and the samples that I've seen of updates look new - her bod looks like it's maturing as one would expect it to be.
The rumors that I read say that she's in school now, so she isn't doing webcam shows, which was a significant part of the site as it is with any solo-girl site, and that she is probably not going to be doing new updates for the site much longer. That could change. One never knows.
|
12-23-09 12:44pm
|
Reply
839
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
When I was a member, when it first opened, the models were Thai - I was a member for 3-6 months, I forget whether I did 1 or 2 90-day joins, but by that point I was so tired of the lacquering of the pics that I quit and never have considered joining again since all the samples have shown that this is their preferred style.
And yes, they gloss them up artificially - it's all very pretty and the models are all very hot but the lacquering gets to me.
I much prefer the style used by Graphis and other Japanese erotic photography.
|
12-22-09 09:01pm
|
Reply
840
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
It's what their members want - or at least the vocal ones - whenever there's a scene that doesn't include anal, there's always very highly rated comments complaining about that.
|
12-22-09 07:07pm
|
Reply
841
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
I have the same issue with this site as I have with their other site, Pier999, which is that ALL of the pics are heavily lacquered.
So they get great hot models, have them in hot outfits and hot poses, and then, for my tastes, ruin it all with the lacuering of their pics.
I want to see real skin tone. I find it very frustrating to see that being erased by their treatment of their pics. If that doesn't bother you, this is a very good site - and has the archives of Asian4You, (I hope I have that right), which also lacquered all their pics.
|
12-22-09 07:04pm
|
Comment
842
|
Action JAV
(0)
|
|
12-22-09 08:52am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
843
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I put "It depends", though I lean toward "getting better" - perhaps I should have flipped a coin.
How is it getting better? HD-quality - being able to see gorgeous women in such great detail is very cool - both for vids and pics, the better sites are presenting awesome material.
Accessibility - pretty much whatever you want is out there and quite accessible. When I first looked at porn, I could either wait for something to come to Pussycat Cinema or go to an adult book store. Now, whatever you want is accessible from your seat in front of your computer.
Where things are going south a bit is that some sites are getting more cookie-cutter, as per my criticisms of Babes.tv, SexyBabes.tv, Babelicious, etc. They've given up on trying to be anything other than a shell for licensed material - probably like radio stations that decided it wasn't worth it to be local & unique and decided to be an affiliate of a national corporate broadcast.
So that just means that porn consumers have to have their radar out to see which sites are changing for the worse and to let other consumers have a heads-up.
|
12-22-09 07:25am
|
Reply
844
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Being as I'm old enough to have gone to PussyCat Cinemas for a number of years, it's been-there, done-that for me - and I've got no great desire to repeat the experience. I like watching porn in the privacy of my own abode, where, quite frankly, I can masturbate without fear of being busted like Peewee Herman.
|
12-21-09 04:57pm
|
Reply
845
|
Eve Angel Official
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I tend to like the 3-month deals since it lowers the monthly cost. I just went for their 3-month deal fairly recently, though, so I'll probably pass on this one - but it's a good deal for people like me that gravitate to 3-month joins on an ordinary basis.
|
12-19-09 03:12pm
|
Comment
846
|
Eve Angel Official
(0)
|
|
12-19-09 06:19am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
847
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Interesting perspective. I've found this site to be among the more varied of the Japanese adult vid sites, given that they have the softcore photo sets and vids as well as the most popular censored adult vids as well as the uncensored stuff.
There are a number of sites that I've seen around that post their stuff in scenes. That seems more like a ripoff to me than a site that posts the entire vids, but then I've never been downloading enough stuff to breach their download limits.
As far as download managers, it was a very helpful customer service guy at this site that first encouraged me to use a download manager when I was having slow downloads.
|
12-18-09 07:57pm
|
Reply
848
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Actually, Monahan, those phone sex things are still going - were really popular & lucrative for a period of time in the mid-80's or so. A friend of mine in LA wrote scripts for them for a while.
That's LA for you.
|
12-18-09 07:50pm
|
Reply
849
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I 3rd Monahan's term, since Twisty's often paints their pics to an infuriating degree for my tastes.
At the same time, when I see sites post pics of completely untreated pics, I'm not very turned on, since harsh lighting can make the girls look like they're ready for a police line-up or something.
I remember Alex at ALS Scan wanted to demonstrate the amount of treatment that they do and he used a pic of petite Latina Kat as an example. Due to being freshly-shaved for the shoot, her pussy had horrible razor-burn and other "issues" that were not in the least attractive and they had taken care of that with the treatment of the pic - they hadn't done much more than that and I think that they're one of the best sites because of that.
I think I've talked about this before, actually, but I also like the very minimal photo-treatment of solo-girl site photographers like Phil-Flash and Spunky, who is most well know for his work with Kate's Playground. They mainly deal with what they want to deal with in their lighting with very little photo treatment as compared to other adult photographers, and their pics have a lot of erotic power as a result.
Some solo-girl sites use cheap auto-treat software that gives all of their pics a lacquered look and takes all the eroticicm away.
Holly Randall frustrates the fuck out of me with her heavy painting of her pics - be a painter or be a photographer, I scream at my monitor. Make up your mind!
Nubiles.net is another site that gets it right for my tastes. They're certainly posting treated pics, but they're not painting them heavily and they're not lacquering them in an art-less way.
As a fan of hot erotic pics, this is a topic that I could go on about for a long while.
I want to see the models, I want to see what they look like, I want to see why the photographer thought they were hot in the first place. I don't care how skilled their photo-shop guy is - he should go photo-shop pics of dolphins and wheat fields and leave the adult photography biz to people that want to see hot women looking like hot women.
|
12-16-09 07:12pm
|
Reply
850
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I'm a cheap sob generally, so few sites that don't give me the opportunity to get a $20/mo price will get me to join, though I'm certainly willing to do a multi-month join to get that price.
If a site is more than that price, they'd better be bringing it in terms of both quality and frequency of updates.
I feel quite ripped off if I join a site and they aren't updating.
So give me a decent price & a decent rate of high quality updates, be honest about what I can expect and deliver what was promised and I'm happy.
|
12-15-09 06:39pm
|
