| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
901
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
09-08-09 10:52pm
Replies (8)
|
Reply
902
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Nxn's Reply
You're completely in the mainstream in disliking streaming-only sites. They're not a good value.
|
09-07-09 06:45pm
|
Reply
903
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Most appealing - well, since Amy Reid is my archetype of amazing flip-me-out hotness, I'm got to go with big boobs, small ass.
But I certainly like a lot of small boob porn babes as well or I wouldn't be such a fan of ALS Scan and Nubiles.net and Asian honeys generally, whether with small or big boobs - so long as they're hot.
|
09-07-09 09:45am
|
Reply
904
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Nxn's Review
A number of the major porn studios have streaming-only sites
Vivid.com does - though you can join the Premium Vivid Channel at Videobox if you want to download whatever they choose to offer there
DigitalPlayground.com does
Hustler.com is a mix - some vids are downloadable, some are streaming only, some vids that are downloadable are available in high res, some only available to download in lower res than the stream
|
09-06-09 05:29pm
|
Reply
905
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
There haven't been all that many Black pornstars in the A listings of pornstars as compared to white, Latina, Asian - so I say "Yes". I've got to say that, unlike the other ethnic groups mentioned, I find much better Black women working in strip clubs or just out on the street, in supermarkets, restaurants, etc, than I do when I look at the latest porn DVD's at Videobox or whatever.
Most of the women in all the Big Black Ass movies are nowhere near as fine as the Black women that I see all over the place in the real world. Meeka Johnson was an exception to this, but she hasn't been around for quite a while - what a honey! And she was the last Black porn babe whose name I even bothered to remember.
|
09-05-09 12:55am
|
Reply
906
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Interestingly, the material that I have downloaded at House of Taboo (and of course this just represents my tastes) downloaded as "Hot Legs and Feet" material - so I believe that there is definitely cross-pollination across all of the various brands - not that there's anything wrong with that, in my opinion.
|
09-04-09 11:12am
|
Comment
907
|
Eve Angel Official
(0)
|
|
09-03-09 10:51pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
908
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Yeah, it was back online this morning - It was weird - I was downloading a vid when it just stopped like the server went down and when I tried to leave the site and go back in, it was unavailable. Oh, well - shit happens
|
09-03-09 06:22pm
|
Comment
909
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
09-02-09 10:01pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
910
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
09-02-09 06:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
911
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Shoot, even Playgirl survived because of purchases by gay men.
|
09-01-09 09:23pm
|
Reply
912
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
They have good material, exotics, but my experience with having joined with a good deal was horrible - trying to cancel is a miserable experience and their Customer Service is horrendous.
|
08-31-09 08:37pm
|
Reply
913
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
Thanks for the heads up, Ken
|
08-31-09 08:28pm
|
Reply
914
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
So, looking again at this site, the only thing that I can figure is that you joined EvilOnDemand.com
http://www.evilondemand.com/main/MDowOjIz
which is just one of the many sites linked from the main corporate site that you commented on - rather confusing.
It's hard to say how these stream sites would be any great deal.
|
08-29-09 08:02am
|
Reply
915
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Wow - different universes, I guess - I just went to the site that you're commenting on and I still don't even see a "join" button - and as a member of Buttman.com, I can attest to the fact that the stuff being posted in that network - for download with no DRM - is far from "B" material.
|
08-29-09 07:37am
|
Reply
916
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
As this poll shows, we're pretty much all a bunch of damned geek porn collectors - lol
|
08-28-09 05:48pm
|
Reply
917
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
Yes, the automatic joins to other sites on top of the crappy vid quality doesn't help the appeal of Porn Pros.
|
08-28-09 05:44pm
|
Reply
918
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
barnlol's Comment
Since the webmaster at DDF recommended using the DownThemAll! plug-in to firefox, my perspective is "Slow downloads - what are they?" If I'm having a slow download, I use DownThemAll! through the firefox browser and I'm getting downloads once again at 515 kb/sec - which is my current speed right at this second from Videobox - I'm happy.
|
08-28-09 05:41pm
|
Reply
919
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Nxn's Review
Best Porn discount gets you membership at $14.95/month, if I remember correctly - not a bad deal considering their live shows, which are quite fun - I found that they work best with firefox as the browser, for whatever reason.
|
08-24-09 07:42pm
|
Reply
920
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I, on the other hand, am enjoying the hell out of the August deal. I've rarely been a member of DDF sites so there's lots of new stuff for me. I'm like a kid in a candy store - the pages do load slow, but with the firefox-based download manager that their webmaster recommended last week, downloads of vids are quite quick.
|
08-24-09 07:38pm
|
Reply
921
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
I wouldn't recommend this site to anybody as a source of boy-girl porn - which doesn't mean I wouldn't recommend it to anybody. Sorry you made the wrong choice for boy-girl porn. Check out some of the DDF sites - especially with their great August deal.
|
08-24-09 07:36pm
|
Reply
922
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Man, if we're gonna be all "Who are you to invade our little slice of porn heaven?" or whatever any time a newbie comes along, this place is gonna get pretty inbred pretty fast - as many forums do when the long-time members are all up in the face of newbies.
People who are joining to spam will spam and they should be treated as spammers. People who come to participate and share opinions and experiences and knowledge should be welcomed as fellow participants.
|
08-24-09 07:34pm
|
Reply
923
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
What site are you actually talking about? Did you join their Video On Demand site or something? The site that you're leaving a comment on isn't even a membership site.
It's their main corporate portal where you can see trailers, buy Video on Demand or DVD's, it has links to their other sites but is not a membership site itself.
So this is a weird comment, it seems to me.
I've been a member of Jonnidarkkoxxx and I'm now a member of Buttman.com and I don't regard any of the material that I've gotten as being low quality "B" material, though there's a ton of stuff available and if you want to download lower quality stuff, it's there, I suppose.
But I haven't had DRM issues, that's for sure, and I've downloaded tons of their vids, including exclusive-to-the-internet material.
|
08-23-09 07:08pm
|
Reply
924
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Vanessa's Reply
I see the distinction that you were making - I'd have phrased it differently, but I'm sure you hear a lot of that.
I hope she starts doing cam shows and lives up to your review. She's a cool person from what I've seen of her.
One thing I've found with porn star sites is that many porn stars would be better off having their site run by a professional site manager. Stephanie Swift's site has never lived up to it's promise because she's tried to do it herself while feature dancing and going to school and...
And she's not a web site designer so she had to rely on other people on an a la carte basis and was frequently ripped off and the site suffered because of it. If porn stars can find a company they trust to run their site, they are probably better off, I've found.
|
08-22-09 06:18pm
|
Reply
925
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I've decided that Comcast cable
a) boosted download speeds considerablly and then
b) put a dampener so that the maximum total that could be downloaded is 525 kb/sec
I used to consider 200 kb/sec to be decent, but Comcast cable has boosted speed quite a bit in the last several months - but considering that I see sites where downloads start at 800 kb/sec+ and then start decreasing, I believe that they have a dampener in effect - probably to make sure that no individual users hog their broadband capabilities too terribly much.
|
08-22-09 10:14am
|
