| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
E-mail them - see if they'll a) cancel your sub and refund you for the remaining time or b) come up with some other solution that you'd find acceptable.
Unlike many sites, I find the responses that I've had from 21st sextury actually seem like responses from another human being, though you might get answers to only part of a question the first time. It's worth a try.
|
06-27-10 09:46pm
|
Reply
702
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
I don't believe that the Zero Tolerance and Third Degree sites ever lived up to their promises to post DVD's BEFORE their general on-sale date. These sites just put up promises with no intention to live up to them, unfortunately.
|
06-27-10 08:28am
|
Reply
703
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
There is an ebb and flow to the quality of updates to Videobox.
There were years when I was looking at high ratings for this site and checking the updates and thinking - Meh - I can easily skip this!
At a certain point, there was a lot of archived material that was of interest to me plus a lot of recent updates that were of interest to me and I joined. At a point when I felt that they were providing enough of interest to make worth my while, I joined long-term.
They're in rather a fallow period for updates these days, for my tastes, so I'll be keeping my eye out for when my subscription runs out and seeing whether I want to re-up or let them buid up an archive that I'm interest in again.
|
06-26-10 04:33pm
|
Reply
704
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Price is an issue - but it's not the only issue.
The question is overall value. If there is a site that is $9.95 a month and doesn't draw me to it very often and another site that is $34.95/month that excites me every day that I'm a member, I'm not going to be a member of that $34.95/month site on an ongoing basis, most likely, but I'll rate it higher than the 9.95/month site that has little of interest for me, because - everything taken into account - the $34.95/month site is giving me a better value.
|
06-26-10 04:29pm
|
Reply
705
|
Action Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I think you've got it now - ActionGirls.com is Scotty JX's project to complete his Masters in Behavioural Psychology - and pay for grad school.
|
06-25-10 09:11pm
|
Reply
706
|
Action Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Yeah, I think I was able to take advantage of viewpornstars once when I had an ActionGirls trial membership, which is all I've ever paid for. That's a drag about the more recent galleries not allowing you to access them.
This is a fun site when you can get access to the material, though it's designed by ants - or some other maze-loving critters.
|
06-25-10 05:45pm
|
Reply
707
|
Met Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Reply
Thanks for the additional details.
|
06-23-10 08:24pm
|
Reply
708
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Pix&Video.com is definitely the same as the 21stSextury site. I assume that Club Sandy is just another portal, though I've never joined through there to know at 100%.
|
06-22-10 05:47pm
|
Reply
709
|
Teen Kasia
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestDave's Review
I think the issue of quality is as much taste and judgement as anything else. Personally, I'm a big fan of Phil-Flash's work and in my opinion, nobody shot Kasia better than Phil did - nobody show-cased her personality the way that he did and she clearly had a blast working for him, judging from all the laughing she did in her work for him.
I also really like the outfits that he had her wear and all the dancing, stripping, teasing stuff is great.
But Phil's got his style, which has amateur origins, and his stuff is not glamour stuff, so pics and vids can have blurry elements at times, and if that ruins it for you then that's the fact of the matter, regardless of the dimensions of the pics or vids.
Also on a factual matter - the dates of the updates show on the home page, and while there were a couple of times that there was 2 weeks between updates, mainly this site has been updated weekly.
I've seen the Kasia material that Phil did that was posted at FDAU.com and at Phil-Flash.com and I like it a lot - but then, I'm a big fan of his style. I've checked out a lot of what Kasia did for other sites and I like Phil's work with her much more - more personality, more engagement equals more erotic heat for me. Femjoy did good work with her too.
As to the price - it ain't any bargain, that's for sure. You have to be a big fan of Kasia to spend $30 for a month of only her updates. There are plenty of sites offering a lot more value, that's for sure.
|
06-19-10 11:16am
|
Reply
710
|
Met Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Comment
New comment at Met Art says that the unique free shows that they used to have will be returning once they work out all the details of the migration to the new hosting site.
|
06-19-10 11:03am
|
Reply
711
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
This site is inaccessible once again - unless you like paying to look at blank screens and error messages during much of your subscription, I REALLY don't recommend it.
|
06-19-10 10:59am
|
Reply
712
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
AND the site is inaccessible again! Not surprising and it's why I react as I do - because when a site gives no access after I first join, and there is no quick C/S response, I've learned to recognize it as a warning sign that the site has MAJOR problems - as this one clearly does.
Now you may want to appoint yourself as the PU Defender of web-masters - that's fine. Me, I want to warn other PU's of sites that are poorly, incompetently run and are un-stable and are likely to not deliver much of value.
How much entertainment do I get from a site to which I have no access - none! How much entertainment do I expect other PU's to get from a site to which I would expect them to get no access - none!
|
06-19-10 10:58am
|
Comment
713
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
|
06-18-10 06:50am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
714
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
They can charge somebody else money to read their error messages. I have no interest in paying for a few days of nothing.
|
06-17-10 10:04pm
|
Comment
715
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
|
06-17-10 08:42pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
716
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Are you talking about the photosets? It's really not that way with Japanese gravure photosets. They're more a random collection of photos than a progression like people are used to with US or European photosets. There will be a number of clothed shots, then some nude, then semi-nude, then clothed, then nude, etc.
If you're looking for a progression as you describe, you might be disappointed. The Japanese stuff is just different.
|
06-17-10 07:24pm
|
Reply
717
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
You got to be true to yourself when it comes to sex or you'll just feel like an asshole. I experimented years ago with bondage and "abusive" games and it wasn't enjoyable at all. On the other hand, nothing makes me happier than to do things that make a girl cum like crazy. Pussy-eating, fingering, stroking, massaging, fucking with condoms with odd bumps and ridges - they all get the kind of reactions that I really like getting.
Slapping and choking a sexual partner don't have the same appeal or deliver anywhere near the same thrill.
Girls do like rough sex, though - many of them.
|
06-17-10 07:00am
|
Reply
718
|
Adult Film Sex Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Club Taylor Rain has/had material of lots of babes, I believe. I know this only because Taylor Rain posted frequently for a while to a particular forum - and just about any hot babe being discussed, Taylor would pop up with a link to a scene on her site - small samples, of course.
I have no idea if that site is still going or not, frankly.
|
06-15-10 06:52am
|
Reply
719
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not interested in limited trials - I have been suckered in before, though.
|
06-12-10 07:51pm
|
Reply
720
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
Nookiemonster's Review
I would add the caveat that you need to have a tolerance for a level of photo treatment that I call lacquer-ing because each photo looks like they took a bunch of shelac and spread it over the whole thing.
Personally, I can't take that level of photo treatment, so even though this site had many many fine models, I stay the hell away from it so I don't sit in front of my monitor screaming about why they fuck up every single god-damned photo on the site.
|
06-12-10 10:03am
|
Reply
721
|
Action JAV
(0)
|
Reply of
Nookiemonster's Comment
When they have sufficient servers operating, I agree that this is a great site - one that I'm drawn back to over and over. There are times, however, when their servers are so insufficient that loading a single page is an excruciating experience and that kind of a thing makes a site pretty much worthless, since you can't download anything.
|
06-12-10 09:59am
|
Reply
722
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
100% perfection as in occasional slow downloads? No problem. If your idea of a slight imperfection is "No pics shows at all on any of the sites in the network", then we'll just have to disagree, because I don't find that tolerable at all.
|
06-12-10 09:56am
|
Reply
723
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
What do you know? Fixed now! Halleluja - you can actually see pix and video
|
06-11-10 09:02pm
|
Comment
724
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
|
06-11-10 07:14pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
725
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Comment
Wait'll you try to end your subscription! That's when the real fun starts! You get a confirmation on the site that your subscription has been cancelled with no e-mail confirmation - so you assume that your subscription has been cancelled and stop using the site at the end of the subscription. Then you get your credit card bill and see that they charged you again. So you try to contact Customer Service - and you try - and you try - and you try - and you try - and you try - and EVENTUALLY someone will deem to respond - right after you have been charged for ANOTHER month - and then they'll say - "Oh, yeah, we'll refund you" and will only refund you for the SECOND excess month that they charged you for.
Hang onto your hat.
|
06-10-10 06:04pm
|
