| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
851
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
It was from the e-mail that I get all the Twistys updates, so I don't think so
|
11-14-09 11:53am
|
Reply
852
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah - and this is the problem that I've been railing about every chance I get everywhere I can - It's dishonest bait-and-switch BS that has gone on for many months.
It's not a mistake. It's not an oversight. I posted numerous times on their forum, which I would never post to again, since it is so completely packed with Brazzers employees posing as members attacking anybody that criticizes the site.
They are the kings of BS.
Want to check out a site that actually likes their members, has a real forum, will do things such as booking members' fave porn babes for live shows on the members' birthdays? Check out Naughty America.
They impress me more and more. Their scenes are not great - many of their live shows are fucking awesome - and they get them up on archives as soon as they can.
Did Brazzers ever put up their live $5/minute show to watch in archives? Hell, no!
|
11-14-09 09:35am
|
Comment
853
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
11-14-09 09:27am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
854
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
There are polls that are interesting and there are polls that, for me, are redundant, ridiculous or that I can't imagine why anybody would give a damn about - kind of like elections.
I vote and give feedback when I'm interested. I stay away when I'm not.
That's the way it ought to be so keep 'em coming.
|
11-06-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
855
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Lupe, no - but sometimes they put models on the home page when their set is coming soon.
Christina Bella - there is one photoset and a vid (same shoot)
|
11-05-09 10:51pm
|
Reply
856
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Twisty's might be better off consolidating the content from this site into the main site as a separate Category, like they do with Twisty's Hard.
|
11-01-09 11:38am
|
Reply
857
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I'm another EA fan and all of the criticisms of this site and network are completely correct and true. Navigation is hideous, the search is atrocious and you might well find broken links once you get a search to work.
I don't remember what score I gave this network when I reviewed it. It's a judgement call, but given how much I like their material, the pain is rewarded with fun and exciting content, frequently updated (sometimes several network updates per day, sometimes one). The Pretty Sloppy recent updates on this site have been stupendous - crazed spit-play and other such madness with gorgeous girls who seem to be having a blast (there's no air of grin-and-bear-it).
And there have been a number of recent network updates with Aurora Snow, who I just adore, and who I think has never looked more beautiful than she does now - including a 2 hour long mind-blowing live show now archived at Buttman.com. Amber Rayne, another fave of mine, is a fave of Jay Sin's and has a lot of updates here.
This site and network need to address their weaknesses but they're providing a lot of good content with frequent updates, so I give them the benefit of the doubt for that and I would recommend this site and network to fans of EA material - just keep in mind that you'll have slowly loading pages, material "posted" before the links are all set up, a horrible search engine and other such issues to give them feedback on.
|
11-01-09 11:35am
|
Reply
858
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I saw someone post at Buttman.com that they were having slow d/l problems. I've been using that "Down-Them-All" plug-in to Firefox and I get consistent download speeds of 515 kb/sec (the max that Comcast seems to ever allow me) from the entire EA network.
Their navigation is terrible. You can search, but their search is crap. At Buttman.com they have a very high-profile link requesting feedback from members, so they seem to be aware that they have some development to do on the site.
|
10-31-09 09:25pm
|
Reply
859
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
Since opening, Clara G has had 84 updates total. Each update has a vid of approx 1.2 gig and 160 or so pics and 200 or so screen shots to go along with it. 16 of those updates are Parts 1 and 2 of the same shoot/live show.
|
10-31-09 09:17pm
|
Reply
860
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Evil Angel's network is a convoluted mess in a lot of ways, as I said when I did my lengthy review a while ago. But there is so much good shit there, and they are doing so much right, that I really enjoy their network.
|
10-30-09 08:07pm
|
Review
861
|
Clara G
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
10-30-09 06:07pm (Update History)
Reason: forgot something
|
| Pros: |
Huge-ass vids that look great - really sharp - real HD
Pics are also large and sharp and look good
Clara-G is a babe |
| Cons: |
Raul Christian is a major turn-off. When it comes to rough sex, I have my radar turned way up, which I believe is appropriate, because if men are going to be treating women roughly, you have to be fairly certain that it's consensual play and not abuse - and Raul C comes off to me as an abusive asshole - and when I see Clara G flinch when he shoves her before she collects herself and puts on a smile, I feel a little sick.
No updates lately. What the fuck? This site hasn't won me over enough to leave me in the lurch update-wise and there haven't been any updates since I joined.
There are no longer any bonus sites as part of your membership, so they eliminated that extra value at the same time that the rate of their updates fell of a cliff.
Download speeds are slow - and if you just leave your system running with a download manager, the downloads break off before they are done. |
| Bottom Line: |
Update or shut the fucking site down is my attitude here.
Since the end of July, there have been 4 updates to this site and they are all just archives of live shows. That's crap, in my book.
Clara G herself is a hot babe and left to her own devices, doing a solo scene or doing a scene with a single babe that she's hot for, she can do great stuff. Why that couldn't result in at least weekly updates to this site is beyond me, so I have to say that there is no justification.
While this site promotes itself as being the wildest of the wild, it's really not. Sunny Leone is not one of the wilder porn babes in the universe and Clara G is flat-out not creative enough to get a wild scene out of her.
This site proves the brilliance of John Stagliano to me, who brings in enough wild cards so that he can almost always get things to that next level of excitement and make you go "ooooooohhhhh". Clara G is nowhere near that level of creativity and her scenes don't have that feel of danger, of newness of flying without a net - except her solo scenes and some moments of her interactions with really wild babes, such as Sasha Grey.
I can't recommend this site, though I was able to get it at quite a decent price, because if you start to sign up for the site, fill out the first page that includes your e-mail address, but don't follow through the rest of the "join", they'll e-mail an offer to join for $19.95 for a month. Still scenes don't excite me in any consistent way.
Plus a site that has files as huge as this one does ought to have servers that can effect downloads of at least 400 kbs/second - at least if you're using a download manager. This site does not deliver that in any consistent way.
My advice to anyone attracted to the type of material that this site promises - join Buttman.com and you'll have Jay Sin's excellent site as well as a dozen or so other updates per week or join the Evil Angel premium addition to Videobox and you'll be assured several updates per week.
This site should get it together or shut down. |
|
10-30-09 06:04pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
862
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm a simple man - turn me on and I'm happy. There are photographers that obectively do good quality work that don't turn me on all that much, such as Dean Capture, the Twisty's guy. His stuff tends to be quite repetitive and it's got the predictable glamour thing and gets further removed from any real heat with the way the pics are finished - but then he'll turn in a set like the recent posting of Michelle Maylene and it's brilliant and mega-hot.
Phil Flash is a photographer I really like - mainly he's done tease stuff, starting with models such as Tiffany Teen. Technically, I'm sure he's nowhere close to a great photographer. You know what? I don't care. He gets great hot pics with florid colors and conveys and intimacy and immmediacy that's hot as hell.
Similarly, Alex of ALS Scan - I'm sure there are lots of technical things one could criticize about his pics. They're like blunt objects rather than anything all that artistic - where the girls are hurled into your face full-force. Me, I like it.
Among the better technical photographers, there are a number at Met Art that are doing fine work - the heat varies depending on the lushnessof the colors and crispness of the style, which is important to me, as well as the models, but there's no denying that they're showcasing a lot of fine work at that site.
|
10-19-09 07:18pm
|
Comment
863
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
10-14-09 10:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
864
|
Little Lupe
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I've found some vids of Zuleidy on the net - Spanish productions, perhaps? Very odd, surreal and sexy.
Her wikipedia page has the following filmography:
DVD Title
Depravada (2007)
Chloe (2007)
Anima..Perversa (2007)
Lesbico Brasileñas (2007)
Isi & Disi, alto voltaje (2006)
Obsesión (2006)
|
10-13-09 11:44am
|
Reply
865
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
You can disagree with Vanessa's rating, but she was pretty clear about the rate of updates - specifically said that there were 3 pic/vid updates in the network in the last week and that they needed more content to get a higher score from her.
I wouldn't agree with her saying that they would be a must-join if they go HD, because there are other networks (Reality Kings & Naughty America) kicking their butts in terms of what they offer
The rate of updates means that you could join once every couple of years and get everything worth having in a month.
|
10-08-09 10:48pm
|
Reply
866
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
What country are you in? I'm in the US and I haven't been experiencing this at all - right now I'm downloading with a download manager with a speed of 516 kb/sec, which is the download cap imposed by Comcast, from what I can tell - I never get downloads faster than 525 kb/sec.
|
10-07-09 06:51pm
|
Reply
867
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
It's quite likely in the US that we'll have a government that will make porn illegal before too long - so many freaking right-wing hypocrital nuts.
|
10-07-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
868
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
If you start from 40 and go backwards, it looks to be true that more than 1/2 are no longer updating - I see 5 or so that just stopped updating in September '09, though, so I assume that they updated weekly between Nov '08 and then.
There are 15 or so that are updating weekly and now they gave access to Zoliboy. It looks like the deal now is to give 25 sites to start with that include Pix and Video, Club Sandy and Zoliboy.
They could make the whole thing better with advances in the size of pics and more HD vids, but they're doing solid work on a number of sites, including bonus sites such as DP Fanatics, Cuties Galore, Anal Teen Angels and Lez Cuties.
|
10-06-09 07:36pm
|
Comment
869
|
Clara G
(0)
|
|
10-04-09 08:56am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
870
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Very little. I've watched some, but not for a while. Live women are just much more hot and interesting.
|
10-04-09 08:46am
|
Reply
871
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
I like the fantasy aspect of porn and I'm fine with seeing hot babes in their 30's cramming themselves into tiny schoolgirl outfits - it's even more fun in some ways when it's obviously done as a complete goof and lacks any of the "pedo" elements of having an 18 year old in a similar outfit.
But most women with a normal maturation pattern really don't look or count as "young" past the age of 23, which doesn't mean that they're not young if they were the president of a major corporation or whatever, but everything's relative, right?
|
10-01-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
872
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Ockinoca's Comment
My suggestion - look around at various forums. She posts a lot. You should be able to send her a message and find out about a Support Person - or go to a cam show and ask.
Also doesn't she have a forum where you could ask who to e-mail for help with Support Issues?
One of those 3 things ought to get you some results.
|
09-29-09 05:47pm
|
Reply
873
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
Let us know what happens. It's one thing for sites to have poor book-keeping and make mistakes. It's another for them to have systems that are all about taking advantage of people that had the mis-fortune of giving them a credit card.
Private.com was so bad that even when they offered me a free month's membership later, I wanted nothing to do with them. They have an auto-cancel feature at their site. I cancelled, received no e-mail confirmation, then they wouldn't respond to e-mails for weeks on end.
Mystique.com is another site that's built to rip you off, from my experience. They offer deals, then they charge you "erroneously" over and over and it's up to you to prove they were wrong each time - when they reverse the charges, their responses are always surly - no apologies for making their customers do their book-keeping for them.
|
09-29-09 06:42am
|
Reply
874
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
No, I'll get myself and my cats out.
|
09-29-09 06:37am
|
Reply
875
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Unless you're in Italy
|
09-27-09 10:30am
|
